Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Human factors in system reliability: lessons learnt from the Maeslant storm surge barrier in The Netherlands

Human factors in system reliability: lessons learnt from the Maeslant storm surge barrier in The... The Maeslant storm surge barrier in the Netherlands is an interesting case in system reliability, first because of the great effort that has been put into making its operation reliable and into assessing its reliability, and second, because it has characteristics that make reliability assessment extremely hard. From its history a number of interesting conclusions can be drawn, of which the most important one is that there is no straightforward, definitive solution to reliability, but reliability is obtained and maintained in a continuous process of improvement. Other conclusions are that humans cannot be excluded from the operation or decision-making in systems such as the Maeslant barrier, that all methods for improving system reliability are most effective when the people involved are sharply aware of each method's limitations and that a continuous, open process of consulting a variety of experts is crucial to obtain the best possible reliability. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Critical Infrastructures Inderscience Publishers

Human factors in system reliability: lessons learnt from the Maeslant storm surge barrier in The Netherlands

Loading next page...
 
/lp/inderscience-publishers/human-factors-in-system-reliability-lessons-learnt-from-the-maeslant-7hFpk8Kx0d

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Inderscience Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. All rights reserved
ISSN
1475-3219
eISSN
1741-8038
DOI
10.1504/IJCIS.2008.02016
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The Maeslant storm surge barrier in the Netherlands is an interesting case in system reliability, first because of the great effort that has been put into making its operation reliable and into assessing its reliability, and second, because it has characteristics that make reliability assessment extremely hard. From its history a number of interesting conclusions can be drawn, of which the most important one is that there is no straightforward, definitive solution to reliability, but reliability is obtained and maintained in a continuous process of improvement. Other conclusions are that humans cannot be excluded from the operation or decision-making in systems such as the Maeslant barrier, that all methods for improving system reliability are most effective when the people involved are sharply aware of each method's limitations and that a continuous, open process of consulting a variety of experts is crucial to obtain the best possible reliability.

Journal

International Journal of Critical InfrastructuresInderscience Publishers

Published: Jan 1, 2008

There are no references for this article.