Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Dance and Fetish: Phenomenology and Metz's Epistemological Shift

Dance and Fetish: Phenomenology and Metz's Epistemological Shift Christian Metz is remembered today as having almost single-handedly transformed the culture of film studies. This widely held view was summarized by one commentator, who wrote that “with Metz a new research paradigm is born, as well as a new generation of scholars. The ontological theories are followed by methodological theories.” According to another, “Metz exemplified a new kind of film theorist, one who came to the field already ‘armed’ with the analytic instruments of a specific discipline, who was unapologetically academic and unconnected to the world of film criticism.” Of course, Metz didn't just surge like a meteor on the scene of film studies. His arrival was “prepared” by the filmologie movement spear-headed in Paris by Gilbert Cohen-Séat and by two early film semiology essays published by Roland Barthes in La Revue internationale de filmologie . Yet it is Metz who is rightly remembered as the figurehead of film semiology. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png October MIT Press

Dance and Fetish: Phenomenology and Metz's Epistemological Shift

October , Volume Spring 2014 (148) – May 1, 2014

Loading next page...
 
/lp/mit-press/dance-and-fetish-phenomenology-and-metz-s-epistemological-shift-DOSBaM0Nt6

References (3)

Publisher
MIT Press
Copyright
© 2014 October Magazine, Ltd. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
ISSN
0162-2870
eISSN
1536-013X
DOI
10.1162/OCTO_a_00177
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Christian Metz is remembered today as having almost single-handedly transformed the culture of film studies. This widely held view was summarized by one commentator, who wrote that “with Metz a new research paradigm is born, as well as a new generation of scholars. The ontological theories are followed by methodological theories.” According to another, “Metz exemplified a new kind of film theorist, one who came to the field already ‘armed’ with the analytic instruments of a specific discipline, who was unapologetically academic and unconnected to the world of film criticism.” Of course, Metz didn't just surge like a meteor on the scene of film studies. His arrival was “prepared” by the filmologie movement spear-headed in Paris by Gilbert Cohen-Séat and by two early film semiology essays published by Roland Barthes in La Revue internationale de filmologie . Yet it is Metz who is rightly remembered as the figurehead of film semiology.

Journal

OctoberMIT Press

Published: May 1, 2014

There are no references for this article.