Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
STEPHEN L. DRYMER Introduction Over a period of almost four years the members of UNCITRAL Working Group II, in addition to numerous observer States and organisations, toiled to complete the task set for them by UNCITRAL in July 2006: the first-ever and in this author's view long-overdue revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules first adopted in 1976.1 The importance of the task was enormous, given the widespread and increasing use of the UNCITRAL Rules by private parties in commercial disputes, by States in investment arbitrations, and as a template for institutional arbitration rules. The effort was not in vain. On 25 June 2010 the Commission adopted revised Rules, which came into effect on 15 August 2010 and apply to arbitration agreements concluded on or after that date that refer to the UNCITRAL Rules, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. The revised Rules incorporate Partner and co-Chair of International Arbitration at Ogilvy Renault LLP [on 1 June 2011 Ogilvy Renault joins the Norton Rose Group]. The author was a member of Canada's delegation to UNCITRAL Working Group II tasked with the revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL, also referred to
ASA Bulletin – Kluwer Law International
Published: Jan 2, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.