Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Pressman, John Flockton (2014)
Violent Extremist Risk Assessment : Issues and applications of the VERA-2 in a high-security correctional setting
N. Thomson (2019)
Biological factorsUnderstanding Psychopathy
A. Weenink (2015)
Behavioral Problems and Disorders among Radicals in Police FilesPerspectives on terrorism, 9
(2016)
Infoblatt zu Hinweisen auf islamistischem Extremismus
J. Meloy, K. Roshdi, Justine Glaz-Ocik, J. Hoffmann (2015)
Investigating the Individual Terrorist in Europe, 2
G. LaFree, Joshua Freilich (2016)
The Handbook of the Criminology of Terrorism
M. Bock (2017)
Radikalisierung. Ein Essay mit der Absicht der Verfremdung., 29
F. Raggi, D. Russo, C. Urbani, C. Sardella, L. Manetti, D. Cappellani, I. Lupi, L. Tomisti, E. Martino, C. Marcocci, F. Bogazzi (2016)
Divergent Effects of Dioxin- or Non-Dioxin-Like Polychlorinated Biphenyls on the Apoptosis of Primary Cell Culture from the Mouse Pituitary GlandPLoS ONE, 11
J. Meloy, P. Gill (2016)
The lone-actor terrorist and the TRAP-18., 3
M. Sageman (2014)
The Stagnation in Terrorism ResearchTerrorism and Political Violence, 26
Mats Dernevik, A. Beck, M. Grann, T. Hogue, J. Mcguire (2009)
The use of psychiatric and psychological evidence in the assessment of terrorist offendersThe Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20
Friederike Sadowski, A. Rossegger, Elaine Pressman, T. Rinne, Nils Duits, J. Endrass (2017)
Das Violent Extremism Risk Assessment Version 2 Revised (VERA-2R) : eine Skala zur Beurteilung des Risikos extremistischer Gewalt ; Deutsche Übersetzung.Kriminalistik, 71
A. Silke (2001)
The Devil You Know: Continuing Problems with Research on TerrorismTerrorism and Political Violence, 13
J. Endres, Sonja King (2018)
Radikalisierung und Deradikalisierung im Justizvollzug
M. Herzog-Evans (2018)
A comparison of two structured professional judgment tools for violent extremism and their relevance in the French contextEuropean Journal of Probation, 10
(2013)
Warum Prognoseinstrumente ? [ Why risk assessment instruments ? ] In
(2017)
Psychology, has been a research assistant at the Institute of Psychology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, since 2017
A.St. Scarcella, Ruairi Page, V. Furtado (2016)
Terrorism, Radicalisation, Extremism, Authoritarianism and Fundamentalism: A Systematic Review of the Quality and Psychometric Properties of AssessmentsPLoS ONE, 11
J. Post (2005)
The socio-cultural underpinnings of terrorist psychology: ‘When hatred is bred in the bone’
R. Baron (2000)
Arousal, Capacity, and Intense IndoctrinationPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 4
(2016)
Generation Allah: Warum wir im Kampf gegen religiösen Extremismus umdenken müssen
(2018)
Evidenzbasierte Kriminalprävention in Deutschland. Ein Leitfaden für Politik und Praxis [Evidence based crime prevention in Germany. A guide for politics and practice
(2013)
Moving terrorism research forward : The crucial role of primary sources ( ICCT Background Note )
J. Bie, C. Poot, J. Leun (2014)
Jihadi networks and the involvement of vulnerable immigrants: reconsidering the ideological and pragmatic valueGlobal Crime, 15
(2009)
Risk assessment decisions for violent political extremism. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies, Carleton University
R. Oliver, T. Thayer (2019)
Mental health disordersBritish Dental Journal, 227
H. Heckhausen, P. Gollwitzer (1987)
Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mindMotivation and Emotion, 11
D. Pressman, John Flockton (2012)
Calibrating risk for violent political extremists and terrorists: the VERA 2 structured assessmentThe British Journal of Forensic Practice, 14
J. Endres, M. Breuer, K. Nolte (2016)
Wiederinhaftierung nach Entlassung aus dem JugendstrafvollzugMonatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 99
Mitchell Silber, A. Bhatt (2007)
Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat
Prisoner Files as Valuable Data Source of Threat Assessment and Management
J. Meloy, Jacqueline Genzman (2016)
The Clinical Threat Assessment of the Lone-Actor Terrorist.The Psychiatric clinics of North America, 39 4
Quintan Wiktorowicz (2006)
Anatomy of the Salafi MovementStudies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29
(2004)
Islamist and Middle Eastern terrorism: A
E. Corner, P. Gill, O. Mason (2016)
Mental Health Disorders and the Terrorist: A Research Note Probing Selection Effects and Disorder PrevalenceStudies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39
Kristin Göbel, F. Sommer, Anabel Taefi, Lina-Maraike Stetten, Nadine Ahlig, Mirko Allwinn, Vincenz Leuschner, Herbert Scheithauer (2016)
Entwicklung und Reliabilitätsprüfung eines interdisziplinären Codebooks zur wissenschaftlichen Analyse von Strafakten zu Mord- und Totschlagsdelikten, 2
Monica Lloyd, Christopher Dean (2015)
University of Birmingham The development of structured guidelines for assessing risk in extremist offenders
D. Cicchetti, F. Rogosch (1996)
Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathologyDevelopment and Psychopathology, 8
A. Merari (1991)
Academic research and government policy on terrorismTerrorism and Political Violence, 3
A. Silke (2008)
Holy WarriorsEuropean Journal of Criminology, 5
Violent extremism research is still lacking a sound empirical basis for the validation of assessment instruments. Yet there is a growing need for these instruments to assess the dangerousness of individuals, but also the success of interventions. By analysing prisoner files of one female and 39 male inmates (average age 28.83 years, SD = 7.58) with administratively assigned Islamism-related security labels in Bavarian prisons, we tried to clarify two questions: Firstly, is it possible to collect relevant data from prisoner files drawing on risk assessment procedures? Secondly, how do inmates associated with the Salafist scene (security label “Salafist scene”) differ from those who are apparently involved with terror networks (security label “terror”), and do these differences predict the risk they pose? Our results suggest that files are a valuable, though not perfect data source for individual assessment and research. The two groups defined by the labels differ significantly in their biographies, mental health, and behaviour. Conclusions pertaining to biographical background factors, risk assessment, and management are discussed.
International Journal of Developmental Science – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.