Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Androff (2010b)
Truth and Reconciliation Commissions (TRCs): An international human rights intervention and its connection to social workBritish Journal of Social Work, 40
D. Androff (2012d)
Reconciliation in community-based restorative justice: Victim assessments of the Greensboro TRCJournal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 39
S. Wysor Nguema (2020)
Working our way out of privilege: Lessons from South Africa on preparing White Americans for transitional justiceSocial Work & Christianity, 47
D. Androff (2012a)
Adaptations of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions in the North American contextAdvances in Social Work, 13
D. Androff (2012c)
Narrative healing among victims of violence: The impact of the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation CommissionFamilies in Society, 93
D. Androff (2018)
A case study of a grassroots Truth and Reconciliation Commission from a community practice perspectiveJournal of Social Work, 18
M. Mamdani (2002)
Amnesty or impunity? A preliminary critique of the report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (TRC)Diacritics, 32
T. Coates (2014)
The case for reparationsThe Atlantic, 313
D. Androff (2012b)
Can civil society reclaim the truth? Results from a community-based TRCInternational Journal of Transitional Justice, 6
D. Androff (2010a)
To not hate?: Reconciliation among victims of violence and participants of the Greensboro TRCContemporary Justice Review, 13
C. J. Bassett (1994)
House Bill 591: Florida compensates Rosewood victims and their families for a seventy-one- year-old injuryFlorida State University Law Review, 22
A. Chapman, P. Ball (2001)
The truth of Truth Commissions: Comparative lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and GuatemalaHuman Rights Quarterly, 23
A U.S. truth and reconciliation commission (TRC) can advance racial justice by acknowledging the historical trauma tied to the United States’ legacy of slavery and subsequent racism. This truth telling can facilitate a national reckoning with the past and set the stage for social transformation. This article aims to present insights into how such a U.S. TRC might work. It begins by defining TRCs and exploring their theoretical foundation of restorative justice. It connects TRCs to aspects of social work practice, including human rights-based approaches, trauma-informed care, and community practice. Then each of a TRC's core functions is analyzed: truth seeking, reconciliation, education, and engagement. Related topics of healing, accountability, and reparations are also discussed. The article draws from a diverse range of global experiences to emphasize lessons learned. It also highlights where local precedents in the United States have started this work, which can be drawn upon and developed further. The article concludes by noting the limitations of TRCs and calling on social workers to advocate for such a TRC to further racial justice.
Social Work – Oxford University Press
Published: May 12, 2022
Keywords: human rights; racial justice; reparations; trauma-informed care; truth and reconciliation commissions
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.