Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Kay, H. Nieburg, A. Kutscher, R. Grey, C. Fudin (1984)
Pet loss and human bereavement.
Critical thoughts about Tamagotchi
B Middelkoop, A Bohnen, J Duisterhout, A Hoes, H. Pleumeekers, A. Prins (1995)
Rotterdam general practitioners report (ROHAPRO): a computerised network of general practices in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Rotterdam's HuisArtsen Project.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 49
(1996)
Tamagotchi Link page Tamagotchi Graveyards
J. Metsemakers, P. Höppener, J. Knottnerus, R. Kocken, C. Limonard (1992)
Computerized health information in The Netherlands: a registration network of family practices.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 42 356
K. Glantz, N. Durlach, Rosalind Barnett, W. Aviles (1996)
Virtual reality (VR) for psychotherapy: From the physical to the social environment.Psychotherapy, 33
(1993)
Morbidity registration in general practice in the Netherlands
Available at: http://www
(1998)
A Paradigm Shift in Health Care Information Systems: Clinical Infrastructures for the 21st Century
Norman Meyers, J. Serrin (1964)
H = W.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 51 6
J. Lei, J. Duisterhout, H. Westerhof, E. Does, P. Cromme, W. Boon, J. Bemmel (1993)
The Introduction of Computer-based Patient Records in the NetherlandsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 119
(1996)
Huisartsgeneeskundige registraties in Nederland
R. Ewert, M. Perthel (1992)
[International classification of primary care].Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung, 86 1-2
B. Bentsen (1986)
International classification of primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 4 1
AbstractIn the Netherlands, several general practice registrations exist. Groups of general practitioners register elements of patient care according to agreed-upon criteria, and these data are collected in a central database. By means of a questionnaire the authors interviewed the managers of all nine computerized registration networks extensively about the possibilities and limitations of their registration. In addition, respondents answered some questions with data from the central database of their network. Various items are collected by nearly all the registration networks, while other items are collected by only one network. Answering questions with data from the central database turned out to be difficult. Organization and manpower are the main obstacles.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.