Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Faye Benjamin, R. Winfree (2014)
Lack of Pollinators Limits Fruit Production in Commercial Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), 43
E. Kaczmarska, A. Dobrowolska, J. Hortyński (2012)
The influence of pollen viability on seed set and fruit mass in strawberry (fragaria x ananassa duch.), 61
J. Hormaza, M. Herrero (1996)
Dynamics of pollen tube growth under different competition regimesSexual Plant Reproduction, 9
M. Bieniasz (2007)
Effects of open and self pollination of four cultivars of highbush blueberry [Vaccinium corymbosum L.] on flower fertilization, fruit set and seed formationJournal of fruit and ornamental plant research, 15
E. Gerbrandt, R. Bors, R. Chibbar (2018)
Agronomic potential of fruit size and yield traits in blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.) foundation germplasmEuphytica, 214
P. Curci, H. Bergès, W. Marande, M. Maccaferri, R. Tuberosa, G. Sonnante (2018)
Asparagine synthetase genes (AsnS1 and AsnS2) in durum wheat: structural analysis and expression under nitrogen stressEuphytica, 214
Lindsey Button, E. Elle (2014)
Wild bumble bees reduce pollination deficits in a crop mostly visited by managed honey beesAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 197
A. McCubbin, T. Kao (2000)
Molecular recognition and response in pollen and pistil interactions.Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 16
W. Antkowiak, A. Wojciechowski (2012)
The evaluation of self-compatibility and crossability in the genus Pyrus based on the observation of pollen tubes growth, 59
(2017)
Breeding estimation of seedlings of Lonicera caeruleae L.from free pollination in Altai conditions
M. Bieniasz, E. Dziedzic, Gerard Słowik (2019)
Biological features of flowers influence the fertility of Lonicera spp. cultivarsHorticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 60
E. Gerbrandt, R. Bors, R. Chibbar, T. Baumann (2018)
Blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.) vegetative growth cessation and leaf drop phenological adaptation to a temperate climateGenetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 65
A. Kulikova, I. Boyarskikh (2015)
Reproductive ability of Lonicera caerulea (Caprifoliaceae) in the local area of geological and geophysical heterogeneity in the Altai MountainsContemporary Problems of Ecology, 8
J. Sanzol, M. Herrero (2001)
The “effective pollination period” in fruit treesScientia Horticulturae, 90
(2003)
Karyotype of bluehoneysuckle species (Lonicera subset.caerulea, Caprifoliaceae)
A. Dafni, M. Maués (1998)
A rapid and simple procedure to determine stigma receptivitySexual Plant Reproduction, 11
B. McClure, V. Franklin-Tong (2006)
Gametophytic self-incompatibility: understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in “self” pollen tube inhibitionPlanta, 224
S. Žilinskaitė, D. Naugžemys, D. Radaitienė, D. Žvingila (2007)
Investigation of blue-berried honeysuckle lines and cultivars in Vilnius University Botanical Garden collection., 26
M. Bożek, J. Wieniarska (2012)
Blooming biology and sugar efficiency of two cultivars of Lonicera kamtschatica (Sevast.) Pojark., 59
C. Erbar (2003)
Pollen Tube Transmitting Tissue: Place of Competition of Male GametophytesInternational Journal of Plant Sciences, 164
J. Gawroński, E. Kaczmarska (2018)
EFFECT OF POLLINATION MODE ON FRUIT SET IN BLUE HONEYSUCKLE (Lonicera caerulea L.)Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus
Ľ. Ďurišová, T. Juríková, P. Eliáš, J. Mlček (2020)
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF TWO EDIBLE HONEYSUCKLES [Lonicera edulis Turcz. ex Freyn., Lonicera kamtchatica (Sevast.) Pojark.] IN THE CONDITIONS OF SOUTHWESTERN SLOVAKIAActa Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus
E. Gerbrandt (2015)
PROPAGATION, MANAGEMENT AND ADAPTATION OF THE BLUE HONEYSUCKLE©
E. Gerbrandt, R. Bors, R. Chibbar, T. Baumann (2017)
Spring phenological adaptation of blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.) foundation germplasm in a temperate climate1Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 98
S. Frier, C. Somers, C. Sheffield (2016)
Floral longevity, nectar production, pollen release, and stigma receptivity in Haskap ( Lonicera caerulea )Journal of pollination ecology, 19
A. Hedhly, J. Hormaza, M. Herrero (2005)
Influence of genotype‐temperature interaction on pollen performanceJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 18
M. Plekhanova (2000)
Blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.) - a new commercial berry crop for temperate climate: genetic resources and breeding.
Breeding of Lonicera caerulea L. for Saskatchewan and Canada
(2007)
Edible honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea var.edulis) –under utilized berry crop in Estonia
M. Bożek (2012)
The Effect of Pollinating Insects on Fruiting of Two Cultivars of Lonicera caerulea L., 56
J. Gawroński, J. Hortyński, E. Kaczmarska, Magdalena Dyduch-Siemińska, W. Marecki, A. Witorożec (2014)
Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic diversity of some Polish and Russian blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.) cultivars and clones.Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-hortorum Cultus, 13
M. Reynolds, A. Pask, W. Hoppitt, K. Sonder, S. Sukumaran, G. Molero, C. Pierre, T. Payne, R. Singh, H. Braun, F. González, I. Terrile, N. Barma, Abdul Hakim, Zhonghu He, Zheru Fan, D. Novoselović, M. Maghraby, K. Gad, ElHusseiny Galal, A. Hagras, M. Mohamed, A. Morad, U. Kumar, G. Singh, R. Naik, I. Kalappanavar, S. Biradar, S. Prasad, R. Chatrath, I. Sharma, Kishor Panchabhai, V. Sohu, G. Mavi, V. Mishra, A. Balasubramaniam, M. Jalal-Kamali, M. Khodarahmi, M. Dastfal, Seyed Tabib-Ghaffari, Jabbar Jafarby, A. Nikzad, H. Moghaddam, Hassan Ghojogh, A. Mehraban, E. Solís-Moya, M. Camacho-Casas, P. Figueroa-López, J. Ireta-Moreno, Jorge Alvarado-Padilla, Alberto Borbón-Gracia, A. Torres, Yei Quiche, S. Upadhyay, Deepak Pandey, M. Imtiaz, M. Rehman, M. Hussain, M. Hussain, R. Ud-Din, M. Qamar, Muhammad Sohail, M. Mujahid, G. Ahmad, A. Khan, M. Sial, P. Mustățea, E. Well, Moses Ncala, S. Groot, Abdelraheem Hussein, I. Tahir, A. Idris, Hala Elamein, Y. Manes, A. Joshi (2017)
Strategic crossing of biomass and harvest index—source and sink—achieves genetic gains in wheatEuphytica, 213
M. Dogterom, Mark Winston, Amy Mukai (2000)
Effect of pollen load size and source (self, outcross) on seed and fruit production in highbush blueberry cv. 'Bluecrop' (VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM; Ericaceae).American journal of botany, 87 11
F. Ciampolini, C. Faleri, D. Pietro, M. Cresti (1996)
Structural and Cytochemical Characteristics of the Stigma and Style in Vitis vinifera L. var. Sangiovese (Vitaceae)Annals of Botany, 78
E. Truta, G. Vochița, C. Roșu, M. Zamfirache (2013)
Karyotype traits in Romanian selections of edible blue honeysuckleTurkish Journal of Biology, 37
P. Bauer (1983)
BUMBLEBEE POLLINATION RELATIONSHIPS ON THE BEARTOOTH PLATEAU TUNDRA OF SOUTHERN MONTANA.American journal of botany, 70 1
M. Małodobry, M. Bieniasz, E. Dziedzic (2010)
Evaluation of the yield and some components in the fruit of blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea var. edulis Turcz. Freyn.)Folia Horticulturae, 22
R. Cruden (2000)
Pollen grains: Why so many?Plant Systematics and Evolution, 222
E. Gerbrandt, R. Bors, R. Chibbar, T. Baumann (2017)
Spring phenological adaptation of improved blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.) germplasm to a temperate climateEuphytica, 213
M. Bożek (2012)
Pollen productivity and morphology of pollen grains in two cultivars of honeyberry (Lonicera kamtschatica (Sevast.) Pojark.), 60
(2013)
Analysis of genetic selection features of Lonicera caerulea edulis in the Alatai Ob river area
BACKGROUND:Haskap (Lonicera L.) is as a new perspective berry species for growing in temperate region climate. According to nowadays knowledge haskap is absolutely self-sterile species hence the studies on pollination mode are required.OBJECTIVE:The aim was to evaluate new haskap cultivars of Canadian and Russian origin in terms of their matching for cross-pollination.METHODS:The overlapping of flowering time of cultivars for mutual cross pollination was selected. The effectiveness of pollination was assessed: in terms of pollen tube overgrowth through the pistil tissue and the quality of set fruit.RESULTS:The Russian cultivars bloomed much earlier than the Canadian cultivars. The stigma is most receptive in the freshly open flower stage and directly after the anther burst. The minimum qualitatively acceptable weight of a berry is 1 g, which corresponds to the formation of about 6 seeds in the fruit. The most compatible pairs of cultivars were: ‘Aurora’בJugana’, ‘Aurora’בSinij Utes’ and ‘Aurora’בVostorg’.CONCLUSION:The Russian cultivars bloomed much earlier than the Canadian cultivars, the stigma is most receptive in the freshly open flower, minimum qualitatively acceptable weight of berry is 1 g (what represents 6 seeds in fruit), best mutual pollinating cultivars are the cultivars within the same breeding group (Russian x Russian and Canadian x Canadian)
Journal of Berry Research – IOS Press
Published: Mar 4, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.