Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

European Community Sex Equality Law

European Community Sex Equality Law Book Reviews ADMINISTRATIVE LAW EUROPEA N COMMUNITY SEX EQUALITY LAW. By Evelyn Ellis. Ox­ ford: Clarendon Press, 1991. Pp. 239. Reviewed by Brian K. Landsberg* Two arguably conflicting theories might support the proposition tha t a common market is hindered by sex discrimination in employ­ ment practices. First, one might argue that sex discrimination dis­ torts the employment market; those enterprises which discriminate on account of sex limit their ability to attract the best employees and hence cannot compete with non-discriminatory enterprises. Thus, countries which forbid sex discrimination have a competitive edge over those which allow it. Second, one might also argue that laws against sex discrimination impose costs on employers, render­ ing it difficult for such employers to compete with employers in countries which do not forbid sex discrimination. A third theory could coexist with either of the other two. It might be argued that a common market requires a certain moral consensus as to business practices, and that such a consensus is lacking in a community where some members forbid sex discrimination and others allow or even encourage it. The unfolding story of sex equality law in the European Com­ munity is instructive at many levels. While http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Comparative Law Oxford University Press

European Community Sex Equality Law

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/european-community-sex-equality-law-1gKvxRCzmv

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 1992 by The American Society of Comparative Law, Inc.
ISSN
0002-919X
eISSN
2326-9197
DOI
10.2307/840805
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Book Reviews ADMINISTRATIVE LAW EUROPEA N COMMUNITY SEX EQUALITY LAW. By Evelyn Ellis. Ox­ ford: Clarendon Press, 1991. Pp. 239. Reviewed by Brian K. Landsberg* Two arguably conflicting theories might support the proposition tha t a common market is hindered by sex discrimination in employ­ ment practices. First, one might argue that sex discrimination dis­ torts the employment market; those enterprises which discriminate on account of sex limit their ability to attract the best employees and hence cannot compete with non-discriminatory enterprises. Thus, countries which forbid sex discrimination have a competitive edge over those which allow it. Second, one might also argue that laws against sex discrimination impose costs on employers, render­ ing it difficult for such employers to compete with employers in countries which do not forbid sex discrimination. A third theory could coexist with either of the other two. It might be argued that a common market requires a certain moral consensus as to business practices, and that such a consensus is lacking in a community where some members forbid sex discrimination and others allow or even encourage it. The unfolding story of sex equality law in the European Com­ munity is instructive at many levels. While

Journal

American Journal of Comparative LawOxford University Press

Published: Oct 1, 1992

There are no references for this article.