Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Antibiotics for Otitis Media: Can We Help Doctors Agree?

Antibiotics for Otitis Media: Can We Help Doctors Agree? Wide variations in antibiotic prescribing for otitis media have suggested the need to discover the causes of the differences and help doctors reach agreement. Simulated cases–in the form of written clinical data extracts based on real patients–were used to study the diagnostic and prescribing behaviour of a group of six general practitioners. Clinical judgement analysis was used to model the way in which doctors diag nosed otitis media and their policy for using antibiotics. Most doctors performed consistently and their judgements could be fitted well to models using a small number of symptoms and signs. These models often differed from the policy they believed they were operating. This information was used as process feedback in a group discussion to help improve agreement within the practice on the management of otitis media. Some of the variation in behaviour observed at the start of the study was reduced by significant changes in that of the trainee. Other doctors changed little and some were sceptical of the validity of the experimental methods. The prospects for and difficulties of this type of analysis are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Family Practice Oxford University Press

Antibiotics for Otitis Media: Can We Help Doctors Agree?

Family Practice , Volume 2 (4) – Dec 1, 1985

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/antibiotics-for-otitis-media-can-we-help-doctors-agree-M1TciJ5GGM

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Oxford University Press
ISSN
0263-2136
eISSN
1460-2229
DOI
10.1093/fampra/2.4.205
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Wide variations in antibiotic prescribing for otitis media have suggested the need to discover the causes of the differences and help doctors reach agreement. Simulated cases–in the form of written clinical data extracts based on real patients–were used to study the diagnostic and prescribing behaviour of a group of six general practitioners. Clinical judgement analysis was used to model the way in which doctors diag nosed otitis media and their policy for using antibiotics. Most doctors performed consistently and their judgements could be fitted well to models using a small number of symptoms and signs. These models often differed from the policy they believed they were operating. This information was used as process feedback in a group discussion to help improve agreement within the practice on the management of otitis media. Some of the variation in behaviour observed at the start of the study was reduced by significant changes in that of the trainee. Other doctors changed little and some were sceptical of the validity of the experimental methods. The prospects for and difficulties of this type of analysis are discussed.

Journal

Family PracticeOxford University Press

Published: Dec 1, 1985

There are no references for this article.