Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/iospress/a-heuristic-method-for-estimating-attribute-importance-by-measuring-WO5eeWI1cx
References (52)
-
John Robinson, H. Schuman, S. Presser (1982)
Questions and answers in attitude surveys -
B. Dellaert, Jeff Brazell, J. Louviere (1999)
The Effect of Attribute Variation on Consumer Choice ConsistencyMarketing Letters, 10
-
J. Jastrow (1886)
An easy method of measuring the time of mental processes.Science, 8 190
-
T. Tyebjee (1979)
Response Time, Conflict, and Involvement in Brand ChoiceJournal of Consumer Research, 6
-
E. Loftus, M. Klinger, Kyle Smith, J. Fiedler (1990)
A TALE OF TWO QUESTIONS: BENEFITS OF ASKING MORE THAN ONE QUESTIONPublic Opinion Quarterly, 54
-
R. Tourangeau, K. Rasinski (1988)
Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude MeasurementPsychological Bulletin, 103
-
P. Green, V. Srinivasan (1978)
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and OutlookJournal of Consumer Research, 5
-
H. Grice (1975)
Logic and conversationSyntax and Semantics, 3
-
Shelley Taylor, S. Fiske (1978)
Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head PhenomenaAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11
-
J. Thurmond, E. Alluisi (1963)
CHOICE TIME AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS DISSIMILARITY AND DISCRIMINABILITY.Canadian journal of psychology, 17
-
C. Lance, D. Woehr (1986)
Statistical control of halo: Clarification from two cognitive models of the performance appraisal process.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71
-
N. Schwarz, F. Strack, G. Müller, Brigitte Chassein (1988)
The range of response alternatives may determine the meaning of the question: Further evidence on informative functions of response alternatives.Social Cognition, 6
-
J. Bassili, J. Fletcher (1991)
Response-time measurement in survey research: A method for CATI and a new look at nonattitudes.Public Opinion Quarterly, 55
-
R. Sekuler, E. Rubin, R. Armstrong (1971)
Processing numerical information: A choice time analysisJournal of Experimental Psychology, 90
-
R. Carson, J. Louviere, Donald Anderson, P. Arabie, D. Bunch, D. Hensher, Richard Johnson, W. Kuhfeld, D. Steinberg, J. Swait, H. Timmermans, J. Wiley (1991)
Experimental analysis of choiceMarketing Letters, 5
-
R. Meyer (1981)
A Model of Multiattribute Judgments under Attribute Uncertainty and Informational ConstraintJournal of Marketing Research, 18
-
J. Busemeyer, J. Townsend (1993)
Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.Psychological review, 100 3
-
P. Green (1984)
Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository ReviewJournal of Marketing Research, 21
-
L. Carr (1971)
The Srole Items and AcquiescenceAmerican Sociological Review, 36
-
M. Haire (1950)
Projective Techniques in Marketing ResearchJournal of Marketing, 14
-
A. Blankenship (1944)
Consumer and opinion research : the questionnaire techniqueAmerican Sociological Review, 9
-
L. Thurstone (1928)
Attitudes Can Be MeasuredAmerican Journal of Sociology, 33
-
G. Box, D. Cox (1964)
An Analysis of TransformationsJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 26
-
F. Bergert, R. Nosofsky (2007)
A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 33 1
-
D. Phillips, K. Clancy (1972)
Some Effects of "Social Desirability" in Survey StudiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 77
-
S. Barone, A. Lombardo, P. Tarantino (2007)
A weighted logistic regression for conjoint analysis and Kansei engineeringQuality and Reliability Engineering International, 23
-
Ron Kenett (2006)
On the planning and design of sample surveysJournal of Applied Statistics, 38
-
G. Fischer, M. Luce, Jianmin Jia (2000)
Attribute Conflict and Preference Uncertainty: Effects on Judgment Time and Error.: Effects on Judgment Time and Error., 46
-
J. Jaccard, D. Brinberg, Lee Ackerman (1986)
Assessing attribute importance: a comparison of six methodsJournal of Consumer Research, 12
-
G. Kalton, H. Schuman (1982)
The Effect of the Question on Survey Responses: A Review, 145
-
R. Heeler, C. Okechuku, S. Reid (1979)
Attribute Importance: Contrasting MeasurementsJournal of Marketing Research, 16
-
Suné Donoghue (2010)
Projective techniques in consumer researchTydskrif vir Gesinsekologie en Verbruikerswetenskappe, 28
-
C. Sedikides, John Skowronski (1991)
The Law of Cognitive Structure ActivationPsychological Inquiry, 2
-
R. Haaijer, W. Kamakura, M. Wedel (2000)
Response Latencies in the Analysis of Conjoint Choice ExperimentsJournal of Marketing Research, 37
-
D. Phillips, K. Clancy (1970)
Response biases in field studies of mental illness.American sociological review, 35 3
-
R. Fazio, Jeaw-mei Chen, E. McDonel, S. Sherman (1982)
Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation associationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18
-
E. Ziegel, L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwartz, D. Trewin (1998)
Survey measurement and process qualityJournal of the American Statistical Association, 40
-
O. Duncan, H. Schuman (1980)
Effects of Question Wording and Context: An Experiment with Religious IndicatorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 75
-
S. Farrar, M. Ryan (1999)
Response-ordering effects: a methodological issue in conjoint analysis.Health economics, 8 1
-
K. Murphy, R. Jako, Rebecca Anhalt (1993)
Nature and Consequences of Halo Error : A Critical AnalysisJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
-
P. Green, A. Krieger (1995)
Attribute Importance Weights Modification in Assessing a Brand's Competitive PotentialMarketing Science, 14
-
N. Klein, M. Yadav (1989)
Context Effects on Effort and Accuracy in Choice: An Enquiry into Adaptive Decision MakingJournal of Consumer Research, 15
-
G. Gaskell, C. O'muircheartaigh, D. Wright (1994)
SURVEY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FREQUENCY OF VAGUELY DEFINED EVENTS: THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE ALTERNATIVESPublic Opinion Quarterly, 58
-
Alexander Todorov (2000)
The accessibility and applicability of knowledge: predicting context effects in national surveys.Public opinion quarterly, 64 4
-
B. Hedges (1979)
Question Wording Effects: Presenting One or Both Sides of a CaseThe Statistician, 28
-
Stephen Ayidiya, M. Mcclendon (1990)
RESPONSE EFFECTS IN MAIL SURVEYSPublic Opinion Quarterly, 54
-
D. Bindra, Judith Williams, J. Wise (1965)
Judgments of Sameness and Difference: Experiments on Decision TimeScience, 150
-
Richard Johnson, I. Levin (1985)
More than Meets the Eye: The Effect of Missing Information on Purchase EvaluationsJournal of Consumer Research, 12
-
P. Tarantino (2008)
A Statistical Thinking Approach to Kansei Engineering for Product Innovation -
J. Feldman (1986)
A note on the statistical correction of halo error.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71
-
M. Alpert (1971)
Identification of Determinant Attributes: A Comparison of MethodsJournal of Marketing Research, 8
-
R. Dhar, S. Nowlis (1999)
The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice DeferralJournal of Consumer Research, 25
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2012 by IOS Press, Inc
- ISSN
- 1569-7371
- eISSN
- 1875-9173
- DOI
- 10.3233/RDA-2012-0065
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The evaluation of a product or service in terms of its attributes has been broadly studied in marketing, management and decision sciences. However, methods for finding important attributes have theoretical and practical limitations. The former are related to the selection of the most appropriate model; the latter are due to large number of variables that affect the specific experimental context. This study aims to present a new methodology that captures attribute preferences from a respondent and in particular, by using the choice time in a ranking task, it allows to indirectly obtain the importance weights for several tested attributes through a simple, fast and inexpensive procedure. Moreover, the method makes it possible to overcome problems associated with context, survey and cognitive variables so allowing to achieve more reliable conclusions. An application of the method concerning a cellular phone validates the proposed method.
Journal
Risk and Decision Analysis – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2012