Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Electrooculogram and Its Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability

The Electrooculogram and Its Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability The EOG was determined in 130 normal subjects. The mean value was 2.42, the interindividual standard deviation 0.42. The difference between the right eye and the left eye was not significant, neither was the difference between a group of youngsters (20–30 years) and an older age group (50–55 years). In another group of 48 normal subjects, 10 or more EOGs were determined per individual. The intraindividual standard deviation was not a fixed number, but appeared to be dependent on the height of the EOG, being approximately 10% of the EOG value. This is a confirmation of one of our previous observations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ophthalmologica Karger

The Electrooculogram and Its Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability

Zonneveldt, A.; van Lith, G.
Ophthalmologica , Volume 181 (3-4): 5 – Jan 1, 2010
Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/karger/the-electrooculogram-and-its-interindividual-and-intraindividual-tdqgS03VBK

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Karger
Copyright
© 1980 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN
0030-3755
eISSN
1423-0267
DOI
10.1159/000309047
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The EOG was determined in 130 normal subjects. The mean value was 2.42, the interindividual standard deviation 0.42. The difference between the right eye and the left eye was not significant, neither was the difference between a group of youngsters (20–30 years) and an older age group (50–55 years). In another group of 48 normal subjects, 10 or more EOGs were determined per individual. The intraindividual standard deviation was not a fixed number, but appeared to be dependent on the height of the EOG, being approximately 10% of the EOG value. This is a confirmation of one of our previous observations.

Journal

Ophthalmologica – Karger

Published: Jan 1, 2010

Keywords: Electrooculogram

There are no references for this article.