Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

An Illustration of the Irreducible Subjectivity in Interpreting Data—Clinical or Written: A Reply to Philip Bromberg

An Illustration of the Irreducible Subjectivity in Interpreting Data—Clinical or Written: A Reply... or summary of my key points in presenting what I had felt to be a most uncontroversial brief article: the Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 30(4), 621­632, 2002 © 2002 The American Academy of Psychoanalysis 622 HIRSCH interpersonal perspective has long worn the mask or persona as psychoanalysis' most radical subgroup; deliberate disclosure of affect is the most radical and controversial psychoanalytic intervention within generally accepted boundaries; contemporary psychoanalytic writing, best captured in the relational oeuvre that has been informed by the interpersonal, has recently been the most articulate in challenging heretofore standard rules of technique, making a strong case for the place of analytic spontaneity; deliberate affective disclosure is one form of spontaneity; many other interventions also leave much room for spontaneity; if clinical illustrations of disclosure are the most commonly used to reflect spontaneity, it may become an emblem or a "mask" for the perspective, giving readers and students the impression that this has become standard; the question of the potential value of affective disclosure and whether it opens up or forecloses the interaction is a key independent issue, and was not addressed in my original paper, except to the extent that I spoke http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis & Dynamic Psychiatry Guilford Press

An Illustration of the Irreducible Subjectivity in Interpreting Data—Clinical or Written: A Reply to Philip Bromberg

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/guilford-press/an-illustration-of-the-irreducible-subjectivity-in-interpreting-data-46v0u9shP8

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Guilford Press
Copyright
© The American Academy of Psychoanalysis
Subject
Articles
ISSN
1546-0371
DOI
10.1521/jaap.30.4.621.24190
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

or summary of my key points in presenting what I had felt to be a most uncontroversial brief article: the Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 30(4), 621­632, 2002 © 2002 The American Academy of Psychoanalysis 622 HIRSCH interpersonal perspective has long worn the mask or persona as psychoanalysis' most radical subgroup; deliberate disclosure of affect is the most radical and controversial psychoanalytic intervention within generally accepted boundaries; contemporary psychoanalytic writing, best captured in the relational oeuvre that has been informed by the interpersonal, has recently been the most articulate in challenging heretofore standard rules of technique, making a strong case for the place of analytic spontaneity; deliberate affective disclosure is one form of spontaneity; many other interventions also leave much room for spontaneity; if clinical illustrations of disclosure are the most commonly used to reflect spontaneity, it may become an emblem or a "mask" for the perspective, giving readers and students the impression that this has become standard; the question of the potential value of affective disclosure and whether it opens up or forecloses the interaction is a key independent issue, and was not addressed in my original paper, except to the extent that I spoke

Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis & Dynamic Psychiatry – Guilford Press

Published: Dec 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.