Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Parliamentary websites: Theoretical and comparative perspectives

Parliamentary websites: Theoretical and comparative perspectives This article analyses the potentialities of parliamentary www-sites to enhance the publicity of decision-making in representative democracies. We introduce two different models that emphasize the role of publicity in representative systems. Jeremy Bentham argued that publicity is needed to enable citizens to control the acts of the representatives. From the perspective of Kantian tradition, recently developed by the theorists of deliberative democracy, publicity is regarded as a test for the validity of the reasons given for public decisions. According to many theorists of deliberative democracy, legislative assemblies can be regarded as central forums of public deliberation in representative democracies. We analyse the contents of the parliamentary websites in 18 democratic countries and find that these contents are rather similar in established democracies across the world. We argue that parliamentary websites can be instrumental to citizens' capacity to control the representatives in the Benthamite sense, although information provided on parliamentary websites does not necessarily provide a sufficient account of all aspects of parliamentary decision-making, most notably in party groups. From the deliberative perspective, however, publicity on parliamentary websites cannot replace the role of such mediating actors as journalists, political activists and parties who "filter" and reflect upon the representatives' arguments and actions. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Information Polity IOS Press

Parliamentary websites: Theoretical and comparative perspectives

Information Polity , Volume 11 (2) – Jan 1, 2006

Loading next page...
 
/lp/iospress/parliamentary-websites-theoretical-and-comparative-perspectives-StktsqxIkj

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
IOS Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by IOS Press, Inc
ISSN
1570-1255
eISSN
1875-8754
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article analyses the potentialities of parliamentary www-sites to enhance the publicity of decision-making in representative democracies. We introduce two different models that emphasize the role of publicity in representative systems. Jeremy Bentham argued that publicity is needed to enable citizens to control the acts of the representatives. From the perspective of Kantian tradition, recently developed by the theorists of deliberative democracy, publicity is regarded as a test for the validity of the reasons given for public decisions. According to many theorists of deliberative democracy, legislative assemblies can be regarded as central forums of public deliberation in representative democracies. We analyse the contents of the parliamentary websites in 18 democratic countries and find that these contents are rather similar in established democracies across the world. We argue that parliamentary websites can be instrumental to citizens' capacity to control the representatives in the Benthamite sense, although information provided on parliamentary websites does not necessarily provide a sufficient account of all aspects of parliamentary decision-making, most notably in party groups. From the deliberative perspective, however, publicity on parliamentary websites cannot replace the role of such mediating actors as journalists, political activists and parties who "filter" and reflect upon the representatives' arguments and actions.

Journal

Information PolityIOS Press

Published: Jan 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.