Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective

Linlin Xia; Jianfeng Wei; Ruwei Wang; Lei Chen; Yan Zhang; Zhifeng Yang

doi:10.3390/ijerph19105793

Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective

Xia, Linlin;Wei, Jianfeng;Wang, Ruwei;Chen, Lei;Zhang, Yan;Yang, Zhifeng 2022-05-10 00:00:00 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective 1 , 2 1 , 2 3 , 4 4 1 , 2 Linlin Xia , Jianfeng Wei , Ruwei Wang *, Lei Chen , Yan Zhang and Zhifeng Yang Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; linlinxia@mail.bnu.edu.cn (L.X.); 2112024025@mail2.gdut.edu.cn (J.W.); zfyang@gdut.edu.cn (Z.Y.) Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Xinjiekouwai Street No. 19, Beijing 100875, China; leichen@gdut.edu.cn (L.C.); zhangyanyxy@126.com (Y.Z.) * Correspondence: wangruwei@jnu.edu.cn Abstract: To meet the global need for carbon neutrality, we must ﬁrst understand the role of urban carbon metabolism. In this study, we developed a land–energy–carbon framework to model the spatial and temporal variation of carbon ﬂows in Beijing from 1990 to 2018. Based on the changes in carbon sequestration and energy consumption, we used ecological network analysis to identify the critical paths for achieving carbon neutrality during land-use changes, thereby revealing possible decarbonization pathways to achieve carbon neutrality. By using GIS software, changes in the center of gravity for carbon ﬂows were visualized in each period, and future urban construction scenarios Citation: Xia, L.; Wei, J.; Wang, R.; were explored based on land-use policy. We found that the direct carbon emission peaked in 2010, Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z. mostly due to a growing area of transportation and industrial land. Total integrated ﬂows through Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the network decreased at an average annual rate of 3.8%, and the change from cultivated land to the the Carbon Emission Gap in an socioeconomic sectors and the paths between each socioeconomic component accounted for 29.5 and Urban Metabolic System: A Network 31.7% of the integrated ﬂows during the study period. The socioeconomic sectors as key nodes in the Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. network should focus both on their scale expansion and on using cleaner energy to reduce carbon Public Health 2022, 19, 5793. https:// emissions. The center of gravity gradually moved southward, indicating that the new emission doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105793 centers should seek a greener mixture of land use. Reducing carbon emission will strongly relied on Academic Editor: Paul B. transforming Beijing’s energy consumption structure and increasing green areas to improve carbon Tchounwou sinks. Our results provide insights into carbon ﬂow paths that must be modiﬁed by implementing land-use policies to reduce carbon emission and produce a more sustainable urban metabolism. Received: 23 March 2022 Accepted: 7 May 2022 Published: 10 May 2022 Keywords: network insight; urban carbon metabolism; center of gravity; carbon neutral paths Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional afﬁl- 1. Introduction iations. Carbon emission reduction is an urgent issue to address the global climate change. The Paris Agreement proposed stabilization of the global temperature increase well below 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures, thereby preventing extensive damage to the global Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. ecosystem [1]. To meet the carbon neutrality challenge, countries are taking actions, but Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. the proportion of energy consumption supplied by fossil fuels remains too high [2–4], This article is an open access article the energy intensity (i.e., energy consumed per unit GDP) continues to increase [5] and distributed under the terms and the emission that results from land-use change grows year by year [6,7], especially in conditions of the Creative Commons developing countries. This will create great challenges for these countries. Seeking effective Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// ways to reduce carbon emission has therefore become a priority for governments around creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ the world. 4.0/). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105793 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 2 of 23 The rapid urbanization that is occurring in developing countries has promoted large- scale urban expansion, resulting in large negative environmental impacts for the areas that sustain these growing cities [8]. Particularly in China, unprecedented urbanization has greatly affected the urban system, and with urbanization expected to reach 70 to 75% by 2050 [9,10], the impact is likely to increase. In particular, enormous changes in the land-use and cover type (hereafter, “land use” for simplicity) have adversely affected the environment [11–13]. For example, these processes have been responsible for nearly 1.45 Pg carbon emission from 1990 to 2010 [14] and a decrease of about 101.79 TgC in carbon storage [15]. Currently, more than 70% of energy consumption still depends on fossil fuels in Chinese cities, and this makes decarbonization particularly challenging [3,16]. Vaughan (2020) noted that reducing carbon emissions and increasing green space to compensate for these emissions will be essential for China to achieve carbon neutrality while still maintaining rapid socioeconomic development [17]. Carbon neutrality is a widely accepted goal that can be achieved by following many paths, including afforestation, energy conservation, and emission reduction. Researchers have mostly focused on the aspects of an urban energy system to promote decarbonization of the energy structure and to reduce carbon emission sources [18,19]. Green compensation plays an important role to increase carbon sinks for offsetting carbon emissions during land- use management [20,21]. Researchers have also investigated the possibility of introducing carbon-neutral materials to achieve zero emissions during use of these materials [22,23]. Although technological innovation could provide signiﬁcant ecological beneﬁts, it is more cost-intensive than improving urban planning and has drawbacks such as long payback periods and facing innovative bottlenecks [24,25]. Thus, optimizing the land-use patterns offers an alternative and potentially more effective way to reduce carbon emissions for achieving carbon neutrality and improving sustainability [26]. Urban metabolism, which was ﬁrst deﬁned by Wolman (1965), provides tools for un- derstanding the coordination and sustainable development of urban ecosystems [27]. Sub- sequent studies performed by Kennedy et al. (2007, 2010) concerned the carbon metabolic processes of different metropolitan areas and deciphered the impact of urban designing and transportation infrastructure on the urban metabolic processes in different cities [28,29]. Moreover, Kennedy et al. (2011, 2014) also pointed out the robustness of urban metabolism application to the low-carbon urban design [30,31]. In the context of growing contradiction between socioeconomic development and the ecological environment, urban metabolism studies have been extensively carried out for developing low-carbon urban ecosystems [12]. Many components of the urban metabolism, such as energy [32], water [33,34], land [35], carbon [36], nitrogen [37], and phosphorus [38], have been investigated. Perspectives such as the energy–carbon nexus [39–42] and land–carbon nexus [26] have been used to analyze the spatial characteristics and temporal changes of an urban carbon metabolism. The linkage between urban metabolism and the land-use changes are essential to reveal the functional mechanisms of carbon transfers [43,44]. Substantial efforts have been devoted to characterizing the variabilities of urban carbon budgets associated with land-use changes, based on 3S technologies. For example, Hutyra et al. (2011) analyzed how spatial distributions of carbon sequestration and emissions were affected by urban expansion [45]. Moreover, a 4D-GIS database was used to trace material stock accompanied by urban development in cities of the UK and Japan [46]. These studies provided good examples of the interpretation of spatial urban metabolism. A recent study reviewed the state-of-the-art research on the spatialization of urban metabolism [47]. They show that recent spatial studies related urban carbon metabolism mainly focused on the modelling of spatial heterogeneity of utilities of urban resources (such as energy and land) and the resulting complex carbon ﬂows or carbon footprint. Due to the complex interactions among the components of an urban system and the frequency of the carbon ﬂows [48,49], urban carbon metabolism based on land-use changes is seldomly analyzed regarding the changing center of gravity of carbon ﬂows. Never- theless, the gravity center could provide key information to recognize the spatiotemporal Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 3 of 23 variation of carbon emissions related to land use [50–52], and also reﬂect the changing carbon sequestration of land cover in space, thus supporting carbon-neutral strategies [53]. Therefore, when the carbon ﬂows related with land-use change can be quantiﬁed from a spatial perspective, feasible paths could be identiﬁed that offer a chance to modify a city’s urban carbon metabolism and thereby move towards carbon neutrality. Ecological network analysis has become an effective tool that is widely used in urban metabolic analysis [41,54], from which the carbon exchanges within a metabolic network as a consequence of land-use changes can be recognized from a network perspective [55]. Examples include analyzing the spatial distribution and the transfer mechanisms for urban carbon metabolism; identifying the processes that increase or decrease carbon stocks [56]; and quantifying the spatial and temporal changes of carbon ﬂows to understand an urban metabolic network. This perspective is important because different land uses have different carbon emission and sequestration characteristics, so changing the land use can greatly change the carbon balance. This approach also provides a macro-scale method to guide low-carbon development to balance a city’s carbon metabolism [57,58], thereby reducing or eliminating disorders in a city’s carbon metabolism. In the current work, we set out to conduct a systematic study to visualize the migration of carbon ﬂows related to land-use change and propose potential paths that cities can follow to achieve carbon neutrality. We also discuss how different land-use patterns moved the city either towards or away from carbon neutrality during the processes of urbanization. We combine the natural and socioeconomic components together into the urban metabolic system using the ENA method to quantify the variation of carbon ﬂows, and to analyze the centers of gravity of carbon ﬂows for future urban spatial planning. The target Beijing was used as a case study owing to its representativeness. Beijing has undergone rapid urbanization and ranked as one of the most developed cities in China, accompanied by annually abundant energy consumption, large amounts of carbon emissions, and severe shortage of land resources. It is one of the few cities that has announced peak carbon emissions [59–61], in contrast to those megacities, such as Shanghai and Shenzhen, which are still facing increasing carbon emissions during the studied period [62,63]. Beijing city is experiencing urban shrink to increase carbon sinks, in contrast to most cities of China which are still expanding their urban body. Therefore, the study of the spatiotemporal variabilities of carbon metabolism taking Beijing as a case can provide critical information and knowledge for the peak carbon emissions of other cities. Using Beijing as a case study, we analyzed the urban carbon ﬂows from 1990 to 2018 that were associated with land use and energy consumption changes. Moreover, we analyze changes in the center of gravity of carbon ﬂows, which have been widely used as a good indicator to characterize the spatial variabilities of carbon ﬂows during urban development, for estimating future urban spatial planning. This study is expected to support urban planning to reduce the gap between carbon emission and sequestration. 2. Methods 2.1. Model Framework The models we used in this paper were developed in previous research by our research group [64]. Based on the availability of data, we deﬁned eight nodes in the network: urban land, rural land, transportation and industrial land, cultivated land, forest, grassland, bodies of water, and bare land (i.e., unused land) including artiﬁcial, semi-natural, and natural types (Figure 1). We focus on the changes in direct carbon emissions caused by energy consumption, indirect carbon emission by the land use and natural carbon sequestration process for exploring carbon-neutral paths in the present study. Speciﬁcally, we set out to identify potential paths a city could follow to achieve carbon neutrality, and how different land-use patterns moved the city either towards or away from carbon neutrality during the process of urbanization. We identiﬁed the key nodes in the urban network during each period; analyzed the spatial and temporal changes of the integrated (direct plus indirect) and direct carbon ﬂows; used GIS software to describe the spatial Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 23 we set out to identify potential paths a city could follow to achieve carbon neutrality, and how different land-use patterns moved the city either towards or away from carbon neu- trality during the process of urbanization. We identified the key nodes in the urban net- work during each period; analyzed the spatial and temporal changes of the integrated Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 4 of 23 (direct plus indirect) and direct carbon flows; used GIS software to describe the spatial distribution of the carbon flows in each period; analyzed how the center of gravity for carbon flows moved over time; and discuss a scenario with different possible paths based distribution of the carbon ﬂows in each period; analyzed how the center of gravity for on current urbanization plans. carbon ﬂows moved over time; and discuss a scenario with different possible paths based on current urbanization plans. Figure 1. Framework for the urban carbon metabolic network used to study the effects of land-use Figure 1. Framework for the urban carbon metabolic network used to study the effects of land-use change on the potential to achieve carbon neutrality. Note: the sub-processes in the red and black change on the potential to achieve carbon neutrality. Note: the sub-processes in the red and black boxes show various socioeconomic activities causing carbon emissions. Carbon density of each boxes show various socioeconomic activities causing carbon emissions. Carbon density of each so- socioeconomic land area was estimated by the sum of emissions from all the sub-processes dividing cioeconomic land area was estimated by the sum of emissions from all the sub-processes dividing its corresponding land area. The red and green arrows represent the carbon exchange between its corresponding land area. The red and green arrows represent the carbon exchange between at- mosphere and biosphere. The atmosphere and black arrow re biosphere. The presen blackts carbo arrow repr n transitions be esents carbon transit tween two ions between components. two components. We obtained data on land uses throughout Beijing from 1990 to 2018, at a 5-year We obtained data on land uses throughout Beijing from 1990 to 2018, at a 5-year in- interval for 1990–2015 and a 3-year interval for 2015–2018 at a spatial resolution of 30 m terval for 1990–2015 and a 3-year interval for 2015–2018 at a spatial resolution of 30 m detailed in Section 2.5 and summarized the areas during each of the years in this period detailed in Section 2.5 and summarized the areas during each of the years in this period (Table S1). We then added this information to version 10.5 of the ArcMap GIS software (Table S1). We then added this information to version 10.5 of the ArcMap GIS software (www.esri.com (accessed on 22 March 2022)) to calculate the change in land use during (www.esri.com (accessed on 22 March 2022)) to calculate the change in land use during each period. Based on the resulting land transfer matrices (Tables S2–S7), we calculated the change in metabolic capacity of each land use (i.e., whether it was a net emission each period. Based on the resulting land transfer matrices (Tables S2–S7), we calculated source or a net sequestration sink) to support ecological network analysis. Using these the change in metabolic capacity of each land use (i.e., whether it was a net emission data, we identiﬁed land-use transitions that increased or decreased the city’s ability to source or a net sequestration sink) to support ecological network analysis. Using these achieve carbon neutrality. For instance, the path from transportation and industrial land to data, we identified land-use transitions that increased or decreased the city’s ability to forest increased the land’s carbon sequestration potential and therefore helped to achieve achieve carbon neutrality. For instance, the path from transportation and industrial land carbon neutrality, whereas the reverse transition increased the land’s carbon emissions and to forest increased the land’s carbon sequestration potential and therefore helped to therefore reduced the ability to achieve carbon neutrality. achieve carbon neutrality, whereas the reverse transition increased the land’s carbon emis- We also used the GIS software to visualize the pattern of carbon ﬂows to reveal the spa- sions and therefore reduced the ability to achieve carbon neutrality. tial variability of these ﬂows and their changes over time. The analysis provided an explicit and integrated method for the natural activities of land with the energy consumption that We also used the GIS software to visualize the pattern of carbon flows to reveal the occurs in that land to reveal the mechanisms that underlie an urban carbon metabolism. spatial variability of these flows and their changes over time. The analysis provided an explicit and integrated method for the natural activities of land with the energy consump- 2.2. Carbon Flow Calculations tion that occurs in that land to reveal the mechanisms that underlie an urban carbon me- The urbanization process causes land-use changes that increase or decrease carbon tabolism. storage. The carbon calculations of direct carbon emission from transportation and indus- trial land, urban land, rural land and cultivated land were based on Chinese data on the Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 5 of 23 consumption of each energy type detailed in Section 2.5, and the IPCC emission factors [65] are summarized in Tables S8 and S9. The accounting items were calculated as listed below: C = k m (1) Ei Ei i C = k p (2) Er Er i C = c f + c s + c a + cs (3) El 1 3 I where C represents the carbon emissions from energy consumption, C , are the car- Er Ei bon emissions from respiration by the city’s population and livestock breeding and C El represents the carbon emissions from agriculture (carried by cultivated land); k and k Ei Er represents the carbon emission coefﬁcients; m represents the consumption of energy type i (as standard tons coal equivalent, tce); p represents the number of humans and livestock (Table S10); f represents the mass of fertilizer; a represents the total use of agriculture machinery (represented by the engine power) ; s and s represents the area of irrigated land and dry cultivated land; and the c values are the conversion coefﬁcients (Table S11). Then, carbon emission of transportation and industrial land can be calculated by Equation (1), and carbon emissions of urban and rural land could be calculated by the sum of C and C . Er Ei The natural metabolic processes included carbon sequestration by natural activities, and were derived from four components (forest, grassland, water, and cultivated land). We used the following equation: C = k s (4) Si i i where C represents the carbon sequestration by natural components; s represents the area of the land use; and k represents the carbon sequestration coefﬁcient of each natural component (Table S12). In the urban carbon metabolic network, we ﬁrstly calculated the carbon density of nodes: w = C /s (5) i i where w represents the carbon density of nodes; for cultivated land, C = C C , for i El Si other land use types, and C is the carbon metabolic rate of C and C . i E S Commonly, carbon ﬂows are from i to j in an urban ecosystem and are shown as the ﬂow (f ) and the interactions among the network’s components are shown in Figure 1. ji These changes between land uses i and j can be described by the following equations: w w DS (i 6= j) i j ji f = Dw DS = (6) ji ji ji w + w DS (i = j) i j ji where f (kg C year ) represents the carbon ﬂow from node i to node j; Dw represents ji ji the differences in the carbon density between nodes along each path between nodes (i.e., different land-use transitions); DS , the area variation of the land use changing from i to ji j, is obtained from the land-use transfer matrices. Additionally, Dw > 0 represents net ji carbon emissions; Dw < 0 represents net carbon sequestration. To make outcomes more ji accurate, we applied standard deviation, mean value and 95% conﬁdential intervals to evaluate the statistical differences. We calculated the mean value, standard deviation, and 95% conﬁdence interval (CI) to account for the differences of carbon emission densities. Among these components, urban land ﬂuctuated most obviously, ranging from 1.09 to 5.21 (95% CI) and deviating from its mean value by 47.1% (3.15 1.48). Subsequently, we also used ecological network analysis to calculate the integrated ﬂows (direct plus indirect). The integrated input ﬂows matrix N [66] was accounted for: 0 1 k 1 N = (n ) = G + G + ...G = (I G) (7) ij where k represents the number of components while 0 represents exchanges within a com- ponent; I represents the identity matrix; G represents the direct ﬂow intensity matrix which Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 6 of 23 is calculated by g = f /T , where T represents the throughﬂow of node j. Additionally, ij ij j j the dimensional integral ﬂow matrix Y is calculated as Y = diag(T)N to represent the contribution weights of the sum of self-feedback and the direct effect, where T is the total integrated throughﬂow of each node. Detailed calculation procedures and the deﬁnition of carbon ﬂows have been described previously [67]. 2.3. Spatial Gradients for the Carbon Flows We characterized the spatial changes of the urban carbon metabolism based on the cascade of land-use changes over time, which created gradients in the spatial distribution of the carbon metabolic processes. Many methods have been proposed to reﬂect the spatial heterogeneity of urban carbon metabolism, such as inversion of remote sensing data [68], spatial assignment based on accounting [67], and spatial interpolation [69] based on the sample plot observation. Considering the research objectives of the present study and feasibility, we selected the spatial assignment method based on carbon accounting to study the gradient changes for the integrated carbon ﬂows. The different metabolic capacities of the different metabolic components in the carbon metabolic network changed the total direct ﬂows and the integrated (direct plus indirect) input ﬂows that created the spatial gradients. Based on the integrated ﬂows, we considered the sums of the row vectors and column vectors for matrix Y, which reﬂected the weights of the contribution rates S y i ij and S y , thereby obtaining the total direct and integrated input ﬂows for each metabolic j ij component. We then imported the results into the ArcMap software to calculate the spatial gradients and their distribution to reﬂect the changes in the total direct and integrated inputs from other metabolic components. Here, we deﬁned the gradient as the change in carbon sequestration or emission between the start and end of a given period (e.g., high gradient category area representing rapid carbon transition). We used the Natural Breaks method provided by ArcGIS (www.esri.com (accessed on 22 March 2022)) to classify the optimal results automatically classiﬁed into ﬁve grades (Table S13) based on the method of Xia et al. (2019a) [67]. 2.4. Center of Gravity for the Carbon Flows Through the migration of the gravity center of carbon ﬂows in each gradient, we can explore the direction and location of carbon ﬂows as a consequence of land-use changes. Therefore, to determine the spatial distribution and overall trend for the carbon ﬂows, we used the center of gravity method [50]. We assumed that Beijing represented a homoge- neous plane, so that the input ﬂows for each metabolic component could be transformed into a point with a weight and so that the center of the region represented an equilibrium point based on the weights of the metabolic agents. The changes in the center of gravity over time indicated changes in the direct and integrated input ﬂows throughout the study area, which reﬂected the spatial variation of the gradients that contributed to the direct and integrated input ﬂows. We used ArcMap to create maps of the input ﬂows based on the results of the direct and integrated ﬂows. The location of the center of gravity was calculated as follows: X = M x / M , Y = M y / M (8) t t å ti i å ti å ti i å ti where X and Y represent the longitude and latitude of the center of gravity in year t; M t t ti represents the input ﬂows of gradient i in year t; and x and y are the longitude and latitude i i of the center of gravity for gradient i in year t. 2.5. Case Study and Data Sources In this paper, we used Beijing as a case study to analyze changes in a city’s carbon metabolism network during urbanization. Beijing, China’s capital, has a large population (more than 7.5 10 people throughout the study period), high energy consumption, and an extensive transportation network [70]. Apart from its unusually large size, it is a typical metropolis in China. From 1990 to 2018, Beijing’s total gross domestic product Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 23 2.5. Case Study and Data Sources In this paper, we used Beijing as a case study to analyze changes in a city’s carbon metabolism network during urbanization. Beijing, China’s capital, has a large population (more than 7.5×10 people throughout the study period), high energy consumption, and Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 7 of 23 an extensive transportation network [70]. Apart from its unusually large size, it is a typical metropolis in China. From 1990 to 2018, Beijing’s total gross domestic product (GDP) in- creased by about 66 times, while the energy consumption increased by nearly three times (GDP) increased by about 66 times, while the energy consumption increased by nearly [71]. Rapid land-use changes took place during the urbanization. Based on the land-use three times [71]. Rapid land-use changes took place during the urbanization. Based on the data in each year (Figure S1) and a digital elevation model (Figure S2), Beijing’s elevation land-use data in each year (Figure S1) and a digital elevation model (Figure S2), Beijing’s was highest in the west and lowest in the east. The center of the urban land was mostly in elevation was highest in the west and lowest in the east. The center of the urban land was the city’s southeastern plains region, and expanded towards the periphery of the south- mostly in the city’s southeastern plains region, and expanded towards the periphery of eastern plains. This is because this kind of terrain is highly suitable for urban develop- the southeastern plains. This is because this kind of terrain is highly suitable for urban ment. The construction land developed rapidly at first, then its development slowed, lead- development. The construction land developed rapidly at ﬁrst, then its development ing to a large reduction in green areas (i.e., natural components of the city) and especially slowed, leading to a large reduction in green areas (i.e., natural components of the city) cultivated land [72], leading to a growing imbalance of the city’s carbon metabolism. After and especially cultivated land [72], leading to a growing imbalance of the city’s carbon the city reached a mature stage, with relatively stable urban construction, the metabolism metabolism. After the city reached a mature stage, with relatively stable urban construction, changed into a system with intensive resource utilization that produced different carbon the metabolism changed into a system with intensive resource utilization that produced flows in the process of intensification on account of the urgent needs to construct an eco- different carbon ﬂows in the process of intensiﬁcation on account of the urgent needs to logical urban system. Thus, Beijing provides a good case study to illustrate which carbon construct an ecological urban system. Thus, Beijing provides a good case study to illustrate flow paths caused by the rapid land-use changes would increase or decrease carbon emis- which carbon ﬂow paths caused by the rapid land-use changes would increase or decrease sions, and would therefore move the city farther from or closer to carbon neutrality. Fi- carbon emissions, and would therefore move the city farther from or closer to carbon nally, this analysis will reveal some possible paths the city could follow to help it towards neutrality. Finally, this analysis will reveal some possible paths the city could follow to help carbon neutrality through appropriate changes in the city’s land-use policy. it towards carbon neutrality through appropriate changes in the city’s land-use policy. The data used in our study included energy use, population, carbon emission coeffi- The data used in our study included energy use, population, carbon emission coefﬁ- cients, and the quantity of livestock for Beijing, which we obtained from the Beijing Sta- cients, and the quantity of livestock for Beijing, which we obtained from the Beijing Statis- tistical Yearbook [71,73,74], China Energy Statistical Yearbook [75–79] and IPCC (2006) tical Yearbook [71,73,74], China Energy Statistical Yearbook [75–79] and IPCC (2006) [65]. [65]. The metabolic rates of the socioeconomic and natural components were calculated The metabolic rates of the socioeconomic and natural components were calculated in 1−1 in kg C year . The spatially explicit land-use data were obtained at a scale of 1:100,000 for kg C year . The spatially explicit land-use data were obtained at a scale of 1:100,000 for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2018 from the Institute of Geographic Sciences and 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2018 from the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (https://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on 22 March 2022)). We Natural Resources Research (https://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on 22 March 2022)). We used ArcGIS to calculate a transition matrix between consecutive years to describe the used ArcGIS to calculate a transition matrix between consecutive years to describe the change in change in land land use use and re and repr present the flows esent the ﬂows in in the the c city’s ity’s carb carbon on m metabolism. etabolism. T The he sourc source e da data ta fo for r Figur Figure e 1 1 ar are e fr free eely ly obtained obtainedonline online (h (https://image.so.com/ ttps://image.so.com/,, ((accessed accessed on on 2 22 2 Ma Mar rch ch 2022)), and are from the above-mentioned databases for Figures 2–7. 2022)), and are from the above-mentioned databases for Figures 2–7. Figure 2. (a) Carbon emission and sequestration in each year. Direct (b) and integrated (c) carbon Figure 2. (a) Carbon emission and sequestration in each year. Direct (b) and integrated (c) carbon flows through the network in each period. Note: F, forest; G, grassland; W, bodies of water; U, urban ﬂows through the network in each period. Note: F, forest; G, grassland; W, bodies of water; U, urban land; R, rural land; T, transportation and industrial land; B, bare land; C, cultivated land; C- land; R, rural land; T, transportation and industrial land; B, bare land; C, cultivated land; C-emission, carbon emission from cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sequestration produced by cultivated land. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Healthem 2022ission , 19, 5793 , carbon emission from cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sequestration produc 8 ofed 23 by culti- emission, carbon emission from cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sequestration produced by culti- vated land. vated land. Figure 3. Spatial distribution of direct carbon ﬂows in each period (the ﬂows that are shown account Figure 3. Spatial distribution of direct carbon flows in each period (the flows that are shown account Figure 3. Spatial distribution of direct carbon flows in each period (the flows that are shown account for at least 80% of the total ﬂows). Note: the ﬂows related to bare land were too small to show in for at least 80% of the total flows). Note: the flows related to bare land were too small to show in the for at least 80% of the total flows). Note: the flows related to bare land were too small to show in the the ﬁgure. figure. figure. Figure 4. Spatial distribution of integrated carbon ﬂows during each period (the ﬂows that are shown Figure 4. Spatial distribution of integrated carbon flows during each period (the flows that are Figure 4. Spatial distribution of integrated carbon flows during each period (the flows that are account for at least 80% of the total ﬂows). Note: the ﬂows related to bare land were too small to shown account for at least 80% of the total flows). Note: the flows related to bare land were too small shown account for at least 80% of the total flows). Note: the flows related to bare land were too small show in the ﬁgure. to show in the figure. to show in the figure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 9 of 23 Figure 5. Migration of the center of gravity for the direct ﬂow gradients. Note: gradient category I Figure 5. Migration of the center of gravity for the direct flow gradients. Note: gradient category I disappeared from 2000 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018, gradient category II disappeared from 2015 disappeared from 2000 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018, gradient category II disappeared from 2015 to 2018, and gradient category III disappeared from 2005 to 2010; numbered rectangles refer to the to 2018, and gradient category III disappeared from 2005 to 2010; numbered rectangles refer to the gradient maps surrounding the overall map. gradient maps surrounding the overall map. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 10 of 23 Figure 6. Changes in the location of the integrated gradient’s center of gravity. Note: Areas with Figure 6. Changes in the location of the integrated gradient’s center of gravity. Note: Areas with gradient I disappeared from 2005 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018; areas with gradients II or III gradient I disappeared from 2005 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018; areas with gradients II or III disap- disappeared from 1995 to 2000; Numbered rectangles refer to the gradient maps surrounding the peared from 1995 to 2000; Numbered rectangles refer to the gradient maps surrounding the overall overall map. map. Figure 7. Land use maps in Beijing from 2018 to the two planned scenarios (in 2035 and 2060). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 23 Figure 6. Changes in the location of the integrated gradient’s center of gravity. Note: Areas with gradient I disappeared from 2005 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018; areas with gradients II or III disap- Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 11 of 23 peared from 1995 to 2000; Numbered rectangles refer to the gradient maps surrounding the overall map. Figure 7. Land use maps in Beijing from 2018 to the two planned scenarios (in 2035 and 2060). Figure 7. Land use maps in Beijing from 2018 to the two planned scenarios (in 2035 and 2060). 3. Results 3.1. Carbon Flows in the Urban Metabolic System The total carbon emissions increased from 10.69 Mt C in 1990 to 20.61 Mt C in 2010, followed by steady decease after 2010 and ﬁnally reached 18.64 Mt C in 2018 (Figure 2a). Meanwhile, total carbon sinks varied insigniﬁcantly during 1990–2018, stabilizing at 0.38 Mt C year . At the peak in 2010, total carbon emissions were about 43.5 times higher than the total carbon sink, and this ratio remained high in 2018 (48.5 times). A serious imbalance between carbon emission and carbon sinks existed in Beijing throughout the study period. Meanwhile, the cumulative carbon emissions caused by the land-use and cover changes were 1.16 Mt C from 1990 to 2018 when the harmful ﬂows of network (i.e., increased emission) contributed 15.37 Mt C year and the beneﬁcial ﬂow (i.e., in- creased sequestration) contributed 14.21Mt C year (Figure 2b). Beijing’s total direct and integrated carbon ﬂows showed a volatile trend during the study period, with relatively high values of 5.81–8.07 Mt C year from 1990 to 2000 and from 2010 to 2015, and with relatively low values of 1.08–1.97 Mt C year from 2000 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018. The changes in network ﬂows (direct and integrated) were inconsistent with the changes in carbon emissions, depending on land sources consumed during urban expansion. As the dominant components in Beijing’s carbon metabolism, transportation and industrial land contributed an average of 64.9% of the total carbon emissions, 46.0% of the total direct ﬂows (beneﬁcial and harmful ﬂows), and 39.5% of the total integrated ﬂows, respectively. As a result of the increasing energy consumption by industrial production and the transportation, storage, postal, and telecommunications services industries, emissions increased from 7.29 Mt C in 1990 to 11.06 Mt C in 2018. Due to the high metabolic density, slight changes in the area of transportation and industrial land caused large carbon ﬂows, with an average contribution of 40.7%~51.3% to the direct network ﬂows. During the study period, relative contributions of transportation and industrial land to carbon emissions decreased from 68.2% to 59.4% (Figure 2a). Meanwhile, its relative contributions to network ﬂows decreased sharply from 51.8% to 9.1% (Figure 2b,c). In urban land, the carbon emission experienced the largest increase from 2.01 Mt C in 1990 to 7.13 Mt C in 2018, mainly because of the industrial structure upgrading after 2005. In addition, ca. 2.2% of the total carbon emissions were caused by human respiration, which contributed 0.46 Mt C year in 2018. Carbon emissions from rural land decreased sharply from 1.51 Mt C in 2015 to 0.38 Mt C in 2018, which mostly resulted from a large reduction in coal consumption which decreased carbon emission by 1.12 Mt C year . Large network ﬂows produced by urban and rural land occurred from 1990 to 1995 and from 2010 to 2018 due to a reduction in the growth rate of urban land and a conversion of this land to transportation and industrial land. In addition, carbon emissions from cultivated land showed a continuous decreasing trend for the large reduction from fertilizer. The relative Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 12 of 23 contributions of this land to network ﬂows slightly increased as the land area sacriﬁced during urbanization. For natural sectors, forest accounted for 91.3 0.8% of the total carbon sink, and was the main reason for the peaking of carbon sink in 1995 (0.40 Mt C). In contrast, the carbon sink from grassland, bodies of water, and cultivated land only accounted for 3.1 0.2, 4.9 0.1, and 0.9 0.2% of the total during the study period, respectively. Positive carbon ﬂows were inﬂuenced by forest, grassland, and bodies of water, which contributed the positive carbon ﬂows of 0.96, 0.51 and 0.28 Mt C year , respectively, during the study period. Total integrated ﬂows from forest, grassland, and bodies of water accounted for averages of 7.3, 3.9, and 2.7%, respectively, of the total during the study period. Generally, integrated ﬂows from these three components contributed relatively small ﬂows to the network, but showed a large increasing trend, from 0.27, 0.14, and 0.08 Mt C year , respectively, from 1995 to 2000 to 0.77, 0.42, and 0.18 Mt C year from 2010 to 2015. Most of the integrated ﬂows for forest, grassland, and bodies of water were caused by integrated input ﬂows from the socioeconomic sectors. As the urban expansion mainly derived from consumption of cultivated land, the natural components were slightly inﬂuenced by the socioeconomic sectors initially, but became more signiﬁcantly inﬂuenced since 2015. 3.2. Spatial Distribution of Carbon Flows To analyze how the carbon ﬂows inﬂuence urban carbon metabolism and acquire a better understanding of the carbon metabolic network, we started by focusing on the direct ﬂows. In Figure 3, the direct ﬂows were generally dominated by the paths re- lated to transportation and industrial land, which accounted for an average of 83.5% of the ﬂows during the study period. The path transportation and industrial land ! culti- vated land, the ﬁrst contributed path (i.e., the path with the largest ﬂow), decreased from 1 1 1.17 Mt C year from 1990 to 1995 to 0.01 Mt C year from 2005 to 2010, then increased 1 1 slightly to 0.47 Mt C year from 2010 to 2015 and then decreased to 0.37 kt C year . The major paths differed among the periods. From 1990 to 1995, direct ﬂows were dominated by the urban land! transportation and industrial land path and the transporta- tion and industrial land ! cultivated land path, which accounted for 66.6% and 69.2% of the direct ﬂows, respectively, from urban land and transportation and industrial land. The paths from transportation and industrial land to other land use types contributed 18.4% of the total direct ﬂows. In contrast, the carbon ﬂows paths from 1995 to 2000 were dominated by the rural land ! transportation and industrial land path, the transportation and indus- trial land ! cultivated land path, and the cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land path, which contributed 87.9, 39.1, and 87.1% of the direct ﬂows, respectively, from rural land, transportation and industrial land, and cultivated land. The direct ﬂows from transportation and industrial land to other land use types increased to 26.1% of the total direct ﬂows as the scale reduction existed in transportation and industrial land (i.e., causing massive carbon transition) which resulted in large carbon ﬂows. This could explain the temporal changes of the harmful effects from transportation and industrial land during the study period. After 2000, the land use changes slowed, and the total direct ﬂows were 1 1 0. 89 Mt C year from 2000 to 2005 and 0.71 Mt C year from 2005 to 2010. The paths in the two periods were dominated by the transportation and industrial land ! culti- vated land path and the cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land path, which contributed 48.1 and 42.1% of the total direct ﬂows, respectively. From 2010 to 2015, the total direct ﬂows in the network increased to 3.55 Mt C year and the main paths were dominated by the transportation and industrial land ! rural land path and the cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land path, which accounted for 42.7 and 65.4% of the direct ﬂows, respectively, from transportation and industrial land and cultivated land. The paths from forest, grassland, urban land, and rural land to transportation and industrial land increased obviously compared to the ﬂows from 2005 to 2010, which contributed 22.9% of the total direct ﬂows. Interestingly, the changes of the direct ﬂows between trans- portation and industrial land and forest were similar to the changes of the total direct ﬂows, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 13 of 23 and contributed 11.1 and 13.4% of the total direct ﬂows from 1995 to 2000 and from 2010 to 2015. From 2015 to 2018, the total direct ﬂows decreased to 1.08 Mt C year , which were dominated by urban land ! rural land and cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land, which accounted for 36.2 and 31.1%, respectively, of the total direct ﬂows. Based on the analysis in Section 3.1, the total network ﬂows decreased from 1990 to 2010, mainly due to the decrease in the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic sectors and cultivated land and the decrease of the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic and natural sectors, with decreases of 8.5 and 4.8%, respectively; these ﬂows accounted for an average of 75.6 and 23.9% of the total integrated ﬂows, respectively. On the other hand, the network’s total integrated ﬂows decreased, mostly due to decreases in the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic sectors and cultivated land, the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic metabolic components, and the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic and natural sectors, with decreases of 9.9, 7.5, and 10.8%, respectively, which accounted for an average of 39.8, 34.5, and 25.9% of the total integrated ﬂows from 2010 to 2018. Figure 4 shows the variation in integrated ﬂows in Beijing from 1990 to 2018. We found that the main path from 1990 to 1995 and from 2000 to 2005 was cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land, which accounted for 35.2 and 42.5% of the total integrated ﬂows, respectively. The paths from 1995 to 2000 and from 2010 to 2015 had similarly large carbon ﬂows, dominated by the cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land path (15.6%, 12.9%), the transportation and industrial land ! cultivated land path (13.8%, 9.5%), the paths from transportation and industrial land to the natural sectors (11.5%, 9.4%), and the paths between the socioeconomic sectors (34.9%, 32.7%). The ﬂows from 2005 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018 were less than in the other periods, and were mainly inﬂuenced by the transportation and industrial land ! cultivated land path, which accounted for 78.6 and 24.5% of the total integrated ﬂows, respectively. In general, integrated ﬂows through the network decreased at an average annual rate of 3.8%, mainly due to decreased carbon ﬂows in the socioeconomic sectors. The main path from cultivated land to the socioeconomic sectors and the paths between each socioeconomic component accounted for 29.5 and 31.7% of the integrated ﬂows during the study period. The main paths in each period were mainly determined by Beijing’s land-use policies during the different developmental stages. The area of each land-use type changed from stable increases or decreases to ﬂuctuation. Overall, the growth of carbon-neutral paths from 1990 to 2000 related to cultivated land and transportation and industrial land, mainly due to increases in the areas of transportation and industrial land. After China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, the fast growth of economy further relied on the rapid urban expansion from 2000 to 2010. As the urban system gradually stabilized, the govern- ment began to prioritize low-carbon and green development, and managing the spatial distribution of these areas became priorities from 2010 to 2018. Thus, the increasing ﬂows along the paths between socioeconomic components generally resulted from these more sustainable land-use policies. However, the ﬂows from cultivated land to transportation and industrial land remained high after 2010 and led to high net carbon emissions. 3.3. Changes of the Centers of Gravity 3.3.1. Changing Center of Gravity for Direct Flows Based on the direct ﬂow gradients in Figure S4, we calculated the spatial distribution of the gradient center of gravity of the direct input ﬂows (Figure 5). From 1990 to 2018, the overall gradient center of gravity (i.e., the value for all gradient categories combined) for the direct input ﬂows was located in the southeastern plains, up to 8 km from the north of the center (plains) and 8 to 14 km from the large areas of category I gradient, although some areas in this category existed north and west of the overall gradient center of gravity. Furthermore, the overall gradient center of gravity was at the intersection of other category gradients and the intersection mostly related to the areas with ﬂows in the highest and second-highest categories (I and II), whereas the areas in category III were slightly scattered and far from the overall gradient center of gravity, followed by the second-lowest and Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 14 of 23 lowest categories (IV and V, respectively). Therefore, the overall gradient center of gravity and its migration were mainly affected by categories I and II, followed by category III. During the study period, the location of the gradient center of gravity for the direct input ﬂows moved southward by 14.4 km, towards the center of southeast plains, and reached the center of the southeast plains in 2010, after which it kept moving southward by about 1.35 km from 2010 to 2018. The migration direction and distance for the overall gradient center of gravity changed over time. From 1990 to 2000, the center of gravity moved farthest (13.5 km) along an az- imuth of 12 . The migration direction for the category I gradient (1400 to 5000 kt C year ) moved about 7.5 km along an azimuth of 305 , but its migration distance was only about a half of that for the overall gradient center of gravity. The center of gravity for the category II gradient (760 to 1400 kt C year ) moved along an azimuth of 55 and the category III gradient (235 to 760 kt C year ) in the northeastern part of the mountainous area migrated along an azimuth of 330 . Thus, the overall trend was dominated by the combined effects of the category I, II, and III gradients. From 2000 to 2005, the overall gradient center of gravity continued to move northward, and its migration direction was relatively small. Compared to the previous period, the overall gradient center of gravity migrated along an azimuth of 200 over a distance of 6.8 km, which was mainly due to the decreased direct input ﬂows in the southeastern plains. The category I gradient disappeared while the migration toward the overall gradient center of gravity weakened sharply, and the category II gradient therefore dominated the migration of the overall gradient center of gravity. From 2005 to 2015, the increased direct input ﬂows in the center of the southeastern plains, causing the overall gradient center of gravity moving along an azimuth of 25 over a distance of 7.2 km, mainly as a result of the category I gradient’s center of gravity moving 4.5 km along an azimuth of 250 while the category II gradient’s center of gravity migrated along an azimuth of 165 over a distance of 8.1 km. From 2015 to 2018, the overall gradient center of gravity moved along an azimuth of 242 by 7.7 km, mainly as a result of migration of the category III gradient’s center of gravity along an azimuth of 120 over a distance of 35 km and migration of the category IV gradient’s center of gravity 18 km along an azimuth of 205 . Generally, the occurrence of a category I gradient was mostly caused by the decreasing area of cultivated land and expansion of the area of transportation and industrial land from 1990 to 2000 and from 2005 to 2015. These both resulted in migration of the overall gradient center of gravity along an azimuth of 12 and 25 , mainly due to rapid land-use changes in the northern periphery of the southeastern plains. Meanwhile, the migration of the gravity center for the direct ﬂow gradients would be mainly dominated by the changing land use in the northern part of Beijing, due to the contemporaneous expansion of land areas of Beijing Capital International Airport and restoration of water of bodies. However, the overall center of gravity moved along an azimuth of 205 , which suggests the need to improve the spatial distribution of carbon emission to promote low-carbon urban development; that is, it will be necessary to develop a subcenter to mitigate carbon emission from the center of the plains area. Although the migration of the center of gravity was related to the activities of the socioeconomic sectors, the urban system became increasingly mature. The land-use patterns gradually stabilized, which is why the category III and IV gradients inﬂuenced the overall gradient center of gravity in the period 2015–2018. 3.3.2. Changing Center of Gravity for Integrated Flows Based on the integrated input ﬂow gradients shown in Figure S5, we mapped the spatial distribution of the overall gradient’s center of gravity (i.e., the value for all gradient categories combined) shown in Figure 6. From 1990 to 2018, the distribution of the input gradient center of gravity was similar to that of the direct input ﬂows, which were also located in the north of the center of the southeast plains and the west areas of the northeast of the center (plains) with a category I gradient. As in the case of the direct input ﬂows, the areas of intersection between gradients mostly occurred where category I, II, and II Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 15 of 23 gradients occurred for the integrated input ﬂows and the intersection with the gradient I center of gravity was largest, followed by the category II and III gradients. However, the distribution of the overall input gradient center of gravity were southeast of the direct input ﬂows, which was closer to the category I and II input areas; that is, it was within 6 to 7 km north of the center of the southeastern plains, and another that was 4 to 12 km from the large areas of transportation and industrial land in the east. In addition, some category I and II areas existed in the northern and western parts of Beijing. The input gradient center of gravity generally moved southward; that is, it moved to areas closed to the center of the southeastern plains. The total movement was 9.1 km and the input gradient center of gravity shifted to an azimuth of 205 . The migration distance and direction differed greatly between periods. The migration distance was greater and the migration direction different from 1990 to 2000 than from 2000 to 2010. The overall input gradient center of gravity migrated 9.4 km along an azimuth of 245 . This resulted from a large shift southwards of the category I gradient’s center of gravity, which was along an azimuth of 105 and 1.5 times the migration distance of the overall input gradient center of gravity but differed from the overall input gradient’s center of gravity direction, which was along an azimuth of 350 and migration of the category II gradient (13 km), which was close to that of the overall input gradient center of gravity with an azimuth of 10 but greater than the overall input migration distance (6.9 km) and the weakening impacts of the category III gradient, which moved 10.8 km in the opposite direction of the overall input gradient center of gravity. From 2000 to 2005, the overall input gradient center of gravity migrated southward by 4.4 m along an azimuth of 85 . This was mainly because the ﬂow decrease in the southeastern plains was greater than that in the northwestern mountainous areas, and areas in the east with a category I gradient center of gravity moved 2.7 km along an azimuth of 355 . Due to the simultaneous decrease in the overall integrated ﬂows in Beijing, a faster decrease occurred in the northwestern mountainous areas, which further weakened the migration of the gradient in northwest mountainous areas toward the overall input gradient center of gravity; that is, the centers of gravity of the category III gradient, category IV gradient (76 to 235 kt C year ), and category V gradient (0 to 76 kt C year ) all turned to the east. The nearly homogeneous distribution of gradients in the southeastern plains also caused the overall input gradient center of gravity to migrate east. From 2005 to 2010, the overall input gradient center of gravity continued to shift northeastward, by 7.2 km. The main reason for this migration trajectory was a further decrease of the integrated input ﬂows in the southeastern plains caused by the disappearance of the category I gradient in the center of the study area and most of its periphery, and movement of the gradient II and III centers of gravity northward. From 2010 to 2015, the category I gradient was sufﬁciently common in the southeastern plains that migration of the category II gradient center of gravity could not offset the northward migration of the overall input gradient center of gravity, leading to a southwestward transfer. After 2015, the overall integrated input ﬂows decreased obviously, leading to disappearance of the category I gradient in the southeastern plains. The overall input gradient center of gravity was mainly inﬂuenced by the category II and III gradients, which migrated southeastward. 4. Discussion and Policy Implication 4.1. Network Characteristics Various groups have employed the ENA method to characterize the spatial and tem- poral changes of carbon ﬂows from the network perspective on regional or city levels in China [26,57,58,64,80]. In the current work, we combined the ENA and GIS methods to estimate spatiotemporal changes in the gravity centers of carbon ﬂows to bridge the rela- tionship between urban form transition and land-use change-related carbon ﬂows transfers. Results indicated that the land-use structure has greatly changed the characteristics of Beijing’s carbon metabolic network. For example, the government’s policy of gradually moving heavy industries outside Beijing, which was implemented starting in 2000, should Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 16 of 23 be modiﬁed to consider the possibility of optimizing the path from transportation and industrial land to cultivated land and other green types as other ways to approach carbon neutrality. Efforts to make these changes will depend on the spatial distribution of land use. In Beijing, this will be inﬂuenced by the “Master plan of Beijing: 2004–2020” and “Beijing 12th Five-Year Plan”, which have the goal of protecting cultivated land from the impacts of expansion of urban land and transportation and industrial land expansion, and by the “Master Plan of Beijing: 2016–2035”, which has the goal of increasing the city’s green areas to offset the increase of carbon emission. To these ends, the uncontrolled expansion of urban land, rural land, and transportation and industrial land will be replaced by more appropriate land uses for overall coordination, and this was the major reason that large negative carbon ﬂows were produced by transportation and industrial land from 2010 to 2015 and by urban land from 2010 to 2018. Despite the increase in the area of rural land from 2010 to 2018, urban intensiﬁcation (to consolidate new residential construction with the goal of achieving a higher population per unit area) is an irresistible trend, which suggests that the increasing area of rural land would be an intermediate stage in the land use management in Beijing. Planners would be more likely to achieve a compact city to promote a reduction in urban and rural construction land, aiming to build a more ecologically and efﬁciently sustainable urban system [21,81]. Furthermore, we observed the trend of the compact city in the period of 2010–2015 and 2015–2018, which would have caused a reduction in urban lands by 19.3% (Tables S5 and S6). Therefore, as China has identiﬁed carbon neutrality as a crucial goal, highly developed cities such as Beijing will need to work harder to optimize the land-use patterns. Thus, urban planners should try to minimize uncontrolled urban expansion and instead focus on increasing the intensity of resource utilization (i.e., increasing its efﬁciency) to minimize carbon emissions. 4.2. Scenario Analysis Analyzing the land use and emission trends provided insights into possible paths to bring Beijing’s metabolism closer to carbon neutrality. Based on the planning map in the “Master plan of Beijing: 2016–2035”, future land use maps (Figure 7) were created using GIS software. On the other hand, the energy indices used to create these maps were based on the “Prospect of Energy and Power Development in China (2020 Edition)”, in which non-fossil fuel energy was predicted to contribute 40 and 81% of the terminal energy consumption in 2035 and 2060, respectively (more detail are presented in Table S14). On account of data from these scenarios from 2018 to 2035 and from 2035 to 2060, we predicted total direct carbon ﬂows of 0.98 and 0.02 Mt C year , respectively, in Beijing’s carbon metabolic network. The corresponding total integrated ﬂows were 1.12 and 0.02 Mt C year , re- spectively. From 2018 to 2035, the main paths were cultivated land ! urban land (37.9%) and rural land ! urban land (32.3%). From 2035 to 2060, the main paths were urban land ! cultivated land (34.2%) and urban land ! rural land (30.3%). Based on the areas of the different land use types in each year (Figure S3), the urban land evolved from fast expansion to a scale reduction, with the carbon metabolic intensity (Table S15) increasing 2 2 2 from 5.1 kg C/m in 2010 to 5.7 kg C/m in 2018 and then decreasing to 1.0 kg C/m in 2060. For the rural land, the carbon metabolic intensity sharply decreased from 1.4 kg C/m in 2010 to 0.2 kg C/m in 2018, mainly caused by eliminating coal consumption in rural land, and became roughly stable at this level from 2018 to 2060. Though the carbon emission from transportation and industrial land decreased, the direct carbon emission was still 2.10 Mt C in 2060, with emission of 8.3 kg C/m in 2060 (Figure 8). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 17 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 23 Figure 8. (a) Direct carbon emission and sinks in 2018, and predicted values in the 2035 and 2060 Figure 8. (a) Direct carbon emission and sinks in 2018, and predicted values in the 2035 and 2060 scenarios; (b) carbon metabolic intensity of the urban socioeconomic components in each year; (c) scenarios; (b) carbon metabolic intensity of the urban socioeconomic components in each year; annual average integrated (direct plus indirect) flows from 2015 to 2018, from 2018 to 2035, and from (c) annual average integrated (direct plus indirect) ﬂows from 2015 to 2018, from 2018 to 2035, and 2035 to 2060. Note: F, forest; G, grassland; W, bodies of water; U, urban land; R, rural land; T, trans- from 2035 to 2060. Note: F, forest; G, grassland; W, bodies of water; U, urban land; R, rural land; T, portation and industrial land; B, bare land; C, cultivated land; C-emission, carbon emission from transportation and industrial land; B, bare land; C, cultivated land; C-emission, carbon emission from cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sinks produced by cultivated land. cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sinks produced by cultivated land. 4.3. Policy Implications Under these scenarios, the gradual maturation of the urban system is expected, leading After quantifying the carbon flows and their changes in response to changing land to low-carbon urban development with increasing green compensation. From 2035 to 2060, use, accurately visualizing the processes that underlie carbon transitions will help plan- forest is predicted to account for almost all of the total direct carbon ﬂows with large ners to explore the possible paths towards carbon neutrality. As our study shows, GIS proportion of integrated ﬂows for offsetting the carbon emission. Although the energy technology permits characterization of the spatial patterns of carbon flows and permits transformation was conducted by decreasing the proportions of the 15 kinds of primary analysis of the spatial pattern of the urban metabolism [84,85]. Our analysis revealed that fossil fuel energy in Beijing, direct carbon emissions will decrease to 11.43 and 4.06 Mt C the eastern parts of Beijing and the surrounding areas are important emission centers, and in 2035 and 2060, respectively, but carbon emissions will still be 26.8 and 9.1 times the the southward migration of the overall gradient center of gravity indicated the develop- carbon sinks in 2035 and 2060, respectively, and will represent carbon emissions 11.01 and ment of a multi-center urban structure that has resulted in areas with a gradient of cate- 3.62 Mt C greater than the sequestration. Meanwhile, a recent study suggested that China gory I in the southeastern plains areas (Figures S4 and S5), which agrees with previous could reduce its net carbon emission by 16% between now and 2060 by increasing carbon research [56,86]. By constantly moving carbon flows to the periphery of the built-up areas storage in forests [82,83]. For Beijing’s ecosystem, the total carbon sinks increased slightly in the southeastern plains, the moving carbon emission to areas outside Beijing could re- during study period, mainly caused by the increasing forest area. lieve pressure on the city’s center. Currently, developing a multi-center urban structure has been shown to be an effective path to reduce carbon emission [87–89] and to improve 4.3. Policy Implications the efficiency of energy use [90,91]. Beijing and other cities in China are facing the chal- After quantifying the carbon ﬂows and their changes in response to changing land use, lenge of forming more compact urban systems to reduce pressure on their surrounding accurately visualizing the processes that underlie carbon transitions will help planners to environment [60]. explore the possible paths towards carbon neutrality. As our study shows, GIS technology However, high energy consumption by the city’s socioeconomic sectors often leads permits characterization of the spatial patterns of carbon ﬂows and permits analysis of the to increased energy intensity [92–94]. As an important part of the urban planning [95], it spatial pattern of the urban metabolism [84,85]. Our analysis revealed that the eastern parts will be necessary to learn how to avoid the effects of this increased compaction, which of Beijing and the surrounding areas are important emission centers, and the southward creates a risk of moving away from carbon neutrality. For example, planning more effi- migration of the overall gradient center of gravity indicated the development of a multi- cient transportation [15] strongly related to the key nodes of urban land and transporta- center urban structure that has resulted in areas with a gradient of category I in the tion and industrial land can improve the ability to develop a multi-center structure in southeastern plains areas (Figures S4 and S5), which agrees with previous research [56,86]. Beijing. In addition, land use in the southeastern plains which links Beijing with the sur- By constantly moving carbon ﬂows to the periphery of the built-up areas in the southeastern rounding cities should be examined to determine the potential for strengthening the in- plains, the moving carbon emission to areas outside Beijing could relieve pressure on the teraction with this region, since that may decrease the city’s carbon emissions [58], partic- city’s center. Currently, developing a multi-center urban structure has been shown to be an ularly if the transportation land at the periphery of the southeastern plains can be ex- effective path to reduce carbon emission [87–89] and to improve the efﬁciency of energy panded to improve transportation efficiency. Thus, more attention should be paid to use [90,91]. Beijing and other cities in China are facing the challenge of forming more changing the development focus, which often involves the sacrifice of green spaces, compact urban systems to reduce pressure on their surrounding environment [60]. thereby providing more sustainable urban planning [96]. For instance, transforming low- However, high energy consumption by the city’s socioeconomic sectors often leads to increased energy intensity [92–94]. As an important part of the urban planning [95], it Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 18 of 23 will be necessary to learn how to avoid the effects of this increased compaction, which creates a risk of moving away from carbon neutrality. For example, planning more efﬁcient transportation [15] strongly related to the key nodes of urban land and transportation and industrial land can improve the ability to develop a multi-center structure in Beijing. In addition, land use in the southeastern plains which links Beijing with the surrounding cities should be examined to determine the potential for strengthening the interaction with this region, since that may decrease the city’s carbon emissions [58], particularly if the transportation land at the periphery of the southeastern plains can be expanded to improve transportation efﬁciency. Thus, more attention should be paid to changing the development focus, which often involves the sacriﬁce of green spaces, thereby providing more sustainable urban planning [96]. For instance, transforming low-quality cultivated land with a low economic value and a low carbon-sink capacity to other land use types can be considerable to improve Beijing’s development in some cases. Finally, although China’s commitment to tackle climate change is strong, it is still not clear how China can achieve its carbon-neutral vision [97,98]. Plans elsewhere in the world use a deadline of 2050, which is earlier than the 2060 deadline that has been set for China. Achieving carbon neutrality will rely on each city’s efforts to follow low-carbon paths, using strategies such as changing the current energy consumption structure [99–101] and developing more effective urban planning [102,103], improving the proportion of clean energy [100]. These paths are popular solutions in some regions to achieve carbon neutrality, and will also be vital to achieve carbon neutrality in China’s cities [97]. 5. Conclusions In this study, we performed a spatially explicit analysis of Beijing’s carbon ﬂows from 1990 to 2018, as well as China’s proposed scenarios for 2035 and 2060, to explore the possible paths to reduce carbon emission reduction. The direct and integrated emission and sequestration by the city’s socioeconomic sectors and cultivated land in Beijing’s urban carbon metabolism were critical to achieve carbon neutrality, especially by regulating land transfers from cultivated land to socioeconomic sectors. The overall center of gravity migrated southward as a result of rapid land use change, leading to the development of a multi-center structure; the migration was driven primarily by migration of the centers of gravity for the category I and II gradients during the study period, thus providing clear information to help decision makers achieve carbon neutrality. Our analysis of the two future scenarios for Beijing revealed that the efforts of city planners to transform the city’s energy-consumption structure and increase green compensation will bring Beijing closer to carbon neutrality by reducing the gap between carbon emission and carbon sequestration. Therefore, future land use planning should consider how to increase the city’s green areas and improve their spatial distribution while constructing a more efﬁcient urban system. However, it will be necessary to clarify the driving mechanisms that underlie the city’s urban carbon metabolism and to perform a sensitivity analysis of the network to determine the reliability of the network model for use in future predictions. This study provides a network perspective to explore the paths to narrow the gap between carbon emissions and sequestrations. However, there are still some limitations. First, it is necessary to clarify the driving mechanisms that underlie the city’s urban carbon metabolism and to perform a sensitivity analysis of the network to determine the reliability of the network model for estimation in future predictions. Secondly, we rearranged the sub-sectors into each land use type owing to lack of relevant information. Therefore, further research should establish more detailed land-use data. Thirdly, a lack of land transaction data between cities limits ﬁne land management. Usually, the local bureau of statistics will not directly report these data online, and for many cities, the data used for metabolic analysis on time series are scarce. The future carbon metabolism database should be able to promote modeling the urban metabolic system in the time cascades, and the future spatial distribution between urban metabolism and land-use policy should also be projected based on the research basis of various models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 19 of 23 Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19105793/s1, Figure S1: Land use map for Beijing from 1990 to 2018; Figure S2: Digital elevation model map of Beijing; Figure S3: Areas of the different land use types areas from 1990 to 2018; Figure S4: Changes in the direct input ﬂows from 1990 to 2018; Figure S5: Changes in the integrated (direct plus indirect) input ﬂows from 1990 to 2018; Table S1: Different land use types areas in each year; Table S2–S7: Land transition matrix from 1990–2018; Table S8: IPCC carbon emission conversion coefﬁcients for the energy types consumed in the study area [65]; Table S9: Carbon emission conversion coefﬁcients for the respiration accounting items [65,104,105]; Table S10: The city’s population and livestock numbers during the study period; Table S11: The conversion coefﬁcients for carbon emission of cultivated land [106]; Table S12: Carbon sequestration coefﬁcients for the natural components of the urban network [107–113]; Table S13: Categories for the total direct and integrated input ﬂows for each component of Beijing’s carbon metabolism; Table S14: Scenarios description in 2035 and 2060; Table S15: Carbon metabolic intensity for the different land use types in each year. Author Contributions: L.X.: wrote the manuscript, designed the model and the research frame work; J.W.: performed the calculations and the images improvement; R.W.: designed the research frame work and contributed to writing improvement; L.C.: provided critical feedback and provided critical feedback; Y.Z.: designed the model and the research frame work; Z.Y.: designed the model and the research frame work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work was supported by the Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams (2019ZT08L213), by the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (GML2019ZD0403), by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2021A1515011889). Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Conﬂicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing ﬁnancial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to inﬂuence the work reported in this paper. References 1. IPCC. Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 C. 2018. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/W (accessed on 22 March 2022). 2. IEA. Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2017. 2018. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status- report-2017 (accessed on 22 March 2022). 3. IEA. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion: Overview; Paris International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2020. 4. Paul, S. Energetic Cities: Energy, Environment and Strategic Thinking. World Policy J. 2010, 27, 11–13. [CrossRef] 5. Abbasi, M.A.; Parveen, S.; Khan, S.; Kamal, M.A. Urbanization and energy consumption effects on carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from Asian-8 countries using panel data analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 18029–18043. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 6. Hong, C.; Burney, J.A.; Pongratz, J.; Nabel, J.E.M.S.; Mueller, N.D.; Jackson, R.B.; Davis, S.J. Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961–2017. Nature 2021, 589, 554–561. [CrossRef] 7. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Spatial Planning, Cambridge; Seto, K.C., Dhakal, S., Bigio, A., Blanco, H., Delgado, G.C., Dewar, D., Huang, L., Inaba, A., Kansal, A., Lwasa, S., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 923–1000. 8. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Xia, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y. Urban expansion simulation towards low-carbon development: A case study of Wuhan, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 63, 102455. [CrossRef] 9. Gu, C.; Guan, W.; Liu, H. Chinese urbanization 2050: SD modeling and process simulation. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2017, 60, 1067–1082. [CrossRef] 10. Liu, J.; Diamond, J. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 2005, 435, 1179–1186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 11. Fang, J.; Yu, G.; Liu, L.; Hu, S.; Chapin, F.S. Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 4015–4020. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 12. Liu, H.; Zhang, Y. Ecological network analysis of urban metabolism based on input-output table. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2012, 13, 1616–1623. [CrossRef] 13. Lu, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Su, H.; Wang, P.; Jenkins, A.; Ferrier, R.C.; Bailey, M.; Squire, G. Ecosystem health towards sustainability. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2015, 1, 1–15. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 20 of 23 14. Lai, L.; Huang, X.; Yang, H.; Chuai, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhong, T.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Thompson, J.R. Carbon emissions from land-use change and management in China between 1990 and 2010. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1601063. [CrossRef] 15. Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Wu, P.; Feng, K.; Hubacek, K.; Li, X.; Sun, L. Impacts of Urban Expansion on Terrestrial Carbon Storage in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 6834–6844. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Zhou, N.; Price, L.; Yande, D.; Creyts, J.; Khanna, N.; Fridley, D.; Lu, H.; Feng, W.; Liu, X.; Hasanbeigi, A.; et al. A roadmap for China to peak carbon dioxide emissions and achieve a 20% share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy by 2030. Appl. Energy 2019, 239, 793–819. [CrossRef] 17. Vaughan, A. China’s surprising ambition. New Sci. 2020, 248, 18. [CrossRef] 18. Gupta, D.; Garg, A. Sustainable development and carbon neutrality: Integrated assessment of transport transitions in India. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 85, 102474. [CrossRef] 19. Li, X.; Damartzis, T.; Stadler, Z.; Moret, S.; Meier, B.; Friedl, M.; Maréchal, F. Decarbonization in Complex Energy Systems: A Study on the Feasibility of Carbon Neutrality for Switzerland in 2050. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 549615. [CrossRef] 20. Bedulli, C.; Lavery, P.S.; Harvey, M.; Duarte, C.M.; Serrano, O. Contribution of Seagrass Blue Carbon toward Carbon Neutral Policies in a Touristic and Environmentally-Friendly Island. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 1. [CrossRef] 21. Deng, M.; Luo, W.; Yin, L. A Systematic Review of International Theory, Research and Practice on Carbon Neutrality. Resour. Sci. 2013, 35, 1084–1094. (In Chinese) 22. Attahiru, Y.B.; Aziz, M.M.A.; Kassim, K.A.; Shahid, S.; Abu Bakar, W.A.W.; Nsashruddin, T.F.; Rahman, F.A.; Ahamed, M.I. A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 101, 600–613. [CrossRef] 23. Bettenhausen, C. Cemex goes global with carbon-neutral concrete. Chem. Eng. News. 2020, 98, 11. [CrossRef] 24. Fang, G.; Lu, L.; Tian, L.; He, Y.; Bai, Y. Can China achieve the energy-saving and emission reducing objectives during the “13th Five-Year-Plan”?—A systematic evolutionary analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121256. [CrossRef] 25. Yuan, Y.; Duan, H.; Tsvetanov, T.G. Synergizing China’s energy and carbon mitigation goals: General equilibrium modeling and policy assessment. Energy Econ. 2020, 89, 104787. [CrossRef] 26. Xia, C.; Chen, B. Urban land-carbon nexus based on ecological network analysis. Appl. Energy 2020, 276, 115465. [CrossRef] 27. Wolman, A. The Metabolism of Cities. Sci. Am. 1965, 213, 178–190. [CrossRef] 28. Kennedy, C.; Cuddihy, J.; Engel-Yan, J. The Changing Metabolism of Cities. J. Ind. Ecol. 2007, 11, 43–59. [CrossRef] 29. Kennedy, C.; Steinberger, J.; Gasson, B.; Hansen, Y.; Hillman, T.; Havránek, M.; Pataki, D.; Phdungsilp, A.; Ramaswami, A.; Mendez, G.V. Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 4828–4837. [CrossRef] 30. Kennedy, C.; Pincetl, S.; Bunje, P. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1965–1973. [CrossRef] 31. Kennedy, C.; Stewart, I.D.; Ibrahim, N.; Facchini, A.; Mele, R. Developing a multi-layered indicator set for urban metabolism studies in megacities. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 47, 7–15. [CrossRef] 32. Tang, M.; Hong, J.; Guo, S.; Liu, G.; Shen, G.Q. A bibliometric review of urban energy metabolism: Evolutionary trends and the application of network analytical methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 279, 123403. [CrossRef] 33. Mostafavi, N.; Shojaei, H.R.; Beheshtian, A.; Hoque, S. Residential Water Consumption Modeling in the Integrated Urban Metabolism Analysis Tool (IUMAT). Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 131, 64–74. [CrossRef] 34. Serrao-Neumann, S.; Renouf, M.A.; Morgan, E.; Kenway, S.J.; Choy, D.L. Urban water metabolism information for planning water sensitive city-regions. Land Use Policy 2019, 88, 104144. [CrossRef] 35. Xia, C.; Li, Y.; Xu, T.; Chen, Q.; Ye, Y.; Shi, Z.; Liu, J.; Ding, Q.; Li, X. Analyzing spatial patterns of urban carbon metabolism and its response to change of urban size: A case of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 615–625. [CrossRef] 36. Li, J.; Huang, G.; Liu, L. Ecological network analysis for urban metabolism and carbon emissions based on input-output tables: A case study of Guangdong province. Ecol. Model. 2018, 383, 118–126. [CrossRef] 37. Dong, Y.; Xu, L.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Chen, L. Aggravation of reactive nitrogen ﬂow driven by human production and consumption in Guangzhou City China. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–10. [CrossRef] 38. Chen, C.; Yao, Z.; Wen, Z.G.; Sheng, N. Impact of city characteristics on its phosphorus metabolism in the bay area: A comparative analysis of cities in the Greater Bay Area of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 286, 124925. [CrossRef] 39. Chen, Q.; Su, M.; Meng, F.; Liu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z. Analysis of urban carbon metabolism characteristics based on provincial input-output tables. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 265, 110561. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 40. Elliot, T.; Almenar, J.B.; Rugani, B. Impacts of policy on urban energy metabolism at tackling climate change: The case of Lisbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123510. [CrossRef] 41. Hu, G.; Mu, X. Analysis of urban energy metabolic system: An ecological network framework and a case study for Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 210, 958–969. [CrossRef] 42. Zhai, M.; Huang, G.; Liu, H.; Liu, L.; He, C.; Liu, Z. Three-perspective energy-carbon nexus analysis for developing China’s policies of CO -emission mitigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135857. [CrossRef] 43. Fernandes, M.M.; Fernandes, M.R.D.M.; Garcia, J.R.; Matricardi, E.A.T.; de Almeida, A.Q.; Pinto, A.S.; Menezes, R.S.C.; Silva, A.D.J.; Lima, A.H.D.S. Assessment of land use and land cover changes and valuation of carbon stocks in the Sergipe semiarid region, Brazil: 1992–2030. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104795. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 21 of 23 44. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, H.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, J.; Su, M.; Liu, G. Characterizing urban metabolic systems with an ecological hierarchy method, Beijing, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 121, 19–33. [CrossRef] 45. Hutyra, L.R.; Yoon, B.; Hepinstall-Cymerman, J.; Alberti, M. Carbon consequences of land cover change and expansion of urban lands: A case study in the Seattle metropolitan region. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 103, 83–93. [CrossRef] 46. Tanikawa, H.; Hashimoto, S. Urban stock over time: Spatial material stock analysis using 4d-GIS. Build. Res. Inf. 2009, 37, 483–502. [CrossRef] 47. Bahers, J.-B.; Athanassiadis, A.; Perrotti, D.; Kampelmann, S. The place of space in urban metabolism research: Towards a spatial turn? A review and future agenda. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 221, 104376. [CrossRef] 48. Pan, H.; Deal, B.; Destouni, G.; Zhang, Y.; Kalantari, Z. Sociohydrology modeling for complex urban environments in support of integrated land and water resource management practices. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 3639–3652. [CrossRef] 49. Pan, H.; Zhang, L.; Cong, C.; Deal, B.; Wang, Y. A dynamic and spatially explicit modeling approach to identify the ecosystem service implications of complex urban systems interactions. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 102, 426–436. [CrossRef] 50. Chen, L.; Xu, L.; Cai, Y.; Yang, Z. Spatiotemporal patterns of industrial carbon emissions at the city level. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 169, 105499. [CrossRef] 51. Li, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Ouyang, J.; Shi, W. Regional differences in carbon emission of China’s industries and its decomposition effects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 122528. [CrossRef] 52. Liu, X.; Ou, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Jiao, L.; Liu, Y. Scenario simulation of urban energy-related CO emissions by coupling the socioeconomic factors and spatial structures. Appl. Energy 2019, 238, 1163–1178. [CrossRef] 53. Zhang, G.; Zhang, N.; Liao, W. How do population and land urbanization affect CO emissions under gravity center change? A spatial econometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 510–523. [CrossRef] 54. Zhu, X.; Mu, X.; Hu, G. Ecological network analysis of urban energy metabolic system—A case study of Beijing. Ecol. Model. 2019, 404, 36–45. [CrossRef] 55. Chen, S.Q.; Chen, B. Network Environ Perspective for Urban Metabolism and Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Vienna, Austria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4498–4506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 56. Zhang, W.; Huang, B.; Luo, D. Effects of land use and transportation on carbon sources and carbon sinks: A case study in Shenzhen, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 122, 175–185. [CrossRef] 57. Chen, S.; Chen, B. Changing Urban Carbon Metabolism over Time: Historical Trajectory and Future Pathway. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 7560–7571. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 58. Zhang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Hao, Y.; Liu, R.; Yang, Z.; Lu, Z. Study of carbon metabolic processes and their spatial distribution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 645, 1630–1642. [CrossRef] 59. Liu, P.; Lin, B.; Zhou, H.; Wu, X.; Little, J.C. CO emissions from urban buildings at the city scale: System dynamic projections and potential mitigation policies. Appl. Energy 2020, 277, 115546. [CrossRef] 60. Wang, J.; Zuo, X.; Liu, F. A Research on Carbon Emissions Peak in Beijing. Theory Mod. 2017, 6, 29–36. (In Chinese) 61. Zhong, L.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z. Research on the Way of Realizing Carbon Emission Peak in Advance in Beijing. Energy China 2019, 41, 42–47. (In Chinese) 62. Liu, S.; Tian, X.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tanikawa, H. Challenges towards carbon dioxide emissions peak under in-depth socioeco- nomic transition in China: Insights from Shanghai. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 247, 119083. [CrossRef] 63. Zhou, Y.; Shan, Y.; Liu, G.; Guan, D. Emissions and low-carbon development in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area cities and their surroundings. Appl. Energy 2018, 228, 1683–1692. [CrossRef] 64. Xia, L.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wei, J.; Banerjee, A.; Yang, Z. The application of spatially explicit networks to compare carbon ﬂows: A case study in Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 281, 124694. [CrossRef] 65. IPCC. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme; Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., Eds.; Institution of Global Environmental Strategies: Kanagawa, Japan, 2006. 66. Fath, B.D.; Patten, B.C. Review of the Foundations of Network Environ Analysis. Ecosystems 1999, 2, 167–179. [CrossRef] 67. Xia, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X. Hierarchical structure analysis of urban carbon metabolism: A case study of Beijing, China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 107, 105602. [CrossRef] 68. Wang, X.; Guo, Y.; He, J. Estimation of above-ground biomass of grassland based on multi-source remote sensing data. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 30, 159–166. (In Chinese) 69. Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Guo l Jiang, Q.; Wang, S. Spatial interpolation model of soil organic carbon density considering land-use and spatial heterogeneity. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 29, 238–246. (In Chinese) [CrossRef] 70. Feng, Y.; Zhang, L. Scenario analysis of urban energy saving and carbon abatement policies: A case study of Beijing city, China. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2012, 13, 632–644. [CrossRef] 71. BSY, 2019. Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2019. 72. Hu, Y.; Kong, X.; Zhang, B. Spatiotemporal features of land use change in Beijing in the past 30 years. J. China Agric. Univ. 2018, 23, 1–14. (In Chinese) 73. BSY, 1992. Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 1992. 74. BSY, 2011. Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2011. 75. CNBS, 1998. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 1998. 76. CNBS, 2004. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2004. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 22 of 23 77. CNBS, 2007. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2007. 78. CNBS, 2011. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2011. 79. CNBS, 2019. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2019. 80. Gao, H.; Tian, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, L.; Shi, F. Evaluating circular economy performance based on ecological network analysis: A framework and application at city level. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105257. [CrossRef] 81. Sun, L.; Liu, W.; Li, Z.; Cai, B.; Fujii, M.; Luo, X.; Chen, W.; Geng, Y.; Fujita, T.; Le, Y. Spatial and structural characteristics of CO emissions in East Asian megacities and its indication for low-carbon city development. Appl. Energy 2021, 284, 116400. [CrossRef] 82. Teo, H.C.; Zeng, Y.; Sarira, T.V.; Fung, T.K.; Zheng, Q.; Song, X.P.; Chong, K.Y.; Koh, L.P. Global urban reforestation can be an important natural climate solution. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 034059. [CrossRef] 83. Yao, N.; Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C.C.; Yang, J.; Devisscher, T.; Wirtz, Z.; Jia, L.; Duan, J.; Ma, L. Beijing’s 50 million new urban trees: Strategic governance for large-scale urban afforestation. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 44, 126392. [CrossRef] 84. Cui, X.; Li, S.; Gao, F. Examining spatial carbon metabolism: Features, future simulation, and land-based mitigation. Ecol. Model. 2020, 438, 109325. [CrossRef] 85. Zhang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Fath, B.D. Review of spatial analysis of urban carbon metabolism. Ecol. Model. 2018, 371, 18–24. [CrossRef] 86. Oldﬁeld, E.E.; Warren, R.J.; Felson, A.; Bradford, M. FORUM: Challenges and future directions in urban afforestation. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 1169–1177. [CrossRef] 87. Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Ruan, S. Polycentric structure and carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical analysis from provincial data in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123411. [CrossRef] 88. Li, J.; Sun, C. Towards a low carbon economy by removing fossil fuel subsidies? China Econ. Rev. 2018, 50, 17–33. [CrossRef] 89. Sun, B.; Ding, S. Do large cities contribute to economic growth of small cities? Evidence from Yangtze River Delta in China. Geogr. Res. 2016, 35, 1615–1625. [CrossRef] 90. Chen, C.; Long, H.; Zeng, X. Planning a sustainable urban electric power system with considering effects of new energy resources and clean production levels under uncertainty: A case study of Tianjin, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 173, 67–81. [CrossRef] 91. Sha, W.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, Z. Will polycentric cities cause more CO emissions? A case study of 232 Chinese cities. J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 96, 33–43. [CrossRef] 92. Shuai, C.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, Y. A three-step strategy for decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: Empirical evidences from 133 countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 524–543. [CrossRef] 93. Wang, Z.; Liu, W. Determinants of CO emissions from household daily travel in Beijing, China: Individual travel characteristic perspectives. Appl. Energy 2015, 158, 292–299. [CrossRef] 94. Zhang, M.; Zhao, P. The impact of land-use mix on residents’ travel energy consumption: New evidence from Beijing. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2017, 57, 224–236. [CrossRef] 95. Pataki, D.E.; Alig, R.J.; Fung, A.S.; Golubiewski, N.E.; Kennedy, C.A.; Mcpherson, E.G.; Nowak, D.J.; Pouyat, R.V.; Romero Lankao, P. Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12, 2092–2102. [CrossRef] 96. Falahatkar, S.; Rezaei, F. Towards low carbon cities: Spatio-temporal dynamics of urban form and carbon dioxide emissions. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2020, 18, 100317. [CrossRef] 97. Deng, X.; Xie, J.; Teng, F. What is carbon neutrality? Clim. Change Res. 2021, 17, 107–113. (In Chinese) 98. Fang, K.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Song, J.; Wen, Q.; Sun, H.; Ji, C.; Xu, A. Will China peak its energy-related carbon emissions by 2030? Lessons from 30 Chinese provinces. Appl. Energy 2019, 255, 113852. [CrossRef] 99. Wu, X.; Li, C.; Shao, L.; Meng, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, G. Is solar power renewable and carbon-neutral: Evidence from a pilot solar tower plant in China under a systems view. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 138, 110655. [CrossRef] 100. Ye, Q.; Stern, N.; Jian-Kun, H.; Jia-Qi, L.; Liu, T.; King, D.; Tong, W. The policy-driven peak and reduction of China’s carbon emissions. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2020, 11, 65–71. [CrossRef] 101. Yu, S.; Zheng, S.; Li, X. The achievement of the carbon emissions peak in China: The role of energy consumption structure optimization. Energy Econ. 2018, 74, 693–707. [CrossRef] 102. Dong, Y.; Jin, G.; Deng, X. Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efﬁciency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 122547. [CrossRef] 103. Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; A review of the current evidence. Environ. Int. 2020, 140, 105661. [CrossRef] 104. Kuang, Y. Present Situation of Carbon Source and Sink and Potential for Increase of Carbon Sink in Guangdong Province. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2010, 20, 56–61. (In Chinese) 105. Fang, J. Carbon Cycle of Terrestrial Ecosystem in China and Its Global Meaning; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 1996. 106. West, T.O.; Marland, G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon ﬂux in agriculture: Comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 91, 217–232. [CrossRef] 107. He, Y. Climate and Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Cycle Study of China; China Meteorological Press: Beijing, China, 2006. (In Chinese) 108. Fang, J.Y.; Liu, G.H.; Xu, S.L. Biomass and net production of Chinese forest vegetation. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1996, 16, 497–508. (In Chinese) 109. Piao, S.; Fang, J.; Zhou, L.; Zhu, B.; Tan, K.; Tao, S. Changes in vegetation net primary productivity from 1982 to 1999 in China. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle. 2005, 19, 1605–1622. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 23 of 23 110. Fang, J.Y.; Guo, Z.D.; Piao, S.L.; Chen, A.P. Carbon sinks estimation of Chinese terrestrial vegetation from 1981 to 2000. Sci. China (Ser. D Earth Sci.) 2007, 37, 804–812. (In Chinese) 111. Walsh, J.J. Importance of continental margins in the marine biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen. Nature 1991, 350, 53–55. [CrossRef] 112. Meybeck, M. Riverine Transport of Atmospheric Carbon: Sources, Global Typology and Budget. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1993, 70, 443–463. [CrossRef] 113. Duan, X.N.; Wang, X.K.; Lu, F.; Ouyang, Z.Y. Carbon sequestration and its potential by wetland ecosystems in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2008, 28, 463–469. (In Chinese) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/multidisciplinary-digital-publishing-institute/exploring-potential-ways-to-reduce-the-carbon-emission-gap-in-an-urban-v8C8LK4swg

Loading next page...

References (116)

(2019)
Research on the Way of Realizing Carbon Emission Peak in Advance in Beijing
Shangwei Liu, X. Tian, Yiling Xiong, Yan Zhang, H. Tanikawa (2020)
Challenges towards carbon dioxide emissions peak under in-depth socioeconomic transition in China: Insights from Shanghai
Journal of Cleaner Production, 247
O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona (2014)
Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change
N. Zhou, L. Price, Dai Yan-de, J. Creyts, N. Khanna, D. Fridley, Hongyou Lu, W. Feng, X. Liu, A. Hasanbeigi, Zhiyu Tian, Hongwei Yang, Quan Bai, Yuezhong Zhu, Huawen Xiong, Jianguo Zhang, Kate Chrisman, J. Agenbroad, Yi Ke, R. McIntosh, David Mullaney, C. Stranger, E. Wanless, Dan Wetzel, Cyril Yee, E. Franconi (2019)
A roadmap for China to peak carbon dioxide emissions and achieve a 20% share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy by 2030
Applied Energy
(2006)
Climate and Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Cycle Study of China
Dipti Gupta, A. Garg (2020)
Sustainable development and carbon neutrality: Integrated assessment of transport transitions in India
Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 85
(2010)
Energetic Cities: Energy, Environment and Strategic Thinking
World Policy J., 27
Linlin Xia, Yan Zhang, Yingshan Huang, Jian-feng Wei, A. Banerjee, Zhifeng Yang (2021)
The application of spatially explicit networks to compare carbon flows: A case study in Beijing, China
Journal of Cleaner Production, 281
Zhaohua Wang, Wei Liu (2015)
Determinants of CO2 emissions from household daily travel in Beijing, China: Individual travel characteristic perspectives
Applied Energy, 158
Jean‐Baptiste Bahers, A. Athanassiadis, D. Perrotti, Stephan Kampelmann (2022)
The place of space in urban metabolism research: Towards a spatial turn? A review and future agenda
Landscape and Urban Planning
Jianglong Li, Chuanwang Sun (2018)
Towards a Low Carbon Economy by Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies?
China Economic Review
(2018)
Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2017
Yongna Yuan, Hongbo Duan, Tsvetan Tsvetanov (2020)
Synergizing China's energy and carbon mitigation goals: General equilibrium modeling and policy assessment
Energy Economics, 89
Shiwei Yu, Shuhong Zheng, Xia Li (2018)
The achievement of the carbon emissions peak in China: The role of energy consumption structure optimization
Energy Economics
C. Bettenhausen (2020)
Cemex goes global with carbon-neutral concrete
C&EN Global Enterprise
(2017)
A Research on Carbon Emissions Peak in Beijing
Theory Mod., 6
M. Meybeck (1993)
Riverine transport of atmospheric carbon: Sources, global typology and budget
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 70
(2014)
Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Spatial Planning, Cambridge
Milton Fernandes, M. Fernandes, Junior Garcia, E. Matricardi, André Almeida, Alexandre Pinto, R. Menezes, Ademilson Silva, Alexandre Lima (2020)
Assessment of land use and land cover changes and valuation of carbon stocks in the Sergipe semiarid region, Brazil: 1992–2030
Land Use Policy
Shaoqing Chen, Bin Chen (2012)
Network environ perspective for urban metabolism and carbon emissions: a case study of Vienna, Austria.
Environmental science & technology, 46 8
Lu Sun, Wenjing Liu, Zhaoling Li, Bofeng Cai, M. Fujii, Xiao Luo, Wei Chen, Y. Geng, Tsuyoshi Fujita, Yiping Le (2021)
Spatial and structural characteristics of CO2 emissions in East Asian megacities and its indication for low-carbon city development
Applied Energy, 284
C. Kennedy, J. Steinberger, Barrie Gasson, Y. Hansen, T. Hillman, Miroslav Havránek, D. Pataki, Aumnad Phdungsilp, A. Ramaswami, G. Méndez (2010)
Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities
Energy Policy, 38
Cong Chen, H. Long, Xueting Zeng (2018)
Planning a sustainable urban electric power system with considering effects of new energy resources and clean production levels under uncertainty: A case study of Tianjin, China
Journal of Cleaner Production, 173
H. Tanikawa, S. Hashimoto (2009)
Urban stock over time: spatial material stock analysis using 4d-GIS
Building Research & Information, 37
Na Yao, C. Bosch, Jun Yang, Tahia Devisscher, Zach Wirtz, L. Jia, J. Duan, Lvyi Ma (2019)
Beijing’s 50 million new urban trees: Strategic governance for large-scale urban afforestation
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
(2018)
Spatiotemporal features of land use change in Beijing in the past 30 years
J. China Agric. Univ., 23
Yan Zhang, Yanfang Liu, Yiheng Wang, Dianfeng Liu, Chang Xia, Wang Zhengyu, Wang Haofeng, Yaolin Liu (2020)
Urban expansion simulation towards low-carbon development: A case study of Wuhan, China
Sustainable Cities and Society, 63
Adam Vaughan (2020)
China's surprising ambition
New Scientist, 248
C. Flachsland (2015)
Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Yonglong Lu, Ruoshi Wang, Yueqing Zhang, Hongqiao Su, Peixue Wang, A. Jenkins, R. Ferrier, Mark Bailey, G. Squire (2015)
Ecosystem health towards sustainability
Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 1
M. Nieuwenhuijsen (2020)
Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; A review of the current evidence.
Environment international
Xiaoping Liu, Jinpei Ou, Yimin Chen, Shaojian Wang, Xia Li, L. Jiao, Yaolin Liu (2019)
Scenario simulation of urban energy-related CO2 emissions by coupling the socioeconomic factors and spatial structures
Applied Energy
Yan Zhang, Qiong Wu, Xinyue Zhao, Yan Hao, Ruimin Liu, Zhifeng Yang, Zhongming Lu (2018)
Study of carbon metabolic processes and their spatial distribution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration.
The Science of the total environment, 645
Kai Fang, Yiqi Tang, Qifeng Zhang, Junnian Song, Qi Wen, Huaping Sun, Chenyang Ji, Anqi Xu (2019)
Will China peak its energy-related carbon emissions by 2030? Lessons from 30 Chinese provinces
Applied Energy, 255
H. Teo, Yiwen Zeng, Tasya Sarira, T. Fung, Qiming Zheng, X. Song, K. Chong, L. Koh (2021)
Global urban reforestation can be an important natural climate solution
Environmental Research Letters, 16
(2020)
Emissions from Fuel Combustion: Overview
D. Pataki, R. Alig, A. Fung, N. Golubiewski, C. Kennedy, E. McPherson, D. Nowak, R. Pouyat, P. Lankao (2006)
Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle
Global Change Biology, 12
(1996)
Carbon Cycle of Terrestrial Ecosystem in China and Its Global Meaning
Haozhi Pan, B. Deal, G. Destouni, Yalei Zhang, Z. Kalantari (2018)
Sociohydrology modeling for complex urban environments in support of integrated land and water resource management practices
Land Degradation & Development, 29
Shaoqing Chen, Bin Chen (2017)
Changing Urban Carbon Metabolism over Time: Historical Trajectory and Future Pathway.
Environmental science & technology, 51 13
Nariman Mostafavi, H. Shojaei, Arash Beheshtian, S. Hoque (2018)
Residential Water Consumption Modeling in the Integrated Urban Metabolism Analysis Tool (IUMAT)
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 131
Xiang Li, Theodoros Damartzis, Zoe Stadler, S. Moret, B. Meier, M. Friedl, F. Maréchal (2020)
Decarbonization in Complex Energy Systems: A Study on the Feasibility of Carbon Neutrality for Switzerland in 2050
, 8
Jingyun Fang, Jingyun Fang, Guirui Yu, Lingli Liu, Shuijin Hu, Shuijin Hu, F. Chapin (2018)
Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115
Guanglai Zhang, Ning Zhang, Wenmei Liao (2018)
How do population and land urbanization affect CO2 emissions under gravity center change? A spatial econometric analysis
Journal of Cleaner Production
S. Serrao‐Neumann, M. Renouf, E. Morgan, S. Kenway, D. Choy (2019)
Urban water metabolism information for planning water sensitive city-regions
Land Use Policy
(2019)
China Energy Statistical Yearbook
Jizhe Li, G. Huang, Lirong Liu (2018)
Ecological network analysis for urban metabolism and carbon emissions based on input-output tables: A case study of Guangdong province
Ecological Modelling
C. Kennedy, J. Cuddihy, J. Engel-Yan (2007)
The Changing Metabolism of Cities
Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11
Miaohan Tang, Jingke Hong, Shan Guo, Guiwen Liu, G. Shen (2021)
A bibliometric review of urban energy metabolism: Evolutionary trends and the application of network analytical methods
Journal of Cleaner Production, 279
Craig Bettenhausen (2020)
Cemex goes global with carbon-neutral concrete
Chemical & Engineering News
J. Walsh (1991)
Importance of continental margins in the marine biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen
Nature, 350
(2006)
Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories
National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme
Hengchen Liu, Yong Zhang (2012)
Ecological network analysis of urban metabolism based on input-output table
Procedia environmental sciences, 13
(2016)
Do large cities contribute to economic growth of small cities? Evidence from Yangtze River Delta in China
Y. Feng, Lixiao Zhang (2012)
Scenario analysis of urban energy saving and carbon abatement policies: A case study of Beijing city, China
Procedia environmental sciences, 13
Qionghong Chen, M. Su, Fanxin Meng, Yufei Liu, Y. Cai, Ya Zhou, Zhifeng Yang (2020)
Analysis of urban carbon metabolism characteristics based on provincial input-output tables.
Journal of environmental management, 265
Linlin Xia, Yan Zhang, Xiangyi Yu, Yaoguang Li, Xiaolin Zhang (2019)
Hierarchical structure analysis of urban carbon metabolism: A case study of Beijing, China
Ecological Indicators, 107
Chen Chen, Zhenfeng Yao, Zongguo Wen, N. Sheng (2020)
Impact of city characteristics on its phosphorus metabolism in the bay area: A comparative analysis of cities in the Greater Bay Area of China
Journal of Cleaner Production
A. Wolman (1965)
THE METABOLISM OF CITIES.
Scientific American, 213
Du Xiaonan, Wang Xiaoke, F. Lu, O. Zhiyun (2008)
Primary evaluation of carbon sequestration potential of wetlands in China
Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28
(2007)
Carbon sinks estimation of Chinese terrestrial vegetation from 1981 to 2000
W. Sha, Ying Chen, Jiansheng Wu, Zhenyu Wang (2020)
Will polycentric cities cause more CO2 emissions? A case study of 232 Chinese cities.
Journal of environmental sciences, 96
C. Shuai, Xi Chen, Ya Wu, Yu Zhang, Yongtao Tan (2019)
A three-step strategy for decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: Empirical evidences from 133 countries.
The Science of the total environment, 646
Yepeng Qi, N. Stern, Jiankun He, J. Lu, Tian Liu, D. King, Tong Wu (2020)
The policy-driven peak and reduction of China's carbon emissions
Advances in Climate Change Research, 11
P. Sullivan (2010)
Energetic Cities: Energy, Environment and Strategic Thinking
World Policy Journal, 27
(1993)
Riverine Transport of Atmospheric Carbon: Sources, Global Typology and Budget
Water Air Soil Pollut., 70
Jianguo Liu, J. Diamond (2005)
China's environment in a globalizing world
Nature, 435
(2018)
Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C
Xu Chen, Shuo Zhang, Sumei Ruan (2021)
Polycentric structure and carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical analysis from provincial data in China
Journal of Cleaner Production, 278
Xuezhu Cui, Shaoying Li, Feng Gao (2020)
Examining spatial carbon metabolism: Features, future simulation, and land-based mitigation
Ecological Modelling, 438
Yusuf Attahiru, M. Aziz, K. Kassim, Shamsuddin Shahid, W. Bakar, Thanwa NSashruddin, F. Rahman, Mohd Ahamed (2019)
A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
(2021)
What is carbon neutrality? Clim
C. Hong, J. Burney, J. Pongratz, J. Nabel, N. Mueller, R. Jackson, S. Davis (2021)
Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961–2017
Nature, 589
Guangwen Hu, Xianzhong Mu (2019)
Analysis of urban energy metabolic system: An ecological network framework and a case study for Beijing
Journal of Cleaner Production
Guochang Fang, Longxi Lu, L. Tian, Yu He, Yang Bai (2020)
Can China achieve the energy-saving and emission reducing objectives during the “13th Five-Year-Plan”? —— A systematic evolutionary analysis
Journal of Cleaner Production, 262
Xiaoping Liu, Shaojian Wang, Peijun Wu, K. Feng, K. Hubacek, Xia Li, Laixiang Sun (2019)
Impacts of Urban Expansion on Terrestrial Carbon Storage in China.
Environmental science & technology
(1996)
Biomass and net production of Chinese forest vegetation
Lucy Hutyraa, Byungman Yoonb, Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymermanc, Marina Albertid (2011)
Carbon consequences of land cover change and expansion of urban lands: A case study in the Seattle metropolitan region
Landscape and Urban Planning, 103
C. Kroeze (1997)
N2O from animal waste. Methodology according to IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
Mengzhu Zhang, P. Zhao (2017)
The impact of land-use mix on residents' travel energy consumption: New evidence from Beijing
Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 57
Yin Dong, G. Jin, Xiangzheng Deng (2020)
Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efficiency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions
Journal of Cleaner Production, 270
C. Kennedy, Iain Stewart, Nadine Ibrahim, A. Facchini, R. Mele (2014)
Developing a multi-layered indicator set for urban metabolism studies in megacities
Ecological Indicators, 47
Emily Oldfield, R. Warren, A. Felson, M. Bradford (2013)
FORUM: Challenges and future directions in urban afforestation
Journal of Applied Ecology, 50
Camila Bedulli, P. Lavery, M. Harvey, C. Duarte, O. Serrano (2020)
Contribution of Seagrass Blue Carbon Toward Carbon Neutral Policies in a Touristic and Environmentally-Friendly Island
, 7
Zitong Wu, Yan Liu, Yi Chen, Long Guo, Qinghu Jiang, S. Wang (2018)
[Spatial interpolation model of soil organic carbon density considering land-use and spatial heterogeneity.]
Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology, 29 1
(2021)
What is carbon neutrality?
Clim. Change Res., 17
T. Elliot, J. Almenar, B. Rugani (2020)
Impacts of policy on urban energy metabolism at tackling climate change: The case of Lisbon
Journal of Cleaner Production, 276
Chuyu Xia, Bin Chen (2020)
Urban land-carbon nexus based on ecological network analysis
Applied Energy, 276
Zhifeng Yang, Yan Zhang, Shengsheng Li, Hong Liu, Hongmei Zheng, Jinyun Zhang, M. Su, Gengyuan Liu (2014)
Characterizing urban metabolic systems with an ecological hierarchy method, Beijing, China
Landscape and Urban Planning, 121
Wang De-hui (2010)
Present Situation of Carbon Source and Sink and Potential for Increase of Carbon Sink in Guangdong Province
China Population, Resources and Environment
Yue Dong, Linyu Xu, Zhifeng Yang, Hanzhong Zheng, Lei Chen (2020)
Aggravation of reactive nitrogen flow driven by human production and consumption in Guangzhou City China
Nature Communications, 11
Xudong Wu, Chaohui Li, L. Shao, Jing Meng, Lixiao Zhang, Guoqian Chen (2021)
Is solar power renewable and carbon-neutral: Evidence from a pilot solar tower plant in China under a systems view
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Special Report on Global Warming of 1 . 5 ◦ C . 2018 Global Energy & CO 2 Status Report 2017 . 2018
(2020)
China’s surprising ambition
New Sci., 248
T. West, G. Marland (2002)
A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 91
(2014)
Estimation of above-ground biomass of grassland based on multi-source remote sensing data
Xueting Zhu, Xianzhong Mu, Guangwen Hu (2019)
Ecological network analysis of urban energy metabolic system—A case study of Beijing
Ecological Modelling
(2008)
Carbon sequestration and its potential by wetland ecosystems in China
Acta Ecol. Sin., 28
Wenting Zhang, Bo Huang, D. Luo (2014)
Effects of land use and transportation on carbon sources and carbon sinks: A case study in Shenzhen, China
Landscape and Urban Planning, 122
Haozhi Pan, Le Zhang, Cong Cong, B. Deal, Yutao Wang (2019)
A dynamic and spatially explicit modeling approach to identify the ecosystem service implications of complex urban systems interactions
Ecological Indicators
M. Abbasi, S. Parveen, Saleem Khan, M. Kamal (2020)
Urbanization and energy consumption effects on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from Asian-8 countries using panel data analysis
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27
Lei Chen, Linyu Xu, Y. Cai, Zhifeng Yang (2021)
Spatiotemporal patterns of industrial carbon emissions at the city level
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 169
Chuyu Xia, Yan Li, Tingbao Xu, Qiuxiao Chen, Yanmei Ye, Z. Shi, Jingming Liu, Qinglong Ding, Xiaoshun Li (2019)
Analyzing spatial patterns of urban carbon metabolism and its response to change of urban size: A case of the Yangtze River Delta, China
Ecological Indicators
Pei Liu, B. Lin, Hao Zhou, Xiaoying Wu, John Little (2020)
CO2 emissions from urban buildings at the city scale: System dynamic projections and potential mitigation policies
Applied Energy, 277
S. Piao, Jingyun Fang, Liming Zhou, B. Zhu, K. Tan, S. Tao (2005)
Changes in vegetation net primary productivity from 1982 to 1999 in China
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19
Ya Zhou, Y. Shan, Guo-Sheng Liu, D. Guan (2018)
Emissions and low-carbon development in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area cities and their surroundings
Applied Energy
Yan Zhang, Qiong Wu, B. Fath (2018)
Review of spatial analysis of urban carbon metabolism
Ecological Modelling, 371
C. Kennedy, S. Pincetl, P. Bunje (2011)
The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design.
Environmental pollution, 159 8-9
Chaolin Gu, Wei-hua Guan, Helin Liu (2017)
Chinese urbanization 2050: SD modeling and process simulation
Science China Earth Sciences, 60
B. Fath, B. Patten (1999)
Review of the Foundations of Network Environ Analysis
Ecosystems, 2
S. Falahatkar, F. Rezaei (2020)
Towards low carbon cities: Spatio-temporal dynamics of urban form and carbon dioxide emissions
Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment
Li Lai, Xianjin Huang, H. Yang, X. Chuai, Mei Zhang, Taiyang Zhong, Zhigang Chen, Yi Chen, Xiao Wang, J. Thompson (2016)
Carbon emissions from land-use change and management in China between 1990 and 2010
Science Advances, 2
Xin Li, Jinman Wang, Min Zhang, Jinming Ouyang, Wen-Jie Shi (2020)
Regional differences in carbon emission of China’s industries and its decomposition effects
Journal of Cleaner Production, 270
M. Zhai, G. Huang, Hongzhi Liu, Lirong Liu, Chengyu He, Zhengpin Liu (2019)
Three-perspective energy-carbon nexus analysis for developing China's policies of CO2-emission mitigation.
The Science of the total environment, 705
Han Gao, X. Tian, Yan Zhang, Lei Shi, F. Shi (2021)
Evaluating circular economy performance based on ecological network analysis: A framework and application at city level
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 168
(2013)
A Systematic Review of International Theory, Research and Practice on Carbon Neutrality

Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Copyright: © 1996-2022 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated Disclaimer The statements, opinions and data contained in the journals are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
ISSN: 1660-4601
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19105793
Publisher site: See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective 1 , 2 1 , 2 3 , 4 4 1 , 2 Linlin Xia , Jianfeng Wei , Ruwei Wang *, Lei Chen , Yan Zhang and Zhifeng Yang Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; linlinxia@mail.bnu.edu.cn (L.X.); 2112024025@mail2.gdut.edu.cn (J.W.); zfyang@gdut.edu.cn (Z.Y.) Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Xinjiekouwai Street No. 19, Beijing 100875, China; leichen@gdut.edu.cn (L.C.); zhangyanyxy@126.com (Y.Z.) * Correspondence: wangruwei@jnu.edu.cn Abstract: To meet the global need for carbon neutrality, we must ﬁrst understand the role of urban carbon metabolism. In this study, we developed a land–energy–carbon framework to model the spatial and temporal variation of carbon ﬂows in Beijing from 1990 to 2018. Based on the changes in carbon sequestration and energy consumption, we used ecological network analysis to identify the critical paths for achieving carbon neutrality during land-use changes, thereby revealing possible decarbonization pathways to achieve carbon neutrality. By using GIS software, changes in the center of gravity for carbon ﬂows were visualized in each period, and future urban construction scenarios Citation: Xia, L.; Wei, J.; Wang, R.; were explored based on land-use policy. We found that the direct carbon emission peaked in 2010, Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z. mostly due to a growing area of transportation and industrial land. Total integrated ﬂows through Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the network decreased at an average annual rate of 3.8%, and the change from cultivated land to the the Carbon Emission Gap in an socioeconomic sectors and the paths between each socioeconomic component accounted for 29.5 and Urban Metabolic System: A Network 31.7% of the integrated ﬂows during the study period. The socioeconomic sectors as key nodes in the Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. network should focus both on their scale expansion and on using cleaner energy to reduce carbon Public Health 2022, 19, 5793. https:// emissions. The center of gravity gradually moved southward, indicating that the new emission doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105793 centers should seek a greener mixture of land use. Reducing carbon emission will strongly relied on Academic Editor: Paul B. transforming Beijing’s energy consumption structure and increasing green areas to improve carbon Tchounwou sinks. Our results provide insights into carbon ﬂow paths that must be modiﬁed by implementing land-use policies to reduce carbon emission and produce a more sustainable urban metabolism. Received: 23 March 2022 Accepted: 7 May 2022 Published: 10 May 2022 Keywords: network insight; urban carbon metabolism; center of gravity; carbon neutral paths Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional afﬁl- 1. Introduction iations. Carbon emission reduction is an urgent issue to address the global climate change. The Paris Agreement proposed stabilization of the global temperature increase well below 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures, thereby preventing extensive damage to the global Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. ecosystem [1]. To meet the carbon neutrality challenge, countries are taking actions, but Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. the proportion of energy consumption supplied by fossil fuels remains too high [2–4], This article is an open access article the energy intensity (i.e., energy consumed per unit GDP) continues to increase [5] and distributed under the terms and the emission that results from land-use change grows year by year [6,7], especially in conditions of the Creative Commons developing countries. This will create great challenges for these countries. Seeking effective Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// ways to reduce carbon emission has therefore become a priority for governments around creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ the world. 4.0/). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105793 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 2 of 23 The rapid urbanization that is occurring in developing countries has promoted large- scale urban expansion, resulting in large negative environmental impacts for the areas that sustain these growing cities [8]. Particularly in China, unprecedented urbanization has greatly affected the urban system, and with urbanization expected to reach 70 to 75% by 2050 [9,10], the impact is likely to increase. In particular, enormous changes in the land-use and cover type (hereafter, “land use” for simplicity) have adversely affected the environment [11–13]. For example, these processes have been responsible for nearly 1.45 Pg carbon emission from 1990 to 2010 [14] and a decrease of about 101.79 TgC in carbon storage [15]. Currently, more than 70% of energy consumption still depends on fossil fuels in Chinese cities, and this makes decarbonization particularly challenging [3,16]. Vaughan (2020) noted that reducing carbon emissions and increasing green space to compensate for these emissions will be essential for China to achieve carbon neutrality while still maintaining rapid socioeconomic development [17]. Carbon neutrality is a widely accepted goal that can be achieved by following many paths, including afforestation, energy conservation, and emission reduction. Researchers have mostly focused on the aspects of an urban energy system to promote decarbonization of the energy structure and to reduce carbon emission sources [18,19]. Green compensation plays an important role to increase carbon sinks for offsetting carbon emissions during land- use management [20,21]. Researchers have also investigated the possibility of introducing carbon-neutral materials to achieve zero emissions during use of these materials [22,23]. Although technological innovation could provide signiﬁcant ecological beneﬁts, it is more cost-intensive than improving urban planning and has drawbacks such as long payback periods and facing innovative bottlenecks [24,25]. Thus, optimizing the land-use patterns offers an alternative and potentially more effective way to reduce carbon emissions for achieving carbon neutrality and improving sustainability [26]. Urban metabolism, which was ﬁrst deﬁned by Wolman (1965), provides tools for un- derstanding the coordination and sustainable development of urban ecosystems [27]. Sub- sequent studies performed by Kennedy et al. (2007, 2010) concerned the carbon metabolic processes of different metropolitan areas and deciphered the impact of urban designing and transportation infrastructure on the urban metabolic processes in different cities [28,29]. Moreover, Kennedy et al. (2011, 2014) also pointed out the robustness of urban metabolism application to the low-carbon urban design [30,31]. In the context of growing contradiction between socioeconomic development and the ecological environment, urban metabolism studies have been extensively carried out for developing low-carbon urban ecosystems [12]. Many components of the urban metabolism, such as energy [32], water [33,34], land [35], carbon [36], nitrogen [37], and phosphorus [38], have been investigated. Perspectives such as the energy–carbon nexus [39–42] and land–carbon nexus [26] have been used to analyze the spatial characteristics and temporal changes of an urban carbon metabolism. The linkage between urban metabolism and the land-use changes are essential to reveal the functional mechanisms of carbon transfers [43,44]. Substantial efforts have been devoted to characterizing the variabilities of urban carbon budgets associated with land-use changes, based on 3S technologies. For example, Hutyra et al. (2011) analyzed how spatial distributions of carbon sequestration and emissions were affected by urban expansion [45]. Moreover, a 4D-GIS database was used to trace material stock accompanied by urban development in cities of the UK and Japan [46]. These studies provided good examples of the interpretation of spatial urban metabolism. A recent study reviewed the state-of-the-art research on the spatialization of urban metabolism [47]. They show that recent spatial studies related urban carbon metabolism mainly focused on the modelling of spatial heterogeneity of utilities of urban resources (such as energy and land) and the resulting complex carbon ﬂows or carbon footprint. Due to the complex interactions among the components of an urban system and the frequency of the carbon ﬂows [48,49], urban carbon metabolism based on land-use changes is seldomly analyzed regarding the changing center of gravity of carbon ﬂows. Never- theless, the gravity center could provide key information to recognize the spatiotemporal Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 3 of 23 variation of carbon emissions related to land use [50–52], and also reﬂect the changing carbon sequestration of land cover in space, thus supporting carbon-neutral strategies [53]. Therefore, when the carbon ﬂows related with land-use change can be quantiﬁed from a spatial perspective, feasible paths could be identiﬁed that offer a chance to modify a city’s urban carbon metabolism and thereby move towards carbon neutrality. Ecological network analysis has become an effective tool that is widely used in urban metabolic analysis [41,54], from which the carbon exchanges within a metabolic network as a consequence of land-use changes can be recognized from a network perspective [55]. Examples include analyzing the spatial distribution and the transfer mechanisms for urban carbon metabolism; identifying the processes that increase or decrease carbon stocks [56]; and quantifying the spatial and temporal changes of carbon ﬂows to understand an urban metabolic network. This perspective is important because different land uses have different carbon emission and sequestration characteristics, so changing the land use can greatly change the carbon balance. This approach also provides a macro-scale method to guide low-carbon development to balance a city’s carbon metabolism [57,58], thereby reducing or eliminating disorders in a city’s carbon metabolism. In the current work, we set out to conduct a systematic study to visualize the migration of carbon ﬂows related to land-use change and propose potential paths that cities can follow to achieve carbon neutrality. We also discuss how different land-use patterns moved the city either towards or away from carbon neutrality during the processes of urbanization. We combine the natural and socioeconomic components together into the urban metabolic system using the ENA method to quantify the variation of carbon ﬂows, and to analyze the centers of gravity of carbon ﬂows for future urban spatial planning. The target Beijing was used as a case study owing to its representativeness. Beijing has undergone rapid urbanization and ranked as one of the most developed cities in China, accompanied by annually abundant energy consumption, large amounts of carbon emissions, and severe shortage of land resources. It is one of the few cities that has announced peak carbon emissions [59–61], in contrast to those megacities, such as Shanghai and Shenzhen, which are still facing increasing carbon emissions during the studied period [62,63]. Beijing city is experiencing urban shrink to increase carbon sinks, in contrast to most cities of China which are still expanding their urban body. Therefore, the study of the spatiotemporal variabilities of carbon metabolism taking Beijing as a case can provide critical information and knowledge for the peak carbon emissions of other cities. Using Beijing as a case study, we analyzed the urban carbon ﬂows from 1990 to 2018 that were associated with land use and energy consumption changes. Moreover, we analyze changes in the center of gravity of carbon ﬂows, which have been widely used as a good indicator to characterize the spatial variabilities of carbon ﬂows during urban development, for estimating future urban spatial planning. This study is expected to support urban planning to reduce the gap between carbon emission and sequestration. 2. Methods 2.1. Model Framework The models we used in this paper were developed in previous research by our research group [64]. Based on the availability of data, we deﬁned eight nodes in the network: urban land, rural land, transportation and industrial land, cultivated land, forest, grassland, bodies of water, and bare land (i.e., unused land) including artiﬁcial, semi-natural, and natural types (Figure 1). We focus on the changes in direct carbon emissions caused by energy consumption, indirect carbon emission by the land use and natural carbon sequestration process for exploring carbon-neutral paths in the present study. Speciﬁcally, we set out to identify potential paths a city could follow to achieve carbon neutrality, and how different land-use patterns moved the city either towards or away from carbon neutrality during the process of urbanization. We identiﬁed the key nodes in the urban network during each period; analyzed the spatial and temporal changes of the integrated (direct plus indirect) and direct carbon ﬂows; used GIS software to describe the spatial Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 23 we set out to identify potential paths a city could follow to achieve carbon neutrality, and how different land-use patterns moved the city either towards or away from carbon neu- trality during the process of urbanization. We identified the key nodes in the urban net- work during each period; analyzed the spatial and temporal changes of the integrated Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 4 of 23 (direct plus indirect) and direct carbon flows; used GIS software to describe the spatial distribution of the carbon flows in each period; analyzed how the center of gravity for carbon flows moved over time; and discuss a scenario with different possible paths based distribution of the carbon ﬂows in each period; analyzed how the center of gravity for on current urbanization plans. carbon ﬂows moved over time; and discuss a scenario with different possible paths based on current urbanization plans. Figure 1. Framework for the urban carbon metabolic network used to study the effects of land-use Figure 1. Framework for the urban carbon metabolic network used to study the effects of land-use change on the potential to achieve carbon neutrality. Note: the sub-processes in the red and black change on the potential to achieve carbon neutrality. Note: the sub-processes in the red and black boxes show various socioeconomic activities causing carbon emissions. Carbon density of each boxes show various socioeconomic activities causing carbon emissions. Carbon density of each so- socioeconomic land area was estimated by the sum of emissions from all the sub-processes dividing cioeconomic land area was estimated by the sum of emissions from all the sub-processes dividing its corresponding land area. The red and green arrows represent the carbon exchange between its corresponding land area. The red and green arrows represent the carbon exchange between at- mosphere and biosphere. The atmosphere and black arrow re biosphere. The presen blackts carbo arrow repr n transitions be esents carbon transit tween two ions between components. two components. We obtained data on land uses throughout Beijing from 1990 to 2018, at a 5-year We obtained data on land uses throughout Beijing from 1990 to 2018, at a 5-year in- interval for 1990–2015 and a 3-year interval for 2015–2018 at a spatial resolution of 30 m terval for 1990–2015 and a 3-year interval for 2015–2018 at a spatial resolution of 30 m detailed in Section 2.5 and summarized the areas during each of the years in this period detailed in Section 2.5 and summarized the areas during each of the years in this period (Table S1). We then added this information to version 10.5 of the ArcMap GIS software (Table S1). We then added this information to version 10.5 of the ArcMap GIS software (www.esri.com (accessed on 22 March 2022)) to calculate the change in land use during (www.esri.com (accessed on 22 March 2022)) to calculate the change in land use during each period. Based on the resulting land transfer matrices (Tables S2–S7), we calculated the change in metabolic capacity of each land use (i.e., whether it was a net emission each period. Based on the resulting land transfer matrices (Tables S2–S7), we calculated source or a net sequestration sink) to support ecological network analysis. Using these the change in metabolic capacity of each land use (i.e., whether it was a net emission data, we identiﬁed land-use transitions that increased or decreased the city’s ability to source or a net sequestration sink) to support ecological network analysis. Using these achieve carbon neutrality. For instance, the path from transportation and industrial land to data, we identified land-use transitions that increased or decreased the city’s ability to forest increased the land’s carbon sequestration potential and therefore helped to achieve achieve carbon neutrality. For instance, the path from transportation and industrial land carbon neutrality, whereas the reverse transition increased the land’s carbon emissions and to forest increased the land’s carbon sequestration potential and therefore helped to therefore reduced the ability to achieve carbon neutrality. achieve carbon neutrality, whereas the reverse transition increased the land’s carbon emis- We also used the GIS software to visualize the pattern of carbon ﬂows to reveal the spa- sions and therefore reduced the ability to achieve carbon neutrality. tial variability of these ﬂows and their changes over time. The analysis provided an explicit and integrated method for the natural activities of land with the energy consumption that We also used the GIS software to visualize the pattern of carbon flows to reveal the occurs in that land to reveal the mechanisms that underlie an urban carbon metabolism. spatial variability of these flows and their changes over time. The analysis provided an explicit and integrated method for the natural activities of land with the energy consump- 2.2. Carbon Flow Calculations tion that occurs in that land to reveal the mechanisms that underlie an urban carbon me- The urbanization process causes land-use changes that increase or decrease carbon tabolism. storage. The carbon calculations of direct carbon emission from transportation and indus- trial land, urban land, rural land and cultivated land were based on Chinese data on the Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 5 of 23 consumption of each energy type detailed in Section 2.5, and the IPCC emission factors [65] are summarized in Tables S8 and S9. The accounting items were calculated as listed below: C = k m (1) Ei Ei i C = k p (2) Er Er i C = c f + c s + c a + cs (3) El 1 3 I where C represents the carbon emissions from energy consumption, C , are the car- Er Ei bon emissions from respiration by the city’s population and livestock breeding and C El represents the carbon emissions from agriculture (carried by cultivated land); k and k Ei Er represents the carbon emission coefﬁcients; m represents the consumption of energy type i (as standard tons coal equivalent, tce); p represents the number of humans and livestock (Table S10); f represents the mass of fertilizer; a represents the total use of agriculture machinery (represented by the engine power) ; s and s represents the area of irrigated land and dry cultivated land; and the c values are the conversion coefﬁcients (Table S11). Then, carbon emission of transportation and industrial land can be calculated by Equation (1), and carbon emissions of urban and rural land could be calculated by the sum of C and C . Er Ei The natural metabolic processes included carbon sequestration by natural activities, and were derived from four components (forest, grassland, water, and cultivated land). We used the following equation: C = k s (4) Si i i where C represents the carbon sequestration by natural components; s represents the area of the land use; and k represents the carbon sequestration coefﬁcient of each natural component (Table S12). In the urban carbon metabolic network, we ﬁrstly calculated the carbon density of nodes: w = C /s (5) i i where w represents the carbon density of nodes; for cultivated land, C = C C , for i El Si other land use types, and C is the carbon metabolic rate of C and C . i E S Commonly, carbon ﬂows are from i to j in an urban ecosystem and are shown as the ﬂow (f ) and the interactions among the network’s components are shown in Figure 1. ji These changes between land uses i and j can be described by the following equations: w w DS (i 6= j) i j ji f = Dw DS = (6) ji ji ji w + w DS (i = j) i j ji where f (kg C year ) represents the carbon ﬂow from node i to node j; Dw represents ji ji the differences in the carbon density between nodes along each path between nodes (i.e., different land-use transitions); DS , the area variation of the land use changing from i to ji j, is obtained from the land-use transfer matrices. Additionally, Dw > 0 represents net ji carbon emissions; Dw < 0 represents net carbon sequestration. To make outcomes more ji accurate, we applied standard deviation, mean value and 95% conﬁdential intervals to evaluate the statistical differences. We calculated the mean value, standard deviation, and 95% conﬁdence interval (CI) to account for the differences of carbon emission densities. Among these components, urban land ﬂuctuated most obviously, ranging from 1.09 to 5.21 (95% CI) and deviating from its mean value by 47.1% (3.15 1.48). Subsequently, we also used ecological network analysis to calculate the integrated ﬂows (direct plus indirect). The integrated input ﬂows matrix N [66] was accounted for: 0 1 k 1 N = (n ) = G + G + ...G = (I G) (7) ij where k represents the number of components while 0 represents exchanges within a com- ponent; I represents the identity matrix; G represents the direct ﬂow intensity matrix which Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 6 of 23 is calculated by g = f /T , where T represents the throughﬂow of node j. Additionally, ij ij j j the dimensional integral ﬂow matrix Y is calculated as Y = diag(T)N to represent the contribution weights of the sum of self-feedback and the direct effect, where T is the total integrated throughﬂow of each node. Detailed calculation procedures and the deﬁnition of carbon ﬂows have been described previously [67]. 2.3. Spatial Gradients for the Carbon Flows We characterized the spatial changes of the urban carbon metabolism based on the cascade of land-use changes over time, which created gradients in the spatial distribution of the carbon metabolic processes. Many methods have been proposed to reﬂect the spatial heterogeneity of urban carbon metabolism, such as inversion of remote sensing data [68], spatial assignment based on accounting [67], and spatial interpolation [69] based on the sample plot observation. Considering the research objectives of the present study and feasibility, we selected the spatial assignment method based on carbon accounting to study the gradient changes for the integrated carbon ﬂows. The different metabolic capacities of the different metabolic components in the carbon metabolic network changed the total direct ﬂows and the integrated (direct plus indirect) input ﬂows that created the spatial gradients. Based on the integrated ﬂows, we considered the sums of the row vectors and column vectors for matrix Y, which reﬂected the weights of the contribution rates S y i ij and S y , thereby obtaining the total direct and integrated input ﬂows for each metabolic j ij component. We then imported the results into the ArcMap software to calculate the spatial gradients and their distribution to reﬂect the changes in the total direct and integrated inputs from other metabolic components. Here, we deﬁned the gradient as the change in carbon sequestration or emission between the start and end of a given period (e.g., high gradient category area representing rapid carbon transition). We used the Natural Breaks method provided by ArcGIS (www.esri.com (accessed on 22 March 2022)) to classify the optimal results automatically classiﬁed into ﬁve grades (Table S13) based on the method of Xia et al. (2019a) [67]. 2.4. Center of Gravity for the Carbon Flows Through the migration of the gravity center of carbon ﬂows in each gradient, we can explore the direction and location of carbon ﬂows as a consequence of land-use changes. Therefore, to determine the spatial distribution and overall trend for the carbon ﬂows, we used the center of gravity method [50]. We assumed that Beijing represented a homoge- neous plane, so that the input ﬂows for each metabolic component could be transformed into a point with a weight and so that the center of the region represented an equilibrium point based on the weights of the metabolic agents. The changes in the center of gravity over time indicated changes in the direct and integrated input ﬂows throughout the study area, which reﬂected the spatial variation of the gradients that contributed to the direct and integrated input ﬂows. We used ArcMap to create maps of the input ﬂows based on the results of the direct and integrated ﬂows. The location of the center of gravity was calculated as follows: X = M x / M , Y = M y / M (8) t t å ti i å ti å ti i å ti where X and Y represent the longitude and latitude of the center of gravity in year t; M t t ti represents the input ﬂows of gradient i in year t; and x and y are the longitude and latitude i i of the center of gravity for gradient i in year t. 2.5. Case Study and Data Sources In this paper, we used Beijing as a case study to analyze changes in a city’s carbon metabolism network during urbanization. Beijing, China’s capital, has a large population (more than 7.5 10 people throughout the study period), high energy consumption, and an extensive transportation network [70]. Apart from its unusually large size, it is a typical metropolis in China. From 1990 to 2018, Beijing’s total gross domestic product Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 23 2.5. Case Study and Data Sources In this paper, we used Beijing as a case study to analyze changes in a city’s carbon metabolism network during urbanization. Beijing, China’s capital, has a large population (more than 7.5×10 people throughout the study period), high energy consumption, and Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 7 of 23 an extensive transportation network [70]. Apart from its unusually large size, it is a typical metropolis in China. From 1990 to 2018, Beijing’s total gross domestic product (GDP) in- creased by about 66 times, while the energy consumption increased by nearly three times (GDP) increased by about 66 times, while the energy consumption increased by nearly [71]. Rapid land-use changes took place during the urbanization. Based on the land-use three times [71]. Rapid land-use changes took place during the urbanization. Based on the data in each year (Figure S1) and a digital elevation model (Figure S2), Beijing’s elevation land-use data in each year (Figure S1) and a digital elevation model (Figure S2), Beijing’s was highest in the west and lowest in the east. The center of the urban land was mostly in elevation was highest in the west and lowest in the east. The center of the urban land was the city’s southeastern plains region, and expanded towards the periphery of the south- mostly in the city’s southeastern plains region, and expanded towards the periphery of eastern plains. This is because this kind of terrain is highly suitable for urban develop- the southeastern plains. This is because this kind of terrain is highly suitable for urban ment. The construction land developed rapidly at first, then its development slowed, lead- development. The construction land developed rapidly at ﬁrst, then its development ing to a large reduction in green areas (i.e., natural components of the city) and especially slowed, leading to a large reduction in green areas (i.e., natural components of the city) cultivated land [72], leading to a growing imbalance of the city’s carbon metabolism. After and especially cultivated land [72], leading to a growing imbalance of the city’s carbon the city reached a mature stage, with relatively stable urban construction, the metabolism metabolism. After the city reached a mature stage, with relatively stable urban construction, changed into a system with intensive resource utilization that produced different carbon the metabolism changed into a system with intensive resource utilization that produced flows in the process of intensification on account of the urgent needs to construct an eco- different carbon ﬂows in the process of intensiﬁcation on account of the urgent needs to logical urban system. Thus, Beijing provides a good case study to illustrate which carbon construct an ecological urban system. Thus, Beijing provides a good case study to illustrate flow paths caused by the rapid land-use changes would increase or decrease carbon emis- which carbon ﬂow paths caused by the rapid land-use changes would increase or decrease sions, and would therefore move the city farther from or closer to carbon neutrality. Fi- carbon emissions, and would therefore move the city farther from or closer to carbon nally, this analysis will reveal some possible paths the city could follow to help it towards neutrality. Finally, this analysis will reveal some possible paths the city could follow to help carbon neutrality through appropriate changes in the city’s land-use policy. it towards carbon neutrality through appropriate changes in the city’s land-use policy. The data used in our study included energy use, population, carbon emission coeffi- The data used in our study included energy use, population, carbon emission coefﬁ- cients, and the quantity of livestock for Beijing, which we obtained from the Beijing Sta- cients, and the quantity of livestock for Beijing, which we obtained from the Beijing Statis- tistical Yearbook [71,73,74], China Energy Statistical Yearbook [75–79] and IPCC (2006) tical Yearbook [71,73,74], China Energy Statistical Yearbook [75–79] and IPCC (2006) [65]. [65]. The metabolic rates of the socioeconomic and natural components were calculated The metabolic rates of the socioeconomic and natural components were calculated in 1−1 in kg C year . The spatially explicit land-use data were obtained at a scale of 1:100,000 for kg C year . The spatially explicit land-use data were obtained at a scale of 1:100,000 for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2018 from the Institute of Geographic Sciences and 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2018 from the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (https://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on 22 March 2022)). We Natural Resources Research (https://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on 22 March 2022)). We used ArcGIS to calculate a transition matrix between consecutive years to describe the used ArcGIS to calculate a transition matrix between consecutive years to describe the change in change in land land use use and re and repr present the flows esent the ﬂows in in the the c city’s ity’s carb carbon on m metabolism. etabolism. T The he sourc source e da data ta fo for r Figur Figure e 1 1 ar are e fr free eely ly obtained obtainedonline online (h (https://image.so.com/ ttps://image.so.com/,, ((accessed accessed on on 2 22 2 Ma Mar rch ch 2022)), and are from the above-mentioned databases for Figures 2–7. 2022)), and are from the above-mentioned databases for Figures 2–7. Figure 2. (a) Carbon emission and sequestration in each year. Direct (b) and integrated (c) carbon Figure 2. (a) Carbon emission and sequestration in each year. Direct (b) and integrated (c) carbon flows through the network in each period. Note: F, forest; G, grassland; W, bodies of water; U, urban ﬂows through the network in each period. Note: F, forest; G, grassland; W, bodies of water; U, urban land; R, rural land; T, transportation and industrial land; B, bare land; C, cultivated land; C- land; R, rural land; T, transportation and industrial land; B, bare land; C, cultivated land; C-emission, carbon emission from cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sequestration produced by cultivated land. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Healthem 2022ission , 19, 5793 , carbon emission from cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sequestration produc 8 ofed 23 by culti- emission, carbon emission from cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sequestration produced by culti- vated land. vated land. Figure 3. Spatial distribution of direct carbon ﬂows in each period (the ﬂows that are shown account Figure 3. Spatial distribution of direct carbon flows in each period (the flows that are shown account Figure 3. Spatial distribution of direct carbon flows in each period (the flows that are shown account for at least 80% of the total ﬂows). Note: the ﬂows related to bare land were too small to show in for at least 80% of the total flows). Note: the flows related to bare land were too small to show in the for at least 80% of the total flows). Note: the flows related to bare land were too small to show in the the ﬁgure. figure. figure. Figure 4. Spatial distribution of integrated carbon ﬂows during each period (the ﬂows that are shown Figure 4. Spatial distribution of integrated carbon flows during each period (the flows that are Figure 4. Spatial distribution of integrated carbon flows during each period (the flows that are account for at least 80% of the total ﬂows). Note: the ﬂows related to bare land were too small to shown account for at least 80% of the total flows). Note: the flows related to bare land were too small shown account for at least 80% of the total flows). Note: the flows related to bare land were too small show in the ﬁgure. to show in the figure. to show in the figure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 9 of 23 Figure 5. Migration of the center of gravity for the direct ﬂow gradients. Note: gradient category I Figure 5. Migration of the center of gravity for the direct flow gradients. Note: gradient category I disappeared from 2000 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018, gradient category II disappeared from 2015 disappeared from 2000 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018, gradient category II disappeared from 2015 to 2018, and gradient category III disappeared from 2005 to 2010; numbered rectangles refer to the to 2018, and gradient category III disappeared from 2005 to 2010; numbered rectangles refer to the gradient maps surrounding the overall map. gradient maps surrounding the overall map. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 10 of 23 Figure 6. Changes in the location of the integrated gradient’s center of gravity. Note: Areas with Figure 6. Changes in the location of the integrated gradient’s center of gravity. Note: Areas with gradient I disappeared from 2005 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018; areas with gradients II or III gradient I disappeared from 2005 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018; areas with gradients II or III disap- disappeared from 1995 to 2000; Numbered rectangles refer to the gradient maps surrounding the peared from 1995 to 2000; Numbered rectangles refer to the gradient maps surrounding the overall overall map. map. Figure 7. Land use maps in Beijing from 2018 to the two planned scenarios (in 2035 and 2060). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 23 Figure 6. Changes in the location of the integrated gradient’s center of gravity. Note: Areas with gradient I disappeared from 2005 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018; areas with gradients II or III disap- Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 11 of 23 peared from 1995 to 2000; Numbered rectangles refer to the gradient maps surrounding the overall map. Figure 7. Land use maps in Beijing from 2018 to the two planned scenarios (in 2035 and 2060). Figure 7. Land use maps in Beijing from 2018 to the two planned scenarios (in 2035 and 2060). 3. Results 3.1. Carbon Flows in the Urban Metabolic System The total carbon emissions increased from 10.69 Mt C in 1990 to 20.61 Mt C in 2010, followed by steady decease after 2010 and ﬁnally reached 18.64 Mt C in 2018 (Figure 2a). Meanwhile, total carbon sinks varied insigniﬁcantly during 1990–2018, stabilizing at 0.38 Mt C year . At the peak in 2010, total carbon emissions were about 43.5 times higher than the total carbon sink, and this ratio remained high in 2018 (48.5 times). A serious imbalance between carbon emission and carbon sinks existed in Beijing throughout the study period. Meanwhile, the cumulative carbon emissions caused by the land-use and cover changes were 1.16 Mt C from 1990 to 2018 when the harmful ﬂows of network (i.e., increased emission) contributed 15.37 Mt C year and the beneﬁcial ﬂow (i.e., in- creased sequestration) contributed 14.21Mt C year (Figure 2b). Beijing’s total direct and integrated carbon ﬂows showed a volatile trend during the study period, with relatively high values of 5.81–8.07 Mt C year from 1990 to 2000 and from 2010 to 2015, and with relatively low values of 1.08–1.97 Mt C year from 2000 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018. The changes in network ﬂows (direct and integrated) were inconsistent with the changes in carbon emissions, depending on land sources consumed during urban expansion. As the dominant components in Beijing’s carbon metabolism, transportation and industrial land contributed an average of 64.9% of the total carbon emissions, 46.0% of the total direct ﬂows (beneﬁcial and harmful ﬂows), and 39.5% of the total integrated ﬂows, respectively. As a result of the increasing energy consumption by industrial production and the transportation, storage, postal, and telecommunications services industries, emissions increased from 7.29 Mt C in 1990 to 11.06 Mt C in 2018. Due to the high metabolic density, slight changes in the area of transportation and industrial land caused large carbon ﬂows, with an average contribution of 40.7%~51.3% to the direct network ﬂows. During the study period, relative contributions of transportation and industrial land to carbon emissions decreased from 68.2% to 59.4% (Figure 2a). Meanwhile, its relative contributions to network ﬂows decreased sharply from 51.8% to 9.1% (Figure 2b,c). In urban land, the carbon emission experienced the largest increase from 2.01 Mt C in 1990 to 7.13 Mt C in 2018, mainly because of the industrial structure upgrading after 2005. In addition, ca. 2.2% of the total carbon emissions were caused by human respiration, which contributed 0.46 Mt C year in 2018. Carbon emissions from rural land decreased sharply from 1.51 Mt C in 2015 to 0.38 Mt C in 2018, which mostly resulted from a large reduction in coal consumption which decreased carbon emission by 1.12 Mt C year . Large network ﬂows produced by urban and rural land occurred from 1990 to 1995 and from 2010 to 2018 due to a reduction in the growth rate of urban land and a conversion of this land to transportation and industrial land. In addition, carbon emissions from cultivated land showed a continuous decreasing trend for the large reduction from fertilizer. The relative Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 12 of 23 contributions of this land to network ﬂows slightly increased as the land area sacriﬁced during urbanization. For natural sectors, forest accounted for 91.3 0.8% of the total carbon sink, and was the main reason for the peaking of carbon sink in 1995 (0.40 Mt C). In contrast, the carbon sink from grassland, bodies of water, and cultivated land only accounted for 3.1 0.2, 4.9 0.1, and 0.9 0.2% of the total during the study period, respectively. Positive carbon ﬂows were inﬂuenced by forest, grassland, and bodies of water, which contributed the positive carbon ﬂows of 0.96, 0.51 and 0.28 Mt C year , respectively, during the study period. Total integrated ﬂows from forest, grassland, and bodies of water accounted for averages of 7.3, 3.9, and 2.7%, respectively, of the total during the study period. Generally, integrated ﬂows from these three components contributed relatively small ﬂows to the network, but showed a large increasing trend, from 0.27, 0.14, and 0.08 Mt C year , respectively, from 1995 to 2000 to 0.77, 0.42, and 0.18 Mt C year from 2010 to 2015. Most of the integrated ﬂows for forest, grassland, and bodies of water were caused by integrated input ﬂows from the socioeconomic sectors. As the urban expansion mainly derived from consumption of cultivated land, the natural components were slightly inﬂuenced by the socioeconomic sectors initially, but became more signiﬁcantly inﬂuenced since 2015. 3.2. Spatial Distribution of Carbon Flows To analyze how the carbon ﬂows inﬂuence urban carbon metabolism and acquire a better understanding of the carbon metabolic network, we started by focusing on the direct ﬂows. In Figure 3, the direct ﬂows were generally dominated by the paths re- lated to transportation and industrial land, which accounted for an average of 83.5% of the ﬂows during the study period. The path transportation and industrial land ! culti- vated land, the ﬁrst contributed path (i.e., the path with the largest ﬂow), decreased from 1 1 1.17 Mt C year from 1990 to 1995 to 0.01 Mt C year from 2005 to 2010, then increased 1 1 slightly to 0.47 Mt C year from 2010 to 2015 and then decreased to 0.37 kt C year . The major paths differed among the periods. From 1990 to 1995, direct ﬂows were dominated by the urban land! transportation and industrial land path and the transporta- tion and industrial land ! cultivated land path, which accounted for 66.6% and 69.2% of the direct ﬂows, respectively, from urban land and transportation and industrial land. The paths from transportation and industrial land to other land use types contributed 18.4% of the total direct ﬂows. In contrast, the carbon ﬂows paths from 1995 to 2000 were dominated by the rural land ! transportation and industrial land path, the transportation and indus- trial land ! cultivated land path, and the cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land path, which contributed 87.9, 39.1, and 87.1% of the direct ﬂows, respectively, from rural land, transportation and industrial land, and cultivated land. The direct ﬂows from transportation and industrial land to other land use types increased to 26.1% of the total direct ﬂows as the scale reduction existed in transportation and industrial land (i.e., causing massive carbon transition) which resulted in large carbon ﬂows. This could explain the temporal changes of the harmful effects from transportation and industrial land during the study period. After 2000, the land use changes slowed, and the total direct ﬂows were 1 1 0. 89 Mt C year from 2000 to 2005 and 0.71 Mt C year from 2005 to 2010. The paths in the two periods were dominated by the transportation and industrial land ! culti- vated land path and the cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land path, which contributed 48.1 and 42.1% of the total direct ﬂows, respectively. From 2010 to 2015, the total direct ﬂows in the network increased to 3.55 Mt C year and the main paths were dominated by the transportation and industrial land ! rural land path and the cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land path, which accounted for 42.7 and 65.4% of the direct ﬂows, respectively, from transportation and industrial land and cultivated land. The paths from forest, grassland, urban land, and rural land to transportation and industrial land increased obviously compared to the ﬂows from 2005 to 2010, which contributed 22.9% of the total direct ﬂows. Interestingly, the changes of the direct ﬂows between trans- portation and industrial land and forest were similar to the changes of the total direct ﬂows, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 13 of 23 and contributed 11.1 and 13.4% of the total direct ﬂows from 1995 to 2000 and from 2010 to 2015. From 2015 to 2018, the total direct ﬂows decreased to 1.08 Mt C year , which were dominated by urban land ! rural land and cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land, which accounted for 36.2 and 31.1%, respectively, of the total direct ﬂows. Based on the analysis in Section 3.1, the total network ﬂows decreased from 1990 to 2010, mainly due to the decrease in the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic sectors and cultivated land and the decrease of the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic and natural sectors, with decreases of 8.5 and 4.8%, respectively; these ﬂows accounted for an average of 75.6 and 23.9% of the total integrated ﬂows, respectively. On the other hand, the network’s total integrated ﬂows decreased, mostly due to decreases in the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic sectors and cultivated land, the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic metabolic components, and the integrated ﬂows between the socioeconomic and natural sectors, with decreases of 9.9, 7.5, and 10.8%, respectively, which accounted for an average of 39.8, 34.5, and 25.9% of the total integrated ﬂows from 2010 to 2018. Figure 4 shows the variation in integrated ﬂows in Beijing from 1990 to 2018. We found that the main path from 1990 to 1995 and from 2000 to 2005 was cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land, which accounted for 35.2 and 42.5% of the total integrated ﬂows, respectively. The paths from 1995 to 2000 and from 2010 to 2015 had similarly large carbon ﬂows, dominated by the cultivated land ! transportation and industrial land path (15.6%, 12.9%), the transportation and industrial land ! cultivated land path (13.8%, 9.5%), the paths from transportation and industrial land to the natural sectors (11.5%, 9.4%), and the paths between the socioeconomic sectors (34.9%, 32.7%). The ﬂows from 2005 to 2010 and from 2015 to 2018 were less than in the other periods, and were mainly inﬂuenced by the transportation and industrial land ! cultivated land path, which accounted for 78.6 and 24.5% of the total integrated ﬂows, respectively. In general, integrated ﬂows through the network decreased at an average annual rate of 3.8%, mainly due to decreased carbon ﬂows in the socioeconomic sectors. The main path from cultivated land to the socioeconomic sectors and the paths between each socioeconomic component accounted for 29.5 and 31.7% of the integrated ﬂows during the study period. The main paths in each period were mainly determined by Beijing’s land-use policies during the different developmental stages. The area of each land-use type changed from stable increases or decreases to ﬂuctuation. Overall, the growth of carbon-neutral paths from 1990 to 2000 related to cultivated land and transportation and industrial land, mainly due to increases in the areas of transportation and industrial land. After China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, the fast growth of economy further relied on the rapid urban expansion from 2000 to 2010. As the urban system gradually stabilized, the govern- ment began to prioritize low-carbon and green development, and managing the spatial distribution of these areas became priorities from 2010 to 2018. Thus, the increasing ﬂows along the paths between socioeconomic components generally resulted from these more sustainable land-use policies. However, the ﬂows from cultivated land to transportation and industrial land remained high after 2010 and led to high net carbon emissions. 3.3. Changes of the Centers of Gravity 3.3.1. Changing Center of Gravity for Direct Flows Based on the direct ﬂow gradients in Figure S4, we calculated the spatial distribution of the gradient center of gravity of the direct input ﬂows (Figure 5). From 1990 to 2018, the overall gradient center of gravity (i.e., the value for all gradient categories combined) for the direct input ﬂows was located in the southeastern plains, up to 8 km from the north of the center (plains) and 8 to 14 km from the large areas of category I gradient, although some areas in this category existed north and west of the overall gradient center of gravity. Furthermore, the overall gradient center of gravity was at the intersection of other category gradients and the intersection mostly related to the areas with ﬂows in the highest and second-highest categories (I and II), whereas the areas in category III were slightly scattered and far from the overall gradient center of gravity, followed by the second-lowest and Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 14 of 23 lowest categories (IV and V, respectively). Therefore, the overall gradient center of gravity and its migration were mainly affected by categories I and II, followed by category III. During the study period, the location of the gradient center of gravity for the direct input ﬂows moved southward by 14.4 km, towards the center of southeast plains, and reached the center of the southeast plains in 2010, after which it kept moving southward by about 1.35 km from 2010 to 2018. The migration direction and distance for the overall gradient center of gravity changed over time. From 1990 to 2000, the center of gravity moved farthest (13.5 km) along an az- imuth of 12 . The migration direction for the category I gradient (1400 to 5000 kt C year ) moved about 7.5 km along an azimuth of 305 , but its migration distance was only about a half of that for the overall gradient center of gravity. The center of gravity for the category II gradient (760 to 1400 kt C year ) moved along an azimuth of 55 and the category III gradient (235 to 760 kt C year ) in the northeastern part of the mountainous area migrated along an azimuth of 330 . Thus, the overall trend was dominated by the combined effects of the category I, II, and III gradients. From 2000 to 2005, the overall gradient center of gravity continued to move northward, and its migration direction was relatively small. Compared to the previous period, the overall gradient center of gravity migrated along an azimuth of 200 over a distance of 6.8 km, which was mainly due to the decreased direct input ﬂows in the southeastern plains. The category I gradient disappeared while the migration toward the overall gradient center of gravity weakened sharply, and the category II gradient therefore dominated the migration of the overall gradient center of gravity. From 2005 to 2015, the increased direct input ﬂows in the center of the southeastern plains, causing the overall gradient center of gravity moving along an azimuth of 25 over a distance of 7.2 km, mainly as a result of the category I gradient’s center of gravity moving 4.5 km along an azimuth of 250 while the category II gradient’s center of gravity migrated along an azimuth of 165 over a distance of 8.1 km. From 2015 to 2018, the overall gradient center of gravity moved along an azimuth of 242 by 7.7 km, mainly as a result of migration of the category III gradient’s center of gravity along an azimuth of 120 over a distance of 35 km and migration of the category IV gradient’s center of gravity 18 km along an azimuth of 205 . Generally, the occurrence of a category I gradient was mostly caused by the decreasing area of cultivated land and expansion of the area of transportation and industrial land from 1990 to 2000 and from 2005 to 2015. These both resulted in migration of the overall gradient center of gravity along an azimuth of 12 and 25 , mainly due to rapid land-use changes in the northern periphery of the southeastern plains. Meanwhile, the migration of the gravity center for the direct ﬂow gradients would be mainly dominated by the changing land use in the northern part of Beijing, due to the contemporaneous expansion of land areas of Beijing Capital International Airport and restoration of water of bodies. However, the overall center of gravity moved along an azimuth of 205 , which suggests the need to improve the spatial distribution of carbon emission to promote low-carbon urban development; that is, it will be necessary to develop a subcenter to mitigate carbon emission from the center of the plains area. Although the migration of the center of gravity was related to the activities of the socioeconomic sectors, the urban system became increasingly mature. The land-use patterns gradually stabilized, which is why the category III and IV gradients inﬂuenced the overall gradient center of gravity in the period 2015–2018. 3.3.2. Changing Center of Gravity for Integrated Flows Based on the integrated input ﬂow gradients shown in Figure S5, we mapped the spatial distribution of the overall gradient’s center of gravity (i.e., the value for all gradient categories combined) shown in Figure 6. From 1990 to 2018, the distribution of the input gradient center of gravity was similar to that of the direct input ﬂows, which were also located in the north of the center of the southeast plains and the west areas of the northeast of the center (plains) with a category I gradient. As in the case of the direct input ﬂows, the areas of intersection between gradients mostly occurred where category I, II, and II Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 15 of 23 gradients occurred for the integrated input ﬂows and the intersection with the gradient I center of gravity was largest, followed by the category II and III gradients. However, the distribution of the overall input gradient center of gravity were southeast of the direct input ﬂows, which was closer to the category I and II input areas; that is, it was within 6 to 7 km north of the center of the southeastern plains, and another that was 4 to 12 km from the large areas of transportation and industrial land in the east. In addition, some category I and II areas existed in the northern and western parts of Beijing. The input gradient center of gravity generally moved southward; that is, it moved to areas closed to the center of the southeastern plains. The total movement was 9.1 km and the input gradient center of gravity shifted to an azimuth of 205 . The migration distance and direction differed greatly between periods. The migration distance was greater and the migration direction different from 1990 to 2000 than from 2000 to 2010. The overall input gradient center of gravity migrated 9.4 km along an azimuth of 245 . This resulted from a large shift southwards of the category I gradient’s center of gravity, which was along an azimuth of 105 and 1.5 times the migration distance of the overall input gradient center of gravity but differed from the overall input gradient’s center of gravity direction, which was along an azimuth of 350 and migration of the category II gradient (13 km), which was close to that of the overall input gradient center of gravity with an azimuth of 10 but greater than the overall input migration distance (6.9 km) and the weakening impacts of the category III gradient, which moved 10.8 km in the opposite direction of the overall input gradient center of gravity. From 2000 to 2005, the overall input gradient center of gravity migrated southward by 4.4 m along an azimuth of 85 . This was mainly because the ﬂow decrease in the southeastern plains was greater than that in the northwestern mountainous areas, and areas in the east with a category I gradient center of gravity moved 2.7 km along an azimuth of 355 . Due to the simultaneous decrease in the overall integrated ﬂows in Beijing, a faster decrease occurred in the northwestern mountainous areas, which further weakened the migration of the gradient in northwest mountainous areas toward the overall input gradient center of gravity; that is, the centers of gravity of the category III gradient, category IV gradient (76 to 235 kt C year ), and category V gradient (0 to 76 kt C year ) all turned to the east. The nearly homogeneous distribution of gradients in the southeastern plains also caused the overall input gradient center of gravity to migrate east. From 2005 to 2010, the overall input gradient center of gravity continued to shift northeastward, by 7.2 km. The main reason for this migration trajectory was a further decrease of the integrated input ﬂows in the southeastern plains caused by the disappearance of the category I gradient in the center of the study area and most of its periphery, and movement of the gradient II and III centers of gravity northward. From 2010 to 2015, the category I gradient was sufﬁciently common in the southeastern plains that migration of the category II gradient center of gravity could not offset the northward migration of the overall input gradient center of gravity, leading to a southwestward transfer. After 2015, the overall integrated input ﬂows decreased obviously, leading to disappearance of the category I gradient in the southeastern plains. The overall input gradient center of gravity was mainly inﬂuenced by the category II and III gradients, which migrated southeastward. 4. Discussion and Policy Implication 4.1. Network Characteristics Various groups have employed the ENA method to characterize the spatial and tem- poral changes of carbon ﬂows from the network perspective on regional or city levels in China [26,57,58,64,80]. In the current work, we combined the ENA and GIS methods to estimate spatiotemporal changes in the gravity centers of carbon ﬂows to bridge the rela- tionship between urban form transition and land-use change-related carbon ﬂows transfers. Results indicated that the land-use structure has greatly changed the characteristics of Beijing’s carbon metabolic network. For example, the government’s policy of gradually moving heavy industries outside Beijing, which was implemented starting in 2000, should Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 16 of 23 be modiﬁed to consider the possibility of optimizing the path from transportation and industrial land to cultivated land and other green types as other ways to approach carbon neutrality. Efforts to make these changes will depend on the spatial distribution of land use. In Beijing, this will be inﬂuenced by the “Master plan of Beijing: 2004–2020” and “Beijing 12th Five-Year Plan”, which have the goal of protecting cultivated land from the impacts of expansion of urban land and transportation and industrial land expansion, and by the “Master Plan of Beijing: 2016–2035”, which has the goal of increasing the city’s green areas to offset the increase of carbon emission. To these ends, the uncontrolled expansion of urban land, rural land, and transportation and industrial land will be replaced by more appropriate land uses for overall coordination, and this was the major reason that large negative carbon ﬂows were produced by transportation and industrial land from 2010 to 2015 and by urban land from 2010 to 2018. Despite the increase in the area of rural land from 2010 to 2018, urban intensiﬁcation (to consolidate new residential construction with the goal of achieving a higher population per unit area) is an irresistible trend, which suggests that the increasing area of rural land would be an intermediate stage in the land use management in Beijing. Planners would be more likely to achieve a compact city to promote a reduction in urban and rural construction land, aiming to build a more ecologically and efﬁciently sustainable urban system [21,81]. Furthermore, we observed the trend of the compact city in the period of 2010–2015 and 2015–2018, which would have caused a reduction in urban lands by 19.3% (Tables S5 and S6). Therefore, as China has identiﬁed carbon neutrality as a crucial goal, highly developed cities such as Beijing will need to work harder to optimize the land-use patterns. Thus, urban planners should try to minimize uncontrolled urban expansion and instead focus on increasing the intensity of resource utilization (i.e., increasing its efﬁciency) to minimize carbon emissions. 4.2. Scenario Analysis Analyzing the land use and emission trends provided insights into possible paths to bring Beijing’s metabolism closer to carbon neutrality. Based on the planning map in the “Master plan of Beijing: 2016–2035”, future land use maps (Figure 7) were created using GIS software. On the other hand, the energy indices used to create these maps were based on the “Prospect of Energy and Power Development in China (2020 Edition)”, in which non-fossil fuel energy was predicted to contribute 40 and 81% of the terminal energy consumption in 2035 and 2060, respectively (more detail are presented in Table S14). On account of data from these scenarios from 2018 to 2035 and from 2035 to 2060, we predicted total direct carbon ﬂows of 0.98 and 0.02 Mt C year , respectively, in Beijing’s carbon metabolic network. The corresponding total integrated ﬂows were 1.12 and 0.02 Mt C year , re- spectively. From 2018 to 2035, the main paths were cultivated land ! urban land (37.9%) and rural land ! urban land (32.3%). From 2035 to 2060, the main paths were urban land ! cultivated land (34.2%) and urban land ! rural land (30.3%). Based on the areas of the different land use types in each year (Figure S3), the urban land evolved from fast expansion to a scale reduction, with the carbon metabolic intensity (Table S15) increasing 2 2 2 from 5.1 kg C/m in 2010 to 5.7 kg C/m in 2018 and then decreasing to 1.0 kg C/m in 2060. For the rural land, the carbon metabolic intensity sharply decreased from 1.4 kg C/m in 2010 to 0.2 kg C/m in 2018, mainly caused by eliminating coal consumption in rural land, and became roughly stable at this level from 2018 to 2060. Though the carbon emission from transportation and industrial land decreased, the direct carbon emission was still 2.10 Mt C in 2060, with emission of 8.3 kg C/m in 2060 (Figure 8). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 17 of 23 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 23 Figure 8. (a) Direct carbon emission and sinks in 2018, and predicted values in the 2035 and 2060 Figure 8. (a) Direct carbon emission and sinks in 2018, and predicted values in the 2035 and 2060 scenarios; (b) carbon metabolic intensity of the urban socioeconomic components in each year; (c) scenarios; (b) carbon metabolic intensity of the urban socioeconomic components in each year; annual average integrated (direct plus indirect) flows from 2015 to 2018, from 2018 to 2035, and from (c) annual average integrated (direct plus indirect) ﬂows from 2015 to 2018, from 2018 to 2035, and 2035 to 2060. Note: F, forest; G, grassland; W, bodies of water; U, urban land; R, rural land; T, trans- from 2035 to 2060. Note: F, forest; G, grassland; W, bodies of water; U, urban land; R, rural land; T, portation and industrial land; B, bare land; C, cultivated land; C-emission, carbon emission from transportation and industrial land; B, bare land; C, cultivated land; C-emission, carbon emission from cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sinks produced by cultivated land. cultivated land; C-sink, carbon sinks produced by cultivated land. 4.3. Policy Implications Under these scenarios, the gradual maturation of the urban system is expected, leading After quantifying the carbon flows and their changes in response to changing land to low-carbon urban development with increasing green compensation. From 2035 to 2060, use, accurately visualizing the processes that underlie carbon transitions will help plan- forest is predicted to account for almost all of the total direct carbon ﬂows with large ners to explore the possible paths towards carbon neutrality. As our study shows, GIS proportion of integrated ﬂows for offsetting the carbon emission. Although the energy technology permits characterization of the spatial patterns of carbon flows and permits transformation was conducted by decreasing the proportions of the 15 kinds of primary analysis of the spatial pattern of the urban metabolism [84,85]. Our analysis revealed that fossil fuel energy in Beijing, direct carbon emissions will decrease to 11.43 and 4.06 Mt C the eastern parts of Beijing and the surrounding areas are important emission centers, and in 2035 and 2060, respectively, but carbon emissions will still be 26.8 and 9.1 times the the southward migration of the overall gradient center of gravity indicated the develop- carbon sinks in 2035 and 2060, respectively, and will represent carbon emissions 11.01 and ment of a multi-center urban structure that has resulted in areas with a gradient of cate- 3.62 Mt C greater than the sequestration. Meanwhile, a recent study suggested that China gory I in the southeastern plains areas (Figures S4 and S5), which agrees with previous could reduce its net carbon emission by 16% between now and 2060 by increasing carbon research [56,86]. By constantly moving carbon flows to the periphery of the built-up areas storage in forests [82,83]. For Beijing’s ecosystem, the total carbon sinks increased slightly in the southeastern plains, the moving carbon emission to areas outside Beijing could re- during study period, mainly caused by the increasing forest area. lieve pressure on the city’s center. Currently, developing a multi-center urban structure has been shown to be an effective path to reduce carbon emission [87–89] and to improve 4.3. Policy Implications the efficiency of energy use [90,91]. Beijing and other cities in China are facing the chal- After quantifying the carbon ﬂows and their changes in response to changing land use, lenge of forming more compact urban systems to reduce pressure on their surrounding accurately visualizing the processes that underlie carbon transitions will help planners to environment [60]. explore the possible paths towards carbon neutrality. As our study shows, GIS technology However, high energy consumption by the city’s socioeconomic sectors often leads permits characterization of the spatial patterns of carbon ﬂows and permits analysis of the to increased energy intensity [92–94]. As an important part of the urban planning [95], it spatial pattern of the urban metabolism [84,85]. Our analysis revealed that the eastern parts will be necessary to learn how to avoid the effects of this increased compaction, which of Beijing and the surrounding areas are important emission centers, and the southward creates a risk of moving away from carbon neutrality. For example, planning more effi- migration of the overall gradient center of gravity indicated the development of a multi- cient transportation [15] strongly related to the key nodes of urban land and transporta- center urban structure that has resulted in areas with a gradient of category I in the tion and industrial land can improve the ability to develop a multi-center structure in southeastern plains areas (Figures S4 and S5), which agrees with previous research [56,86]. Beijing. In addition, land use in the southeastern plains which links Beijing with the sur- By constantly moving carbon ﬂows to the periphery of the built-up areas in the southeastern rounding cities should be examined to determine the potential for strengthening the in- plains, the moving carbon emission to areas outside Beijing could relieve pressure on the teraction with this region, since that may decrease the city’s carbon emissions [58], partic- city’s center. Currently, developing a multi-center urban structure has been shown to be an ularly if the transportation land at the periphery of the southeastern plains can be ex- effective path to reduce carbon emission [87–89] and to improve the efﬁciency of energy panded to improve transportation efficiency. Thus, more attention should be paid to use [90,91]. Beijing and other cities in China are facing the challenge of forming more changing the development focus, which often involves the sacrifice of green spaces, compact urban systems to reduce pressure on their surrounding environment [60]. thereby providing more sustainable urban planning [96]. For instance, transforming low- However, high energy consumption by the city’s socioeconomic sectors often leads to increased energy intensity [92–94]. As an important part of the urban planning [95], it Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 18 of 23 will be necessary to learn how to avoid the effects of this increased compaction, which creates a risk of moving away from carbon neutrality. For example, planning more efﬁcient transportation [15] strongly related to the key nodes of urban land and transportation and industrial land can improve the ability to develop a multi-center structure in Beijing. In addition, land use in the southeastern plains which links Beijing with the surrounding cities should be examined to determine the potential for strengthening the interaction with this region, since that may decrease the city’s carbon emissions [58], particularly if the transportation land at the periphery of the southeastern plains can be expanded to improve transportation efﬁciency. Thus, more attention should be paid to changing the development focus, which often involves the sacriﬁce of green spaces, thereby providing more sustainable urban planning [96]. For instance, transforming low-quality cultivated land with a low economic value and a low carbon-sink capacity to other land use types can be considerable to improve Beijing’s development in some cases. Finally, although China’s commitment to tackle climate change is strong, it is still not clear how China can achieve its carbon-neutral vision [97,98]. Plans elsewhere in the world use a deadline of 2050, which is earlier than the 2060 deadline that has been set for China. Achieving carbon neutrality will rely on each city’s efforts to follow low-carbon paths, using strategies such as changing the current energy consumption structure [99–101] and developing more effective urban planning [102,103], improving the proportion of clean energy [100]. These paths are popular solutions in some regions to achieve carbon neutrality, and will also be vital to achieve carbon neutrality in China’s cities [97]. 5. Conclusions In this study, we performed a spatially explicit analysis of Beijing’s carbon ﬂows from 1990 to 2018, as well as China’s proposed scenarios for 2035 and 2060, to explore the possible paths to reduce carbon emission reduction. The direct and integrated emission and sequestration by the city’s socioeconomic sectors and cultivated land in Beijing’s urban carbon metabolism were critical to achieve carbon neutrality, especially by regulating land transfers from cultivated land to socioeconomic sectors. The overall center of gravity migrated southward as a result of rapid land use change, leading to the development of a multi-center structure; the migration was driven primarily by migration of the centers of gravity for the category I and II gradients during the study period, thus providing clear information to help decision makers achieve carbon neutrality. Our analysis of the two future scenarios for Beijing revealed that the efforts of city planners to transform the city’s energy-consumption structure and increase green compensation will bring Beijing closer to carbon neutrality by reducing the gap between carbon emission and carbon sequestration. Therefore, future land use planning should consider how to increase the city’s green areas and improve their spatial distribution while constructing a more efﬁcient urban system. However, it will be necessary to clarify the driving mechanisms that underlie the city’s urban carbon metabolism and to perform a sensitivity analysis of the network to determine the reliability of the network model for use in future predictions. This study provides a network perspective to explore the paths to narrow the gap between carbon emissions and sequestrations. However, there are still some limitations. First, it is necessary to clarify the driving mechanisms that underlie the city’s urban carbon metabolism and to perform a sensitivity analysis of the network to determine the reliability of the network model for estimation in future predictions. Secondly, we rearranged the sub-sectors into each land use type owing to lack of relevant information. Therefore, further research should establish more detailed land-use data. Thirdly, a lack of land transaction data between cities limits ﬁne land management. Usually, the local bureau of statistics will not directly report these data online, and for many cities, the data used for metabolic analysis on time series are scarce. The future carbon metabolism database should be able to promote modeling the urban metabolic system in the time cascades, and the future spatial distribution between urban metabolism and land-use policy should also be projected based on the research basis of various models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 19 of 23 Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19105793/s1, Figure S1: Land use map for Beijing from 1990 to 2018; Figure S2: Digital elevation model map of Beijing; Figure S3: Areas of the different land use types areas from 1990 to 2018; Figure S4: Changes in the direct input ﬂows from 1990 to 2018; Figure S5: Changes in the integrated (direct plus indirect) input ﬂows from 1990 to 2018; Table S1: Different land use types areas in each year; Table S2–S7: Land transition matrix from 1990–2018; Table S8: IPCC carbon emission conversion coefﬁcients for the energy types consumed in the study area [65]; Table S9: Carbon emission conversion coefﬁcients for the respiration accounting items [65,104,105]; Table S10: The city’s population and livestock numbers during the study period; Table S11: The conversion coefﬁcients for carbon emission of cultivated land [106]; Table S12: Carbon sequestration coefﬁcients for the natural components of the urban network [107–113]; Table S13: Categories for the total direct and integrated input ﬂows for each component of Beijing’s carbon metabolism; Table S14: Scenarios description in 2035 and 2060; Table S15: Carbon metabolic intensity for the different land use types in each year. Author Contributions: L.X.: wrote the manuscript, designed the model and the research frame work; J.W.: performed the calculations and the images improvement; R.W.: designed the research frame work and contributed to writing improvement; L.C.: provided critical feedback and provided critical feedback; Y.Z.: designed the model and the research frame work; Z.Y.: designed the model and the research frame work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work was supported by the Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams (2019ZT08L213), by the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (GML2019ZD0403), by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2021A1515011889). Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Conﬂicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing ﬁnancial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to inﬂuence the work reported in this paper. References 1. IPCC. Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 C. 2018. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/W (accessed on 22 March 2022). 2. IEA. Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2017. 2018. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status- report-2017 (accessed on 22 March 2022). 3. IEA. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion: Overview; Paris International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2020. 4. Paul, S. Energetic Cities: Energy, Environment and Strategic Thinking. World Policy J. 2010, 27, 11–13. [CrossRef] 5. Abbasi, M.A.; Parveen, S.; Khan, S.; Kamal, M.A. Urbanization and energy consumption effects on carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from Asian-8 countries using panel data analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 18029–18043. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 6. Hong, C.; Burney, J.A.; Pongratz, J.; Nabel, J.E.M.S.; Mueller, N.D.; Jackson, R.B.; Davis, S.J. Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961–2017. Nature 2021, 589, 554–561. [CrossRef] 7. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Spatial Planning, Cambridge; Seto, K.C., Dhakal, S., Bigio, A., Blanco, H., Delgado, G.C., Dewar, D., Huang, L., Inaba, A., Kansal, A., Lwasa, S., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 923–1000. 8. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Xia, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y. Urban expansion simulation towards low-carbon development: A case study of Wuhan, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 63, 102455. [CrossRef] 9. Gu, C.; Guan, W.; Liu, H. Chinese urbanization 2050: SD modeling and process simulation. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2017, 60, 1067–1082. [CrossRef] 10. Liu, J.; Diamond, J. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 2005, 435, 1179–1186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 11. Fang, J.; Yu, G.; Liu, L.; Hu, S.; Chapin, F.S. Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 4015–4020. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 12. Liu, H.; Zhang, Y. Ecological network analysis of urban metabolism based on input-output table. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2012, 13, 1616–1623. [CrossRef] 13. Lu, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Su, H.; Wang, P.; Jenkins, A.; Ferrier, R.C.; Bailey, M.; Squire, G. Ecosystem health towards sustainability. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2015, 1, 1–15. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 20 of 23 14. Lai, L.; Huang, X.; Yang, H.; Chuai, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhong, T.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Thompson, J.R. Carbon emissions from land-use change and management in China between 1990 and 2010. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1601063. [CrossRef] 15. Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Wu, P.; Feng, K.; Hubacek, K.; Li, X.; Sun, L. Impacts of Urban Expansion on Terrestrial Carbon Storage in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 6834–6844. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Zhou, N.; Price, L.; Yande, D.; Creyts, J.; Khanna, N.; Fridley, D.; Lu, H.; Feng, W.; Liu, X.; Hasanbeigi, A.; et al. A roadmap for China to peak carbon dioxide emissions and achieve a 20% share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy by 2030. Appl. Energy 2019, 239, 793–819. [CrossRef] 17. Vaughan, A. China’s surprising ambition. New Sci. 2020, 248, 18. [CrossRef] 18. Gupta, D.; Garg, A. Sustainable development and carbon neutrality: Integrated assessment of transport transitions in India. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 85, 102474. [CrossRef] 19. Li, X.; Damartzis, T.; Stadler, Z.; Moret, S.; Meier, B.; Friedl, M.; Maréchal, F. Decarbonization in Complex Energy Systems: A Study on the Feasibility of Carbon Neutrality for Switzerland in 2050. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 549615. [CrossRef] 20. Bedulli, C.; Lavery, P.S.; Harvey, M.; Duarte, C.M.; Serrano, O. Contribution of Seagrass Blue Carbon toward Carbon Neutral Policies in a Touristic and Environmentally-Friendly Island. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 1. [CrossRef] 21. Deng, M.; Luo, W.; Yin, L. A Systematic Review of International Theory, Research and Practice on Carbon Neutrality. Resour. Sci. 2013, 35, 1084–1094. (In Chinese) 22. Attahiru, Y.B.; Aziz, M.M.A.; Kassim, K.A.; Shahid, S.; Abu Bakar, W.A.W.; Nsashruddin, T.F.; Rahman, F.A.; Ahamed, M.I. A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 101, 600–613. [CrossRef] 23. Bettenhausen, C. Cemex goes global with carbon-neutral concrete. Chem. Eng. News. 2020, 98, 11. [CrossRef] 24. Fang, G.; Lu, L.; Tian, L.; He, Y.; Bai, Y. Can China achieve the energy-saving and emission reducing objectives during the “13th Five-Year-Plan”?—A systematic evolutionary analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121256. [CrossRef] 25. Yuan, Y.; Duan, H.; Tsvetanov, T.G. Synergizing China’s energy and carbon mitigation goals: General equilibrium modeling and policy assessment. Energy Econ. 2020, 89, 104787. [CrossRef] 26. Xia, C.; Chen, B. Urban land-carbon nexus based on ecological network analysis. Appl. Energy 2020, 276, 115465. [CrossRef] 27. Wolman, A. The Metabolism of Cities. Sci. Am. 1965, 213, 178–190. [CrossRef] 28. Kennedy, C.; Cuddihy, J.; Engel-Yan, J. The Changing Metabolism of Cities. J. Ind. Ecol. 2007, 11, 43–59. [CrossRef] 29. Kennedy, C.; Steinberger, J.; Gasson, B.; Hansen, Y.; Hillman, T.; Havránek, M.; Pataki, D.; Phdungsilp, A.; Ramaswami, A.; Mendez, G.V. Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 4828–4837. [CrossRef] 30. Kennedy, C.; Pincetl, S.; Bunje, P. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1965–1973. [CrossRef] 31. Kennedy, C.; Stewart, I.D.; Ibrahim, N.; Facchini, A.; Mele, R. Developing a multi-layered indicator set for urban metabolism studies in megacities. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 47, 7–15. [CrossRef] 32. Tang, M.; Hong, J.; Guo, S.; Liu, G.; Shen, G.Q. A bibliometric review of urban energy metabolism: Evolutionary trends and the application of network analytical methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 279, 123403. [CrossRef] 33. Mostafavi, N.; Shojaei, H.R.; Beheshtian, A.; Hoque, S. Residential Water Consumption Modeling in the Integrated Urban Metabolism Analysis Tool (IUMAT). Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 131, 64–74. [CrossRef] 34. Serrao-Neumann, S.; Renouf, M.A.; Morgan, E.; Kenway, S.J.; Choy, D.L. Urban water metabolism information for planning water sensitive city-regions. Land Use Policy 2019, 88, 104144. [CrossRef] 35. Xia, C.; Li, Y.; Xu, T.; Chen, Q.; Ye, Y.; Shi, Z.; Liu, J.; Ding, Q.; Li, X. Analyzing spatial patterns of urban carbon metabolism and its response to change of urban size: A case of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 615–625. [CrossRef] 36. Li, J.; Huang, G.; Liu, L. Ecological network analysis for urban metabolism and carbon emissions based on input-output tables: A case study of Guangdong province. Ecol. Model. 2018, 383, 118–126. [CrossRef] 37. Dong, Y.; Xu, L.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Chen, L. Aggravation of reactive nitrogen ﬂow driven by human production and consumption in Guangzhou City China. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–10. [CrossRef] 38. Chen, C.; Yao, Z.; Wen, Z.G.; Sheng, N. Impact of city characteristics on its phosphorus metabolism in the bay area: A comparative analysis of cities in the Greater Bay Area of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 286, 124925. [CrossRef] 39. Chen, Q.; Su, M.; Meng, F.; Liu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z. Analysis of urban carbon metabolism characteristics based on provincial input-output tables. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 265, 110561. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 40. Elliot, T.; Almenar, J.B.; Rugani, B. Impacts of policy on urban energy metabolism at tackling climate change: The case of Lisbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123510. [CrossRef] 41. Hu, G.; Mu, X. Analysis of urban energy metabolic system: An ecological network framework and a case study for Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 210, 958–969. [CrossRef] 42. Zhai, M.; Huang, G.; Liu, H.; Liu, L.; He, C.; Liu, Z. Three-perspective energy-carbon nexus analysis for developing China’s policies of CO -emission mitigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135857. [CrossRef] 43. Fernandes, M.M.; Fernandes, M.R.D.M.; Garcia, J.R.; Matricardi, E.A.T.; de Almeida, A.Q.; Pinto, A.S.; Menezes, R.S.C.; Silva, A.D.J.; Lima, A.H.D.S. Assessment of land use and land cover changes and valuation of carbon stocks in the Sergipe semiarid region, Brazil: 1992–2030. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104795. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 21 of 23 44. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, H.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, J.; Su, M.; Liu, G. Characterizing urban metabolic systems with an ecological hierarchy method, Beijing, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 121, 19–33. [CrossRef] 45. Hutyra, L.R.; Yoon, B.; Hepinstall-Cymerman, J.; Alberti, M. Carbon consequences of land cover change and expansion of urban lands: A case study in the Seattle metropolitan region. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 103, 83–93. [CrossRef] 46. Tanikawa, H.; Hashimoto, S. Urban stock over time: Spatial material stock analysis using 4d-GIS. Build. Res. Inf. 2009, 37, 483–502. [CrossRef] 47. Bahers, J.-B.; Athanassiadis, A.; Perrotti, D.; Kampelmann, S. The place of space in urban metabolism research: Towards a spatial turn? A review and future agenda. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 221, 104376. [CrossRef] 48. Pan, H.; Deal, B.; Destouni, G.; Zhang, Y.; Kalantari, Z. Sociohydrology modeling for complex urban environments in support of integrated land and water resource management practices. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 3639–3652. [CrossRef] 49. Pan, H.; Zhang, L.; Cong, C.; Deal, B.; Wang, Y. A dynamic and spatially explicit modeling approach to identify the ecosystem service implications of complex urban systems interactions. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 102, 426–436. [CrossRef] 50. Chen, L.; Xu, L.; Cai, Y.; Yang, Z. Spatiotemporal patterns of industrial carbon emissions at the city level. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 169, 105499. [CrossRef] 51. Li, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Ouyang, J.; Shi, W. Regional differences in carbon emission of China’s industries and its decomposition effects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 122528. [CrossRef] 52. Liu, X.; Ou, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Jiao, L.; Liu, Y. Scenario simulation of urban energy-related CO emissions by coupling the socioeconomic factors and spatial structures. Appl. Energy 2019, 238, 1163–1178. [CrossRef] 53. Zhang, G.; Zhang, N.; Liao, W. How do population and land urbanization affect CO emissions under gravity center change? A spatial econometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 510–523. [CrossRef] 54. Zhu, X.; Mu, X.; Hu, G. Ecological network analysis of urban energy metabolic system—A case study of Beijing. Ecol. Model. 2019, 404, 36–45. [CrossRef] 55. Chen, S.Q.; Chen, B. Network Environ Perspective for Urban Metabolism and Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Vienna, Austria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4498–4506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 56. Zhang, W.; Huang, B.; Luo, D. Effects of land use and transportation on carbon sources and carbon sinks: A case study in Shenzhen, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 122, 175–185. [CrossRef] 57. Chen, S.; Chen, B. Changing Urban Carbon Metabolism over Time: Historical Trajectory and Future Pathway. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 7560–7571. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 58. Zhang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Hao, Y.; Liu, R.; Yang, Z.; Lu, Z. Study of carbon metabolic processes and their spatial distribution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 645, 1630–1642. [CrossRef] 59. Liu, P.; Lin, B.; Zhou, H.; Wu, X.; Little, J.C. CO emissions from urban buildings at the city scale: System dynamic projections and potential mitigation policies. Appl. Energy 2020, 277, 115546. [CrossRef] 60. Wang, J.; Zuo, X.; Liu, F. A Research on Carbon Emissions Peak in Beijing. Theory Mod. 2017, 6, 29–36. (In Chinese) 61. Zhong, L.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z. Research on the Way of Realizing Carbon Emission Peak in Advance in Beijing. Energy China 2019, 41, 42–47. (In Chinese) 62. Liu, S.; Tian, X.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tanikawa, H. Challenges towards carbon dioxide emissions peak under in-depth socioeco- nomic transition in China: Insights from Shanghai. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 247, 119083. [CrossRef] 63. Zhou, Y.; Shan, Y.; Liu, G.; Guan, D. Emissions and low-carbon development in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area cities and their surroundings. Appl. Energy 2018, 228, 1683–1692. [CrossRef] 64. Xia, L.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wei, J.; Banerjee, A.; Yang, Z. The application of spatially explicit networks to compare carbon ﬂows: A case study in Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 281, 124694. [CrossRef] 65. IPCC. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme; Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., Eds.; Institution of Global Environmental Strategies: Kanagawa, Japan, 2006. 66. Fath, B.D.; Patten, B.C. Review of the Foundations of Network Environ Analysis. Ecosystems 1999, 2, 167–179. [CrossRef] 67. Xia, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X. Hierarchical structure analysis of urban carbon metabolism: A case study of Beijing, China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 107, 105602. [CrossRef] 68. Wang, X.; Guo, Y.; He, J. Estimation of above-ground biomass of grassland based on multi-source remote sensing data. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 30, 159–166. (In Chinese) 69. Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Guo l Jiang, Q.; Wang, S. Spatial interpolation model of soil organic carbon density considering land-use and spatial heterogeneity. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 29, 238–246. (In Chinese) [CrossRef] 70. Feng, Y.; Zhang, L. Scenario analysis of urban energy saving and carbon abatement policies: A case study of Beijing city, China. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2012, 13, 632–644. [CrossRef] 71. BSY, 2019. Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2019. 72. Hu, Y.; Kong, X.; Zhang, B. Spatiotemporal features of land use change in Beijing in the past 30 years. J. China Agric. Univ. 2018, 23, 1–14. (In Chinese) 73. BSY, 1992. Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 1992. 74. BSY, 2011. Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2011. 75. CNBS, 1998. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 1998. 76. CNBS, 2004. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2004. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 22 of 23 77. CNBS, 2007. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2007. 78. CNBS, 2011. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2011. 79. CNBS, 2019. China Energy Statistical Yearbook, 1st ed.; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2019. 80. Gao, H.; Tian, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, L.; Shi, F. Evaluating circular economy performance based on ecological network analysis: A framework and application at city level. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105257. [CrossRef] 81. Sun, L.; Liu, W.; Li, Z.; Cai, B.; Fujii, M.; Luo, X.; Chen, W.; Geng, Y.; Fujita, T.; Le, Y. Spatial and structural characteristics of CO emissions in East Asian megacities and its indication for low-carbon city development. Appl. Energy 2021, 284, 116400. [CrossRef] 82. Teo, H.C.; Zeng, Y.; Sarira, T.V.; Fung, T.K.; Zheng, Q.; Song, X.P.; Chong, K.Y.; Koh, L.P. Global urban reforestation can be an important natural climate solution. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 034059. [CrossRef] 83. Yao, N.; Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C.C.; Yang, J.; Devisscher, T.; Wirtz, Z.; Jia, L.; Duan, J.; Ma, L. Beijing’s 50 million new urban trees: Strategic governance for large-scale urban afforestation. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 44, 126392. [CrossRef] 84. Cui, X.; Li, S.; Gao, F. Examining spatial carbon metabolism: Features, future simulation, and land-based mitigation. Ecol. Model. 2020, 438, 109325. [CrossRef] 85. Zhang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Fath, B.D. Review of spatial analysis of urban carbon metabolism. Ecol. Model. 2018, 371, 18–24. [CrossRef] 86. Oldﬁeld, E.E.; Warren, R.J.; Felson, A.; Bradford, M. FORUM: Challenges and future directions in urban afforestation. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 1169–1177. [CrossRef] 87. Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Ruan, S. Polycentric structure and carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical analysis from provincial data in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123411. [CrossRef] 88. Li, J.; Sun, C. Towards a low carbon economy by removing fossil fuel subsidies? China Econ. Rev. 2018, 50, 17–33. [CrossRef] 89. Sun, B.; Ding, S. Do large cities contribute to economic growth of small cities? Evidence from Yangtze River Delta in China. Geogr. Res. 2016, 35, 1615–1625. [CrossRef] 90. Chen, C.; Long, H.; Zeng, X. Planning a sustainable urban electric power system with considering effects of new energy resources and clean production levels under uncertainty: A case study of Tianjin, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 173, 67–81. [CrossRef] 91. Sha, W.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, Z. Will polycentric cities cause more CO emissions? A case study of 232 Chinese cities. J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 96, 33–43. [CrossRef] 92. Shuai, C.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, Y. A three-step strategy for decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: Empirical evidences from 133 countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 524–543. [CrossRef] 93. Wang, Z.; Liu, W. Determinants of CO emissions from household daily travel in Beijing, China: Individual travel characteristic perspectives. Appl. Energy 2015, 158, 292–299. [CrossRef] 94. Zhang, M.; Zhao, P. The impact of land-use mix on residents’ travel energy consumption: New evidence from Beijing. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2017, 57, 224–236. [CrossRef] 95. Pataki, D.E.; Alig, R.J.; Fung, A.S.; Golubiewski, N.E.; Kennedy, C.A.; Mcpherson, E.G.; Nowak, D.J.; Pouyat, R.V.; Romero Lankao, P. Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12, 2092–2102. [CrossRef] 96. Falahatkar, S.; Rezaei, F. Towards low carbon cities: Spatio-temporal dynamics of urban form and carbon dioxide emissions. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2020, 18, 100317. [CrossRef] 97. Deng, X.; Xie, J.; Teng, F. What is carbon neutrality? Clim. Change Res. 2021, 17, 107–113. (In Chinese) 98. Fang, K.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Song, J.; Wen, Q.; Sun, H.; Ji, C.; Xu, A. Will China peak its energy-related carbon emissions by 2030? Lessons from 30 Chinese provinces. Appl. Energy 2019, 255, 113852. [CrossRef] 99. Wu, X.; Li, C.; Shao, L.; Meng, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, G. Is solar power renewable and carbon-neutral: Evidence from a pilot solar tower plant in China under a systems view. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 138, 110655. [CrossRef] 100. Ye, Q.; Stern, N.; Jian-Kun, H.; Jia-Qi, L.; Liu, T.; King, D.; Tong, W. The policy-driven peak and reduction of China’s carbon emissions. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2020, 11, 65–71. [CrossRef] 101. Yu, S.; Zheng, S.; Li, X. The achievement of the carbon emissions peak in China: The role of energy consumption structure optimization. Energy Econ. 2018, 74, 693–707. [CrossRef] 102. Dong, Y.; Jin, G.; Deng, X. Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efﬁciency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 122547. [CrossRef] 103. Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; A review of the current evidence. Environ. Int. 2020, 140, 105661. [CrossRef] 104. Kuang, Y. Present Situation of Carbon Source and Sink and Potential for Increase of Carbon Sink in Guangdong Province. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2010, 20, 56–61. (In Chinese) 105. Fang, J. Carbon Cycle of Terrestrial Ecosystem in China and Its Global Meaning; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 1996. 106. West, T.O.; Marland, G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon ﬂux in agriculture: Comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 91, 217–232. [CrossRef] 107. He, Y. Climate and Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Cycle Study of China; China Meteorological Press: Beijing, China, 2006. (In Chinese) 108. Fang, J.Y.; Liu, G.H.; Xu, S.L. Biomass and net production of Chinese forest vegetation. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1996, 16, 497–508. (In Chinese) 109. Piao, S.; Fang, J.; Zhou, L.; Zhu, B.; Tan, K.; Tao, S. Changes in vegetation net primary productivity from 1982 to 1999 in China. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle. 2005, 19, 1605–1622. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5793 23 of 23 110. Fang, J.Y.; Guo, Z.D.; Piao, S.L.; Chen, A.P. Carbon sinks estimation of Chinese terrestrial vegetation from 1981 to 2000. Sci. China (Ser. D Earth Sci.) 2007, 37, 804–812. (In Chinese) 111. Walsh, J.J. Importance of continental margins in the marine biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen. Nature 1991, 350, 53–55. [CrossRef] 112. Meybeck, M. Riverine Transport of Atmospheric Carbon: Sources, Global Typology and Budget. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1993, 70, 443–463. [CrossRef] 113. Duan, X.N.; Wang, X.K.; Lu, F.; Ouyang, Z.Y. Carbon sequestration and its potential by wetland ecosystems in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2008, 28, 463–469. (In Chinese)

Journal

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

Published: May 10, 2022

Keywords: network insight; urban carbon metabolism; center of gravity; carbon neutral paths

Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective

Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective

Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective

Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective

References (116)

Abstract

Journal

Recommended Articles

There are no references for this article.

Our policy towards the use of cookies