Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Goel (1997)
Earthquake Characteristics of Bridges with Integral AbutmentsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 123
A. Astaneh-Asl, S. Ravat (1998)
Cyclic behavior and seismic design of steel H-piles
A. Shama, J. Mander, Stuart Chen (2002)
Seismic Investigation of Steel Pile Bents: II. Retrofit and Vulnerability AnalysisEarthquake Spectra, 18
M. Bruneau, John Wilson, R. Tremblay (1996)
Performance of steel bridges during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquakeCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23
M. Arockiasamy, Narongrit Butrieng, M. Sivakumar (2004)
STATE-OF-THE-ART OF INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGES: DESIGN AND PRACTICEJournal of Bridge Engineering, 9
D. Conboy, Erik Stoothoff (2005)
Integral Abutment Design and Construction: The New England Experience
Jonathan Kunin, S. Alampalli (2000)
Integral Abutment Bridges: Current Practice in United States and CanadaJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 14
S. Civjan, Christine Bonczar, S. Breña, J. DeJong, Daniel Crovo (2007)
Integral abutment bridge behavior: Parametric analysis of a Massachusetts bridgeJournal of Bridge Engineering, 12
A. Shama, J. Mander, Blaise Blabac, Stuart Chen (2002)
Seismic Investigation of Steel Pile Bents: I. Evaluation of PerformanceEarthquake Spectra, 18
G. Pekcan, Ahmad Itani, E. Monzon (2010)
Seismic Design Recommendations for Steel Girder Bridges with Integral Abutments
Integral abutment bridges have certain advantages over conventional seat-type abutment bridges due to increased redundancy, higher damping, smaller displacements, and, thus, the elimination of unseating potential. However, there is a lack of information on their seismic modeling, system response, and seismic design. This paper presents the recommended guidelines for the seismic design of steel bridges with integral abutments. These guidelines are based on extensive analytical investigations as well as available experimental research. Contrary to the common assumption in analysis and design, nonlinear finite element analyses showed that the typical girder-to-abutment connection is not rigid and can influence the overall seismic response of the bridge. A procedure for calculating the minimum required embedment length of the girder into abutment stem to achieve a rigid connection is proposed. A procedure to evaluate the steel pile ultimate lateral displacement capacity is also proposed. The use of the system-level damping due to yielding and inelastic response of the various components including the soil behind the abutments and around the piles is discussed.
Bridge Structures – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.