Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Familiarity with a GP and patients' evaluations of care. A cross-sectional study

Familiarity with a GP and patients' evaluations of care. A cross-sectional study Background. Personal continuity is considered a core feature of general practice care. Nowadays, another important concept for general practice may be patients' familiarity with a GP.Objectives. We studied the extent to which patients see a familiar GP, and how this matches their preferences. Furthermore we studied the impact of knowing the GP on patients' evaluations of consultations.Methods. A cross-sectional design was used and 2400 patients visiting 17 general practices (30 GPs) in The Netherlands for a consultation were approached; 2152 patients completed the questionnaire. The main outcome measures were: i) the extent to which patients saw a familiar GP in relation to the reason for encounter, perceived seriousness of symptoms, and concern about symptoms; and ii) the impact of ‘knowing the GP’ on patients' overall satisfaction with the consultation, feeling of being helped to move forwards, trust in the GP, and perceived clearness of treatment plans.Results. Patients saw a familiar GP to a high extent, regardless of the reason for encounter, perceived seriousness of symptoms and worries. Higher levels of familiarity with a GP were associated with higher levels of satisfaction, with increased feelings of being helped forward, with more trust in the GP, and with the perception of clearer treatment plans made. A multivariate model including the variable ‘knowing the GP’ explained 11% of the observed variance in patients' evaluations of consultations.Conclusion. Familiarity with a GP improves patients' assessment of general practice care. Also in the future, personal continuity should be promoted. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Family Practice Oxford University Press

Familiarity with a GP and patients' evaluations of care. A cross-sectional study

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/familiarity-with-a-gp-and-patients-evaluations-of-care-a-cross-0Yj6ShPuhS

References (17)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
ISSN
0263-2136
eISSN
1460-2229
DOI
10.1093/fampra/cmh721
pmid
15640289
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Background. Personal continuity is considered a core feature of general practice care. Nowadays, another important concept for general practice may be patients' familiarity with a GP.Objectives. We studied the extent to which patients see a familiar GP, and how this matches their preferences. Furthermore we studied the impact of knowing the GP on patients' evaluations of consultations.Methods. A cross-sectional design was used and 2400 patients visiting 17 general practices (30 GPs) in The Netherlands for a consultation were approached; 2152 patients completed the questionnaire. The main outcome measures were: i) the extent to which patients saw a familiar GP in relation to the reason for encounter, perceived seriousness of symptoms, and concern about symptoms; and ii) the impact of ‘knowing the GP’ on patients' overall satisfaction with the consultation, feeling of being helped to move forwards, trust in the GP, and perceived clearness of treatment plans.Results. Patients saw a familiar GP to a high extent, regardless of the reason for encounter, perceived seriousness of symptoms and worries. Higher levels of familiarity with a GP were associated with higher levels of satisfaction, with increased feelings of being helped forward, with more trust in the GP, and with the perception of clearer treatment plans made. A multivariate model including the variable ‘knowing the GP’ explained 11% of the observed variance in patients' evaluations of consultations.Conclusion. Familiarity with a GP improves patients' assessment of general practice care. Also in the future, personal continuity should be promoted.

Journal

Family PracticeOxford University Press

Published: Feb 7, 2005

There are no references for this article.