Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/oxford-university-press/comparative-approaches-to-the-use-of-legislative-history-in-statutory-FfPU650mA0
References (55)
-
Eskridge, N. William (1990)
Gadamer/Statutory InterpretationColumbia Law Review, 90
-
Aileen Kavanagh (2005)
Pepper v Hart and Matters of Constitutional Principle -
J. Goutal (1976)
Characteristics of judicial style in France, Britain and the U.S.A.American Journal of Comparative Law, 24
-
R. Vaughn (1996)
A Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Legislative History on Judicial Decision-Making and LegislationIndiana international and comparative law review, 7
-
R. Cooke (2004)
The Road Ahead for the Common LawInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53
-
J. Steyn (2001)
Pepper v Hart; A Re-examinationOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21
-
C. Sunstein (1989)
Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory StateIO: Regulation
-
U. Schroth (1983)
Theorie und Praxis subjektiver Auslegung im Strafrecht -
Ahilan Arulanantham (1998)
Breaking the Rules?: Wittgenstein and Legal RealismYale Law Journal, 107
-
K. Starr (1987)
Observations About the Use of Legislative HistoryDuke Law Journal, 36
-
Eskridge, N. William (1988)
Interpreting Legislative InactionMichigan Law Review, 87
-
R. Summers, R. Posner (1991)
Judge Richard Posner's JurisprudenceMichigan Law Review, 89
-
B. Markesinis (1986)
Conceptualism, pragmatism and courage: a common lawyer looks at some judgments of the German Federal CourtAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 34
-
Philip Frickey (1992)
From the Big Sleep to the Big Heat: The Revival of Theory in Statutory InterpretationMinnesota Law Review, 77
-
S. Styles (1994)
The Rule of Parliament: Statutory Interpretation after Pepper υ HartOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14
-
R. Dworkin (1982)
Law as InterpretationCritical Inquiry, 9
-
Eskridge, N. William (2006)
No Frills Textualism -
J. Rödig (1973)
Die Theorie des gerichtlichen Erkenntnisverfahrens -
E. Simon (2005)
Gesetzesauslegung im Strafrecht. -
D. Farber (1988)
Statutory Interpretation, Legislative Inaction, and Civil RightsMichigan Law Review, 87
-
N. Rosenkranz (2002)
Federal Rules of Statutory InterpretationHarvard Law Review, 115
-
Alexander Aleinikoff (1988)
Updating Statutory InterpretationMichigan Law Review, 87
-
M. Hesselink (2008)
The Common Frame of Reference as a Source of European Private LawTulane Law Review, 2009
-
M. Auer (2008)
Methodenkritik und Interessenjurisprudenz - Philipp Heck zum 150. Geburtstag, 2008
-
David Law, David Zaring (2010)
Law Versus Ideology: The Supreme Court and the Use of Legislative HistoryWilliam and Mary law review, 51
-
C. Cramer (2006)
Der unhistorische Gesetzgeber -
Bernd Ruethers (2011)
Klartext zu den Grenzen des Richterrechts, 64
-
Bruce Markell (2005)
Bewitched By Language: Wittgenstein and the Practice of LawPepperdine Law Review, 32
-
J. Siegel (2007)
Judicial Interpretation in the Cost-Benefit Crucible -
R. Danner (2004)
Justice Jackson's Lament: Historical and Comparative Perspectives on the Availability of Legislative HistoryDuke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 13
-
F. Schnapp (2011)
Unbegrenzte Nachbesserung von Gesetzen bei unklarer und verworrener RechtslageJuristenzeitung, 66
-
J. Brudney (2006)
Below the Surface: Comparing Legislative History Usage by the House of Lords and the Supreme CourtLaw & Society: Criminal Procedure eJournal
-
R. Munday (2011)
Interpretation of Legislation in England: The Expanding Quest for Parlamentary IntentionRabels Zeitschrift Fuer Auslaendisches Und Internationales Privatrecht, 75
-
S. Foster (2008)
Should Courts Give Stare Decisis Effect to Statutory Interpretation Methodology?Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal
-
D. Looschelders, W. Roth (1996)
Juristische Methodik im Prozeß der Rechtsanwendung : Zugleich ein Beitrag zu den verfassungsrechtlichen Grundlagen von Gesetzesauslegung und Rechtsfortbildung -
H. Fleischer (2011)
Europäische Methodenlehre: Stand und PerspektivenRabels Zeitschrift Fuer Auslaendisches Und Internationales Privatrecht, 75
-
S. Vogenauer (2005)
A Retreat from Pepper v Hart? A Reply to Lord SteynOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25
-
Jacob Gersen, E. Posner (2008)
Soft Law: Lessons from Congressional PracticeStanford Law Review, 61
-
Bj Ard (2010)
Interpreting by the Book: Legislative Drafting Manuals and Statutory InterpretationYale Law Journal, 120
-
Gary O'Connor (2003)
Restatement (First) of Statutory Interpretation -
F. Schmidt (1976)
Zur Methode der Rechtsfindung: Aus dem Schwedischen und Englischen übertragen von Joachim Heilmann -
E. Leib, Michael Serota (2010)
The Costs of Consensus in Statutory Construction, 120
-
Corey Ditslear, J. Brudney (2009)
The Warp and Woof of Statutory Interpretation: Comparing Supreme Court Approaches in Tax Law and Workplace LawDuke Law Journal, 58
-
Kejioneth Shepsle (1992)
Congress is a “They,” not an “It”: Legislative intent as oxymoronInternational Review of Law and Economics, 12
-
C. Wendehorst (2011)
Methodennormen in kontinentaleuropäischen KodifikationenRabels Zeitschrift Fuer Auslaendisches Und Internationales Privatrecht, 75
-
A. Arnauld (2001)
Möglichkeiten und Grenzen Dynamischer Interpretation von RechtsnormenRechtstheorie, 32
-
F. Bennion (1993)
HANSARD - HELP OR HINDRANCE? A DRAFTSMAN'S VIEW OF PEPPER v HARTStatute Law Review, 14
-
Hein Kötz (1973)
Über den Stil höchstrichterlicher Entscheidungen -
F. Easterbrook (1988)
The Role of Original Intent in Statutory ConstructionHarvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 11
-
R. Weisberg (1983)
The Calabresian Judicial Artist: Statutes and the New Legal ProcessStanford Law Review, 35
-
Fritz-René Grabau (1993)
Über die Normen zur Gesetzes- und Vertragsinterpretation -
Abbe Gluck (2010)
The States as Laboratories of Statutory Interpretation: Methodological Consensus and the New Modified TextualismYale Law Journal, 119
-
R. Christensen (1989)
Was heißt Gesetzesbindung? : eine rechtslinguistische Untersuchung -
Simon Critchley (2006)
Derrida: The ReaderEpoch, 10
-
J. Manning (2010)
Second-Generation TextualismCalifornia Law Review, 98
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Copyright
- © American Association for the Comparative Study of Law 2012
- ISSN
- 0002-919X
- eISSN
- 2326-9197
- DOI
- 10.5131/AJCL.2011.0008
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
AbstractIn many legal systems the significance to be attributed to legislative history in the context of statutory interpretation remains unsettled. The following Article explores this matter with regard to German, UK and U.S. law. It develops arguments based on legal theory, constitutional law, and law and economics and thus affords deeper insight into the current discussion on legal methods on both sides of the Atlantic. At the same time, the topic is used to promote the further development of comparative legal methodology.
Journal
American Journal of Comparative Law – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 1, 2012