Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Nilsson, M. Pallemaerts, I. Homeyer (2009)
International regimes and environmental policy integration: introducing the special issueInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9
R. Connor, S. Dovers (2004)
Institutional change for sustainable development
S. Oberthür (2009)
Interplay management: enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutionsInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9
B. Richardson, S. Wood (2006)
Environmental Law for Sustainability : A Reader
A. Ross, S. Dovers (2008)
Making the Harder Yards: Environmental Policy Integration in AustraliaAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 67
Elizabeth Desombre (2002)
The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale
T. Minayeva, O. Bragg, O. Cherednychenko, J. Couwenberg, G. Duinen, W. Giesen, A. Grootjans, P. Grundling, V. Nikolaev, S. Schaaf (2008)
Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change
K. Asmal (2000)
Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. The report of the World Commission on dams.
F. Biermann, O. Davies, N. Grijp (2009)
Environmental policy integration and the architecture of global environmental governanceInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9
C. Gough, S. Shackley (2001)
The Respectable Politics of Climate Change: The Epistemic Communities and NGOsInternational Affairs, 77
O. Young (2008)
Institutions and Environmental Change: The Scientific Legacy of a Decade of IDGEC Research
J. Pittock (2010)
Better management of hydropower in an era of climate change.Water alternatives, 3
P. Gleick (2019)
CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATEREarth under Fire
J. Pittock, L. Hansen, R. Abell (2008)
Running dry: Freshwater biodiversity, protected areas and climate changeBiodiversity, 9
P. Vellinga, R. Howarth, J. Gupta (2002)
Improving Global Environmental GovernanceInternational Environmental Agreements, 2
B. Walker, S. Barrett, S. Polasky, V. Galaz, C. Folke, Gustav Engström, F. Ackerman, K. Arrow, S. Carpenter, K. Chopra, G. Daily, P. Ehrlich, T. Hughes, N. Kautsky, S. Levin, K. Mäler, J. Shogren, J. Vincent, T. Xepapadeas, A. Zeeuw (2009)
Looming Global-Scale Failures and Missing InstitutionsScience, 325
P. Shergold (2004)
Connecting Government: Whole of Government Responses to Australia's Priority Challenges. [Launching speech made on 20 April 2004.]
A. Underdal (1980)
Integrated marine policy: What? Why? How?☆Marine Policy, 4
M. Finlayson, R. Cruz, N. Davidson, J. Alder, S. Cork, R. Groot, C. Lévêque, G. Milton, Garry Peterson, D. Pritchard, B. Ratner, W. Reid, C. Revenga, M. Rivera, F. Schutyser, M. Siebentritt, M. Stuip, R. Tharme, S. Butchard, E. Dieme-Amting, H. Gitay, S. Raaymakers, D. Taylor (2005)
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis
J. Rockström, J. Rockström, W. Steffen, W. Steffen, K. Noone, Åsa Persson, Åsa Persson, F. Chapin, E. Lambin, T. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, C. Folke, H. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, B. Nykvist, C. Wit, T. Hughes, S. Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, S. Sörlin, P. Snyder, R. Costanza, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, L. Karlberg, R. Corell, V. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, Brianna Walker, D. Liverman, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, J. Foley (2009)
A safe operating space for humanityNature, 461
T. Morrison, M. Lane (2005)
What ‘Whole-of-Government’ Means for Environmental Policy and Management: An Analysis of the Connecting Government initiativeAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management, 12
D. Molden (2007)
Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture
D. French (2005)
International law and policy of sustainable development
Avoiding dangerous climate change,conserving biodiversity, and sustaining water resources are three of the greatest environmental challenges facing humanity: their expression and management are inextricably linked. National governments have adopted multilateral environmental agreements to respond to these issues by providing mandates for action, setting higher environmental standards, mobilizing resources, and sharing knowledge. This article examines whether three relevant, global conventions—the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands—are being implemented as effectively and efficiently as possible by managing conflicts and enhancing positive synergies among them through integrative mechanisms. Systematic analysis of the conventions identifies many conflicts between measures adopted under the UNFCCC and the two biodiversity-related conventions, as well as unrealized positive synergies. Detailed assessment of integrative mechanisms reveals isolated examples of good practice. More commonly, integrative measures were not being used, particularly by the UNFCCC. After more than a decade of attempts to expand inter-convention collaboration and harmonization, I conclude that voluntary efforts need to be replaced by financial incentives or governance reforms if perverse impacts are to be avoided and these agreements are to be better implemented.
Climate Law – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.