Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Fenwick, R. Edwards (2012)
Researching Education Through Actor-Network Theory
M. Denscombe (2008)
Communities of PracticeJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 2
T. Schatzki (2000)
The Social Bearing of NatureInquiry, 43
T. Schatzki (2003)
A New Societist Social OntologyPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 33
(2013)
Professional knowing in an emerging sector: understanding the practices of engineers in the renewable energy industry", paper presented at 8th International Conference on Researching
(2012)
Partnership and pedagogy in child and family health practice: a resource for professionals, educators and students, Lambert Academic Publishing, Hertsellung
D. Mulcahy (2011)
Assembling the ‘Accomplished’ Teacher: The performativity and politics of professional teaching standardsEducational Philosophy and Theory, 43
D. Mulcahy (2012)
Affective assemblages: body matters in the pedagogic practices of contemporary school classroomsPedagogy, Culture & Society, 20
R. Iedema, Debbi Long, Rowena Forsyth, B. Lee (2006)
Visibilising clinical work: Video ethnography in the contemporary hospitalHealth Sociology Review, 15
T. Fenwick, Monika Nerland, Karen Jensen (2012)
Sociomaterial approaches to conceptualising professional learning and practiceJournal of Education and Work, 25
D. Keatinge, Cathrine Fowler, C. Briggs (2007)
Evaluating the Family Partnership Model (FPM) Program and Implementation in Practice in New South Wales, AustraliaAustralian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25
N. Hopwood (2013)
Ethnographic fieldwork as embodied material practice: Reflections from theory and the field, 40
T. Schatzki (2010)
The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events
J. Collier (1967)
Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method
T. Schatzki (1996)
Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social
J. Reid, B. Kamler, Alyson Simpson, R. Maclean (1996)
“Do you see what I see?” Reading a different classroom sceneInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9
Davide Nicolini (2009)
Articulating Practice through the Interview to the DoubleManagement Learning, 40
R. Dunston, Alison Lee, D. Boud, P. Brodie, M. Chiarella (2009)
Co‐Production and Health System Reform – From Re‐Imagining To Re‐MakingAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 68
Jeanette Lancaster (2012)
The Complex Systems of Practice
T. Fenwick (2012)
Matterings of knowing and doing: sociomaterial approaches to understanding practice
M. Callon (2001)
Actor Network Theory
Alison Lee, R. Dunston, Cathrine Fowler (2012)
Seeing is Believing : An Embodied Pedagogy of ‘Doing Partnership’ in Child and Family Health
(2008)
Partnership working: the key to public health", in Cowley, S. (Ed.) Community public health in policy and practice
A. Edwards, H. Daniels, Tony Gallagher, J. Leadbetter, Paul Warmington (2009)
Improving Inter-professional Collaborations: Multi-Agency Working for Children's Wellbeing
Stephen Jones (2009)
The future of renewable energy in Australia: A test for cooperative federalism?Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68
David Mills, Richard Ratcliffe (2012)
After method? Ethnography in the knowledge economyQualitative Research, 12
N. Hopwood (2014)
The rhythms of pedagogy: an ethnographic study of parenting education practicesStudies in Continuing Education, 36
T. Fenwick, R. Edwards, Peter Sawchuk (2011)
Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Socio-Material
(2001)
Introduction: practice theory", in Schatzki
T. Fenwick (2010)
Re‐thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in workJournal of Workplace Learning, 22
T. Schatzki (2012)
A Primer on Practices
C. Rossiter, Cathrine Fowler, N. Hopwood, Alison Lee, R. Dunston (2011)
Working in partnership with vulnerable families: the experience of child and family health practitioners.Australian journal of primary health, 17 4
Cathrine Fowler, C. Rossiter, M. Bigsby, N. Hopwood, Alison Lee, R. Dunston (2012)
Working in partnership with parents: the experience and challenge of practice innovation in child and family health nursing.Journal of clinical nursing, 21 21-22
(2002)
Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research
K. Cetina, T. Schatzki, E. Savigny (2001)
The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory
D. Scott (2010)
Working with Vulnerable Families: Working within and between organisations
Nina Fudge, C. Wolfe, C. McKevitt (2008)
Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic studyBMJ : British Medical Journal, 336
P. Hager (2011)
Theories of workplace learning
D. Clarke (2006)
The LPS Research Design
S. Gherardi (2008)
Situated Knowledge and Situated Action: What do Practice-Based Studies Promise?
T. Fenwick, R. Edwards (2010)
Actor-Network Theory in Education
T. Schatzki (2002)
The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change
(2013)
Visual methodology for the study of practice
F. Arney, D. Scott, F. Stanley (2010)
Working with Vulnerable Families: A Partnership Approach
Hilton Davis (2010)
Working in partnership: the family partnership model
Purpose– To explore the methodological implications of sociomaterial theory for qualitative research about practice. The purpose of this paper is to assess the potential and limitations of video stimulus to discussion about practice as embodied and material, and to theorise this in terms of epistemic objects. Design/methodology/approach– A video based on a residential child and family service in Sydney was used as a stimulus in six focus group discussions with researchers and professionals in child and family health. Three focus groups were held in Sweden, and three in the British Isles, settings where a similar approach to supporting families with young children is established. A sociomaterial perspective, drawing on Schatzki's practice theory and Knorr Cetina's notion of epistemic objects informed the design and methodologically focused analysis. Findings– The use of video is shown to be successful in facilitating and prompting participants to reflect and comment on practice as embodied and material. However, the analysis also accounts for more problematic nature of this approach, exploring the affective connections and illusion of totality that can be associated with video screenings. An alternative, based on line drawings, is suggested, and the paper concludes by raising further questions about data reduction and stimulus artefacts. Originality/value– The turn to sociomaterial theory has huge potential, but its methodological implications remain unexplored. This paper contributes original perspectives relating to the use of video in a qualitative study, offering innovative theorisation and discussion of stimulus material as epistemic objects, which offers fresh insights into significant methodological prospects and problems.
Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 8, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.