Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Unspecified Operating Expense Disclosure Requirements in New Zealand. Has FRS 9 Made a Difference

Unspecified Operating Expense Disclosure Requirements in New Zealand. Has FRS 9 Made a Difference This paper examines the effect that the introduction of the FRS 9, the general disclosure standard in New Zealand, has on the level of disclosure of certain unspecified operating expenses. Generally, a low level of operating expense disclosure was found with no overall improvement recorded after the introduction of FRS 9. In many cases, companies did not disclose any unspecified operating expenses. Firm size and overseas listingownership appeared to be positively associated with the disclosure of unspecified operating expenses. Most companies did disclose the mandatory expenses monitored depreciation, audit and directors' fees. Commentary is provided on the inadequacy of the discretionary aspects of accounting standards such as FRS 9, and the inadequacy of regulatory enforcement. Given the move to international harmonisation, and the level of disclosure seemingly at odds with international practice, the adoption and enforcement of International Accounting Standard 1 IAS 1 would provide a simple solution. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Pacific Accounting Review Emerald Publishing

Unspecified Operating Expense Disclosure Requirements in New Zealand. Has FRS 9 Made a Difference

Lont, David
Pacific Accounting Review , Volume 14 (2): 43 – Feb 1, 2002
Download PDF
39 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/unspecified-operating-expense-disclosure-requirements-in-new-zealand-sS3PJwvvv8

References (37)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0114-0582
DOI
10.1108/eb037967
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper examines the effect that the introduction of the FRS 9, the general disclosure standard in New Zealand, has on the level of disclosure of certain unspecified operating expenses. Generally, a low level of operating expense disclosure was found with no overall improvement recorded after the introduction of FRS 9. In many cases, companies did not disclose any unspecified operating expenses. Firm size and overseas listingownership appeared to be positively associated with the disclosure of unspecified operating expenses. Most companies did disclose the mandatory expenses monitored depreciation, audit and directors' fees. Commentary is provided on the inadequacy of the discretionary aspects of accounting standards such as FRS 9, and the inadequacy of regulatory enforcement. Given the move to international harmonisation, and the level of disclosure seemingly at odds with international practice, the adoption and enforcement of International Accounting Standard 1 IAS 1 would provide a simple solution.

Journal

Pacific Accounting Review – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.