Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/oxford-university-press/a-duty-of-care-to-prevent-online-exploitation-of-consumers-digital-sQsZUs9GVI
References (19)
-
Offline there is just one-2000/12/EC: Commission Decision of 20 July 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case IV/36 -
)d concerning misleading information with regard to 'the price or the manner in which the price is calculated -
S. Williams (2015)
The Ball Is in Your Court, 23
-
A. Dobkin (2018)
Information Fiduciaries in Practice: Data Privacy and User ExpectationsBerkeley Technology Law Journal, 33
-
ECLI:EU:T:1999:246, para 112; Case T-203/01 Manufacture française des pneumatiques Michelin v Commission Judgment of -
ECLI:EU:C:2017:689; Case C-177/16 Opinion of AG Wahl -
Harvard Law Review; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No 14-622 -
Inge Graef (2016)
EU Competition Law, Data Protection and Online Platforms: Data as Essential Facility -
(2000)
0033149875354 Fining the Organisers of the 1998 World Cup -
A Grand Bargain to Make Tech Companies Trustworthy: Doctors and Lawyers Are Prohibited from Using Clients' Information for Their Own Interests, So Why Aren't Google and Facebook -
(2004)
concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/ 450/EEC -
(2018)
How to Exercise the Power You Didn't Ask for -
The White Paper on Online Harms Is a Global First -
J. West (2005)
Competition on the MeritsIO: Regulation
-
ECLI:EU:C:2012:770, para 134; Case C-209/10 Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet Judgment of 27 -
Case C-62/86 AKZO Chemie BV v Commission Judgment of 3 -
Article 102 -
Lina Khan, David Pozen (2019)
A Skeptical View of Information FiduciariesU.S. Constitutional Law: Interpretation & Judicial Review eJournal
-
ECLI:EU:T:2003:343, para 242; Case C-202/07 P France Télécom v Commission Judgment of 2
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2022 Oxford University Press
- ISSN
- 2050-0688
- eISSN
- 2050-0696
- DOI
- 10.1093/jaenfo/jnz035
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/antitrust/article/8/3/649/5643949 by DeepDyve user on 16 July 2022 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2020, 8, 649 doi: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnz035 Advance Access Publication Date: 26 November 2019 Corrigendum CORRIGENDUM A duty of care to prevent online exploitation of consumers? Digital dominance and special responsibility in EU competition law Wolf Sauter Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2019; doi: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnz023. The first version of this article did not include the author’s affiliation with the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. This has now been corrected. V The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs li- cence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com
Journal
Journal of Antitrust Enforcement – Oxford University Press
Published: Feb 3, 2021