Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chien-Chih Yu (2008)
Building a Value-Centric e-Government Service Framework Based on a Business Model Perspective
Alina Chircu (2008)
E-government evaluation: towards a multidimensional frameworkElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 5
M. Janssen, G. Kuk (2007)
E-Government Business Models for Public Service NetworksInt. J. Electron. Gov. Res., 3
C. Forgy (1982)
Rete: A Fast Algorithm for the Many Patterns/Many Objects Match ProblemArtif. Intell., 19
M. Shareef, U. Kumar, Vinod Kumar, Yogesh Dwivedi (2009)
Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-governmentElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 6
W. Long (1989)
Medical Diagnosis using a probabilistic causal networkAppl. Artif. Intell., 3
J. Pearl (1986)
Fusion, Propagation, and Structuring in Belief NetworksProbabilistic and Causal Inference
Petter Gottschalk (2007)
Information systems in police knowledge managementElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 4
Helaiel Almutairi (2010)
Electronic government return assessment by measuring information system usageElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 7
M. Janssen, G. Kuk, R. Wagenaar (2008)
A survey of Web-based business models for e-government in the NetherlandsGov. Inf. Q., 25
M. Sagheb-Tehrani (2010)
A model of successful factors towards e-government implementationElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 7
The process of court appointed counsel can experience severe problems and cause societal damage if the counsel is not assigned properly. To overcome these challenges a new strategy facilitated by a business model and a prototype decision support system (Court Appointed Council System) is developed in this paper. This system is based on a strategic management assessment model to aid public defenders in improving the assignment of court appointed counsel for indigent clients. The proposed system demonstrates that with the appropriate collection of data and rules along with reengineering the appointment process, it is possible to improve personnel assignments by reducing unknown conflicts of interests and identifying the attorney most likely to be acceptable to the client while taking into consideration case-weighting. The study found that CACS was able to account for over 95% of qualitative and quantitative data to make more effective court appointed assignments. If fully implemented, such a system could create value by saving count appointed counsel offices significant dollars by reducing incarceration and attorney costs.
Electronic Government, an International Journal – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.