Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Link, G. Tassey (1987)
Strategies for Technology-Based Competition: Meeting the New Global Challenge
J. March (1995)
The Future, Disposable Organizations and the Rigidities of ImaginationOrganization, 2
A. Lewin, C. Long, Timothy Carroll (1999)
The Coevolution of New Organizational FormsOrganization Science, 10
V. Cane, R. Luce (1960)
Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis., 123
Dorothy Leonard-Barton (1992)
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development: Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125 (Summer 1992)Long Range Planning, 26
Barbara Keats, M. Hitt (1988)
A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 31
M. Hannan (1984)
Structural Inertia and Organizational ChangeThe Sociological Review, 49
M. Boisot, J. Child (1999)
Organizations As Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: the Case of ChinaOrganization Science, 10
Rosanna Garcia, R. Calantone (2002)
A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature reviewJournal of Product Innovation Management, 19
David Miller, P. Friesen (1983)
Strategy‐making and environment: The third linkSouthern Medical Journal, 4
Erhard Bruderer, Jitendra Singh (1996)
Organizational Evolution, Learning, and Selection: A Genetic-Algorithm-Based ModelAcademy of Management Journal, 39
P. Swann (1993)
New technologies and the firm : innovation and competition
Melanie Mitchell (2009)
Complexity: A Guided Tour
L. Dubins, L. Savage (1965)
How to Gamble If You Must: Inequalities for Stochastic Processes
Rosanna Garcia (2005)
Uses of Agent-Based Modeling in Innovation/New Product Development ResearchJournal of Product Innovation Management, 22
J. March (1991)
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
Daniel Levinthal, J. March (1981)
A model of adaptive organizational searchJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2
I. Zander, U. Zander (2005)
The Inside Track: On the Important (But Neglected) Role of Customers in the Resource - Based View of Strategy and Firm GrowthJournal of Management Studies, 42
M. Tushman (2004)
From engineering management/R&D management, to the management of innovation, to exploiting and exploring over value nets: 50 years of research initiated by the IEEE-TEMIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51
S. Zahra (1996)
Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environmentJournal of Business Venturing, 11
J. Bower, Clayton Christensen (1995)
Disruptive Technologies: Catching the WaveJournal of Product Innovation Management, 1
Justin Jansen, F. Bosch, H. Volberda (2006)
Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental ModeratorsMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
D. Lindley (1966)
How to Gamble if You Must. (Inequalities for Stochastic Processes) By Lester E. Dubins and Leonard J. Savage. Pp. xiv, 249. 102s. 1965. (McGraw-Hill Book Co.)The Mathematical Gazette, 50
A. Wadhwa, S. Kotha (2006)
Knowledge Creation Through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing IndustryAcademy of Management Journal, 49
David Miller (1987)
The structural and environmental correlates of business strategySouthern Medical Journal, 8
W. Arthur (1990)
Positive feedbacks in the economyScientific American, 262
H. Dawid, M. Reimann, B. Bullnheimer (2001)
To innovate or not to innovate?IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 5
I. Olkin, Sudhish Churye, W. Hoeffding, W. Madow, H. Mann (1961)
Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, 124
Gérard Cachon, Paul Zipkin, Philip Anderson (1999)
Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization ScienceOrganization Science, 10
Rosanna Garcia, R. Calantone, Ralph Levine (2003)
The Role of Knowledge in Resource Allocation to Exploration versus Exploitation in Technologically Oriented OrganizationsDecis. Sci., 34
V. Filios (1985)
Accounting for Customers as a Resource: A Forgotten Research ProposalManagement Research News, 8
Robert Burgelman (1991)
Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field ResearchOrganization Science, 2
G. Lumpkin, Gregory Dess, David Harrison, Jay Janney, Marian Kramer, Rodney Shrader (2001)
Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life CycleJournal of Business Venturing, 16
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchSTUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
J. Debenham, I. Wilkinson (2006)
Exploitation versus Exploration in Market CompetitionIndustry and Innovation, 13
P. Ghemawat, J. Ricart (1993)
Organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency, The
Michael Cohen, J. March, Johan Olsen (1972)
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17
J. Holland (1975)
Adaptation in natural and artificial systems
R. Stacey (2005)
Experiencing Emergence in Organizations : local interaction and the emergence of global pattern
H. Levene (1961)
Robust tests for equality of variances
Anil Gupta, Ken Smith, C. Shalley (2006)
The interplay between exploration and exploitation.Academy of Management Journal, 49
Mary Benner, M. Tushman (2003)
Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma RevisitedAcademy of Management Review, 28
Technologically-oriented firms must allocate resources between exploration (research) and exploitation (development) activities. While scholars have emphasised the need for a mix between exploration and exploitation, some firms consciously choose to specialise only in either exploration or exploitation. The reasons for such a strategic posture could be many, including rigidities emanating from resources or routines. While previous studies suggest that an exploration/exploitation mix is necessary for success in an innovation strategy, focused strategies have recently come into research focus. We adopt a methodological approach using case studies combined with an agent-based simulation model in order to learn about the effectiveness of specialisation strategies. The results suggest that an exploration-based specialisation strategy can have a relative advantage over an exploitation-based specialisation strategy, and a balanced strategy is not absolutely necessary to ensure innovation success. We find that as competitive intensity increases, the relative advantage of exploration-based specialisation strategy diminishes.
International Journal of Business and Systems Research – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.