Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Brian Kelly (2012)
Investing in a Centralized Cybersecurity Infrastructure: Why "Hacktivism" Can and Should Influence Cybersecurity ReformBoston University Law Review, 92
(2004)
International CIIP Handbook 2004: An Inventory and Analysis of Protection Policies in Fourteen Countries, ETH, Zurich
Leon Kappelman (2010)
John Zachman’s Concise Definition of the Zachman Framework
D. Walters, S. Moorthy, Bry Carter (2014)
System of systems engineering and enterprise architecture: implications for governance of complex systemsInt. J. Syst. Syst. Eng., 5
(2014)
A comparative analysis of the national cyber security strategies of leading nations
C. Keating, Polinpapilinho Katina (2011)
Systems of systems engineering: prospects and challenges for the emerging fieldInt. J. Syst. Syst. Eng., 2
H. Luiijf (2013)
National Cyber Security Framework Manual
S. Rinaldi, J. Peerenboom, T. Kelly (2001)
Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependenciesIEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21
B. Obama (2013)
Presidential Policy Directive 21: Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience
W. Kröger (2008)
Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical toolsReliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 93
The Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations (2013) A Common Perspective on Enterprise Architecture
Bilge Karabacak, Sevgi Özkan, N. Baykal (2016)
Regulatory approaches for cyber security of critical infrastructures: The case of TurkeyComput. Law Secur. Rev., 32
Amanda Andress (2001)
Surviving Security: How to Integrate People, Process, and Technology, Second Edition
D. Romero, F. Vernadat (2016)
Enterprise information systems state of the art: Past, present and future trendsComput. Ind., 79
(2008)
Evaluating disaster recovery readiness with Zachman framework
S. Thacker, R. Pant, J. Hall (2017)
System-of-systems formulation and disruption analysis for multi-scale critical national infrastructuresReliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 167
L. Ertaul, Raadika (2005)
Security Planning Using Zachman Framework for Enterprises
(2009)
Action Plan for Critical Infrastructure
A. Kozłowski (2014)
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CYBERATTACKS ON ESTONIA, GEORGIA AND KYRGYZSTAN
(2006)
Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of U.S. and International Research, No. INL/EXT-06-11464, 911792
C. Feltus, Moussa Ouedraogo, D. Khadraoui (2014)
Towards cyber-security protection of critical infrastructures by generating security policy for SCADA systems2014 1st International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Disaster Management (ICT-DM)
M. Bruijne, M. Eeten (2007)
Systems that Should Have Failed: Critical Infrastructure Protection in an Institutionally Fragmented EnvironmentJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15
C. Keating, R. Rogers, R. Unal, D. Dryer, Andres Sousa-Poza, Robert Safford, W. Peterson, G. Rabadi (2003)
System of systems engineeringIEEE Engineering Management Review, 36
Steve Orlowski (2001)
Information Management: Protecting Critical Information AssetsComput. Law Secur. Rev., 17
William Tolone, E. Johnson, Seok-Won Lee, W. Xiang, L. Marsh, C. Yeager, Joshua Blackwell (2009)
Enabling System of Systems Analysis of Critical Infrastructure Behaviors
R. Little (2003)
Toward more robust infrastructure: observations on improving the resilience and reliability of critical systems36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the
M. Ekstedt, T. Sommestad (2009)
Enterprise architecture models for cyber security analysis2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition
Lise Urbaczewski, S. Mrdalj (2006)
A comparison of enterprise architecture frameworks
S. Oda, Huirong Fu, Ye Zhu (2009)
Enterprise information security architecture a review of frameworks, methodology, and case studies2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology
I. Eusgeld, Nan Cen, S. Dietz (2011)
"System-of-systems" approach for interdependent critical infrastructuresReliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96
J. Sowa, J. Zachman (1992)
Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems ArchitectureIBM Syst. J., 31
(2003)
Excerpts from the Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture: Primer for Enterprise Engineering and Manufacturing
Bry Carter, S. Moorthy, D. Walters (2016)
Enterprise architecture view of complex system governanceInt. J. Syst. Syst. Eng., 7
Héctor Beltrán, A. Fontenay, M. Almeida (2005)
Internet as a critical infrastructure: lessons from the backbone experience in South AmericaCommunications & Strategies
Unal Tatar, Bilge Karabacak, A. Gheorghe (2020)
An Assessment Model to Improve National Cyber Security Governance
M. Pulkkinen, A. Naumenko, K. Luostarinen (2007)
Managing information security in a business network of machinery maintenance services business - Enterprise architecture as a coordination toolJ. Syst. Softw., 80
S. Rinaldi (2004)
Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the
Critical infrastructures are vital assets for public safety, economic welfare or national security of countries. The importance of critical infrastructures necessitates state-level coordination of security efforts based on some rigid policies, strategies, and procedures. This hierarchical set of rules is collectively referred to as the critical infrastructure protection program (CIPP). As the pioneer of CIPP, the USA has a very complex program in which partners and stakeholders have multiple and varied interacting roles and responsibilities. The complexity of roles and interactions creates a need to make a representation of these complex structures by using intuitive tools. The Zachman framework is such a tool that provides a formal and structured way of viewing and defining a complex enterprise. It is represented by a 6×6 matrix with rows defining stakeholders and columns defining underlying interrogatives. In this article, a proof-of-concept study is performed to represent the US CIPP using the Zachman framework. The proof-of-concept study showed that the Zachman framework could be beneficial in overcoming challenges of a CIPP program which can be regarded as a complex enterprise.
International Journal of System of Systems Engineering – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.