Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
We aim to determine the existence of a difference in the opinions given by external and governmental auditors in the context of public foundations. Moreover, we analyse if some organisational and environmental variables, related to return, risk and geographical location, have any influence in this difference. To answer this aim, we accessed a sample composed of 174 public foundations located in Spain during the period 2012-2017. We perform the asymptotic chi-squared test and the Fisher exact test to measure the existence of a difference of opinion and a logit regression model to examine the influence and impact of return, risk and geographical location on the above-mentioned difference. The obtained results show the existence of discrepancies between external and governmental auditors, which are influenced by the geographical location. We highlight the need for higher level of harmonisation in regional civil laws via the enforcement of a fundamental law as a regulatory instrument.
International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.