Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
In the context of politics, emotions and facts work together to shapeopinions about political candidates. While there is considerable research onmotivated reasoning about political issues, there is less attention to howaffect and rationality combine in the hybrid world of new media. This studyexamined the interaction of social media comments about politicians withmore traditional information sources. Participants were exposed to politicalcandidates' Facebook news feeds, to news articles about the candidates, andto a political speech. The order of exposure was varied and measures of bothknowledge and emotion were taken. When social media was encountered beforenews about a political candidate, it influenced feelings toward thecandidate but did not influence personal mood or perceived knowledge. Incontrast, when social media was encountered before information unrelated tothe candidates, it negatively influenced all dependent measures. Thefindings are discussed in terms of motivated reasoning theories,Papacharissi's concept of ``affective publics,'' and the implications forcivic participation in the new media era.
Information Polity – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.