Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Aspetti del Processo Civile Negli Stati Uniti

Aspetti del Processo Civile Negli Stati Uniti 43 6 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW vention as last revised at Brussels. It is particularly gratifying that the author has given us at the end of his excellent work a resume' in English, French, and German of the major conclusions at which he has arrived. Having pointed out that, under Dutch law, a cinematographic work is a collective work, the view also taken by Dr. Gerard in his book, he expresses the view that "because of the nature of cinematographic work as a visual, acoustic unit, the copyright should vest in the collaborating authors." Much study is given to the legal position of the so-called "adapter" and to the position of the producer of the film in his capacity as an employer. This work, too, devotes considerable space to a discussion of the problems of the moral right of authors. Attention may be called to still another recent publication on the same sub­ ject of cinematographic works, the Spanish article by Carlos Mouchet and Sigfrido A. Radaelli, which was originally published in La Revista General de Legislacidn y Jurisprudencia in October, 1953, and has now been issued as a pamphlet. Savatier, contrary to the above-discussed authorities, Gerard http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Comparative Law Oxford University Press

Aspetti del Processo Civile Negli Stati Uniti

American Journal of Comparative Law , Volume 3 (3) – Jul 1, 1954

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/aspetti-del-processo-civile-negli-stati-uniti-wahZB60bCL

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 1954 by The American Association for the Comparative Study of Law, Inc.
ISSN
0002-919X
eISSN
2326-9197
DOI
10.2307/837964
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

43 6 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW vention as last revised at Brussels. It is particularly gratifying that the author has given us at the end of his excellent work a resume' in English, French, and German of the major conclusions at which he has arrived. Having pointed out that, under Dutch law, a cinematographic work is a collective work, the view also taken by Dr. Gerard in his book, he expresses the view that "because of the nature of cinematographic work as a visual, acoustic unit, the copyright should vest in the collaborating authors." Much study is given to the legal position of the so-called "adapter" and to the position of the producer of the film in his capacity as an employer. This work, too, devotes considerable space to a discussion of the problems of the moral right of authors. Attention may be called to still another recent publication on the same sub­ ject of cinematographic works, the Spanish article by Carlos Mouchet and Sigfrido A. Radaelli, which was originally published in La Revista General de Legislacidn y Jurisprudencia in October, 1953, and has now been issued as a pamphlet. Savatier, contrary to the above-discussed authorities, Gerard

Journal

American Journal of Comparative LawOxford University Press

Published: Jul 1, 1954

There are no references for this article.