Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton Compression in Pressure-Gradient Hollow-Core Fibers

Runzhi Chen; Zhuo Shi; Guoqing Chang

doi:10.3390/photonics8090357

Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton Compression in Pressure-Gradient Hollow-Core Fibers

Chen, Runzhi;Shi, Zhuo;Chang, Guoqing 2021-08-27 00:00:00 hv photonics Communication Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton Compression in Pressure-Gradient Hollow-Core Fibers 1 , 2 1 , 2 1 , 2 , 3 , Runzhi Chen , Zhuo Shi and Guoqing Chang * Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; runzhi.chen@iphy.ac.cn (R.C.); shizhuo20@mails.ucas.ac.cn (Z.S.) University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China * Correspondence: guoqing.chang@iphy.ac.cn Abstract: Post-pulse-compression is demanded to produce energetic few-cycle pulses. We propose pre-chirp-managed adiabatic soliton compression (ASC) in gas-ﬁlled pressure-gradient hollow-core ﬁbers to suppress the detrimental pedestals and therefore signiﬁcantly improve the compressed pulse quality. We show that two-stage ASC can compress 125 J, 130 fs pulses at 2 m to a nearly two-cycle pulse 15 fs in duration. Our analytical analysis suggests that ASC is in favor of compressing pulses centered at a longer wavelength. As an example, a 280 J, 220 fs Gaussian pulse at 4 m is compressed to 60 fs with minimal pedestals. We expect that the resulting high-quality, energetic few-cycle pulses will ﬁnd important applications in high-ﬁeld science. Keywords: adiabatic soliton compression; pressure gradient; hollow-core ﬁbers 1. Introduction High-energy (>100 J) few-cycle optical pulses with high average power (>100 W) Citation: Chen, R.; Shi, Z.; Chang, G. are increasingly demanded by high-ﬁeld science. To date, nearly all these powerful and Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton energetic pulses are obtained via post-compression of relatively long pulses [1]. In gen- Compression in Pressure-Gradient eral, pulse compression techniques can be divided into two types: (1) nonlinear spectral Hollow-Core Fibers. Photonics 2021, 8, broadening followed by a dispersive device for proper phase compensation and (2) soliton 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ self-compression without further phase removal. Both types of compression involve strong photonics8090357 nonlinear light–matter interaction such that the optical pulse acquires a huge nonlinear phase, resulting in substantial spectral broadening. In the ﬁrst type of pulse compres- Received: 4 July 2021 sion (e.g., multi-plate compression), the spectrally broadened pulse develops frequency Accepted: 23 August 2021 chirp and thus requires dispersive devices such as chirped mirrors for pulse dechirping Published: 27 August 2021 to generate a few-cycle pulse. In contrast, the second type of compression relies on the formation of a high-order soliton as a result of pulse propagation in a waveguide with Kerr Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral nonlinearity and negative group-velocity dispersion (GVD). More speciﬁcally, an input with regard to jurisdictional claims in pulse given enough energy evolves into a high-order soliton inside the waveguide and published maps and institutional afﬁl- experiences spectral broadening. Such evolution leads to a compressed, chirp-free pulse, iations. which does not need an extra dechirping device. Although both types of pulse compression techniques are successful in producing high-power, energetic few-cycle pulses, they suffer one common drawback: the compressed pulse exhibits a relatively large pedestal, which compromises its applications in high-ﬁeld science. This unwanted pedestal in the ﬁrst type Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. of compression arises from the uncompensated high-order spectral phase; for the second Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. type, it originates from the intrinsic property of a high-order soliton. This article is an open access article Besides high-order soliton compression, compressed chirp-free pulses can also be distributed under the terms and obtained using adiabatic soliton compression (ASC) [2–13]. ASC differs from high-order conditions of the Creative Commons soliton compression in that the pulse to be compressed evolves into a fundamental soliton Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// as propagating in a waveguide with negative GVD. A fundamental soliton results from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ a balance between Kerr nonlinearity and GVD, and hence increasing the nonlinearity or 4.0/). Photonics 2021, 8, 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8090357 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/photonics Photonics 2021, 8, 357 2 of 11 decreasing the GVD along the pulse propagation renders a gradual decrease in the pulse duration to reinforce a local nonlinearity–GVD balance [2]. Consequently, the input pulse is continuously compressed along the propagation. Despite the perturbation by high-order nonlinearities and dispersion, the compressed pulse stays close to be a fundamental soliton, and the pedestal is signiﬁcantly suppressed. ASC has been demonstrated to achieve pulse compression in single-mode ﬁbers with ampliﬁcation [3–5], dispersion-decreasing ﬁbers [6–9], and non-uniform grating struc- tures [10]. All these demonstrations were achieved in ﬁbers with solid cores. Recent years have seen intense research on nonlinear optical phenomena arising from propagation of femtosecond pulses inside gas-ﬁlled hollow-core ﬁbers (HCFs) [11]. These HCFs are widely used to implement the above-mentioned two types of pulse compression [1]. However, ASC in gas-ﬁlled hollow-core ﬁbers is rarely investigated. Lægsgaard et al. presented a the- oretical study on ASC limited by third-order dispersion and the Raman effect in photonic bandgap ﬁbers [12]. Huang et al. experimentally studied ASC in the presence of strong ionization, which demonstrated a 300 nm blueshift of the soliton central wavelength [13]. In this paper, we study the ASC of femtosecond pulses in pressure-gradient HCFs, with the focus on how to optimize the process to produce high-quality, pedestal-free few-cycle pulses. We show that introducing positive pre-chirp to the pulse prior to compression facilitates ASC and improves the compressed pulse quality. The pedestal stays ~30 dB below the pulse peak. We further demonstrate that two-stage ASC can generate two-cycle pulses at 2 m. We also discuss the performance of ASC in compressing pulses centered at 4 m. 2. Simple Analysis of ASC in Pressure-Gradient HCFs Based on the Soliton Area Theorem According to Ref. [14], the GVD of the fundamental mode in an HCF is given by cu b = f (w) , (1) 3 2 c w a where r is the gas density relative to standard conditions, c the speed of light in vacuum, u the ﬁrst zero of the zeroth-order Bessel function of the ﬁrst kind, and a the core radius. (1) 2 (1) f (w) = ¶ c + w¶ c /2, and ¶ is the derivative with respect to the frequency w. w w (1) c (w) is the linear susceptibility of the gas. Equation (1) shows that GVD includes two contributions: (1) positive gas dispersion and (2) negative waveguide dispersion. The Kerr nonlinear parameter of the gas is deﬁned by = n w / c A , where n 2 0 e f f 2 is the nonlinear index coefﬁcient. A 1.65a is the effective mode area for a negative- e f f curvature HCF (e.g., antiresonant HCF) [15]. The nonlinear parameter is related to the gas density and ﬁber core radius by n w n w r 2 0 20 0 r g = = , (2) c A 1.65a c e f f where n corresponds to the nonlinear index coefﬁcient of the gas under standard condi- tions. The well-known soliton area theorem connects the pulse energy E and the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the fundamental soliton, T , written as gE T 0 0 = 1. (3) 3.5jb (w )j 2 0 Plugging Equations (1) and (2) into Equation (3) and considering r being proportional to pressure p, we obtain the following equation: 2 2 3.5 b w 5.8u c 5.8 f w a A j ( )j ( ) 2 0 0 1 01 2 E T = = A a . (4) 0 0 2 g w n p w n r r 0 20 0 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 3 of 11 2 2 5.8u c p atm 5.8 f (w ) A and A are constants given by A = and A = . p is set at 1 atm. atm 1 2 1 4 2 w n w n 0 20 Equation (4) clearly shows that increasing the gas pressure along an HCF can effectively decrease the pulse duration. Indeed, pressure-gradient HCFs are widely employed to control the nonlinear interaction between the ﬁlled noble gas and the optical pulse [16–18]. Equation (4) seems to suggest that increasing the input pulse energy is another efﬁcient way of shorting the pulse duration. However, an increased pulse energy and reduced duration may result in high enough peak power that causes strong ionization and therefore degrades the compressed pulse quality. To avoid detrimental ionization effects, we set a limit to the gas ionization such that the variation of the refractive index induced by gas ionization is less than the index variation induced by the Kerr effect. Such a limit leads to following equation that connects the pulse energy, the pulse duration, and the ﬁber core radius [19]: a A T E (5) 0 0 where a ' 0.45 and ' 0.51. A is a constant, which depends on the ﬁlled gas. A combination of Equations (4) and (5) determines the maximum input pulse energy and the minimum pulse duration at the output of the pressure-gradient HCF: a+b a A 1 2 E = A a (6) max 2 A p 3 out " # 1 b a+b A A 3 1 T = A a (7) min 2 a p out p is the gas pressure at the ﬁber output. In most cases, the gas dispersion is much smaller out than the waveguide dispersion, and therefore Equations (6) and (7) are further simpliﬁed as a+b a A E = (8) max A p 3 out " # 1 a+b A A 3 1 T = (9) min a p out Figure 1 shows the dependence of E and T on the HCF core radius at different max min gas pressure values. We assume the HCF is ﬁlled with helium and the pulse is centered at a b 2 m, which leads to A 12.6 m fs /J . Given that the helium pressure at the HCF output is ﬁxed, E increases and T decreases as the ﬁber core radius is increased. At a max min ﬁxed ﬁber core radius, increasing the helium pressure reduces both E and T . max min Recent years have seen a huge effort to develop high-energy few-cycle pulses with the center wavelength at ~4 m, aiming for driving high-harmonic generation to extend the cut-off energy and produce keV photons [20,21]. These pulses were obtained via post- compression of initial ~100-fs pulses delivered by optical parametric ampliﬁers. Indeed, ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs is in favor of compressing high-energy pulses at a longer wavelength. Besides the ﬁber core radius and gas pressure, two other parameters, A and A , appear in Equations (8) and (9). A is weakly dependent on the pulse wavelength, 3 3 and it is 13.9 m fs /J at 4 m. However, A is proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength. As Equation (8) shows, increasing the center wavelength from 2 m to 4 m can increase E by a factor of ~4. Figure 2 shows the dependence of E and T on the max max min core radius of an HCF at different helium pressure values for the pulse centered at 4 m. The results indicate that ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs is able to compress sub-mJ pulses at 4 m. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 4 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 4 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 4 of 11 Figure 1. Dependence of Emax (a) and Tmin (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 2 μm. Recent years have seen a huge effort to develop high‐energy few‐cycle pulses with the center wavelength at ~4 μm, aiming for driving high‐harmonic generation to extend the cut‐off energy and produce keV photons [20,21]. These pulses were obtained via post‐ compression of initial ~100‐fs pulses delivered by optical parametric amplifiers. Indeed, ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs is in favor of compressing high‐energy pulses at a longer wavelength. Besides the fiber core radius and gas pressure, two other parameters, 𝐴 and 𝐴 , appear in Equations (8) and (9). 𝐴 is weakly dependent on the pulse wavelength, and it is 13.9 μm ∙ fs /μJ at 4 μm. However, 𝐴 is proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength. As Equation (8) shows, increasing the center wavelength from 2 μm to 4 μm can increase 𝐸 by a factor of ~4. Figure 2 shows the dependence of 𝐸 and 𝑇 on the core radius of an HCF at different helium pressure values for the pulse cen‐ tered at 4 μm. The results indicate that ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs is able to compress Figure 1. Dependence of Emax (a) and Tmin (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, Figure 1. Dependence of E (a) and T (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, max min sub‐mJ pulses at 4 μm. and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 2 μm. and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 2 m. Recent years have seen a huge effort to develop high‐energy few‐cycle pulses with the center wavelength at ~4 μm, aiming for driving high‐harmonic generation to extend the cut‐off energy and produce keV photons [20,21]. These pulses were obtained via post‐ compression of initial ~100‐fs pulses delivered by optical parametric amplifiers. Indeed, ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs is in favor of compressing high‐energy pulses at a longer wavelength. Besides the fiber core radius and gas pressure, two other parameters, 𝐴 and 𝐴 , appear in Equations (8) and (9). 𝐴 is weakly dependent on the pulse wavelength, and it is 13.9 μm ∙ fs /μJ at 4 μm. However, 𝐴 is proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength. As Equation (8) shows, increasing the center wavelength from 2 μm to 4 μm can increase 𝐸 by a factor of ~4. Figure 2 shows the dependence of 𝐸 and 𝑇 on the core radius of an HCF at different helium pressure values for the pulse cen‐ tered at 4 μm. The results indicate that ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs is able to compress sub‐mJ pulses at 4 μm. Figure 2. Dependence of Emax (a) and Tmin (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, Figure 2. Dependence of E (a) and T (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, max min and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 4 μm. and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 4 m. 3. Simulation Results and Discussion 3. Simulation Results and Discussion Although Equations (8) and (9) predict the maximum pulse energy and the minimum Although Equations (8) and (9) predict the maximum pulse energy and the minimum pulse duration as a function of the HCF radius and the filled gas pressure, they provide pulse duration as a function of the HCF radius and the ﬁlled gas pressure, they provide no information about the compressed pulse quality. To further investigate the ASC process in detail, we solve the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation (GNLSE), taking into account dispersion, Kerr nonlinearity, and ionization effects [22]: " # w A I ¶ N b (i¶ ) p t e p e f f m t 2 ¶ y = i + g 1 + iw ¶ jy(t)j + i y, (10) z t m! 2w c 0 2jy(z, t)j m2 where y corresponds to the complex ﬁeld envelope of the pulse and b denotes the th m -order dispersion coefﬁcient calculated at the center frequency w . I , N , and A Figure 2. Dependence of Emax (a) and Tmin (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 p bar, e 8 bar, 0 e f f represent the gas ionization energy, the free-electron density, and the effective mode area, and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 4 μm. 0.5 respectively. The plasma frequency w is given by w = e N /(# m ) , where # is the p p e 0 e 0 3. Simulation Results and Discussion Although Equations (8) and (9) predict the maximum pulse energy and the minimum pulse duration as a function of the HCF radius and the filled gas pressure, they provide Photonics 2021, 8, 357 5 of 11 vacuum permittivity, e the electronic charge, and m the electron mass. The free electron density N is given by [23]: ¶N = W t N N , (11) ( )( ) 0 e ¶t where W(t) is the ionization rate and N is the density of gas atoms. The effects of electron attachment and recombination are neglected in Equation (2) for pulses shorter than 1 ps. In this letter, we use Ammosov–Delone–Krainov (ADK) theory to calculate the ionization rate W(t) [24]: 2n 1 4w 4w 2 tr tr W(t) = w jC j exp , (12) tr n w 3w t t 0.5 where w = I /} is the transition frequency and n = Z I / I is the effective tr p ph p 0.5 principal quantum number. w = e E z, t 2m I is the tunneling frequency, in which j ( )j t e p the carrier-resolved electric ﬁeld E(z, t) is given by E(z, t) = 2/# n c A y(z, t), and 0 0 e f f 2 1 2n n is the linear refractive index. C = 2 [n G(n + 1)G(n )] , where Z is the net j j 0 n resulting charge of the ion, I is the ionization energy of the hydrogen atom, and G(x) is ph the Euler gamma function. It is noteworthy that Equation (10) remains valid even as the pulse duration approaches one carrier oscillation cycle [25]. For a pressure-gradient HCF, the gas pressure along the ﬁber is given by 2 2 2 2 p z = p + p p . (13) ( ) 0 L 0 p and p denote the pressure at the ﬁber input end and the output end, respectively. L 0 L represents the ﬁber length. In the ﬁrst simulation, we investigate the ASC of pulses at 2 m in antiresonant HCFs, which feature a large mode area, low transmission loss, negative dispersion, and broadband transmission [26]. We assume that the antiresonant HCF is 8 m long with a core radius of 28 m ﬁlled with helium with the pressure varying from p = 0.6 bar to p = 2.6 bar. 0 L The input pulse is a transform-limited Gaussian pulse centered at 2 m with 100 J pulse energy and 110 fs duration. These pulses can be experimentally obtained by state-of-the-art high-power Tm-ﬁber ampliﬁer systems [18]. Figure 3a shows the pulse evolution along the ﬁber in the logarithmic scale. Due to increased gas pressure leading to a reduced group velocity, the center of gravity of the pulse shifts toward a later time. The central part of the pulse becomes narrower continuously during the propagation of the ﬁrst 5 m; for further propagation, it becomes wider and then narrower again. During the propagation, the ionization is minimal, as expected. The black curve in Figure 3b plots the FWHM of the pulse as a function of the propagation distance, and the blue curve shows the FWHM of the corresponding fundamental soliton that shares the same energy and nonlinear coefﬁcient as the pulse propagating in the HCF. Clearly, the pulse duration oscillates around the fundamental soliton duration, indicating that the pulse adiabatically evolves into a fundamental soliton. The quality of a pulse is quantiﬁed by the Strehl ratio deﬁned by the peak–power ratio between the compressed pulse and the transform-limited pulse. A pulse with a Strehl ratio of ~0.8 is regarded as a decent pulse. However, most high-energy pulses obtained by post-compression exhibit much lower Strehl ratios, with a large portion of energy shed in pedestals and satellite pulses. Figure 3c plots the output pulse (black curve), the transform-limited pulse calculated from the output spectrum (red dashed curve), and the fundamental soliton determined by the dispersion/nonlinearity at the ﬁber output (blue curve). The input 110 fs pulse is compressed to 38 fs, which is close to the transform-limited pulse with the Strehl ratio reaching as high as ~0.99. The pedestal stays >28 dB below the pulse peak; the central part of the compressed pulse has an excellent overlap with the fundamental soliton pulse and contains 97.5% of the total pulse energy. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 6 of 11 The results in Figure 3b shows that the pulse evolves toward a fundamental soliton. However, the output spectrum (Figure 3d) clearly indicates that the compressed pulse devi- ates much from an ideal fundamental soliton that features a spectrum of hyperbolic secant shape. It is well known that pre-chirping the input pulse into an optical ﬁber can be used to control the nonlinear propagation. The pre-chirp management technique has been applied to nonlinear pulse ampliﬁcation [27,28], delivery of femtosecond pulses [29–31], nonlin- ear pulse compression [32–34], dispersive wave generation [35], soliton self-frequency shift [36], and self-phase modulation enabled spectral selection for generating widely tunable femtosecond pulses [37]. Here we propose to pre-chirp the input pulse to control ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs. Figure 4 shows the simulation results corresponding to the ASC of a positively chirped pulse. In the simulation, we added 2000 fs group-delay dispersion (GDD) to positively pre-chirp the 100 J, 110 fs Gaussian pulse to a duration of 120 fs. All other parameters remained unchanged. Figure 4a plots the pulse evolution. A comparison between Figures 3a and 4a shows that introducing pre-chirp reduces the duration oscillation of the central part in the compressed pulse. This is more evidently revealed by the results in Figure 4b: due to the negative GVD, the positively chirped pulse is shortened more rapidly at the beginning of the compression; the FWHM of the compressed pulse quickly converges to the FWHM of the fundamental soliton after 3 m propagation. At the HCF output, the optical spectrum (black curve in Figure 4d) is close to the soliton spectrum (blue curve in Figure 4d). Consequently, compared with the ASC of the un-chirped pulse, pre-chirp-managed ASC leads to a compressed pulse with the pedestal further suppressed (Figure 4c). In this case, the pedestal stays >37 dB below the pulse peak. The input pre-chirped 120 fs pulse is compressed to 37 fs (corresponding to 5.5 cycles) with the Strehl ratio reaching as high as ~0.99, and the central part of the compressed pulse contains 99% of the total pulse energy. The results in Figure 4 demonstrate that pre-chirp-managed ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs can produce high-quality few-cycle pulses with the pedestal signiﬁcantly suppressed. However, our extensive simulation shows that the compression ratio is limited to 3–4 to suppress the pedestal by more than 30 dB. This is caused by the characteristic pressure gradient determined by Equation (10): the square of the gas pressure increases linearly with the ﬁber length, and accordingly the adiabatic soliton duration drops sharply at the beginning of the HCF and then quickly ﬂattens out. It is hard (if not impossible) to achieve a higher compression ratio via just pre-chirping the input pulse to reinforce the ASC. This drawback of low compression ratio can be alleviated by cascading the ASC in multiple stages. The results in Figure 5 show two-stage pre-chirp-managed ASC that compresses an initial unchirped 125 J, 130 fs pulse down to 15 fs in duration. In the ﬁrst stage, the 5-m-long HCF has a core radius of 30 m, and the helium pressure varies from p = 0.2 bar to p = 1.4 bar. The 5-m-long HCF in the second stage has a core radius of 45 m, and the helium pressure varies from p = 0.5 bar to p = 6 bar. We assume a coupling loss of 20% 0 L such that the pulse energy is reduced to 100 J at the input of the second HCF. Given the core difference (30 m versus 45 m) between the two HCFs, the ﬁrst ﬁber has a GVD about 2.25 times larger than the second one, since gas dispersion is much smaller compared with waveguide dispersion. As the results in Refs. [38,39] have shown, a soliton experiencing an abrupt dispersion change may cause dispersive shedding and soliton degradation. Such a detrimental effect can be mitigated by introducing a ﬁnite-length ﬁber junction between the two ﬁbers with a large dispersion difference [38,39]. In our situation, instead of adding a ﬁber junction, we properly pre-chirp the soliton before entering the second HCF to ensure 2 2 ASC. More speciﬁcally, we add 2500 fs (500 fs ) GDD to the pulse at the input of the ﬁrst (second) HCF. The input pulse is compressed to 54 fs inside the ﬁrst HCF and then compressed to 15 fs by the second HCF corresponding to 2.3 optical cycles. It is noteworthy that using gas-ﬁlled HCFs to self-compress 2 m pulses to few- cycle duration has been experimentally demonstrated by several groups [18,40]. The self- compression was based on high-order soliton compression, and therefore the compressed Photonics 2021, 8, 357 7 of 11 degradation. Such a detrimental effect can be mitigated by introducing a finite‐length fiber junction between the two fibers with a large dispersion difference [38,39]. In our situation, instead of adding a fiber junction, we properly pre‐chirp the soliton before entering the 2 2 second HCF to ensure ASC. More specifically, we add 2500 fs (500 fs ) GDD to the pulse at the input of the first (second) HCF. The input pulse is compressed to 54 fs inside the first HCF and then compressed to 15 fs by the second HCF corresponding to 2.3 optical cycles. It is noteworthy that using gas‐filled HCFs to self‐compress 2 μm pulses to few‐cycle Photonics 2021, 8, 357 7 of 11 duration has been experimentally demonstrated by several groups [18,40]. The self‐com‐ pression was based on high‐order soliton compression, and therefore the compressed pulse quality was compromised. For example, Gebhardt et al. employed a 42 cm gas‐filled pulse quality was compromised. For example, Gebhardt et al. employed a 42 cm gas- antiresonant HCF to compress 34.4 μJ pulses centered at 1.8 μm from 110 fs to 13 fs. How‐ ﬁlled antiresonant HCF to compress 34.4 J pulses centered at 1.8 m from 110 fs to 13 fs. ever, the compressed 2.1‐cycle pulse has elongated pedestals that are less than 10 dB be‐ However, the compressed 2.1-cycle pulse has elongated pedestals that are less than 10 dB low the main peak [18]. Assisted by numerical simulation, the authors estimated that the below the main peak [18]. Assisted by numerical simulation, the authors estimated that central part of the pulse only includes 60% of the pulse energy [18]. In contrast, our results the central part of the pulse only includes 60% of the pulse energy [18]. In contrast, our in Figure 5 show that two‐stage pre‐chirp‐managed ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs can results in Figure 5 show that two-stage pre-chirp-managed ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs generate nearly pedestal‐free nearly two‐cycle pulses with ~98% energy confined in the can generate nearly pedestal-free nearly two-cycle pulses with ~98% energy conﬁned in central part of the compressed pulse. the central part of the compressed pulse. Figure 3. ASC of an unchirped 110 fs, 100 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation distance. The Figure 3. ASC of an unchirped 110 fs, 100 J pulse at 2 m. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation distance. The intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform-limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) and soliton curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 8 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 8 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 8 of 11 Figure 4. ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 120 fs, 100 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation Figure 4. ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 120 fs, 100 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation Figure 4. ASC of a positively pre-chirped 120 fs, 100 J pulse at 2 m. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation distance. The intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed distance. The intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed distance. The intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited (TL) pulse pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited (TL) pulse pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform-limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) (red dashed curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) (red dashed curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. Figure 5. Two‐stage ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 125 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) Figure 5. Two‐stage ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 125 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) Figure 5. Two-stage ASC of a positively pre-chirped 125 J pulse at 2 m. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance in two‐stage ASC. Inset: pulse spectrum and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance in two‐stage ASC. Inset: pulse spectrum and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance in two-stage ASC. Inset: pulse spectrum (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. transform‐limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. transform-limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 9 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 9 of 11 The results in Figure 2 show that ASC is favorable for compressing pulses at a longer The results in Figure 2 show that ASC is favorable for compressing pulses at a longer center wavelength. To verify this prediction based on analytical analysis, we simulate the center wavelength. To verify this prediction based on analytical analysis, 2 we simulate propagation of a 280 μJ, 220 fs Gaussian pulse (240 fs after adding 8000 fs GDD) centered the propagation of a 280 J, 220 fs Gaussian pulse (240 fs after adding 8000 fs GDD) at 4 μm inside an antiresonant HCF with a core radius of 40 μm. The HCF is filled with centered at 4 m inside an antiresonant HCF with a core radius of 40 m. The HCF is helium, with the pressure varying from p0 = 1 bar to pL = 9 bar. The results in Figure 6 ﬁlled with helium, with the pressure varying from p = 1 bar to p = 9 bar. The results in 0 L indicate that the pulse can be adiabatically compressed down to 60 fs in duration, corre‐ Figure 6 indicate that the pulse can be adiabatically compressed down to 60 fs in duration, sponding to 4.5 optical cycles. The compressed pulse has a peak power of 4 GW, and the corresponding to 4.5 optical cycles. The compressed pulse has a peak power of 4 GW, and pedestal is about 35 dB below the peak. the pedestal is about 35 dB below the peak. Figure 6. ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 280 μJ pulse at 4 μm. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and Figure 6. ASC of a positively pre-chirped 280 J pulse at 4 m. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of ac ompressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. Inset: pulse spectrum (black curve) and FWHM of ac ompressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. Inset: pulse spectrum (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform-limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. Equations (8) and (9) indicate that increasing the fiber core radius allows compress‐ Equations (8) and (9) indicate that increasing the ﬁber core radius allows compressing ing pulses with higher energy to a shorter dispersion. We anticipate that energy scaling pulses with higher energy to a shorter dispersion. We anticipate that energy scaling of ASC of ASC to compress >1 mJ pulses is possible by using capillary HCFs with the core radius to compress >1 mJ pulses is possible by using capillary HCFs with the core radius exceeding exceeding 100 μm. In general, ASC requires meters‐long propagation distance. Conven‐ 100 m. In general, ASC requires meters-long propagation distance. Conventional capillary tional capillary HCFs that are made of thick‐walled rigid fused silica tubes are limited to HCFs that are made of thick-walled rigid fused silica tubes are limited to ~1 m in length ~1 m in length to avoid introducing propagation loss. ASC in this type of HCFs is unlikely to avoid introducing propagation loss. ASC in this type of HCFs is unlikely possible. In possible. In contrast, stretched flexible HCFs (SF‐HCFs) that feature much thinner walls contrast, stretched ﬂexible HCFs (SF-HCFs) that feature much thinner walls (only tens of (only tens of microns) are being widely used for post‐pulse‐compression. Thanks to the microns) are being widely used for post-pulse-compression. Thanks to the light weight, light weight, these HCFs can be kept straight to prevent excessive loss, even when their these HCFs can be kept straight to prevent excessive loss, even when their length is length is 6 m [41]. We expect that pressure‐gradient SF‐HCFs may allow ASC of >1 mJ 6 m [41]. We expect that pressure-gradient SF-HCFs may allow ASC of >1 mJ pulses pulses at 4 μm, and the resulting few‐cycle high‐quality pulses constitute an enabling tool at 4 m, and the resulting few-cycle high-quality pulses constitute an enabling tool for for high‐field applications. high-ﬁeld applications. 4. Conclusions 4. Conclusions In conclusion, we investigated ASC in gas‐filled pressure‐gradient HCFs. The maxi‐ In conclusion, we investigated ASC in gas-ﬁlled pressure-gradient HCFs. The maxi- mum pulse energy and the minimum compressed pulse duration are dependent on the mum pulse energy and the minimum compressed pulse duration are dependent on the HCF core size, gas type and pressure, and the center wavelength. We show that properly HCF core size, gas type and pressure, and the center wavelength. We show that properly pre‐chirping the pulse prior to compression can accelerate the pulse compression rapidly pre-chirping the pulse prior to compression can accelerate the pulse compression rapidly converging to ASC, which results in improved pulse quality with the pedestal further converging to ASC, which results in improved pulse quality with the pedestal further sup- suppressed. Despite a relatively low compression ratio from single‐state ASC, we showed pressed. Despite a relatively low compression ratio from single-state ASC, we showed that that two‐stage ASC can offer a compression ratio of ~9. As a result, 130 fs pulses at 2 μm two-stage ASC can offer a compression ratio of ~9. As a result, 130 fs pulses at 2 m can be can be compressed to a nearly two‐cycle pulse 15 fs in duration. We also showed that compressed to a nearly two-cycle pulse 15 fs in duration. We also showed that compression compression of pulses with al onger center wavelength is favored by ASC. For example, of pulses with al onger center wavelength is favored by ASC. For example, a 280 J, 220 fs a 280 μJ, 220 fs Gaussian pulse at 4 μm can be compressed to 60 fs. Work is ongoing to Gaussian pulse at 4 m can be compressed to 60 fs. Work is ongoing to experimentally verify our theoretical predictions on ASC in gas-ﬁlled pressure-gradient HCFs. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 10 of 11 Author Contributions: Conceptualization, R.C. and G.C.; methodology, R.C. and Z.S.; software, R.C. and Z.S.; validation, R.C.; formal analysis, Z.S.; investigation, R.C.; resources, G.C.; data curation, R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C.; writing—review and editing, G.C.; visualization, R.C. and Z.S.; supervision, G.C.; project administration, G.C.; funding acquisition, G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11774234), the Guangdong Key R&D Program (no. 2018B090904003), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (no. YJKYYQ20190034). Acknowledgments: We thank Zhiyi Wei of the Institute of Physics CAS for useful discussions. Conﬂicts of Interest: The authors declare no conﬂict of interest. References 1. Nagy, T.; Simon, P.; Veisz, L. High-energy few-cycle pulses: Post-compression techniques. Adv. Phys. X 2021, 6, 11845795. 2. Kuehl, H.H. Solitons on an axially nonuniform optical ﬁber. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1988, 5, 709–713. [CrossRef] 3. Smith, K.; Mollenauer, L.F. Experimental-Observation of Adiabatic-Compression and Expansion of Soliton Pulses over Long Fiber Paths. Opt. Lett. 1989, 14, 751–753. [CrossRef] 4. Iwatsuki, K.; Suzuki, K.-I.; Nishi, S. Adiabatic soliton compression of gain-switched DFB-LD pulse by distributed ﬁber Raman ampliﬁcation. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 1991, 3, 1074–1076. [CrossRef] 5. Quiroga-Teixeiro, M.L.; Anderson, D.; Andrekson, P.A.; Berntson, A.; Lisak, M. Efﬁcient soliton compression by fast adiabatic ampliﬁcation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1996, 13, 687–692. [CrossRef] 6. Chernikov, S.V.; Mamyshev, P.V. Femtosecond Soliton Propagation in Fibers with Slowly Decreasing Dispersion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1991, 8, 1633–1641. [CrossRef] 7. Suzuki, K.; Iwatsuki, K.; Nishi, S.; Saruwatari, M.; Kitoh, T. 160 Gbit/s sub-picosecond transform-limited pulse signal generation utilizing adiabatic soliton compression and optical time-division multiplexing. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 1994, 6, 352–354. [CrossRef] 8. Travers, J.C.; Stone, J.M.; Rulkov, A.B.; Cumberland, B.A.; George, A.K.; Popov, S.V.; Knight, J.C.; Taylor, J.R. Optical pulse compression in dispersion decreasing photonic crystal ﬁber. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 13203–13211. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 9. Tse, M.L.V.; Horak, P.; Price, J.H.V.; Poletti, F.; He, F.; Richardson, D.J. Pulse compression at 1.06 m in dispersion-decreasing holey ﬁbers. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 3504–3506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 10. Lenz, G.; Eggleton, B.J. Adiabatic Bragg soliton compression in nonuniform grating structures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1998, 15, 2979–2985. [CrossRef] 11. Russell, P.S.J.; Hölzer, P.; Chang, W.; Abdolvand, A.; Travers, J.C. Hollow-core photonic crystal ﬁbres for gasbased nonlinear optics. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 278–286. [CrossRef] 12. Lægsgaard, J.; Roberts, P.J. Theory of adiabatic pressure-gradient soliton compression in hollow-core photonic bandgap ﬁbers. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 3710–3712. [CrossRef] 13. Huang, Z.Y.; Chen, Y.F.; Yu, F.; Wu, D.K.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, D.; Leng, Y.X. Ionization-induced adiabatic soliton compression in gas-ﬁlled hollow-core photonic crystal ﬁbers. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 5562–5565. [CrossRef] 14. Schade, D.; Köttig, F.; Koehler, J.R.; Frosz, M.H.; Russell, P.S.J.; Tani, F. Scaling rules for high quality soliton self-compression in hollow-core ﬁbers. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 19147–19158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Hasan, M.I.; Akhmediev, N.; Chang, W. Empirical Formulae for Dispersion and Effective Mode Area in Hollow-Core Antiresonant Fibers. J. Lightwave Technol. 2018, 36, 4060–4065. [CrossRef] 16. Nurhuda, M.; Suda, A.; Kaku, M.; Midorikawa, K. Optimization of hollow ﬁber pulse compression using pressure gradients. Appl. Phys. B 2007, 89, 209–215. [CrossRef] 17. Mak, K.F.; Travers, J.C.; Joly, N.Y.; Abdolvand, A.; Russell, P.S.J. Two techniques for temporal pulse compression in gas-ﬁlled hollow-core kagomé photonic crystal ﬁber. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 3592–3595. [CrossRef] 18. Gebhardt, M.; Gaida, C.; Heuermann, T.; Stutzki, F.; Jauregui, C.; Antonio-Lopez, J.; Schulzgen, A.; Amezcua-Correa, R.; Limpert, J.; Tünnermann, A. Nonlinear pulse compression to 43 W GW-class few-cycle pulses at 2 m wavelength. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 4179–4182. [CrossRef] 19. Vozzi, C.; Nisoli, M.; Sansone, G.; Stagira, S.; Silvestri, S.D. Optimal spectral broadening in hollow-ﬁber compressor systems. Appl. Phys. B 2005, 80, 285–289. [CrossRef] 20. Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Li, W.; Su, H.; Shao, B.; Li, S.; Wang, C.; Wang, D.; Zhao, R.; Peng, Y.; et al. 2.6 mJ/100 Hz CEP-stable near-single-cycle 4 m laser based on OPCPA and hollow-core ﬁber compression. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 2197–2200. [CrossRef] 21. Kanai, T.; Lee, Y.; Seo, M.; Kim, D.E. Supercontinuum-seeded, carrier-envelope phase-stable, 4. 5-W, 3.8-m, 6-cycle, KTA optical parametric ampliﬁer driven by a 1.4-ps Yb:YAG thin-disk ampliﬁer for nonperturbative spectroscopy in solids. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2019, 36, 2407–2413. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 11 of 11 22. Saleh, M.; Chang, W.; Hölzer, P.; Nazarkin, A.; Travers, J.C.; Joly, N.; Russell, P.S.J.; Biancalana, F. Theory of photoionization- induced blueshift of ultrashort solitons in gas-ﬁlled hollow-core photonic crystal ﬁbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 203902. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 23. Sprangle, P.; Peñano, J.R.; Haﬁzi, B. Propagation of intense short laser pulses in the atmosphere. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 66, 046418. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 24. Ammosov, M.V.; Delone, N.B.; Krainov, V.P. Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an alternating electromag- netic ﬁeld. Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics 1986, 64, 1191–1194. 25. Brabec, T.; Krausz, F. Nonlinear Optical Pulse Propagation in the Single-Cycle Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 3282–3285. [CrossRef] 26. Yu, F.; Knight, J. Negative curvature hollow core optical ﬁber. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2016, 22, 4400610. [CrossRef] 27. Liu, W.; Schimpf, D.N.; Eidam, T.; Limpert, J.; Tuennermann, A.; Kaertner, F.X.; Chang, G.Q. Pre-chirp managed nonlinear ampliﬁcation in ﬁbers delivering 100 W, 60 fs pulse. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 151. [CrossRef] 28. Heuermann, T.; Gaida, C.; Gebhardt, M.; Limpert, J. Thulium-doped nonlinear ﬁber ampliﬁer delivering 50 fs pulses at 20 W of average power. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 4441. [CrossRef] 29. Le, T.; Tempea, G.; Cheng, Z.; Hofer, M.; Stingl, A. Routes to ﬁber delivery of ultra-short laser pulses in the 25 fs regime. Opt. Lett. 2009, 17, 1240. [CrossRef] 30. Kalashyan, M.; Lefort, C.; -León, L.M.; Mansuryan, T.; Mouradian, L.; Louradour, F. Ultrashort pulse ﬁber delivery with optimized dispersion control by reﬂection grisms at 800 nm. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 25624. [CrossRef] 31. Andreana, M.; Le, T.; Drexler, W.; Unterhuber, A. Ultrashort pulse Kagome hollow-core photonic crystal ﬁber delivery for nonlinear optical imaging. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 1588. [CrossRef] 32. Várallyay, Z.; Fekete, J.; Bányász, Á.; Szipocs, ˝ R. Optimizing input and output chirps up to the third-order for sub-nanojoule, ultra-short pulse compression in small core area PCF. Appl. Phys. B 2007, 86, 567. [CrossRef] 33. Martial, I.; Papadopoulos, D.; Hanna, M.; Druon, F.; Georges, P. Nonlinear compression in a rod-type ﬁber for high energy ultrashort pulse generation. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 11155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 34. Ganz, T.; Pervak, V.; Apolonski, A.; Baum, P. 16 fs, 350 nJ pulses at 5 MHz repetition rate delivered by chirped pulse compression in ﬁbers. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 1107. [CrossRef] 35. Tauser, F.; Adler, F.; Leitenstorfer, A. Widely tunable sub-30-fs pulses from a compact erbium-doped ﬁber source. Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 516–518. [CrossRef] 36. Rosenberg, Y.; Drori, J.; Bermudez, D.; Leonhardt, U. Boosting few-cycle soliton self-frequency shift using negative prechirp. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 3107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 37. Chen, R.; Chang, G. Pre-chirp managed self-phase modulation for efﬁcient generation of wavelength-tunable energetic femtosec- ond pulses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2020, 37, 2388–2397. [CrossRef] 38. Anderson, D.; Lisak, M.; Malomed, B.; Quiroga-Teixeiro, M. Tunneling of an optical soliton through a ﬁber junction. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1994, 11, 2380–2384. [CrossRef] 39. Bertilsson, K.; Aakjer, T.; Quiroga-Teixeiro, M.L.; Andrekson, P.A.; Hedekvist, P. Investigation of soliton compression by propagation through ﬁber junctions. Opt. Fiber Technol. 1995, 1, 117–124. [CrossRef] 40. Balciunas, T.; Fourcade-Dutin, C.; Fan, G.; Witting, T.; Voronin, A.A.; Zheltikov, A.M.; Gerome, F.; Paulus, G.G.; Baltuska, A.; Benabid, F. A strong-ﬁeld driver in the single-cycle regime based on self-compression in a Kagome ﬁbre. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6117. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 41. Nagy, T.; Hädrich, S.; Simon, P.; Blumenstein, A.; Walther, N.; Klas, R.; Buldt, J.; Stark, H.; Breitkopf, S.; Jójárt, P.; et al. Generation of three-cycle multi-millijoule laser pulses at 318 W average power. Optica 2019, 6, 1423–1424. [CrossRef] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Photonics Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/multidisciplinary-digital-publishing-institute/pre-chirp-managed-adiabatic-soliton-compression-in-pressure-gradient-RYKxIetqLo

Loading next page...

References (46)

T. Ganz, V. Pervak, A. Apolonski, P. Baum (2011)
16 fs, 350 nJ pulses at 5 MHz repetition rate delivered by chirped pulse compression in fibers.
Optics letters, 36 7
K. Smith, L. Mollenauer (1989)
Experimental observation of adiabatic compression and expansion of soliton pulses over long fiber paths.
Optics letters, 14 14
Supplementary Material Supplementary Figures
F. Yu, J. Knight (2016)
Negative Curvature Hollow-Core Optical Fiber
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 22
Yu.A. Rosenberg, J. Drori, David Bermudez, U. Leonhardt (2020)
Boosting few-cycle soliton self-frequency shift using negative prechirp.
Optics express, 28 3
C. Vozzi, M. Nisoli, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, S. Silvestri (2005)
Optimal spectral broadening in hollow-fiber compressor systems
Applied Physics B, 80
M. Andreana, T. Le, W. Drexler, A. Unterhuber (2019)
Ultrashort pulse Kagome hollow-core photonic crystal fiber delivery for nonlinear optical imaging.
Optics letters, 44 7
K. Iwatsuki, K.-i. Suzuki, S. Nishi (1991)
Adiabatic soliton compression of gain-switched DFB-LD pulse by distributed fiber Raman amplification
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 3
(2011)
Theory of photoionizationinduced blueshift of ultrashort solitons in gas-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fibers
M. Ammosov (1987)
Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an altemating electromagnetic field
, 64
H. Kuehl (1988)
Solitons on an axially nonuniform optical fiber
Journal of The Optical Society of America B-optical Physics, 5
Z. Huang, Y. Chen, F. Yu, Di Wu, Y. Zhao, D. Wang, Y. Leng (2019)
Ionization-induced adiabatic soliton compression in gas-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fibers.
Optics letters, 44 22
P. Sprangle, J. Peñano, B. Hafizi (2002)
Propagation of intense short laser pulses in the atmosphere.
Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 66 4 Pt 2
Wei Liu, D. Schimpf, T. Eidam, J. Limpert, A. Tünnermann, F. Kärtner, G. Chang (2015)
Pre-chirp managed nonlinear amplification in fibers delivering 100 W, 60 fs pulses.
Optics letters, 40 2
M. Tse, P. Horák, J. Price, F. Poletti, F. He, D. Richardson (2006)
Pulse compression at 1.06 μm in dispersion-decreasing holey fibers
Optics Letters, 31
I. Martial, Dimitris Papadopulos, M. Hanna, F. Druon, P. Georges (2009)
Nonlinear compression in a rod-type fiber for high energy ultrashort pulse generation.
Optics express, 17 13
T. Nagy, P. Simon, L. Veisz (2021)
High-energy few-cycle pulses: post-compression techniques
Advances in Physics: X, 6
S. Chernikov, P. Mamyshev (1991)
Femtosecond soliton propagation in fibers with slowly decreasing dispersion
Journal of The Optical Society of America B-optical Physics, 8
M. Kalashyan, C. Lefort, L. Martínez-León, T. Mansuryan, L. Mouradian, F. Louradour (2012)
Ultrashort pulse fiber delivery with optimized dispersion control by reflection grisms at 800 nm.
Optics express, 20 23
D. Schade, Felix Koettig, J. Koehler, M. Frosz, P. Russell, F. Tani (2021)
Scaling rules for high quality soliton self-compression in hollow-core fibers.
Optics express, 29 12
Pengfei Wang, Yanyan Li, Wenkai Li, Hongpeng Su, Beijie Shao, Shuai Li, Cheng Wang, Ding Wang, Ruirui Zhao, Yujie Peng, Y. Leng, Ruxin Li, Zhi‐zhan Xu (2017)
2.6 mJ/100 Hz CEP-stable near-single-cycle 4 μm laser based on OPCPA and hollow-core fiber compression.
Optics letters, 43 9
Z. Várallyay, J. Fekete, A. Banyasz, R. Szipőcs (2007)
Optimizing input and output chirps up to the third-order for sub-nanojoule, ultra-short pulse compression in small core area PCF
Applied Physics B, 86
T. Heuermann, C. Gaida, M. Gebhardt, J. Limpert (2018)
Thulium-doped nonlinear fiber amplifier delivering 50 fs pulses at 20 W of average power.
Optics letters, 43 18
T. Brabec, F. Krausz (1997)
NONLINEAR OPTICAL PULSE PROPAGATION IN THE SINGLE-CYCLE REGIME
Physical Review Letters, 78
(1994)
Gbit/s sub-picosecond transform-limited pulse signal generation utilizing adiabatic soliton compression and optical time-division multiplexing
Kanai (2019)
Supercontinuum-seeded, carrier-envelope phase-stable, 4
5-W, 3.8-μm, 6-cycle, KTA optical parametric amplifier driven by a 1.4-ps Yb:YAG thin-disk amplifier for nonperturbative spectroscopy in solids. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 36
10.1038/ncomms7117
T. Nagy, S. Hädrich, P. Simon, A. Blumenstein, N. Walther, R. Klas, J. Buldt, H. Stark, S. Breitkopf, P. Jójárt, I. Seres, Z. Várallyay, T. Eidam, J. Limpert (2019)
Generation of three-cycle multi-millijoule laser pulses at 318 W average power
Optica
T. Kanai, Yeon Lee, M. Seo, D. Kim (2019)
Supercontinuum-seeded, carrier-envelope phase-stable, 45-W, 38-μm, 6-cycle, KTA optical parametric amplifier driven by a 14-ps Yb:YAG thin-disk amplifier for nonperturbative spectroscopy in solids
Journal of the Optical Society of America B
J. Laegsgaard, P. Roberts (2009)
Theory of adiabatic pressure-gradient soliton compression in hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers.
Optics letters, 34 23
G. Lenz, B. Eggleton (1998)
Adiabatic Bragg soliton compression in nonuniform grating structures
Journal of The Optical Society of America B-optical Physics, 15
P. Russell, P. Holzer, Wonkeun Chang, A. Abdolvand, J. Travers (2014)
Hollow-core photonic crystal fibres for gas-based nonlinear optics
Nature Photonics, 8
M. Nurhuda, A. Suda, M. Kaku, K. Midorikawa (2007)
Optimization of hollow fiber pulse compression using pressure gradients
Applied Physics B, 89
K. Suzuki, K. Iwatsuki, S. Nishi, M. Samwatari, T. Kitoh (1994)
160 Gb/s sub-picosecond transform-limited pulse signal generation utilizing adiabatic soliton compression and optical time-division multiplexing
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 6
M. Saleh, Wonkeun Chang, P. Hölzer, A. Nazarkin, J. Travers, N. Joly, P. Russell, F. Biancalana (2011)
Theory of photoionization-induced blueshift of ultrashort solitons in gas-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fibers.
Physical review letters, 107 20
K. Bertilsson, T. Aakjer, M. Quiroga-Teixeiro, P. Andrekson, P. Hedekvist (1995)
Investigation of Soliton Compression by Propagation through Fiber Junctions
Optical Fiber Technology, 1
D. Anderson, M. Lisak, B. Malomed, M. Quiroga-Teixeiro (1994)
Tunneling of an optical soliton through a fiber junction
Journal of The Optical Society of America B-optical Physics, 11
(1994)
160 Gbit / s sub - picosecond transform - limited pulse signal generation utilizing adiabatic soliton compression and optical time - division multiplexing
Md. Hasan, N. Akhmediev, Wonkeun Chang (2018)
Empirical Formulae for Dispersion and Effective Mode Area in Hollow-Core Antiresonant Fibers
Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36
John Travers, J. Stone, A. Rulkov, B. Cumberland, A. George, S. Popov, J. Knight, J. Taylor (2007)
Optical pulse compression in dispersion decreasing photonic crystal fiber.
Optics express, 15 20
Runzhi Chen, G. Chang (2020)
Pre-chirp managed self-phase modulation for efficient generation of wavelength-tunable energetic femtosecond pulses
Journal of The Optical Society of America B-optical Physics, 37
M. Gebhardt, C. Gaida, T. Heuermann, F. Stutzki, C. Jauregui, J. Antonio-Lopez, A. Schülzgen, R. Amezcua-correa, J. Limpert, A. Tünnermann (2017)
Nonlinear pulse compression to 43 W GW-class few-cycle pulses at 2 μm wavelength.
Optics letters, 42 20
T. Le, G. Tempea, Zhao Cheng, M. Hofer, A. Stingl (2009)
Routes to fiber delivery of ultra-short laser pulses in the 25 fs regime.
Optics express, 17 3
K. Mak, J. Travers, N. Joly, A. Abdolvand, P. Russell (2013)
Two techniques for temporal pulse compression in gas-filled hollow-core kagomé photonic crystal fiber.
Optics letters, 38 18
F. Tauser, F. Adler, A. Leitenstorfer (2004)
Widely tunable sub-30-fs pulses from a compact erbium-doped fiber source.
Optics letters, 29 5
M. Quiroga-Teixeiro, D. Anderson, P. Andrekson, A. Berntson, M. Lisak (1996)
Efficient soliton compression by fast adiabatic amplification
Journal of The Optical Society of America B-optical Physics, 13

Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Copyright: © 1996-2021 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated Disclaimer The statements, opinions and data contained in the journals are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
ISSN: 2304-6732
DOI: 10.3390/photonics8090357
Publisher site: See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

hv photonics Communication Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton Compression in Pressure-Gradient Hollow-Core Fibers 1 , 2 1 , 2 1 , 2 , 3 , Runzhi Chen , Zhuo Shi and Guoqing Chang * Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; runzhi.chen@iphy.ac.cn (R.C.); shizhuo20@mails.ucas.ac.cn (Z.S.) University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China * Correspondence: guoqing.chang@iphy.ac.cn Abstract: Post-pulse-compression is demanded to produce energetic few-cycle pulses. We propose pre-chirp-managed adiabatic soliton compression (ASC) in gas-ﬁlled pressure-gradient hollow-core ﬁbers to suppress the detrimental pedestals and therefore signiﬁcantly improve the compressed pulse quality. We show that two-stage ASC can compress 125 J, 130 fs pulses at 2 m to a nearly two-cycle pulse 15 fs in duration. Our analytical analysis suggests that ASC is in favor of compressing pulses centered at a longer wavelength. As an example, a 280 J, 220 fs Gaussian pulse at 4 m is compressed to 60 fs with minimal pedestals. We expect that the resulting high-quality, energetic few-cycle pulses will ﬁnd important applications in high-ﬁeld science. Keywords: adiabatic soliton compression; pressure gradient; hollow-core ﬁbers 1. Introduction High-energy (>100 J) few-cycle optical pulses with high average power (>100 W) Citation: Chen, R.; Shi, Z.; Chang, G. are increasingly demanded by high-ﬁeld science. To date, nearly all these powerful and Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton energetic pulses are obtained via post-compression of relatively long pulses [1]. In gen- Compression in Pressure-Gradient eral, pulse compression techniques can be divided into two types: (1) nonlinear spectral Hollow-Core Fibers. Photonics 2021, 8, broadening followed by a dispersive device for proper phase compensation and (2) soliton 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ self-compression without further phase removal. Both types of compression involve strong photonics8090357 nonlinear light–matter interaction such that the optical pulse acquires a huge nonlinear phase, resulting in substantial spectral broadening. In the ﬁrst type of pulse compres- Received: 4 July 2021 sion (e.g., multi-plate compression), the spectrally broadened pulse develops frequency Accepted: 23 August 2021 chirp and thus requires dispersive devices such as chirped mirrors for pulse dechirping Published: 27 August 2021 to generate a few-cycle pulse. In contrast, the second type of compression relies on the formation of a high-order soliton as a result of pulse propagation in a waveguide with Kerr Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral nonlinearity and negative group-velocity dispersion (GVD). More speciﬁcally, an input with regard to jurisdictional claims in pulse given enough energy evolves into a high-order soliton inside the waveguide and published maps and institutional afﬁl- experiences spectral broadening. Such evolution leads to a compressed, chirp-free pulse, iations. which does not need an extra dechirping device. Although both types of pulse compression techniques are successful in producing high-power, energetic few-cycle pulses, they suffer one common drawback: the compressed pulse exhibits a relatively large pedestal, which compromises its applications in high-ﬁeld science. This unwanted pedestal in the ﬁrst type Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. of compression arises from the uncompensated high-order spectral phase; for the second Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. type, it originates from the intrinsic property of a high-order soliton. This article is an open access article Besides high-order soliton compression, compressed chirp-free pulses can also be distributed under the terms and obtained using adiabatic soliton compression (ASC) [2–13]. ASC differs from high-order conditions of the Creative Commons soliton compression in that the pulse to be compressed evolves into a fundamental soliton Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// as propagating in a waveguide with negative GVD. A fundamental soliton results from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ a balance between Kerr nonlinearity and GVD, and hence increasing the nonlinearity or 4.0/). Photonics 2021, 8, 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8090357 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/photonics Photonics 2021, 8, 357 2 of 11 decreasing the GVD along the pulse propagation renders a gradual decrease in the pulse duration to reinforce a local nonlinearity–GVD balance [2]. Consequently, the input pulse is continuously compressed along the propagation. Despite the perturbation by high-order nonlinearities and dispersion, the compressed pulse stays close to be a fundamental soliton, and the pedestal is signiﬁcantly suppressed. ASC has been demonstrated to achieve pulse compression in single-mode ﬁbers with ampliﬁcation [3–5], dispersion-decreasing ﬁbers [6–9], and non-uniform grating struc- tures [10]. All these demonstrations were achieved in ﬁbers with solid cores. Recent years have seen intense research on nonlinear optical phenomena arising from propagation of femtosecond pulses inside gas-ﬁlled hollow-core ﬁbers (HCFs) [11]. These HCFs are widely used to implement the above-mentioned two types of pulse compression [1]. However, ASC in gas-ﬁlled hollow-core ﬁbers is rarely investigated. Lægsgaard et al. presented a the- oretical study on ASC limited by third-order dispersion and the Raman effect in photonic bandgap ﬁbers [12]. Huang et al. experimentally studied ASC in the presence of strong ionization, which demonstrated a 300 nm blueshift of the soliton central wavelength [13]. In this paper, we study the ASC of femtosecond pulses in pressure-gradient HCFs, with the focus on how to optimize the process to produce high-quality, pedestal-free few-cycle pulses. We show that introducing positive pre-chirp to the pulse prior to compression facilitates ASC and improves the compressed pulse quality. The pedestal stays ~30 dB below the pulse peak. We further demonstrate that two-stage ASC can generate two-cycle pulses at 2 m. We also discuss the performance of ASC in compressing pulses centered at 4 m. 2. Simple Analysis of ASC in Pressure-Gradient HCFs Based on the Soliton Area Theorem According to Ref. [14], the GVD of the fundamental mode in an HCF is given by cu b = f (w) , (1) 3 2 c w a where r is the gas density relative to standard conditions, c the speed of light in vacuum, u the ﬁrst zero of the zeroth-order Bessel function of the ﬁrst kind, and a the core radius. (1) 2 (1) f (w) = ¶ c + w¶ c /2, and ¶ is the derivative with respect to the frequency w. w w (1) c (w) is the linear susceptibility of the gas. Equation (1) shows that GVD includes two contributions: (1) positive gas dispersion and (2) negative waveguide dispersion. The Kerr nonlinear parameter of the gas is deﬁned by = n w / c A , where n 2 0 e f f 2 is the nonlinear index coefﬁcient. A 1.65a is the effective mode area for a negative- e f f curvature HCF (e.g., antiresonant HCF) [15]. The nonlinear parameter is related to the gas density and ﬁber core radius by n w n w r 2 0 20 0 r g = = , (2) c A 1.65a c e f f where n corresponds to the nonlinear index coefﬁcient of the gas under standard condi- tions. The well-known soliton area theorem connects the pulse energy E and the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the fundamental soliton, T , written as gE T 0 0 = 1. (3) 3.5jb (w )j 2 0 Plugging Equations (1) and (2) into Equation (3) and considering r being proportional to pressure p, we obtain the following equation: 2 2 3.5 b w 5.8u c 5.8 f w a A j ( )j ( ) 2 0 0 1 01 2 E T = = A a . (4) 0 0 2 g w n p w n r r 0 20 0 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 3 of 11 2 2 5.8u c p atm 5.8 f (w ) A and A are constants given by A = and A = . p is set at 1 atm. atm 1 2 1 4 2 w n w n 0 20 Equation (4) clearly shows that increasing the gas pressure along an HCF can effectively decrease the pulse duration. Indeed, pressure-gradient HCFs are widely employed to control the nonlinear interaction between the ﬁlled noble gas and the optical pulse [16–18]. Equation (4) seems to suggest that increasing the input pulse energy is another efﬁcient way of shorting the pulse duration. However, an increased pulse energy and reduced duration may result in high enough peak power that causes strong ionization and therefore degrades the compressed pulse quality. To avoid detrimental ionization effects, we set a limit to the gas ionization such that the variation of the refractive index induced by gas ionization is less than the index variation induced by the Kerr effect. Such a limit leads to following equation that connects the pulse energy, the pulse duration, and the ﬁber core radius [19]: a A T E (5) 0 0 where a ' 0.45 and ' 0.51. A is a constant, which depends on the ﬁlled gas. A combination of Equations (4) and (5) determines the maximum input pulse energy and the minimum pulse duration at the output of the pressure-gradient HCF: a+b a A 1 2 E = A a (6) max 2 A p 3 out " # 1 b a+b A A 3 1 T = A a (7) min 2 a p out p is the gas pressure at the ﬁber output. In most cases, the gas dispersion is much smaller out than the waveguide dispersion, and therefore Equations (6) and (7) are further simpliﬁed as a+b a A E = (8) max A p 3 out " # 1 a+b A A 3 1 T = (9) min a p out Figure 1 shows the dependence of E and T on the HCF core radius at different max min gas pressure values. We assume the HCF is ﬁlled with helium and the pulse is centered at a b 2 m, which leads to A 12.6 m fs /J . Given that the helium pressure at the HCF output is ﬁxed, E increases and T decreases as the ﬁber core radius is increased. At a max min ﬁxed ﬁber core radius, increasing the helium pressure reduces both E and T . max min Recent years have seen a huge effort to develop high-energy few-cycle pulses with the center wavelength at ~4 m, aiming for driving high-harmonic generation to extend the cut-off energy and produce keV photons [20,21]. These pulses were obtained via post- compression of initial ~100-fs pulses delivered by optical parametric ampliﬁers. Indeed, ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs is in favor of compressing high-energy pulses at a longer wavelength. Besides the ﬁber core radius and gas pressure, two other parameters, A and A , appear in Equations (8) and (9). A is weakly dependent on the pulse wavelength, 3 3 and it is 13.9 m fs /J at 4 m. However, A is proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength. As Equation (8) shows, increasing the center wavelength from 2 m to 4 m can increase E by a factor of ~4. Figure 2 shows the dependence of E and T on the max max min core radius of an HCF at different helium pressure values for the pulse centered at 4 m. The results indicate that ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs is able to compress sub-mJ pulses at 4 m. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 4 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 4 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 4 of 11 Figure 1. Dependence of Emax (a) and Tmin (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 2 μm. Recent years have seen a huge effort to develop high‐energy few‐cycle pulses with the center wavelength at ~4 μm, aiming for driving high‐harmonic generation to extend the cut‐off energy and produce keV photons [20,21]. These pulses were obtained via post‐ compression of initial ~100‐fs pulses delivered by optical parametric amplifiers. Indeed, ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs is in favor of compressing high‐energy pulses at a longer wavelength. Besides the fiber core radius and gas pressure, two other parameters, 𝐴 and 𝐴 , appear in Equations (8) and (9). 𝐴 is weakly dependent on the pulse wavelength, and it is 13.9 μm ∙ fs /μJ at 4 μm. However, 𝐴 is proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength. As Equation (8) shows, increasing the center wavelength from 2 μm to 4 μm can increase 𝐸 by a factor of ~4. Figure 2 shows the dependence of 𝐸 and 𝑇 on the core radius of an HCF at different helium pressure values for the pulse cen‐ tered at 4 μm. The results indicate that ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs is able to compress Figure 1. Dependence of Emax (a) and Tmin (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, Figure 1. Dependence of E (a) and T (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, max min sub‐mJ pulses at 4 μm. and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 2 μm. and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 2 m. Recent years have seen a huge effort to develop high‐energy few‐cycle pulses with the center wavelength at ~4 μm, aiming for driving high‐harmonic generation to extend the cut‐off energy and produce keV photons [20,21]. These pulses were obtained via post‐ compression of initial ~100‐fs pulses delivered by optical parametric amplifiers. Indeed, ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs is in favor of compressing high‐energy pulses at a longer wavelength. Besides the fiber core radius and gas pressure, two other parameters, 𝐴 and 𝐴 , appear in Equations (8) and (9). 𝐴 is weakly dependent on the pulse wavelength, and it is 13.9 μm ∙ fs /μJ at 4 μm. However, 𝐴 is proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength. As Equation (8) shows, increasing the center wavelength from 2 μm to 4 μm can increase 𝐸 by a factor of ~4. Figure 2 shows the dependence of 𝐸 and 𝑇 on the core radius of an HCF at different helium pressure values for the pulse cen‐ tered at 4 μm. The results indicate that ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs is able to compress sub‐mJ pulses at 4 μm. Figure 2. Dependence of Emax (a) and Tmin (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, Figure 2. Dependence of E (a) and T (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 bar, 8 bar, max min and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 4 μm. and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 4 m. 3. Simulation Results and Discussion 3. Simulation Results and Discussion Although Equations (8) and (9) predict the maximum pulse energy and the minimum Although Equations (8) and (9) predict the maximum pulse energy and the minimum pulse duration as a function of the HCF radius and the filled gas pressure, they provide pulse duration as a function of the HCF radius and the ﬁlled gas pressure, they provide no information about the compressed pulse quality. To further investigate the ASC process in detail, we solve the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation (GNLSE), taking into account dispersion, Kerr nonlinearity, and ionization effects [22]: " # w A I ¶ N b (i¶ ) p t e p e f f m t 2 ¶ y = i + g 1 + iw ¶ jy(t)j + i y, (10) z t m! 2w c 0 2jy(z, t)j m2 where y corresponds to the complex ﬁeld envelope of the pulse and b denotes the th m -order dispersion coefﬁcient calculated at the center frequency w . I , N , and A Figure 2. Dependence of Emax (a) and Tmin (b) on the HCF core radius with the helium pressure at 2 bar, 4 bar, 6 p bar, e 8 bar, 0 e f f represent the gas ionization energy, the free-electron density, and the effective mode area, and 10 bar. The pulse is centered at 4 μm. 0.5 respectively. The plasma frequency w is given by w = e N /(# m ) , where # is the p p e 0 e 0 3. Simulation Results and Discussion Although Equations (8) and (9) predict the maximum pulse energy and the minimum pulse duration as a function of the HCF radius and the filled gas pressure, they provide Photonics 2021, 8, 357 5 of 11 vacuum permittivity, e the electronic charge, and m the electron mass. The free electron density N is given by [23]: ¶N = W t N N , (11) ( )( ) 0 e ¶t where W(t) is the ionization rate and N is the density of gas atoms. The effects of electron attachment and recombination are neglected in Equation (2) for pulses shorter than 1 ps. In this letter, we use Ammosov–Delone–Krainov (ADK) theory to calculate the ionization rate W(t) [24]: 2n 1 4w 4w 2 tr tr W(t) = w jC j exp , (12) tr n w 3w t t 0.5 where w = I /} is the transition frequency and n = Z I / I is the effective tr p ph p 0.5 principal quantum number. w = e E z, t 2m I is the tunneling frequency, in which j ( )j t e p the carrier-resolved electric ﬁeld E(z, t) is given by E(z, t) = 2/# n c A y(z, t), and 0 0 e f f 2 1 2n n is the linear refractive index. C = 2 [n G(n + 1)G(n )] , where Z is the net j j 0 n resulting charge of the ion, I is the ionization energy of the hydrogen atom, and G(x) is ph the Euler gamma function. It is noteworthy that Equation (10) remains valid even as the pulse duration approaches one carrier oscillation cycle [25]. For a pressure-gradient HCF, the gas pressure along the ﬁber is given by 2 2 2 2 p z = p + p p . (13) ( ) 0 L 0 p and p denote the pressure at the ﬁber input end and the output end, respectively. L 0 L represents the ﬁber length. In the ﬁrst simulation, we investigate the ASC of pulses at 2 m in antiresonant HCFs, which feature a large mode area, low transmission loss, negative dispersion, and broadband transmission [26]. We assume that the antiresonant HCF is 8 m long with a core radius of 28 m ﬁlled with helium with the pressure varying from p = 0.6 bar to p = 2.6 bar. 0 L The input pulse is a transform-limited Gaussian pulse centered at 2 m with 100 J pulse energy and 110 fs duration. These pulses can be experimentally obtained by state-of-the-art high-power Tm-ﬁber ampliﬁer systems [18]. Figure 3a shows the pulse evolution along the ﬁber in the logarithmic scale. Due to increased gas pressure leading to a reduced group velocity, the center of gravity of the pulse shifts toward a later time. The central part of the pulse becomes narrower continuously during the propagation of the ﬁrst 5 m; for further propagation, it becomes wider and then narrower again. During the propagation, the ionization is minimal, as expected. The black curve in Figure 3b plots the FWHM of the pulse as a function of the propagation distance, and the blue curve shows the FWHM of the corresponding fundamental soliton that shares the same energy and nonlinear coefﬁcient as the pulse propagating in the HCF. Clearly, the pulse duration oscillates around the fundamental soliton duration, indicating that the pulse adiabatically evolves into a fundamental soliton. The quality of a pulse is quantiﬁed by the Strehl ratio deﬁned by the peak–power ratio between the compressed pulse and the transform-limited pulse. A pulse with a Strehl ratio of ~0.8 is regarded as a decent pulse. However, most high-energy pulses obtained by post-compression exhibit much lower Strehl ratios, with a large portion of energy shed in pedestals and satellite pulses. Figure 3c plots the output pulse (black curve), the transform-limited pulse calculated from the output spectrum (red dashed curve), and the fundamental soliton determined by the dispersion/nonlinearity at the ﬁber output (blue curve). The input 110 fs pulse is compressed to 38 fs, which is close to the transform-limited pulse with the Strehl ratio reaching as high as ~0.99. The pedestal stays >28 dB below the pulse peak; the central part of the compressed pulse has an excellent overlap with the fundamental soliton pulse and contains 97.5% of the total pulse energy. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 6 of 11 The results in Figure 3b shows that the pulse evolves toward a fundamental soliton. However, the output spectrum (Figure 3d) clearly indicates that the compressed pulse devi- ates much from an ideal fundamental soliton that features a spectrum of hyperbolic secant shape. It is well known that pre-chirping the input pulse into an optical ﬁber can be used to control the nonlinear propagation. The pre-chirp management technique has been applied to nonlinear pulse ampliﬁcation [27,28], delivery of femtosecond pulses [29–31], nonlin- ear pulse compression [32–34], dispersive wave generation [35], soliton self-frequency shift [36], and self-phase modulation enabled spectral selection for generating widely tunable femtosecond pulses [37]. Here we propose to pre-chirp the input pulse to control ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs. Figure 4 shows the simulation results corresponding to the ASC of a positively chirped pulse. In the simulation, we added 2000 fs group-delay dispersion (GDD) to positively pre-chirp the 100 J, 110 fs Gaussian pulse to a duration of 120 fs. All other parameters remained unchanged. Figure 4a plots the pulse evolution. A comparison between Figures 3a and 4a shows that introducing pre-chirp reduces the duration oscillation of the central part in the compressed pulse. This is more evidently revealed by the results in Figure 4b: due to the negative GVD, the positively chirped pulse is shortened more rapidly at the beginning of the compression; the FWHM of the compressed pulse quickly converges to the FWHM of the fundamental soliton after 3 m propagation. At the HCF output, the optical spectrum (black curve in Figure 4d) is close to the soliton spectrum (blue curve in Figure 4d). Consequently, compared with the ASC of the un-chirped pulse, pre-chirp-managed ASC leads to a compressed pulse with the pedestal further suppressed (Figure 4c). In this case, the pedestal stays >37 dB below the pulse peak. The input pre-chirped 120 fs pulse is compressed to 37 fs (corresponding to 5.5 cycles) with the Strehl ratio reaching as high as ~0.99, and the central part of the compressed pulse contains 99% of the total pulse energy. The results in Figure 4 demonstrate that pre-chirp-managed ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs can produce high-quality few-cycle pulses with the pedestal signiﬁcantly suppressed. However, our extensive simulation shows that the compression ratio is limited to 3–4 to suppress the pedestal by more than 30 dB. This is caused by the characteristic pressure gradient determined by Equation (10): the square of the gas pressure increases linearly with the ﬁber length, and accordingly the adiabatic soliton duration drops sharply at the beginning of the HCF and then quickly ﬂattens out. It is hard (if not impossible) to achieve a higher compression ratio via just pre-chirping the input pulse to reinforce the ASC. This drawback of low compression ratio can be alleviated by cascading the ASC in multiple stages. The results in Figure 5 show two-stage pre-chirp-managed ASC that compresses an initial unchirped 125 J, 130 fs pulse down to 15 fs in duration. In the ﬁrst stage, the 5-m-long HCF has a core radius of 30 m, and the helium pressure varies from p = 0.2 bar to p = 1.4 bar. The 5-m-long HCF in the second stage has a core radius of 45 m, and the helium pressure varies from p = 0.5 bar to p = 6 bar. We assume a coupling loss of 20% 0 L such that the pulse energy is reduced to 100 J at the input of the second HCF. Given the core difference (30 m versus 45 m) between the two HCFs, the ﬁrst ﬁber has a GVD about 2.25 times larger than the second one, since gas dispersion is much smaller compared with waveguide dispersion. As the results in Refs. [38,39] have shown, a soliton experiencing an abrupt dispersion change may cause dispersive shedding and soliton degradation. Such a detrimental effect can be mitigated by introducing a ﬁnite-length ﬁber junction between the two ﬁbers with a large dispersion difference [38,39]. In our situation, instead of adding a ﬁber junction, we properly pre-chirp the soliton before entering the second HCF to ensure 2 2 ASC. More speciﬁcally, we add 2500 fs (500 fs ) GDD to the pulse at the input of the ﬁrst (second) HCF. The input pulse is compressed to 54 fs inside the ﬁrst HCF and then compressed to 15 fs by the second HCF corresponding to 2.3 optical cycles. It is noteworthy that using gas-ﬁlled HCFs to self-compress 2 m pulses to few- cycle duration has been experimentally demonstrated by several groups [18,40]. The self- compression was based on high-order soliton compression, and therefore the compressed Photonics 2021, 8, 357 7 of 11 degradation. Such a detrimental effect can be mitigated by introducing a finite‐length fiber junction between the two fibers with a large dispersion difference [38,39]. In our situation, instead of adding a fiber junction, we properly pre‐chirp the soliton before entering the 2 2 second HCF to ensure ASC. More specifically, we add 2500 fs (500 fs ) GDD to the pulse at the input of the first (second) HCF. The input pulse is compressed to 54 fs inside the first HCF and then compressed to 15 fs by the second HCF corresponding to 2.3 optical cycles. It is noteworthy that using gas‐filled HCFs to self‐compress 2 μm pulses to few‐cycle Photonics 2021, 8, 357 7 of 11 duration has been experimentally demonstrated by several groups [18,40]. The self‐com‐ pression was based on high‐order soliton compression, and therefore the compressed pulse quality was compromised. For example, Gebhardt et al. employed a 42 cm gas‐filled pulse quality was compromised. For example, Gebhardt et al. employed a 42 cm gas- antiresonant HCF to compress 34.4 μJ pulses centered at 1.8 μm from 110 fs to 13 fs. How‐ ﬁlled antiresonant HCF to compress 34.4 J pulses centered at 1.8 m from 110 fs to 13 fs. ever, the compressed 2.1‐cycle pulse has elongated pedestals that are less than 10 dB be‐ However, the compressed 2.1-cycle pulse has elongated pedestals that are less than 10 dB low the main peak [18]. Assisted by numerical simulation, the authors estimated that the below the main peak [18]. Assisted by numerical simulation, the authors estimated that central part of the pulse only includes 60% of the pulse energy [18]. In contrast, our results the central part of the pulse only includes 60% of the pulse energy [18]. In contrast, our in Figure 5 show that two‐stage pre‐chirp‐managed ASC in pressure‐gradient HCFs can results in Figure 5 show that two-stage pre-chirp-managed ASC in pressure-gradient HCFs generate nearly pedestal‐free nearly two‐cycle pulses with ~98% energy confined in the can generate nearly pedestal-free nearly two-cycle pulses with ~98% energy conﬁned in central part of the compressed pulse. the central part of the compressed pulse. Figure 3. ASC of an unchirped 110 fs, 100 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation distance. The Figure 3. ASC of an unchirped 110 fs, 100 J pulse at 2 m. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation distance. The intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform-limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) and soliton curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 8 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 8 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 8 of 11 Figure 4. ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 120 fs, 100 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation Figure 4. ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 120 fs, 100 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation Figure 4. ASC of a positively pre-chirped 120 fs, 100 J pulse at 2 m. (a) Pulse evolution as a function of propagation distance. The intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed distance. The intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed distance. The intensity is shown in log scale. (b) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited (TL) pulse pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited (TL) pulse pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. (c) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform-limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) (red dashed curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) (red dashed curve) at HCF output. The fundamental soliton is shown as the blue curve. (d) Optical spectrum (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at HCF output. Figure 5. Two‐stage ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 125 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) Figure 5. Two‐stage ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 125 μJ pulse at 2 μm. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) Figure 5. Two-stage ASC of a positively pre-chirped 125 J pulse at 2 m. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance in two‐stage ASC. Inset: pulse spectrum and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance in two‐stage ASC. Inset: pulse spectrum and FWHM of a compressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance in two-stage ASC. Inset: pulse spectrum (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. transform‐limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. transform-limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 9 of 11 Photonics 2021, 8, 357 9 of 11 The results in Figure 2 show that ASC is favorable for compressing pulses at a longer The results in Figure 2 show that ASC is favorable for compressing pulses at a longer center wavelength. To verify this prediction based on analytical analysis, we simulate the center wavelength. To verify this prediction based on analytical analysis, 2 we simulate propagation of a 280 μJ, 220 fs Gaussian pulse (240 fs after adding 8000 fs GDD) centered the propagation of a 280 J, 220 fs Gaussian pulse (240 fs after adding 8000 fs GDD) at 4 μm inside an antiresonant HCF with a core radius of 40 μm. The HCF is filled with centered at 4 m inside an antiresonant HCF with a core radius of 40 m. The HCF is helium, with the pressure varying from p0 = 1 bar to pL = 9 bar. The results in Figure 6 ﬁlled with helium, with the pressure varying from p = 1 bar to p = 9 bar. The results in 0 L indicate that the pulse can be adiabatically compressed down to 60 fs in duration, corre‐ Figure 6 indicate that the pulse can be adiabatically compressed down to 60 fs in duration, sponding to 4.5 optical cycles. The compressed pulse has a peak power of 4 GW, and the corresponding to 4.5 optical cycles. The compressed pulse has a peak power of 4 GW, and pedestal is about 35 dB below the peak. the pedestal is about 35 dB below the peak. Figure 6. ASC of a positively pre‐chirped 280 μJ pulse at 4 μm. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and Figure 6. ASC of a positively pre-chirped 280 J pulse at 4 m. (a) FWHM of a fundamental soliton (blue curve) and FWHM of ac ompressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. Inset: pulse spectrum (black curve) and FWHM of ac ompressed pulse (black curve) versus the propagation distance. Inset: pulse spectrum (black curve) and soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform‐limited soliton spectrum (blue curve) at the output of the second HCF. (b) Compressed pulse (black curve) and transform-limited (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. (TL) pulse (red dashed curve) at HCF output. Equations (8) and (9) indicate that increasing the fiber core radius allows compress‐ Equations (8) and (9) indicate that increasing the ﬁber core radius allows compressing ing pulses with higher energy to a shorter dispersion. We anticipate that energy scaling pulses with higher energy to a shorter dispersion. We anticipate that energy scaling of ASC of ASC to compress >1 mJ pulses is possible by using capillary HCFs with the core radius to compress >1 mJ pulses is possible by using capillary HCFs with the core radius exceeding exceeding 100 μm. In general, ASC requires meters‐long propagation distance. Conven‐ 100 m. In general, ASC requires meters-long propagation distance. Conventional capillary tional capillary HCFs that are made of thick‐walled rigid fused silica tubes are limited to HCFs that are made of thick-walled rigid fused silica tubes are limited to ~1 m in length ~1 m in length to avoid introducing propagation loss. ASC in this type of HCFs is unlikely to avoid introducing propagation loss. ASC in this type of HCFs is unlikely possible. In possible. In contrast, stretched flexible HCFs (SF‐HCFs) that feature much thinner walls contrast, stretched ﬂexible HCFs (SF-HCFs) that feature much thinner walls (only tens of (only tens of microns) are being widely used for post‐pulse‐compression. Thanks to the microns) are being widely used for post-pulse-compression. Thanks to the light weight, light weight, these HCFs can be kept straight to prevent excessive loss, even when their these HCFs can be kept straight to prevent excessive loss, even when their length is length is 6 m [41]. We expect that pressure‐gradient SF‐HCFs may allow ASC of >1 mJ 6 m [41]. We expect that pressure-gradient SF-HCFs may allow ASC of >1 mJ pulses pulses at 4 μm, and the resulting few‐cycle high‐quality pulses constitute an enabling tool at 4 m, and the resulting few-cycle high-quality pulses constitute an enabling tool for for high‐field applications. high-ﬁeld applications. 4. Conclusions 4. Conclusions In conclusion, we investigated ASC in gas‐filled pressure‐gradient HCFs. The maxi‐ In conclusion, we investigated ASC in gas-ﬁlled pressure-gradient HCFs. The maxi- mum pulse energy and the minimum compressed pulse duration are dependent on the mum pulse energy and the minimum compressed pulse duration are dependent on the HCF core size, gas type and pressure, and the center wavelength. We show that properly HCF core size, gas type and pressure, and the center wavelength. We show that properly pre‐chirping the pulse prior to compression can accelerate the pulse compression rapidly pre-chirping the pulse prior to compression can accelerate the pulse compression rapidly converging to ASC, which results in improved pulse quality with the pedestal further converging to ASC, which results in improved pulse quality with the pedestal further sup- suppressed. Despite a relatively low compression ratio from single‐state ASC, we showed pressed. Despite a relatively low compression ratio from single-state ASC, we showed that that two‐stage ASC can offer a compression ratio of ~9. As a result, 130 fs pulses at 2 μm two-stage ASC can offer a compression ratio of ~9. As a result, 130 fs pulses at 2 m can be can be compressed to a nearly two‐cycle pulse 15 fs in duration. We also showed that compressed to a nearly two-cycle pulse 15 fs in duration. We also showed that compression compression of pulses with al onger center wavelength is favored by ASC. For example, of pulses with al onger center wavelength is favored by ASC. For example, a 280 J, 220 fs a 280 μJ, 220 fs Gaussian pulse at 4 μm can be compressed to 60 fs. Work is ongoing to Gaussian pulse at 4 m can be compressed to 60 fs. Work is ongoing to experimentally verify our theoretical predictions on ASC in gas-ﬁlled pressure-gradient HCFs. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 10 of 11 Author Contributions: Conceptualization, R.C. and G.C.; methodology, R.C. and Z.S.; software, R.C. and Z.S.; validation, R.C.; formal analysis, Z.S.; investigation, R.C.; resources, G.C.; data curation, R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C.; writing—review and editing, G.C.; visualization, R.C. and Z.S.; supervision, G.C.; project administration, G.C.; funding acquisition, G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11774234), the Guangdong Key R&D Program (no. 2018B090904003), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (no. YJKYYQ20190034). Acknowledgments: We thank Zhiyi Wei of the Institute of Physics CAS for useful discussions. Conﬂicts of Interest: The authors declare no conﬂict of interest. References 1. Nagy, T.; Simon, P.; Veisz, L. High-energy few-cycle pulses: Post-compression techniques. Adv. Phys. X 2021, 6, 11845795. 2. Kuehl, H.H. Solitons on an axially nonuniform optical ﬁber. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1988, 5, 709–713. [CrossRef] 3. Smith, K.; Mollenauer, L.F. Experimental-Observation of Adiabatic-Compression and Expansion of Soliton Pulses over Long Fiber Paths. Opt. Lett. 1989, 14, 751–753. [CrossRef] 4. Iwatsuki, K.; Suzuki, K.-I.; Nishi, S. Adiabatic soliton compression of gain-switched DFB-LD pulse by distributed ﬁber Raman ampliﬁcation. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 1991, 3, 1074–1076. [CrossRef] 5. Quiroga-Teixeiro, M.L.; Anderson, D.; Andrekson, P.A.; Berntson, A.; Lisak, M. Efﬁcient soliton compression by fast adiabatic ampliﬁcation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1996, 13, 687–692. [CrossRef] 6. Chernikov, S.V.; Mamyshev, P.V. Femtosecond Soliton Propagation in Fibers with Slowly Decreasing Dispersion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1991, 8, 1633–1641. [CrossRef] 7. Suzuki, K.; Iwatsuki, K.; Nishi, S.; Saruwatari, M.; Kitoh, T. 160 Gbit/s sub-picosecond transform-limited pulse signal generation utilizing adiabatic soliton compression and optical time-division multiplexing. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 1994, 6, 352–354. [CrossRef] 8. Travers, J.C.; Stone, J.M.; Rulkov, A.B.; Cumberland, B.A.; George, A.K.; Popov, S.V.; Knight, J.C.; Taylor, J.R. Optical pulse compression in dispersion decreasing photonic crystal ﬁber. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 13203–13211. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 9. Tse, M.L.V.; Horak, P.; Price, J.H.V.; Poletti, F.; He, F.; Richardson, D.J. Pulse compression at 1.06 m in dispersion-decreasing holey ﬁbers. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 3504–3506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 10. Lenz, G.; Eggleton, B.J. Adiabatic Bragg soliton compression in nonuniform grating structures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1998, 15, 2979–2985. [CrossRef] 11. Russell, P.S.J.; Hölzer, P.; Chang, W.; Abdolvand, A.; Travers, J.C. Hollow-core photonic crystal ﬁbres for gasbased nonlinear optics. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 278–286. [CrossRef] 12. Lægsgaard, J.; Roberts, P.J. Theory of adiabatic pressure-gradient soliton compression in hollow-core photonic bandgap ﬁbers. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 3710–3712. [CrossRef] 13. Huang, Z.Y.; Chen, Y.F.; Yu, F.; Wu, D.K.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, D.; Leng, Y.X. Ionization-induced adiabatic soliton compression in gas-ﬁlled hollow-core photonic crystal ﬁbers. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 5562–5565. [CrossRef] 14. Schade, D.; Köttig, F.; Koehler, J.R.; Frosz, M.H.; Russell, P.S.J.; Tani, F. Scaling rules for high quality soliton self-compression in hollow-core ﬁbers. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 19147–19158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Hasan, M.I.; Akhmediev, N.; Chang, W. Empirical Formulae for Dispersion and Effective Mode Area in Hollow-Core Antiresonant Fibers. J. Lightwave Technol. 2018, 36, 4060–4065. [CrossRef] 16. Nurhuda, M.; Suda, A.; Kaku, M.; Midorikawa, K. Optimization of hollow ﬁber pulse compression using pressure gradients. Appl. Phys. B 2007, 89, 209–215. [CrossRef] 17. Mak, K.F.; Travers, J.C.; Joly, N.Y.; Abdolvand, A.; Russell, P.S.J. Two techniques for temporal pulse compression in gas-ﬁlled hollow-core kagomé photonic crystal ﬁber. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 3592–3595. [CrossRef] 18. Gebhardt, M.; Gaida, C.; Heuermann, T.; Stutzki, F.; Jauregui, C.; Antonio-Lopez, J.; Schulzgen, A.; Amezcua-Correa, R.; Limpert, J.; Tünnermann, A. Nonlinear pulse compression to 43 W GW-class few-cycle pulses at 2 m wavelength. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 4179–4182. [CrossRef] 19. Vozzi, C.; Nisoli, M.; Sansone, G.; Stagira, S.; Silvestri, S.D. Optimal spectral broadening in hollow-ﬁber compressor systems. Appl. Phys. B 2005, 80, 285–289. [CrossRef] 20. Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Li, W.; Su, H.; Shao, B.; Li, S.; Wang, C.; Wang, D.; Zhao, R.; Peng, Y.; et al. 2.6 mJ/100 Hz CEP-stable near-single-cycle 4 m laser based on OPCPA and hollow-core ﬁber compression. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 2197–2200. [CrossRef] 21. Kanai, T.; Lee, Y.; Seo, M.; Kim, D.E. Supercontinuum-seeded, carrier-envelope phase-stable, 4. 5-W, 3.8-m, 6-cycle, KTA optical parametric ampliﬁer driven by a 1.4-ps Yb:YAG thin-disk ampliﬁer for nonperturbative spectroscopy in solids. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2019, 36, 2407–2413. Photonics 2021, 8, 357 11 of 11 22. Saleh, M.; Chang, W.; Hölzer, P.; Nazarkin, A.; Travers, J.C.; Joly, N.; Russell, P.S.J.; Biancalana, F. Theory of photoionization- induced blueshift of ultrashort solitons in gas-ﬁlled hollow-core photonic crystal ﬁbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 203902. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 23. Sprangle, P.; Peñano, J.R.; Haﬁzi, B. Propagation of intense short laser pulses in the atmosphere. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 66, 046418. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 24. Ammosov, M.V.; Delone, N.B.; Krainov, V.P. Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an alternating electromag- netic ﬁeld. Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics 1986, 64, 1191–1194. 25. Brabec, T.; Krausz, F. Nonlinear Optical Pulse Propagation in the Single-Cycle Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 3282–3285. [CrossRef] 26. Yu, F.; Knight, J. Negative curvature hollow core optical ﬁber. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2016, 22, 4400610. [CrossRef] 27. Liu, W.; Schimpf, D.N.; Eidam, T.; Limpert, J.; Tuennermann, A.; Kaertner, F.X.; Chang, G.Q. Pre-chirp managed nonlinear ampliﬁcation in ﬁbers delivering 100 W, 60 fs pulse. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 151. [CrossRef] 28. Heuermann, T.; Gaida, C.; Gebhardt, M.; Limpert, J. Thulium-doped nonlinear ﬁber ampliﬁer delivering 50 fs pulses at 20 W of average power. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 4441. [CrossRef] 29. Le, T.; Tempea, G.; Cheng, Z.; Hofer, M.; Stingl, A. Routes to ﬁber delivery of ultra-short laser pulses in the 25 fs regime. Opt. Lett. 2009, 17, 1240. [CrossRef] 30. Kalashyan, M.; Lefort, C.; -León, L.M.; Mansuryan, T.; Mouradian, L.; Louradour, F. Ultrashort pulse ﬁber delivery with optimized dispersion control by reﬂection grisms at 800 nm. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 25624. [CrossRef] 31. Andreana, M.; Le, T.; Drexler, W.; Unterhuber, A. Ultrashort pulse Kagome hollow-core photonic crystal ﬁber delivery for nonlinear optical imaging. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 1588. [CrossRef] 32. Várallyay, Z.; Fekete, J.; Bányász, Á.; Szipocs, ˝ R. Optimizing input and output chirps up to the third-order for sub-nanojoule, ultra-short pulse compression in small core area PCF. Appl. Phys. B 2007, 86, 567. [CrossRef] 33. Martial, I.; Papadopoulos, D.; Hanna, M.; Druon, F.; Georges, P. Nonlinear compression in a rod-type ﬁber for high energy ultrashort pulse generation. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 11155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 34. Ganz, T.; Pervak, V.; Apolonski, A.; Baum, P. 16 fs, 350 nJ pulses at 5 MHz repetition rate delivered by chirped pulse compression in ﬁbers. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 1107. [CrossRef] 35. Tauser, F.; Adler, F.; Leitenstorfer, A. Widely tunable sub-30-fs pulses from a compact erbium-doped ﬁber source. Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 516–518. [CrossRef] 36. Rosenberg, Y.; Drori, J.; Bermudez, D.; Leonhardt, U. Boosting few-cycle soliton self-frequency shift using negative prechirp. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 3107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 37. Chen, R.; Chang, G. Pre-chirp managed self-phase modulation for efﬁcient generation of wavelength-tunable energetic femtosec- ond pulses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2020, 37, 2388–2397. [CrossRef] 38. Anderson, D.; Lisak, M.; Malomed, B.; Quiroga-Teixeiro, M. Tunneling of an optical soliton through a ﬁber junction. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1994, 11, 2380–2384. [CrossRef] 39. Bertilsson, K.; Aakjer, T.; Quiroga-Teixeiro, M.L.; Andrekson, P.A.; Hedekvist, P. Investigation of soliton compression by propagation through ﬁber junctions. Opt. Fiber Technol. 1995, 1, 117–124. [CrossRef] 40. Balciunas, T.; Fourcade-Dutin, C.; Fan, G.; Witting, T.; Voronin, A.A.; Zheltikov, A.M.; Gerome, F.; Paulus, G.G.; Baltuska, A.; Benabid, F. A strong-ﬁeld driver in the single-cycle regime based on self-compression in a Kagome ﬁbre. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6117. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 41. Nagy, T.; Hädrich, S.; Simon, P.; Blumenstein, A.; Walther, N.; Klas, R.; Buldt, J.; Stark, H.; Breitkopf, S.; Jójárt, P.; et al. Generation of three-cycle multi-millijoule laser pulses at 318 W average power. Optica 2019, 6, 1423–1424. [CrossRef]

Journal

Photonics – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

Published: Aug 27, 2021

Keywords: adiabatic soliton compression; pressure gradient; hollow-core fibers

Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton Compression in Pressure-Gradient Hollow-Core Fibers

Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton Compression in Pressure-Gradient Hollow-Core Fibers

Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton Compression in Pressure-Gradient Hollow-Core Fibers

Pre-Chirp-Managed Adiabatic Soliton Compression in Pressure-Gradient Hollow-Core Fibers

References (46)

Abstract

Journal

Recommended Articles

There are no references for this article.

Our policy towards the use of cookies