Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

An aggregated index for assessment of the scientific output of researchers

An aggregated index for assessment of the scientific output of researchers A variety of indices based on different strategies have been proposed in the literature to evaluate the scientific output of researchers. The majority of those indices were designed to quantify the production of researchers and the impact of their publications. Currently, finding a suitable index among existing indices or developing a new index for evaluating the quality of research is a challenging task for the scientific community. The evaluation of the scientific performance of researchers should rely upon a proper aggregation of reliable and valid indices. However, very few studies have been reported on aggregating different indices to possibly generate better results. In this paper, a weighted index to combine the results from individual indices is proposed. The proposed index utilises a policy of consensus that assigns the weights to indices and linearly combines them. We evaluate and compare the weighted consensus index with the 25 indices. Experimental results on two ation data demonstrate that the weighted index may serve as a supplement to h-index and its variants to better draw the evaluation results. Keywords: Hirsch type indices; aggregate index; positionally weighted index; optimisation model. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Alguliyev, R., Aliguliyev, R., http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies Inderscience Publishers

An aggregated index for assessment of the scientific output of researchers

Loading next page...
 
/lp/inderscience-publishers/an-aggregated-index-for-assessment-of-the-scientific-output-of-1whxUdjMSG
Publisher
Inderscience Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
ISSN
1743-8268
eISSN
1743-8276
DOI
10.1504/IJKMS.2015.071650
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A variety of indices based on different strategies have been proposed in the literature to evaluate the scientific output of researchers. The majority of those indices were designed to quantify the production of researchers and the impact of their publications. Currently, finding a suitable index among existing indices or developing a new index for evaluating the quality of research is a challenging task for the scientific community. The evaluation of the scientific performance of researchers should rely upon a proper aggregation of reliable and valid indices. However, very few studies have been reported on aggregating different indices to possibly generate better results. In this paper, a weighted index to combine the results from individual indices is proposed. The proposed index utilises a policy of consensus that assigns the weights to indices and linearly combines them. We evaluate and compare the weighted consensus index with the 25 indices. Experimental results on two ation data demonstrate that the weighted index may serve as a supplement to h-index and its variants to better draw the evaluation results. Keywords: Hirsch type indices; aggregate index; positionally weighted index; optimisation model. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Alguliyev, R., Aliguliyev, R.,

Journal

International Journal of Knowledge Management StudiesInderscience Publishers

Published: Jan 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.