Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Drake (2011)
Why Should Faculty Be Involved in Supplemental Instruction?College Teaching, 59
Clelia Pineda-Báez, José-Javier Bermúdez, Ángela Rubiano-Bello, Natalia Pava-García, Rodrigo Suárez-García, Fabián Cruz-Becerra (2014)
Compromiso Estudiantil en el Contexto Universitario Colombiano y Desempeño AcadémicoRELIEVE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 20
Gerda Hagenauer, S. Volet (2014)
Teacher–student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched fieldOxford Review of Education, 40
L. Kyriakides, B. Creemers, Anastasia Panayiotou, Gudrun Vanlaar, Michael Pfeifer, Gašper Cankar, L. McMahon (2014)
Using student ratings to measure quality of teaching in six European countriesEuropean Journal of Teacher Education, 37
George Kuh (2001)
Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning Inside The National Survey of Student EngagementChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33
S. Plaut, D. Baker (2011)
Teacher–student relationships in medical education: Boundary considerationsMedical Teacher, 33
(2010)
Thinking of students and teachers of good university teacher
Marcia Fuentes, Adriana Alvarado, Jennifer Berdan, Linda DeAngelo (2013)
Mentorship Matters: Does Early Faculty Contact Lead to Quality Faculty Interaction?Research in Higher Education, 55
Education, 8
A. Lambert, L. Rocconi, A. Ribera, A. Miller, Y. Dong (2012)
Faculty lend a helping hand to student success: measuring student-faculty interactions
Ernest Pascarella, P. Terenzini (1978)
Student-Faculty Informal Relationships and Freshman Year Educational OutcomesJournal of Educational Research, 71
Reina Berrueco, Lucía Tarazaga (2014)
Competencias docentes en secundaria. Análisis de perfiles de profesoradoRELIEVE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 20
T. Domina (2014)
Does Merit Aid Program Design Matter? A Cross-Cohort AnalysisResearch in Higher Education, 55
Ernest Pascarella, P. Terenzini (2005)
How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2.Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley
(1998)
Un modelo causal-explicativo sobre la influencia de las variables psicosociales en el rendimiento académico
E. Nussbaum (2014)
Categorical and Nonparametric Data Analysis: Choosing the Best Statistical Technique
X. Poblete, P. Sepúlveda, V. Orellana, G. Abarca (2013)
Situación educativa De América Latina y El Caribe
OECD (2012)
10.1787/edu_today-2013-en
(2011)
Perceived teacher confirmation scale
D. Silva, Nancy Hernández, J. Silva, Silvia González (2010)
Concepción de Estudiantes y Docentes del Buen Profesor Universitario: Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de La FronteraInternational Journal of Morphology, 28
Ann Frymier, M. Houser (2000)
The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationshipCommunication Education, 49
Cheri Simonds (1997)
Classroom understanding: An expanded notion of teacher clarityCommunication Research Reports, 14
G. Glass (2000)
Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence
The purpose of this paper is to identify the main variables that affect the establishment of a good faculty-student pedagogical relationship in representative samples from a main university in Ecuador.Design/methodology/approachIn the first phase of this exploratory mixed methods study, focus groups were conducted to identify the variables of interest, and in a second phase, these variables were rated in relevance by applying the “pile-sort” method.FindingsResults showed that for students, the variable that most affects the establishment of a good relationship with their faculty is the “faculty’s knowledge,” while the variable that showed the least effect is the “number of students in the classroom.” On the other hand, faculty members responded that the variables that most affect the establishment of a good pedagogical relationship are “empathy with students,” “vocation” and “faculty’s knowledge,” while they considered that the least relevant variables were “context” variables such as “the number of students in the classroom” and “the physical conditions of the classroom.”Practical implicationsThese results provide relevant insights into the importance that students place on the theoretical resources that faculty members show as a foundation for establishing positive relationships. In the same way, the relevance that faculty members place on the elements “empathy,” “vocation” and “knowledge” as key variables needed to establish positive interactions.Originality/valuePrevious research had underlined the importance that positive faculty-students relationships have on achieving learning goals. However, the variables that would affect the establishment of these relationships were not clearly recognized.
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 17, 2018
Keywords: Higher education; Learning; Faculty-student relationship
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.