Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evaluation to Differentiate between Tumor Lesions and the Parenchyma in Partial Nephrectomies for Renal Tumors Based on Quantitative Fluorescence Imaging Using Indocyanine Green Dye

Evaluation to Differentiate between Tumor Lesions and the Parenchyma in Partial Nephrectomies for... Introduction: Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is a useful tool during partial nephrectomy. Because an accurate method for judging hasn't been established yet, the success rate may be slightly different and inconsistent. Materials and Methods: A total of 21 cases with suspected renal cancers who had undergone a partial nephrectomy were enrolled. We examined differences in the success rate between malignant lesions and the parenchyma by quantifying fluorescence in the pre-resection and ex vivo phases. Results: Pre-resection imaging showed a significant degradation of fluorescence in the focused lesion in 76.2% (16/21) of cases. A significant degradation was observed in 73.7% (14/19) of the total malignant lesions, 70.5% (12/17) of cases with a clear cell lesion, 100% (2/2) of cases with non-clear cell lesions, and 100% (2/2) of benign angiomyolipomas. In contrast, imaging of the ex vivo resected specimens showed a significant degradation in fluorescence of the focused lesions in 85.7% (18/21) of cases. A significantly degradation was observed in 84.2% (16/19) of the total malignant lesions, 82.3% (14/17) of cases with a clear cell lesion, 100% (2/2) of cases with non-clear cell lesions, and 100% (2/2) of benign angiomyolipomas. Conclusion: We firstly evaluated the efficacy of quantitative indocyanine green-based fluorescence as an objective method. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Current Urology Karger

Evaluation to Differentiate between Tumor Lesions and the Parenchyma in Partial Nephrectomies for Renal Tumors Based on Quantitative Fluorescence Imaging Using Indocyanine Green Dye

Loading next page...
 
/lp/karger/evaluation-to-differentiate-between-tumor-lesions-and-the-parenchyma-7J7F2aIKP1

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Karger
Copyright
© 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN
1661-7649
eISSN
1661-7657
DOI
10.1159/000499289
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Introduction: Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is a useful tool during partial nephrectomy. Because an accurate method for judging hasn't been established yet, the success rate may be slightly different and inconsistent. Materials and Methods: A total of 21 cases with suspected renal cancers who had undergone a partial nephrectomy were enrolled. We examined differences in the success rate between malignant lesions and the parenchyma by quantifying fluorescence in the pre-resection and ex vivo phases. Results: Pre-resection imaging showed a significant degradation of fluorescence in the focused lesion in 76.2% (16/21) of cases. A significant degradation was observed in 73.7% (14/19) of the total malignant lesions, 70.5% (12/17) of cases with a clear cell lesion, 100% (2/2) of cases with non-clear cell lesions, and 100% (2/2) of benign angiomyolipomas. In contrast, imaging of the ex vivo resected specimens showed a significant degradation in fluorescence of the focused lesions in 85.7% (18/21) of cases. A significantly degradation was observed in 84.2% (16/19) of the total malignant lesions, 82.3% (14/17) of cases with a clear cell lesion, 100% (2/2) of cases with non-clear cell lesions, and 100% (2/2) of benign angiomyolipomas. Conclusion: We firstly evaluated the efficacy of quantitative indocyanine green-based fluorescence as an objective method.

Journal

Current UrologyKarger

Published: Jan 1, 2019

Keywords: Infrared fluorescence; Indocyanine green; Partial nephrectomy

There are no references for this article.