Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Change is used in this paper as a context for reflecting on management. Following Watzlawick and his colleagues, the concept of first and second-order change is adopted in order to distinguish between two essential types of change and the question of why is managing change difficult is addressed. Four factors are identified at the heart of this difficulty. They include the Complexity factor, the Epistemic factor, the Structural factor, and the Inertia or Vested-Interest factor. Antidotes to the four factors are briefly discussed, and organisational learning, interpreted as a system's ability to amplify its internal variety is suggested as the most potent means of transcending limitations of existing programming and ensuring constant organisational renewal.
International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.