Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Characterising and minimising sources of error in inertial body sensor networks

Characterising and minimising sources of error in inertial body sensor networks Body sensor network (BSN) applications depend on accurate and precise data from body-worn devices, but issues related to sensor variations, body mounting variations, integration drift and node-to-node synchronisation can dramatically impact the quality and reliability of collected data and, ultimately, application fidelity. Characterising and addressing these sources of error – which are both static and dynamic (e.g. sensors suffer from static manufacturing variability and dynamic environmental impacts) – within the context of application requirements is therefore necessary for the viability of such applications. This work characterises and addresses errors related to node synchronisation, sensor and mounting calibration and integration drift on a case study application – knee joint angle as measured during walking by the TEMPO 3.1 inertial BSN platform. Using the Vicon® optical motion capture system to provide ground truth, synchronisation, calibration and drift error are quantified, and the efficacy of solutions for reducing such errors is evaluated. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Autonomous and Adaptive Communications Systems Inderscience Publishers

Loading next page...
 
/lp/inderscience-publishers/characterising-and-minimising-sources-of-error-in-inertial-body-sensor-PSxN8i2OpB
Publisher
Inderscience Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. All rights reserved
ISSN
1754-8632
eISSN
1754-8640
DOI
10.1504/IJAACS.2013.054828
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Body sensor network (BSN) applications depend on accurate and precise data from body-worn devices, but issues related to sensor variations, body mounting variations, integration drift and node-to-node synchronisation can dramatically impact the quality and reliability of collected data and, ultimately, application fidelity. Characterising and addressing these sources of error – which are both static and dynamic (e.g. sensors suffer from static manufacturing variability and dynamic environmental impacts) – within the context of application requirements is therefore necessary for the viability of such applications. This work characterises and addresses errors related to node synchronisation, sensor and mounting calibration and integration drift on a case study application – knee joint angle as measured during walking by the TEMPO 3.1 inertial BSN platform. Using the Vicon® optical motion capture system to provide ground truth, synchronisation, calibration and drift error are quantified, and the efficacy of solutions for reducing such errors is evaluated.

Journal

International Journal of Autonomous and Adaptive Communications SystemsInderscience Publishers

Published: Jan 1, 2013

There are no references for this article.