Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES APPLIED AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL, 2012

EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES APPLIED AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL, 2012 Arthropod Management Tests 2013, Vol. 38 doi: 10.4182/amt.2013.F11 (F11) CORN: Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer P1173HR’ EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES APPLIED AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL, 2012 Terry A. DeVries South Central Agricultural Laboratory University of Nebraska-Lincoln 842 Road 313, P.O. Box 66 Clay Center, NE 68933 Phone: (402) 762-4405 Fax: (402) 762-4411 E-mail: tdevries1@unl.edu Robert J. Wright E-mail: rwright2@unl.edu Western corn rootworm (WCR): Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte Granular and liquid insecticides were applied at planting time to evaluate their effectiveness for larval corn rootworm (CRW) control in field corn near Clay Center, NE during 2012. Trial site was late-planted corn and pumpkins (insecticide free) during 2011. Experimental design was a RCB with 4 replicates. Plot size was 2 rows x 145 ft length in 30-inch row spacing. Soil type was a Crete silt loam. ‘Pioneer P1173HR’ (contains Herculex I insect traits) corn hybrid was planted on 23 Apr with a 2-row JD 7100 Maximerge planter with finger pickup seed units. The corn hybrid received a seed-applied treatment of Pioneer Premium Seed Treatment 250 (thiamethoxam @ 0.25 mg/kernel). A south wind at < 12 mph occurred at planting. Granular insecticides were applied via the SmartBox application system and directed into the open seed furrow (IF). Liquid insecticides were applied in a 5 GPA water solution via a CO pressurized system and directed IF. Initial CRW egg hatch occurred on approximately 08 May. Plant populations were evaluated on 09 May. The total number of plants per plot was recorded and converted to plants per acre. The total number of dead plants per plot was recorded on 27 Jun. Larval feeding damage was evaluated on 02 Jul. Five randomly selected plants were dug from each plot, washed, and rated using the Iowa State 0-3 scale (0 = no feeding, 1 = one node of roots pruned to within 1.5 inches of the stalk, 2 = two nodes of roots pruned to within 1.5 inches of the stalk, 3 = 3 or more nodes of roots pruned to within 1.5 inches of the stalk). The total number of pre-harvest root lodged plants per plot was recorded on 25 Sept. Plots were machine harvested on 26 Sept. Percent moisture and lbs of grain were recorded and corrected to 56 lbs/bu @ 15.5% moisture. Data were analyzed by PROC MIXED with mean separation using differences of least square means (P = 0.05). From planting (23 Apr) to larval feeding damage evaluation (02 Jul), rainfall totaled 8.55 inches and overhead irrigation, 1.57 inches. A planting error occurred in the Aztec 2.1G plot of Rep 1. Table 1 contains data from Reps 1-4 for the two Force treatments and untreated check. Table 2 contains data from Reps 2-4 for the three insecticide treatments and untreated check. Larval CRW densities were moderate, with mean root injury ratings (Iowa 0-3 scale) in the untreated check, averaging 1.42 (Table 1) and 1.32 (Table 2). At planting applications of Force 3G and Force CS significantly enhanced root injury protection compared to the untreated check (Table 1). All treatments significantly reduced the number of pre-harvest root lodged plants compared to the untreated check (Table 1 & 2). Grain yield levels were not significantly increased by the application of a soil insecticide at planting (Table 1 & 2). This research was supported by industry gifts of pesticides and research funding. Table 1 Treatment / Rate-amt form/ Plants/ No. of Root Injury No. of Root Yield c c b b c Formulation 1000 row ft Placement Acre Dead Plants Rating Lodged Plants Bu/Acre Force 3G 4 oz IF 30,354 0.3 0.66a 122.0a 207.8 Force CS 0.46 fl oz IF 30,292 0.0 0.73a 132.3a 208.2 Untreated 30,051 1.3 1.42b 316.8b 202.7 P 0.5407 0.3025 0.0395 0.0315 0.8494 1 Arthropod Management Tests 2013, Vol. 38 doi: 10.4182/amt.2013.F11 Table 2 Treatment / Rate-amt form/ Plants/ No. of Root Injury No. of Root Yield c c c b c Formulation 1000 row ft Placement Acre Dead Plants Rating Lodged Plants Bu/Acre Aztec 2.1G 6.7 oz IF 30,477 0.3 0.34 33.0a 224.4 Force 3G 4 oz IF 30,323 0.3 0.65 138.0a 207.1 Force CS 0.46 fl oz IF 30,299 0.0 0.78 123.0a 207.3 Untreated 30,204 0.3 1.32 335.7b 202.9 P 0.8863 0.8022 0.0698 0.0252 0.4126 Granular insecticides were applied via the SmartBox application system and liquid insecticides were applied in a 5 GPA water solution at planting. Means in column followed by the same lower case letter are not statistically different using the differences of least square means (MIXED; p|t|>0.05.) Means in column are not statistically different using the differences of least square means (MIXED; p|t|>0.05) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Arthropod Management Tests Oxford University Press

EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES APPLIED AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL, 2012

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/evaluation-of-insecticides-applied-at-planting-for-larval-corn-pM2yFa0ywi

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Published by Oxford University Press.
eISSN
2155-9856
DOI
10.4182/amt.2013.F11
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Arthropod Management Tests 2013, Vol. 38 doi: 10.4182/amt.2013.F11 (F11) CORN: Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer P1173HR’ EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES APPLIED AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL, 2012 Terry A. DeVries South Central Agricultural Laboratory University of Nebraska-Lincoln 842 Road 313, P.O. Box 66 Clay Center, NE 68933 Phone: (402) 762-4405 Fax: (402) 762-4411 E-mail: tdevries1@unl.edu Robert J. Wright E-mail: rwright2@unl.edu Western corn rootworm (WCR): Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte Granular and liquid insecticides were applied at planting time to evaluate their effectiveness for larval corn rootworm (CRW) control in field corn near Clay Center, NE during 2012. Trial site was late-planted corn and pumpkins (insecticide free) during 2011. Experimental design was a RCB with 4 replicates. Plot size was 2 rows x 145 ft length in 30-inch row spacing. Soil type was a Crete silt loam. ‘Pioneer P1173HR’ (contains Herculex I insect traits) corn hybrid was planted on 23 Apr with a 2-row JD 7100 Maximerge planter with finger pickup seed units. The corn hybrid received a seed-applied treatment of Pioneer Premium Seed Treatment 250 (thiamethoxam @ 0.25 mg/kernel). A south wind at < 12 mph occurred at planting. Granular insecticides were applied via the SmartBox application system and directed into the open seed furrow (IF). Liquid insecticides were applied in a 5 GPA water solution via a CO pressurized system and directed IF. Initial CRW egg hatch occurred on approximately 08 May. Plant populations were evaluated on 09 May. The total number of plants per plot was recorded and converted to plants per acre. The total number of dead plants per plot was recorded on 27 Jun. Larval feeding damage was evaluated on 02 Jul. Five randomly selected plants were dug from each plot, washed, and rated using the Iowa State 0-3 scale (0 = no feeding, 1 = one node of roots pruned to within 1.5 inches of the stalk, 2 = two nodes of roots pruned to within 1.5 inches of the stalk, 3 = 3 or more nodes of roots pruned to within 1.5 inches of the stalk). The total number of pre-harvest root lodged plants per plot was recorded on 25 Sept. Plots were machine harvested on 26 Sept. Percent moisture and lbs of grain were recorded and corrected to 56 lbs/bu @ 15.5% moisture. Data were analyzed by PROC MIXED with mean separation using differences of least square means (P = 0.05). From planting (23 Apr) to larval feeding damage evaluation (02 Jul), rainfall totaled 8.55 inches and overhead irrigation, 1.57 inches. A planting error occurred in the Aztec 2.1G plot of Rep 1. Table 1 contains data from Reps 1-4 for the two Force treatments and untreated check. Table 2 contains data from Reps 2-4 for the three insecticide treatments and untreated check. Larval CRW densities were moderate, with mean root injury ratings (Iowa 0-3 scale) in the untreated check, averaging 1.42 (Table 1) and 1.32 (Table 2). At planting applications of Force 3G and Force CS significantly enhanced root injury protection compared to the untreated check (Table 1). All treatments significantly reduced the number of pre-harvest root lodged plants compared to the untreated check (Table 1 & 2). Grain yield levels were not significantly increased by the application of a soil insecticide at planting (Table 1 & 2). This research was supported by industry gifts of pesticides and research funding. Table 1 Treatment / Rate-amt form/ Plants/ No. of Root Injury No. of Root Yield c c b b c Formulation 1000 row ft Placement Acre Dead Plants Rating Lodged Plants Bu/Acre Force 3G 4 oz IF 30,354 0.3 0.66a 122.0a 207.8 Force CS 0.46 fl oz IF 30,292 0.0 0.73a 132.3a 208.2 Untreated 30,051 1.3 1.42b 316.8b 202.7 P 0.5407 0.3025 0.0395 0.0315 0.8494 1 Arthropod Management Tests 2013, Vol. 38 doi: 10.4182/amt.2013.F11 Table 2 Treatment / Rate-amt form/ Plants/ No. of Root Injury No. of Root Yield c c c b c Formulation 1000 row ft Placement Acre Dead Plants Rating Lodged Plants Bu/Acre Aztec 2.1G 6.7 oz IF 30,477 0.3 0.34 33.0a 224.4 Force 3G 4 oz IF 30,323 0.3 0.65 138.0a 207.1 Force CS 0.46 fl oz IF 30,299 0.0 0.78 123.0a 207.3 Untreated 30,204 0.3 1.32 335.7b 202.9 P 0.8863 0.8022 0.0698 0.0252 0.4126 Granular insecticides were applied via the SmartBox application system and liquid insecticides were applied in a 5 GPA water solution at planting. Means in column followed by the same lower case letter are not statistically different using the differences of least square means (MIXED; p|t|>0.05.) Means in column are not statistically different using the differences of least square means (MIXED; p|t|>0.05)

Journal

Arthropod Management TestsOxford University Press

Published: Jan 1, 2013

There are no references for this article.