Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Clinical implementation of an empirical method for electron output factor determination

Clinical implementation of an empirical method for electron output factor determination The objective of this work has been to develop and implement an empirical calculation method for the determination of clinical electron output factors. Electron beams with various energies, field sizes, and source to surface distances using cutouts of varying radii were used to measure dose output at the depth of maximum dose in water. A 30 cm × 30 cm × 17.8 cm water equivalent phantom with a 0.125 cc cylindrical ion-chamber (PTW Model 31010) was used. The calculation model predicted the output factor as a product of the cone factor, radius dependent cutout factor, the effective source to surface distance factor and the area dependent aspect ratio factor. A comparative analysis of clinical cutout output factors, determined through both empirical calculation and direct measurement was performed to evaluate the clinical viability of the calculation method before its implementation in our clinic. A total of 643 output factors for 294 different cutout shapes were determined through both traditional measurement and predictive calculation. Predictive calculation differed from definitive measurement by at most 3.5% for all cases, a majority of cases falling within 1%. The method developed successfully predicts electron output factors on the basis of cutout geometry with accuracy better than 96% for all cases and better then 98% for most cases. This ability holds true for all practical SSD, electron energy, cone, and irregular shape combinations. The method has been clinically implemented and in use at our center since 2007. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology IOS Press

Clinical implementation of an empirical method for electron output factor determination

Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ios-press/clinical-implementation-of-an-empirical-method-for-electron-output-0Xar07pKEq

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
IOS Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by IOS Press, Inc
ISSN
0895-3996
eISSN
1095-9114
DOI
10.3233/XST-2010-0262
pmid
20714088
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The objective of this work has been to develop and implement an empirical calculation method for the determination of clinical electron output factors. Electron beams with various energies, field sizes, and source to surface distances using cutouts of varying radii were used to measure dose output at the depth of maximum dose in water. A 30 cm × 30 cm × 17.8 cm water equivalent phantom with a 0.125 cc cylindrical ion-chamber (PTW Model 31010) was used. The calculation model predicted the output factor as a product of the cone factor, radius dependent cutout factor, the effective source to surface distance factor and the area dependent aspect ratio factor. A comparative analysis of clinical cutout output factors, determined through both empirical calculation and direct measurement was performed to evaluate the clinical viability of the calculation method before its implementation in our clinic. A total of 643 output factors for 294 different cutout shapes were determined through both traditional measurement and predictive calculation. Predictive calculation differed from definitive measurement by at most 3.5% for all cases, a majority of cases falling within 1%. The method developed successfully predicts electron output factors on the basis of cutout geometry with accuracy better than 96% for all cases and better then 98% for most cases. This ability holds true for all practical SSD, electron energy, cone, and irregular shape combinations. The method has been clinically implemented and in use at our center since 2007.

Journal

Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology – IOS Press

Published: Jan 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.