Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Control of Cotton Fleahopper in Cotton Using Foliar Applied Insecticides, 2019

Control of Cotton Fleahopper in Cotton Using Foliar Applied Insecticides, 2019 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/amt/article/45/1/tsaa090/5890089 by DeepDyve user on 27 August 2020 applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" applyparastyle "fig" parastyle "Figure" Arthropod Management T ests, 45(1), 2020, 1–1 doi: 10.1093/amt/tsaa090 Section F: Field & Cereal Crops COTTON: Gossypium hirsutum (L.) ‘DP1822’ Control of Cotton Fleahopper in Cotton Using Foliar HeadA=HeadB=HeadA=HeadB/HeadA Applied Insecticides, 2019 HeadB=HeadC=HeadB=HeadC/HeadB 1, HeadC=HeadD=HeadC=HeadD/HeadC Suhas S. Vyavhare and Blayne Reed Extract3=HeadA=Extract1=HeadA Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, 1102 E. FM 1294, Lubbock, TX 79403, Phone: (806) 723-8446, Fax: (806) 723- History=Text=History=Text_First 8499 (suhas.vyavhare@ag.tamu.edu; blayne.reed@ag.tamu.edu) and  Corresponding author, e-mail: suhas.vyavhare@ag.tamu.edu EDI_HeadA=EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadA=EDI_HeadB/HeadA Section Editor: Clyde Sorenson EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadC/HeadB Cotton (cottonseed) | Gossypium spp. EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadD=EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadD/HeadC Cotton Fleahopper (CFH) | Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter) EDI_Extract3=EDI_HeadA=EDI_Extract1=EDI_HeadA ERR_HeadA=ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadA=ERR_HeadB/HeadA A trial was conducted to evaluate foliar insecticides for control of CFHs compared to the untreated check on both the sample dates. No ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadC/HeadB cotton fleahopper in cotton. This test was conducted on a dryland significant differences were observed among insecticide treatments. ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadD=ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadD/HeadC commercial cotton field near Plainview, TX. The field was planted on 3 May on 40-inch row spacing. The experiment was designed as Table 1. ERR_Extract3=ERR_HeadA=ERR_Extract1=ERR_HeadA an RCB with seven treatments and four replications. The plots were Treatment/ formulation Rate amt Total CFHs per four-rows wide × 40 ft. in length. Treatments were applied on 19 product/acre 100 plants July during the peak bloom stage of cotton. Insecticide applications were made with a CO pressurized hand-boom sprayer calibrated 2 7 DAT 14 DAT to deliver 11.5 GPA through hollow cone TeeJet TXVS6 spray tip Untreated check - 60.0a 50.0a nozzles (two per row) at 30 psi. Wind speed was ~9 mph during Sefina 0.42DC 3 fl oz 17.5b 27.5b spray applications. Two drop-cloth samples (average of five plants/ Sefina 0.42DC 6 fl oz 10.0b 20.0b sample) were taken from the middle two rows of each plot at 7 DAT Sefina 0.42DC + Orthene 97S 3 fl oz + 4 oz wt 7.5b 15.0b and 14 DAT. Numbers of CFH nymphs and adults were counted in Transform 50WG 1 oz wt 2.5b 5.0b each drop cloth sample. Data are reported as mean number of CFHs Centric 40WG 2 oz wt 2.5b 2.5b per 100 plants per plot. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and means Admire Pro 4.6F 1.5 fl oz 2.5b 7.5b were separated by Tukey’s mean separation. Insecticide application had a significant impact on CFH population Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Table 1). All the insecticide treatments resulted in significantly fewer (Tukey’s HSD, P = 0.05). This research was supported in part by industry gifts of pesticides and research funding. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Arthropod Management Tests Oxford University Press

Control of Cotton Fleahopper in Cotton Using Foliar Applied Insecticides, 2019

Download PDF
1 page

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/control-of-cotton-fleahopper-in-cotton-using-foliar-applied-J5IEUV6zaj

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
eISSN
2155-9856
DOI
10.1093/amt/tsaa090
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/amt/article/45/1/tsaa090/5890089 by DeepDyve user on 27 August 2020 applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" applyparastyle "fig" parastyle "Figure" Arthropod Management T ests, 45(1), 2020, 1–1 doi: 10.1093/amt/tsaa090 Section F: Field & Cereal Crops COTTON: Gossypium hirsutum (L.) ‘DP1822’ Control of Cotton Fleahopper in Cotton Using Foliar HeadA=HeadB=HeadA=HeadB/HeadA Applied Insecticides, 2019 HeadB=HeadC=HeadB=HeadC/HeadB 1, HeadC=HeadD=HeadC=HeadD/HeadC Suhas S. Vyavhare and Blayne Reed Extract3=HeadA=Extract1=HeadA Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, 1102 E. FM 1294, Lubbock, TX 79403, Phone: (806) 723-8446, Fax: (806) 723- History=Text=History=Text_First 8499 (suhas.vyavhare@ag.tamu.edu; blayne.reed@ag.tamu.edu) and  Corresponding author, e-mail: suhas.vyavhare@ag.tamu.edu EDI_HeadA=EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadA=EDI_HeadB/HeadA Section Editor: Clyde Sorenson EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadC/HeadB Cotton (cottonseed) | Gossypium spp. EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadD=EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadD/HeadC Cotton Fleahopper (CFH) | Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter) EDI_Extract3=EDI_HeadA=EDI_Extract1=EDI_HeadA ERR_HeadA=ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadA=ERR_HeadB/HeadA A trial was conducted to evaluate foliar insecticides for control of CFHs compared to the untreated check on both the sample dates. No ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadC/HeadB cotton fleahopper in cotton. This test was conducted on a dryland significant differences were observed among insecticide treatments. ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadD=ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadD/HeadC commercial cotton field near Plainview, TX. The field was planted on 3 May on 40-inch row spacing. The experiment was designed as Table 1. ERR_Extract3=ERR_HeadA=ERR_Extract1=ERR_HeadA an RCB with seven treatments and four replications. The plots were Treatment/ formulation Rate amt Total CFHs per four-rows wide × 40 ft. in length. Treatments were applied on 19 product/acre 100 plants July during the peak bloom stage of cotton. Insecticide applications were made with a CO pressurized hand-boom sprayer calibrated 2 7 DAT 14 DAT to deliver 11.5 GPA through hollow cone TeeJet TXVS6 spray tip Untreated check - 60.0a 50.0a nozzles (two per row) at 30 psi. Wind speed was ~9 mph during Sefina 0.42DC 3 fl oz 17.5b 27.5b spray applications. Two drop-cloth samples (average of five plants/ Sefina 0.42DC 6 fl oz 10.0b 20.0b sample) were taken from the middle two rows of each plot at 7 DAT Sefina 0.42DC + Orthene 97S 3 fl oz + 4 oz wt 7.5b 15.0b and 14 DAT. Numbers of CFH nymphs and adults were counted in Transform 50WG 1 oz wt 2.5b 5.0b each drop cloth sample. Data are reported as mean number of CFHs Centric 40WG 2 oz wt 2.5b 2.5b per 100 plants per plot. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and means Admire Pro 4.6F 1.5 fl oz 2.5b 7.5b were separated by Tukey’s mean separation. Insecticide application had a significant impact on CFH population Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Table 1). All the insecticide treatments resulted in significantly fewer (Tukey’s HSD, P = 0.05). This research was supported in part by industry gifts of pesticides and research funding. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

Journal

Arthropod Management Tests – Oxford University Press

Published: Jan 1, 2020

There are no references for this article.