Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Matteo Spiotta, P. Terenziani, D. Dupré (2017)
Temporal Conformance Analysis and Explanation of Clinical Guidelines Execution: An Answer Set Programming ApproachIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29
D. Riaño, W. Ortega (2017)
Computer technologies to integrate medical treatments to manage multimorbidityJournal of biomedical informatics, 75
Xiuyi Fan, Francesca Toni (2015)
On Explanations for Non-Acceptable Arguments
B. Moulin, H. Irandoust, M. Bélanger, G. Desbordes (2002)
Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities:Towards the Creation of More Persuasive AgentsArtificial Intelligence Review, 17
Amin Karamlou, K. Čyras, Francesca Toni (2019)
Deciding the Winner of a Debate Using Bipolar Argumentation
T. Wakaki, K. Nitta, Hajime Sawamura (2009)
Computing Abductive Argumentation in Answer Set Programming
M. Peleg (2013)
Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: A methodological reviewJournal of biomedical informatics, 46 4
Dunja Šešelja, Christian Straßer (2013)
Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debatesSynthese, 190
D. Walton (2004)
A new dialectical theory of explanationPhilosophical Explorations, 7
Malik Qassas, D. Fogli, M. Giacomin, G. Guida (2016)
ArgMed: A Support System for Medical Decision Making Based on the Analysis of Clinical Discussions
P. Fraccaro, Mercedes Casteleiro, J. Ainsworth, I. Buchan (2015)
Adoption of Clinical Decision Support in Multimorbidity: A Systematic ReviewJMIR Medical Informatics, 3
Cristian Briguez, M. Budán, Cristhian Deagustini, Ana Maguitman, Marcela Capobianco, Guillermo Simari (2014)
Argument-based mixed recommenders and their application to movie suggestionExpert Syst. Appl., 41
K. Čyras, K. Satoh, Francesca Toni (2016)
Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning
Leila Amgoud, M. Serrurier (2008)
Agents that argue and explain classificationsAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 16
Claudia Schulz, Francesca Toni (2013)
ABA-Based Answer Set JustificationTheory Pract. Log. Program., 13
S. Wilk, Martin Michalowski, W. Michalowski, D. Rosu, M. Carrier, Mounira Kezadri-Hamiaz (2017)
Comprehensive mitigation framework for concurrent application of multiple clinical practice guidelinesJournal of biomedical informatics, 66
L. Sacchi, S. Rubrichi, C. Rognoni, S. Panzarasa, Enea Parimbelli, A. Mazzanti, C. Napolitano, S. Priori, S. Quaglini (2015)
From decision to shared-decision: Introducing patients' preferences into clinical decision analysisArtificial intelligence in medicine, 65 1
R. Booth, D. Gabbay, S. Kaci, Tjitze Rienstra, Leendert Torre (2014)
Abduction and Dialogical Proof in Argumentation and Logic ProgrammingArXiv, abs/1407.3896
D. Ellard, M. Thorogood, M. Underwood, C. Seale, Stephanie Taylor (2014)
Whole home exercise intervention for depression in older care home residents (the OPERA study): a process evaluationBMC Medicine, 12
Xiuyi Fan (2018)
On Generating Explainable Plans with Assumption-Based Argumentation
I. Sassoon, Nadin Kökciyan, E. Sklar, Simon Parsons (2019)
Explainable Argumentation for Wellness Consultation
E. Sklar, M. Azhar (2018)
Explanation through ArgumentationProceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
Ziyi Bao, K. Čyras, Francesca Toni (2017)
ABAplus: Attack Reversal in Abstract and Structured Argumentation with Preferences
O. Cocarascu, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni (2019)
Extracting Dialogical Explanations for Review Aggregations with Argumentative Dialogical Agents
Floris Bex, D. Walton (2016)
Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogueArgument Comput., 7
Leila Amgoud, H. Prade (2009)
Using arguments for making and explaining decisionsArtif. Intell., 173
Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic (2014)
Rich preference-based argumentation frameworksInt. J. Approx. Reason., 55
Nikos Gorogiannis, A. Hunter (2011)
Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and propertiesArtif. Intell., 175
P. Besnard, A. Hunter (2001)
A logic-based theory of deductive argumentsArtif. Intell., 128
S. Kaci, Leendert Torre (2008)
Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple valuesInt. J. Approx. Reason., 48
A. Kakas, Pavlos Moraitis (2003)
Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents
Bart Verheij (2003)
DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified AssumptionsJ. Log. Comput., 13
Abdelraouf Hecham, Abdallah Arioua, Gem Stapleton, Madalina Croitoru (2017)
An Empirical Evaluation of Argumentation in Explaining Inconsistency-Tolerant Query Answering
S. Modgil, H. Prakken (2014)
The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorialArgument Comput., 5
K. Čyras, David Birch, Yike Guo, Francesca Toni, Rajvinder Dulay, Sally Turvey, Daniel Greenberg, T. Hapuarachchi (2019)
Explanations by arbitrated argumentative disputeExpert Syst. Appl., 127
Naziha Sendi, Nadia Abchiche-Mimouni, F. Zehraoui (2019)
A new Transparent Ensemble Method based on Deep learning
J. Fox, Liz Black, D. Glasspool, S. Modgil, A. Oettinger, V. Patkar, Matthew Williams (2006)
Towards a General Model for Argumentation Services
Emanuele Albini, Antonio Rago, P. Baroni, Francesca Toni (2020)
Relation-Based Counterfactual Explanations for Bayesian Network Classifiers
Nadin Kökciyan, I. Sassoon, A. Young, M. Chapman, Talya Porat, M. Ashworth, V. Curcin, S. Modgil, S. Parsons, E. Sklar (2018)
Towards an Argumentation System for Supporting Patients in Self-Managing Their Chronic Conditions
T. Gordon, D. Walton (2009)
Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes
S. Modgil (2009)
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworksArtif. Intell., 173
A. Hunter, Matthew Williams (2012)
Aggregating evidence about the positive and negative effects of treatmentsArtificial intelligence in medicine, 56 3
Prashan Madumal, Tim Miller, L. Sonenberg, F. Vetere (2019)
A Grounded Interaction Protocol for Explainable Artificial Intelligence
P. Tolchinsky, U. Cortés, S. Modgil, F. Caballero, A. López-Navidad (2006)
Increasing Human-Organ Transplant Availability: Argumentation-Based Agent DeliberationIEEE Intelligent Systems, 21
P. Besnard, A. Hunter (2014)
Constructing argument graphs with deductive arguments: a tutorialArgument Comput., 5
P. Besnard, A. García, A. Hunter, S. Modgil, H. Prakken, Guillermo Simari, Francesca Toni (2014)
Introduction to structured argumentationArgument Comput., 5
Katie Atkinson, P. Baroni, M. Giacomin, A. Hunter, H. Prakken, C. Reed, Guillermo Simari, Matthias Thimm, S. Villata (2017)
Towards Artificial ArgumentationAI Mag., 38
M. Chapman, P. Balatsoukas, M. Ashworth, V. Curcin, Nadin Kökciyan, Kai Essers, I. Sassoon, S. Modgil, S. Parsons, E. Sklar (2019)
Computational Argumentation-based Clinical Decision Support
M. Chapman, V. Curcin (2019)
A Microservice Architecture for the Design of Computer-Interpretable Guideline Processing ToolsIEEE EUROCON 2019 -18th International Conference on Smart Technologies
Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson, P. McBurney
Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems Manuscript No. Using Argumentation to Model Agent Decision Making in Economic Experiments
Chiaki Sakama (2018)
Abduction in argumentation frameworksJournal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 28
S. Modgil, Martin Caminada (2009)
Argumentation in Artificial IntelligenceSpringer US
G. Brewka (1989)
Preferred Subtheories: An Extended Logical Framework for Default Reasoning
Francesca Toni (2014)
A tutorial on assumption-based argumentationArgument Comput., 5
D. Walton (2009)
Explanations and Arguments Based on Practical Reasoning
Qiaoting Zhong, Xiuyi Fan, Xudong Luo, Francesca Toni (2019)
An explainable multi-attribute decision model based on argumentationExpert Syst. Appl., 117
M. Grando, D. Glasspool, A. Boxwala (2012)
Argumentation logic for the flexible enactment of goal-based medical guidelinesJournal of biomedical informatics, 45 5
Neeltje Vermunt, M. Harmsen, G. Westert, M. Rikkert, M. Faber (2017)
Collaborative goal setting with elderly patients with chronic disease or multimorbidity: a systematic reviewBMC Geriatrics, 17
S. Kaci, Namrata Patel (2012)
A postulate-based analysis of comparative preference statementsJ. Appl. Log., 12
Yannis Dimopoulos, Bernhard Nebel, Francesca Toni (2002)
On the computational complexity of assumption-based argumentation for default reasoningArtif. Intell., 141
K. Čyras, Tiago Oliveira (2019)
Resolving Conflicts in Clinical Guidelines using ArgumentationArXiv, abs/1902.07526
K. Čyras, Dimitrios Letsios, R. Misener, Francesca Toni (2018)
Argumentation for Explainable Scheduling (Full Paper with Proofs)ArXiv, abs/1811.05437
R. Tsopra, J. Lamy, Karima Sedki (2018)
Using preference learning for detecting inconsistencies in clinical practice guidelines: Methods and application to antibiotherapyArtificial intelligence in medicine, 89
V. Zamborlini, Marcos Silveira, C. Pruski, A. Teije, Edwin Geleijn, M. Leeden, M. Stuiver, F. Harmelen (2017)
Analyzing interactions on combining multiple clinical guidelinesArtificial intelligence in medicine, 81
P. Dung (1995)
On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person GamesArtif. Intell., 77
Tuomo Lehtonen, J. Wallner, M. Järvisalo (2019)
Reasoning over Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks via Direct Answer Set Programming Encodings
A. García, C. Chesñevar, Nicolás Rotstein, Guillermo Simari (2013)
Formalizing dialectical explanation support for argument-based reasoning in knowledge-based systemsExpert Syst. Appl., 40
Liang Xiao, J. Fox (2016)
A Distributed Decision Support Architecture for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer
T. Wakaki (2014)
Assumption-Based Argumentation Equipped with Preferences
Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson, A. Chorley (2005)
Persuasion and Value in Legal ArgumentJ. Log. Comput., 15
Erez Shalom, Yuval Shahar, E. Lunenfeld (2016)
An architecture for a continuous, user-driven, and data-driven application of clinical guidelines and its evaluationJournal of biomedical informatics, 59
P. Thang, H. Luong (2014)
Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentationJ. Log. Comput., 24
Antonio Rago, O. Cocarascu, Francesca Toni (2018)
Argumentation-Based Recommendations: Fantastic Explanations and How to Find Them
K. Čyras, Tiago Oliveira (2018)
Argumentation for Reasoning with Conflicting Clinical Guidelines and Preferences
Zhiwei Zeng, Xiuyi Fan, C. Miao, Cyril Leung, J. Chin, Y. Ong (2018)
Context-based and Explainable Decision Making with Argumentation
S. Modgil, H. Prakken (2013)
A general account of argumentation with preferencesArXiv, abs/1804.06763
Abdallah Arioua, Nouredine Tamani, Madalina Croitoru (2015)
Query Answering Explanation in Inconsistent Datalog +/- Knowledge Bases
G. Leonardi, A. Bottrighi, Gabriele Galliani, P. Terenziani, Antonio Messina, F. Corte (2012)
Exceptions Handling within GLARE Clinical Guideline FrameworkAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012
A. García, Guillermo Simari (2014)
Defeasible logic programming: DeLP-servers, contextual queries, and explanations for answersArgument Comput., 5
Jann Müller, A. Hunter (2012)
An Argumentation-Based Approach for Decision Making2012 IEEE 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 1
Iyad Rahwan, Guillermo Simari (2009)
Argumentation in Artificial IntelligenceApplied Artificial Intelligence
Trevor Bench-Capon (2003)
Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation FrameworksJ. Log. Comput., 13
Bart Verheij (2003)
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentationArtif. Intell., 150
S. Modgil, Martin Caminada (2009)
Proof Theories and Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
K. Čyras, K. Satoh, Francesca Toni (2016)
Explanation for Case-Based Reasoning via Abstract Argumentation
Tiago Oliveira, Jérémie Dauphin, K. Satoh, S. Tsumoto, P. Novais (2018)
Argumentation with Goals for Clinical Decision Support in Multimorbidity
V. Zamborlini, R. Hoekstra, Marcos Silveira, C. Pruski, A. Teije, F. Harmelen (2016)
Inferring recommendation interactions in clinical guidelinesSemantic Web, 7
Alex Raymond, H. Gunes, A. Prorok (2019)
Culture-Based Explainable Human-Agent DeconflictionArXiv, abs/1911.10098
S. Timmer, J. Meyer, H. Prakken, S. Renooij, Bart Verheij (2017)
A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networksInt. J. Approx. Reason., 80
T. Gordon, H. Prakken, D. Walton (2007)
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proofArtif. Intell., 171
A. Young, Nadin Kökciyan, I. Sassoon, S. Modgil, S. Parsons (2018)
Instantiating Metalevel Argumentation Frameworks
K. Čyras, Francesca Toni (2016)
ABA+: Assumption-Based Argumentation with PreferencesArXiv, abs/1610.03024
S. Parsons, C. Sierra, N. Jennings (1998)
Agents That Reason and Negotiate by ArguingJ. Log. Comput., 8
H. Prakken (2010)
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured argumentsArgument Comput., 1
Xiuyi Fan, Francesca Toni (2015)
On Computing Explanations in Argumentation
Zhiwei Zeng, C. Miao, Cyril Leung, J. Chin (2018)
Building More Explainable Artificial Intelligence With Argumentation
C. Muth, M. Akker, J. Blom, C. Mallen, J. Rochon, F. Schellevis, A. Becker, M. Beyer, J. Gensichen, H. Kirchner, R. Perera, A. Prados-Torres, M. Scherer, U. Thiem, H. Bussche, P. Glasziou (2014)
The Ariadne principles: how to handle multimorbidity in primary care consultationsBMC Medicine, 12
A. Grace, Carolanne Mahony, J. O'Donoghue, T. Heffernan, D. Molony, Thomas Carroll (2013)
Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical decision support systems: the case of multimorbidity careJournal of Decision Systems, 22
L. Longo (2016)
Argumentation for Knowledge Representation, Conflict Resolution, Defeasible Inference and Its Integration with Machine Learning
A. Bondarenko, P. Dung, R. Kowalski, Francesca Toni (1997)
An Abstract, Argumentation-Theoretic Approach to Default ReasoningArtif. Intell., 93
A paramount, yet unresolved issue in personalised medicine is that of automated reasoning with clinical guidelines in multimorbidity settings. This entails enabling machines to use computerised generic clinical guideline recommendations and patient-specific information to yield patient-tailored recommendations where interactions arising due to multimorbidities are resolved. This problem is further complicated by patient management desiderata, in particular the need to account for patient-centric goals as well as preferences of various parties involved. We propose to solve this problem of automated reasoning with interacting guideline recommendations in the context of a given patient by means of computational argumentation. In particular, we advance a structured argumentation formalism ABA+G (short for Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferences (ABA+) and Goals) for integrating and reasoning with information about recommendations, interactions, patient’s state, preferences and prioritised goals. ABA+G combines assumption-based reasoning with preferences and goal-driven selection among reasoning outcomes. Specifically, we assume defeasible applicability of guideline recommendations with the general goal of patient well-being, resolve interactions (conflicts and otherwise undesirable situations) among recommendations based on the state and preferences of the patient, and employ patient-centered goals to suggest interaction-resolving, goal-importance maximising and preference-adhering recommendations. We use a well-established Transition-based Medical Recommendation model for representing guideline recommendations and identifying interactions thereof, and map the components in question, together with the given patient’s state, prioritised goals, and preferences over actions, to ABA+G for automated reasoning. In this, we follow principles of patient management and establish corresponding theoretical properties as well as illustrate our approach in realistic personalised clinical reasoning scenaria.
Argument & Computation – IOS Press
Published: Jun 9, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.