Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Charity Commission
Charities and public benefit
Headway UK
Society ‘discriminating’ against brain injured
A. Mantell, A. Clark
Making choices: the Mental Capacity Act 2005
James Charlton (1998)
Nothing About Us without Us
Care Quality Commission
The state of health care and adult social care in England
Department of Health
Our health, our care, our say a new direction for community services
Cambridgeshire County Council
Self Directed Support Policy
Jenny Morris (1993)
Independent Lives?: Community Care and Disabled People
P. Beresford (2010)
Re-Examining Relationships Between Experience, Knowledge, Ideas and Research: A Key Role for Recipients of State Welfare and Their MovementsSocial work and society, 8
Department of Health
Local authority circular LAC (DH) (2008) 1: transforming social care
A. Gardner
Personalisation in Social Work – Transforming Social Work Practice
J. Todd, J. Loewy, Glenn Kelly, G. Simpson (2004)
Managing Challenging Behaviours: Getting Interventions to Work in Nonspecialised Community SettingsBrain Impairment, 5
A. Roberts (2011)
Employment and Support Allowance
Andy Mantell (2010)
Traumatic brain injury and potential safeguarding concernsThe Journal of Adult Protection, 12
Purpose – With the introduction of the personalisation agenda (Department of Health, 2008) within social care (and health), this paper aims to discursively explore two themes: improving the lives of people with acquired brain injury through the introduction of more personalised services and support; and the impact of the culture shift on Headway Cambridgeshire as a service provider. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents examples to illustrate how it is possible to plan in a way that is broad enough to meet the needs of the majority whilst being flexible enough to deal with differing individualised circumstances. Findings – The paper highlights the challenges faced by individuals and service provider organisations when introducing personalised services and suggests some approaches that can be taken to overcome them. Practical implications – Recommendations for good practice in personalised services. Originality/value – This paper sets out a framework for organisations working with people with acquired brain injury in a social care setting in the community and how the principles embodied by the personalisation agenda can be introduced into existing service provision.
Social Care and Neurodisability – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 15, 2011
Keywords: Acquired brain injury; Personalisation; Self‐directed support; Service provider; Social services; Neurology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.