Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Drug prescribing in hospital as experienced by general practitioners: East versus West Germany

Drug prescribing in hospital as experienced by general practitioners: East versus West Germany Background and objectivesDrugs prescribed by the general practitioner (GP) are often changed during hospitalization. This study set out to test the hypothesis that the extent of drug change and the information provided by the hospital determines the GPs' assessment of hospital co-operation. The perception of drug change and hospital co-operation may also be influenced by the degree of institutional separation of primary and secondary care. Therefore we compared GPs' respective attitudes in ‘East’ and ‘West’ Germany.MethodIn 1993, a representative sample of ‘eastern’ and ‘western’ German doctors received a structured questionnaire; 554 doctors (63%) participated.ResultsFifty-seven per cent of the western and 39% of the eastern GPs believed that their medication was changed in hospital in more than 60% of their patients. Only a minority of eastern (10%) and western (15%) doctors described the information provided by the hospitals as more or less satisfactory. More western than eastern doctors (56% versus 32%) expressed dissatisfaction with hospital co-operation. Respondents in eastern Germany who felt sufficiently informed about hospital drug change were more likely to express satisfaction with the hospital doctors' co-operation. In the former area of West Germany the judgement of co-operation was significantly better if the extent of drug change and the frequency of generic drug replacement by original brand-name drugs were lower.ConclusionsThe study showed that hospital-initiated drug change is a matter of concern, especially for GPs who are working in an area with a tradition of strictly separated primary and secondary care. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Family Practice Oxford University Press

Drug prescribing in hospital as experienced by general practitioners: East versus West Germany

Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/drug-prescribing-in-hospital-as-experienced-by-general-practitioners-IguhEWdDgH

References (26)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Oxford University Press
ISSN
0263-2136
eISSN
1460-2229
DOI
10.1093/fampra/13.3.247
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Background and objectivesDrugs prescribed by the general practitioner (GP) are often changed during hospitalization. This study set out to test the hypothesis that the extent of drug change and the information provided by the hospital determines the GPs' assessment of hospital co-operation. The perception of drug change and hospital co-operation may also be influenced by the degree of institutional separation of primary and secondary care. Therefore we compared GPs' respective attitudes in ‘East’ and ‘West’ Germany.MethodIn 1993, a representative sample of ‘eastern’ and ‘western’ German doctors received a structured questionnaire; 554 doctors (63%) participated.ResultsFifty-seven per cent of the western and 39% of the eastern GPs believed that their medication was changed in hospital in more than 60% of their patients. Only a minority of eastern (10%) and western (15%) doctors described the information provided by the hospitals as more or less satisfactory. More western than eastern doctors (56% versus 32%) expressed dissatisfaction with hospital co-operation. Respondents in eastern Germany who felt sufficiently informed about hospital drug change were more likely to express satisfaction with the hospital doctors' co-operation. In the former area of West Germany the judgement of co-operation was significantly better if the extent of drug change and the frequency of generic drug replacement by original brand-name drugs were lower.ConclusionsThe study showed that hospital-initiated drug change is a matter of concern, especially for GPs who are working in an area with a tradition of strictly separated primary and secondary care.

Journal

Family Practice – Oxford University Press

Published: Jan 1, 1996

There are no references for this article.