Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Predicting financial distress in an emerging market: corporate actions, accounting ratios, or both?

Predicting financial distress in an emerging market: corporate actions, accounting ratios, or both? This paper investigates the utility of corporate actions in predicting financial distress in the context of an emerging country: Malaysia. Recognising the dominance of historical accounting ratios in distress prediction models, we set out to test if employing more current information in the form of corporate action fares better. To this end, we employ three logistic regression models on data from 54 firms and find that corporate actions, on a stand-alone basis, outperform pure accounting ratios and a pooled combination of both. The most significant corporate actions are frequency of capital issuance and shuffling of audit committees. These findings are novel for Malaysia and relatively scarce in broader empirical literature. Meanwhile, among the accounting ratios, working capital and sales volumes emerge as significant predictors of distress, both of which have extensive empirical precedents. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Finance and Accounting Inderscience Publishers

Predicting financial distress in an emerging market: corporate actions, accounting ratios, or both?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/inderscience-publishers/predicting-financial-distress-in-an-emerging-market-corporate-actions-yeBoRtKonv

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Inderscience Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
ISSN
1752-7767
eISSN
1752-7775
DOI
10.1504/AJFA.2021.117217
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper investigates the utility of corporate actions in predicting financial distress in the context of an emerging country: Malaysia. Recognising the dominance of historical accounting ratios in distress prediction models, we set out to test if employing more current information in the form of corporate action fares better. To this end, we employ three logistic regression models on data from 54 firms and find that corporate actions, on a stand-alone basis, outperform pure accounting ratios and a pooled combination of both. The most significant corporate actions are frequency of capital issuance and shuffling of audit committees. These findings are novel for Malaysia and relatively scarce in broader empirical literature. Meanwhile, among the accounting ratios, working capital and sales volumes emerge as significant predictors of distress, both of which have extensive empirical precedents.

Journal

American Journal of Finance and AccountingInderscience Publishers

Published: Jan 1, 2021

There are no references for this article.