Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Drèze, F. Modigliani (1972)
Consumption decisions under uncertaintyJournal of Economic Theory, 5
David Kreps, Evan Porteus (1978)
Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice TheoryEconometrica, 46
J. Mossin (1969)
A Note on Uncertainty and Preferences in a Temporal ContextThe American Economic Review, 59
M. Spence, R. Zeckhauser (1972)
The Effect of the Timing of Consumption Decisions and the Resolution of Lotteries on the Choice of LotteriesEconometrica, 40
C. Smith, John Neumann, O. Morgenstern (1945)
Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 40
W. Semmler, Lucas Bernard (2010)
"Boundedly rational exuberance in commodity markets" - Some comments on Bertrand MunierRisk Decis. Anal., 2
David Kreps, Evan Porteus (1979)
Temporal von neumann-morgenstern and induced preferencesJournal of Economic Theory, 20
D. Friedman (2007)
Market Theories Evolve, And so Do MarketsJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 63
Risk and Decision Analysis 2 (2010/2011) 1â3 DOI 10.3233/RDA-2010-0021 IOS Press From preferences on resolution time in risky bets to the modeling of complex ï¬nancialized markets This issue of Risk and Decision Analysis is devoted to innovations in modeling decisions under risk or in designing models for the class of markets described as âï¬nancializedâ. made clear that they had no intention to deal with such issues. Rather, their seminal work was intended to deal with the issue to value risky assets of individuals, so that, for example, individuals would know how to trade risky against non-risky assets considered in games outcomes. Only such knowledge would allow dealing with the issue of side-payments in games. Their problem had no link whatsoever with time â their model being static â neither with any kind of preference on time directly nor with preference on the pleasure of gambling or impatience to know, etc. However, as has been argued by Drèze and Modigliani [1], Mossin [5], Spence and Zeckhauser [7], to quote only the seminal contributions, these issues cannot, in many practical situations, be considered separately from the preferences on outcome. The problem is then to derive actual preferences from âexpected utility
Risk and Decision Analysis – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.