Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Electronystagmographic Recording of Acquired (?) Monocular Vertical Nystagmus

Electronystagmographic Recording of Acquired (?) Monocular Vertical Nystagmus Ten I ) o e s s c li a I e keratosis, and which I regarded as a manifestation (as yet not described) of lupus erythematosus of the cornea.” References. 1. Ammann: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk. 95, 650, 1035. — 2. I)uke-Elder, St.: Textbook of Ophthalmology V, 4910, 1952. — 3. Kraus and Gört: Münch, ined. Wschr. 54, 1849, 1907. — 4. Lomholt: Zbl. Haut- u. Geschlkr. 19, 834, 1926. — 5. Pillât: Sitzungsher. Wiener Ophth. Ges. 16. Jan. 1933. 6. Pillât: v. Graefes Arch. Ophthal. 1-VI, 566, 1935. Discussion. Ten Doesschate (reply to Flieringa): The aetiology of lupus erythematosus is still unknown. Although a tuberculous aetiology has been suggested, dermatologists now generally agree that this aetiology is highly improbable. Biopsy nearly always allows a sharp distinction between lupus erythematosus and lupus vulgaris (tuberculosis cutis luposa). Doesschate, J . ten : O phthalm ologica 1 3 2 , 156, 1956 (From the Nederlands Gasthuis voor Ooglijders, Utrecht [Director: Prof. Dr. H. J. M. WeveJ.) E l e c t r o n y s t a g m o g r a p h i c R e c o rd in g o f A c q u http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ophthalmologica Karger

Electronystagmographic Recording of Acquired (?) Monocular Vertical Nystagmus

Ten Doesschate, J.
Ophthalmologica , Volume 132 (3): 4 – Jan 1, 2010
Download PDF
4 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/karger/electronystagmographic-recording-of-acquired-monocular-vertical-qkYTpFxZHk

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Karger
Copyright
© 1956 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN
0030-3755
eISSN
1423-0267
DOI
10.1159/000302945
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Ten I ) o e s s c li a I e keratosis, and which I regarded as a manifestation (as yet not described) of lupus erythematosus of the cornea.” References. 1. Ammann: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk. 95, 650, 1035. — 2. I)uke-Elder, St.: Textbook of Ophthalmology V, 4910, 1952. — 3. Kraus and Gört: Münch, ined. Wschr. 54, 1849, 1907. — 4. Lomholt: Zbl. Haut- u. Geschlkr. 19, 834, 1926. — 5. Pillât: Sitzungsher. Wiener Ophth. Ges. 16. Jan. 1933. 6. Pillât: v. Graefes Arch. Ophthal. 1-VI, 566, 1935. Discussion. Ten Doesschate (reply to Flieringa): The aetiology of lupus erythematosus is still unknown. Although a tuberculous aetiology has been suggested, dermatologists now generally agree that this aetiology is highly improbable. Biopsy nearly always allows a sharp distinction between lupus erythematosus and lupus vulgaris (tuberculosis cutis luposa). Doesschate, J . ten : O phthalm ologica 1 3 2 , 156, 1956 (From the Nederlands Gasthuis voor Ooglijders, Utrecht [Director: Prof. Dr. H. J. M. WeveJ.) E l e c t r o n y s t a g m o g r a p h i c R e c o rd in g o f A c q u

Journal

Ophthalmologica – Karger

Published: Jan 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.