Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2005)
Learning evaluation metrics for mt
(1998)
Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. Proceedings of the Linguistic Coreference Workshop at The First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’98)
Amit Bagga, B. Baldwin (1998)
Algorithms for Scoring Coreference Chains
David Chiang, Adam Lopez, Nitin Madnani, Christof Monz, P. Resnik, M. Subotin (2005)
Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language ProcessingThe Association for Computational Linguistics
Samuel Broscheit, Simone Ponzetto, Yannick Versley, Massimo Poesio (2010)
Extending BART to Provide a Coreference Resolution System for German
BART coreference system
T. Morton (1999)
Using Coreference for Question Answering
(2013)
J Am Med Inform Assoc
(LuoX On coreference resolution performance metrics. HTL-EMNLP. 2005)
LuoX On coreference resolution performance metrics. HTL-EMNLP. 2005LuoX On coreference resolution performance metrics. HTL-EMNLP. 2005, LuoX On coreference resolution performance metrics. HTL-EMNLP. 2005
(2005)
On coreference resolution performance metrics. HTL-EMNLP
(AzzamSHumphreysKGaizauskasR Using coreference chains for text summarization. Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, 1999)
AzzamSHumphreysKGaizauskasR Using coreference chains for text summarization. Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, 1999AzzamSHumphreysKGaizauskasR Using coreference chains for text summarization. Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, 1999, AzzamSHumphreysKGaizauskasR Using coreference chains for text summarization. Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, 1999
Xiaoqiang Luo (2005)
On Coreference Resolution Performance Metrics
C. Fellbaum (2000)
WordNet : an electronic lexical databaseLanguage, 76
(U.S. National Library of Medicine Unified Medical Language System. 2011 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/ (accessed 1 Feb 2011).)
U.S. National Library of Medicine Unified Medical Language System. 2011 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/ (accessed 1 Feb 2011).U.S. National Library of Medicine Unified Medical Language System. 2011 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/ (accessed 1 Feb 2011)., U.S. National Library of Medicine Unified Medical Language System. 2011 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/ (accessed 1 Feb 2011).
(FellbaumC WordNet: an electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998)
FellbaumC WordNet: an electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998FellbaumC WordNet: an electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998, FellbaumC WordNet: an electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998
(VilainMBurgerJAberdeenJ A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference. MUC-6 1995 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 45–52.)
VilainMBurgerJAberdeenJ A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference. MUC-6 1995 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 45–52.VilainMBurgerJAberdeenJ A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference. MUC-6 1995 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 45–52., VilainMBurgerJAberdeenJ A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference. MUC-6 1995 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 45–52.
(LitaLVRogatiMLavieA Blanc: Learning evaluation metrics for mt. Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2005 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, pages 740–7.)
LitaLVRogatiMLavieA Blanc: Learning evaluation metrics for mt. Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2005 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, pages 740–7.LitaLVRogatiMLavieA Blanc: Learning evaluation metrics for mt. Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2005 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, pages 740–7., LitaLVRogatiMLavieA Blanc: Learning evaluation metrics for mt. Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2005 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, pages 740–7.
i2b2/VA co-reference annotation guidelines for the clinical domain
(KarthikRHeeyoungLSudarshanR A multi-pass sieve for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP '10). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 492–501)
KarthikRHeeyoungLSudarshanR A multi-pass sieve for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP '10). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 492–501KarthikRHeeyoungLSudarshanR A multi-pass sieve for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP '10). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 492–501, KarthikRHeeyoungLSudarshanR A multi-pass sieve for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP '10). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 492–501
Karthik Raghunathan, Heeyoung Lee, Sudarshan Thitte, N. Chambers, M. Surdeanu, Dan Jurafsky, Christopher Manning (2010)
A Multi-Pass Sieve for Coreference Resolution
(UzunerOForbushTShenS i2b2/VA co-reference annotation guidelines for the clinical domain. 2011 https://www.i2b2.org/NLP/Coreference/assets/ (accessed 15 Apr 2011).)
UzunerOForbushTShenS i2b2/VA co-reference annotation guidelines for the clinical domain. 2011 https://www.i2b2.org/NLP/Coreference/assets/ (accessed 15 Apr 2011).UzunerOForbushTShenS i2b2/VA co-reference annotation guidelines for the clinical domain. 2011 https://www.i2b2.org/NLP/Coreference/assets/ (accessed 15 Apr 2011)., UzunerOForbushTShenS i2b2/VA co-reference annotation guidelines for the clinical domain. 2011 https://www.i2b2.org/NLP/Coreference/assets/ (accessed 15 Apr 2011).
(PoesioMPonzettoSVersleyY BART coreference system. 2007 http://www.bart-coref.org/ (accessed 1 Mar 2011).)
PoesioMPonzettoSVersleyY BART coreference system. 2007 http://www.bart-coref.org/ (accessed 1 Mar 2011).PoesioMPonzettoSVersleyY BART coreference system. 2007 http://www.bart-coref.org/ (accessed 1 Mar 2011)., PoesioMPonzettoSVersleyY BART coreference system. 2007 http://www.bart-coref.org/ (accessed 1 Mar 2011).
(MortonT Using coreference for question answering. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 1999)
MortonT Using coreference for question answering. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 1999MortonT Using coreference for question answering. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 1999, MortonT Using coreference for question answering. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 1999
M. Vilain, J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly, L. Hirschman (1995)
A Model-Theoretic Coreference Scoring Scheme
(2011)
i2b2/VA co-reference annotation guidelines for the clinical
L. Lita, Monica Rogati, A. Lavie (2005)
BLANC: Learning Evaluation Metrics for MT
(2011)
12 Alias-i . LingPipe 4.1.0. 2008. http://alias-i.com/lingpipe
P. Sinha, Gaur Sunder, Prashant Bendale, Manisha Mantri, A. Dande (2013)
Unified Medical Language System
(Alias-i LingPipe 4.1.0. 2008 http://alias-i.com/lingpipe (accessed 10 Mar 2011).)
Alias-i LingPipe 4.1.0. 2008 http://alias-i.com/lingpipe (accessed 10 Mar 2011).Alias-i LingPipe 4.1.0. 2008 http://alias-i.com/lingpipe (accessed 10 Mar 2011)., Alias-i LingPipe 4.1.0. 2008 http://alias-i.com/lingpipe (accessed 10 Mar 2011).
Saliha Azzam, K. Humphreys, R. Gaizauskas (1999)
Using Coreference Chains for Text Summarization
D. Lindberg, B. Humphreys, A. McCray (1993)
The Unified Medical Language SystemYearbook of Medical Informatics, 02
(BaggaABaldwinB Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. Proceedings of the Linguistic Coreference Workshop at The First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'98) 1998 Granada, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 563–6.)
BaggaABaldwinB Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. Proceedings of the Linguistic Coreference Workshop at The First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'98) 1998 Granada, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 563–6.BaggaABaldwinB Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. Proceedings of the Linguistic Coreference Workshop at The First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'98) 1998 Granada, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 563–6., BaggaABaldwinB Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. Proceedings of the Linguistic Coreference Workshop at The First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'98) 1998 Granada, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pages 563–6.
AbstractObjective To build an effective co-reference resolution system tailored to the biomedical domain.Methods Experimental materials used in this study were provided by the 2011 i2b2 Natural Language Processing Challenge. The 2011 i2b2 challenge involves co-reference resolution in medical documents. Concept mentions have been annotated in clinical texts, and the mentions that co-refer in each document are linked by co-reference chains. Normally, there are two ways of constructing a system to automatically discoverco-referent links. One is to manually build rules forco-reference resolution; the other is to use machine learning systems to learn automatically from training datasets and then perform the resolution task on testing datasets.Results The existing co-reference resolution systems are able to find some of the co-referent links; our rule based system performs well, finding the majority of the co-referent links. Our system achieved 89.6% overall performance on multiple medical datasets.Conclusions Manually crafted rules based on observation of training data is a valid way to accomplish high performance in this co-reference resolution task for the critical biomedical domain.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 11, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.