Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This paper investigates the utility of corporate actions in predicting financial distress in the context of an emerging country: Malaysia. Recognising the dominance of historical accounting ratios in distress prediction models, we set out to test if employing more current information in the form of corporate action fares better. To this end, we employ three logistic regression models on data from 54 firms and find that corporate actions, on a stand-alone basis, outperform pure accounting ratios and a pooled combination of both. The most significant corporate actions are frequency of capital issuance and shuffling of audit committees. These findings are novel for Malaysia and relatively scarce in broader empirical literature. Meanwhile, among the accounting ratios, working capital and sales volumes emerge as significant predictors of distress, both of which have extensive empirical precedents.
American Journal of Finance and Accounting – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.