Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Visweswaran, M. Becich, Vincent D’Itri, Elaina Sendro, D. MacFadden, Nicholas Anderson, Karen Allen, Dipti Ranganathan, S. Murphy, E. Morrato, H. Pincus, R. Toto, G. Firestein, Lee Nadler, S. Reis (2018)
Accrual to Clinical Trials (ACT): A Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium NetworkJAMIA Open, 1
G. Hripcsak, D. Albers (2012)
Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health recordsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 20
Sarah Greene, A. Geiger (2006)
A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 59 8
M. Cooley, L. Sarna, Jean Brown, Roma Williams, C. Chernecky, G. Padilla, L. Danao (2003)
Challenges of Recruitment and Retention in Multisite Clinical ResearchCancer Nursing, 26
Nicholas Dobbins, Cliff Spital, R. Black, Jason Morrison, B. Veer, Liz Zampino, R. Harrington, Bethene Britt, K. Stephens, A. Wilcox, P. Tarczy-Hornoch, S. Mooney (2019)
Leaf—An open-source, model-agnostic, data-driven web application for cohort discovery and translational biomedical researchbioRxiv
R. Richesson (2016)
A Framework to Support the Sharing and Reuse of Computable Phenotype Definitions Across Health Care Delivery and Clinical Research ApplicationseGEMs, 4
S. Murphy, A. Wilcox (2014)
Mission and Sustainability of Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2)eGEMs, 2
C. Weng, S. Tu, I. Sim, R. Richesson (2010)
Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature reviewJournal of biomedical informatics, 43 3
S. Reis, L. Berglund, G. Bernard, R. Califf, G. FitzGerald, P. Johnson (2010)
Reengineering the National Clinical and Translational Research Enterprise: The Strategic Plan of the National Clinical and Translational Science Awards ConsortiumAcademic Medicine, 85
G. Bernard, P. Harris, J. Pulley, D. Benjamin, J. Dean, D. Ford, D. Hanley, H. Selker, C. Wilkins (2018)
A collaborative, academic approach to optimizing the national clinical research infrastructure: The first year of the Trial Innovation NetworkJournal of Clinical and Translational Science, 2
Hansi Zhang, Zhe He, Xing He, Yi Guo, D. Nelson, François Modave, Yonghui Wu, W. Hogan, M. Prosperi, J. Bian (2018)
Computable Eligibility Criteria through Ontology-driven Data Access: A Case Study of Hepatitis C Virus TrialsAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2018
(2018)
Computable phenotypes: standardized ways to classify people using electronic health record data. Perspect
I. Danciu, J. Cowan, Melissa Basford, Xiaoming Wang, Alexander Saip, Susan Osgood, J. Shirey-Rice, Jacqueline Kirby, P. Harris (2014)
Secondary use of clinical data: The Vanderbilt approachJournal of biomedical informatics, 52
P. Harris, Robert Taylor, R. Thielke, Jonathon Payne, N. Gonzalez, J. Conde (2009)
Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of biomedical informatics, 42 2
R. Kost, S. Mervin-Blake, Rose Hallarn, Charles Rathmann, H. Kolb, C. Himmelfarb, Toni D'Agostino, Eric Rubinstein, A. Dozier, K. Schuff (2014)
Accrual and Recruitment Practices at Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Institutions: A Call for Expectations, Expertise, and EvaluationAcademic Medicine, 89
U. Topaloglu, M. Palchuk (2018)
Using a Federated Network of Real-World Data to Optimize Clinical Trials Operations.JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2
(2018)
Computable phenotypes: standardized ways to classify people using electronic health record data
J. Obeid, L. Beskow, Marie Rape, R. Gouripeddi, R. Black, J. Cimino, P. Embí, C. Weng, R. Marnocha, J. Buse, Informatics Workgroup (2017)
A survey of practices for the use of electronic health records to support research recruitmentJournal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1
N. Weiskopf, C. Weng (2013)
Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical researchJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 20
ATLAS-A unified interface for the OHDSI tools-OHDSI
C. North, M. Dougan, C. Sacks (2020)
Improving Clinical Trial Enrollment - In the Covid-19 Era and Beyond.The New England journal of medicine
J. Selby, Claudia Grossman, M. Zirkle, Shayna Barbash (2018)
Multistakeholder Engagement in PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research NetworkMedical Care, 56
N. Weiskopf, A. Rusanov, C. Weng (2013)
Sick Patients Have More Data: The Non-Random Completeness of Electronic Health RecordsAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2013
Nicholas Anderson, A. Abend, Aaron Mandel, E. Geraghty, D. Gabriel, Rob Wynden, Michael Kamerick, Kent Anderson, Julie Rainwater, P. Tarczy-Hornoch (2011)
Implementation of a deidentified federated data network for population-based cohort discoveryJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 19
ObjectiveThe Recruitment Innovation Center (RIC), partnering with the Trial Innovation Network and institutions in the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program, aimed to develop a service line to retrieve study population estimates from electronic health record (EHR) systems for use in selecting enrollment sites for multicenter clinical trials. Our goal was to create and field-test a low burden, low tech, and high-yield method.Materials and MethodsIn building this service line, the RIC strove to complement, rather than replace, CTSA hubs’ existing cohort assessment tools. For each new EHR cohort request, we work with the investigator to develop a computable phenotype algorithm that targets the desired population. CTSA hubs run the phenotype query and return results using a standardized survey. We provide a comprehensive report to the investigator to assist in study site selection.ResultsFrom 2017 to 2020, the RIC developed and socialized 36 phenotype-dependent cohort requests on behalf of investigators. The average response rate to these requests was 73%.DiscussionAchieving enrollment goals in a multicenter clinical trial requires that researchers identify study sites that will provide sufficient enrollment. The fast and flexible method the RIC has developed, with CTSA feedback, allows hubs to query their EHR using a generalizable, vetted phenotype algorithm to produce reliable counts of potentially eligible study participants.ConclusionThe RIC’s EHR cohort assessment process for evaluating sites for multicenter trials has been shown to be efficient and helpful. The model may be replicated for use by other programs.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Nov 30, 2021
Keywords: medical informatics; electronic health records; multicenter studies as topic; cohort assessment; randomized controlled trials as topic
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.