Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Chambers, Ya-Ting Chung, R. Färe (1996)
Benefit and Distance FunctionsJournal of Economic Theory, 70
A. Karimov (2014)
Factors affecting efficiency of cotton producers in rural Khorezm, Uzbekistan: Re-examining the role of knowledge indicators in technical efficiency improvementAgricultural and Food Economics, 2
L. Lau, P. Yotopoulos (1971)
A Test for Relative Efficiency and Application to Indian AgricultureThe American Economic Review, 61
A. Karimov, M. Niño-Zarazúa (2015)
Assessing Efficiency of Input Utilization in Wheat Production in UzbekistanAgricultural Food Science
Maksud Bekchanov, A. Karimov, J. Lamers (2010)
Impact of Water Availability on Land and Water Productivity: A Temporal and Spatial Analysis of the Case Study Region Khorezm, UzbekistanWater, 2
A. Bhattacharyya, E. Parker, K. Raffiee (1994)
An Examination of the Effect of Ownership on the Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Water UtilitiesLand Economics, 70
A. Karimov (2013)
Economic Inefficiency and Shadow Prices of Inputs: The Case of Vegetable Growing Farms in UzbekistanProcedia. Economics and finance, 5
D. Luenberger (1995)
Externalities and benefitsJournal of Mathematical Economics, 24
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, William Weber (2001)
Shadow Prices of Missouri Public Conservation LandPublic Finance Review, 29
J. Quiggin, Anh Bui‐Lan (1984)
The Use Of Cross-Sectional Estimates Of Profit Functions For Tests Of Relative Efficiency: A Critical ReviewAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 28
Kevin Murphy, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1992)
The Transition to a Market Economy: Pitfalls of Partial ReformQuarterly Journal of Economics, 107
Caleb Wall (2008)
Argorods of Western Uzbekistan: Knowledge Control and Agriculture in Khorezm
Maksud Bekchanov, J. Lamers, A. Karimov, M. Müller (2012)
Estimation of Spatial and Temporal Variability of Crop Water Productivity with Incomplete Data
R. Shephard (1953)
Cost and production functions
S. Osborne, M. Trueblood (2006)
An examination of economic efficiency of Russian crop production in the reform periodAgricultural Economics, 34
G. Roland (2000)
Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets, and Firms
D. Luenberger (1992)
Benefit functions and dualityJournal of Mathematical Economics, 21
S. Kumbhakar, A. Heshmati (1995)
Efficiency Measurement in Swedish Dairy Farms: An Application of Rotating Panel Data, 1976–88American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77
A. Singbo, A. Lansink (2010)
Lowland farming system inefficiency in Benin (West Africa): directional distance function and truncated bootstrap approachFood Security, 2
B. Awotide, A. Karimov, A. Diagne, Tebila Nakelse (2013)
The impact of seed vouchers on poverty reduction among smallholder rice farmers in NigeriaAgricultural Economics, 44
Elvira Silva, A. Lansink (2013)
Dynamic Efficiency Measurement: A Directional Distance Function Approach
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, Browse Roland, William Weber (2009)
LICENSE FEES: THE CASE OF NORWEGIAN SALMON FARMINGAquaculture Economics & Management, 13
S. Stefanou, A. Lansink (2011)
Measurement of Dynamic Efficiency: A Directional Distance Function Parametric ApproachWiley-Blackwell: American Journal of Agricultural Economics
J. Swinnen, L. Vranken (2010)
Reforms and agricultural productivity in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Republics: 1989–2005Journal of Productivity Analysis, 33
A. Karimov (2013)
Productive Efficiency of Potato and Melon Growing Farms in Uzbekistan: A Two Stage Double Bootstrap Data Envelopment AnalysisAgriculture, 3
R. Cross, R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, William Weber (2013)
Valuing Vineyards: A Directional Distance Function ApproachJournal of Wine Economics, 8
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, H. Fukuyama (2004)
New directions : efficiency and productivity
This paper attempts to estimate overall inefficiency of the sample of vegetable farms in Uzbekistan. Using the duality between the directional input distance function (DIDF) and the cost function, the study reports allocative inefficiency scores in addition to technical inefficiency in the vegetable farming system. Model results suggest for substantial reduction of input costs while maintaining the current level of production technology. Findings imply for better organisation of farming, improving access to market information, and developing extension services. The derived shadow prices of land and labour in the existence of production inefficiency could be of great interest to policy makers and researchers. Insofar as market–based reforms could take place and better incentives are provided, inefficient farmers could learn from farming best practices and adopt innovative and cost–effective ways of farming.
International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.