Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Knight (1998)
Assessment for learning in higher education
M. Birenbaum, F. Dochy (1996)
Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes, and Prior Knowledge
Lesley Greer (2001)
Does Changing the Method of Assessment of a Module Improve the Performance of a Student?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26
N. Entwistle, H. Tait, Carol Speth (1996)
Identifying and Advising Students with Deficient Study Skills: An Integrated Computer-Based Package for Staff and Students
D. Boud (1981)
Developing Student Autonomy in Learning.
J. Brown, A. Collins, P. Duguid (1989)
Situated Cognition and the Culture of LearningEducational Researcher, 18
A. Collins, J. Brown, S. Newman (1988)
Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics
T. Gray (1987)
An Exercise in Improving the Potential of Exams for Learning.European Journal of Engineering Education, 12
Sally Brown, A. Glasner (1999)
Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches.
N. Falchikov (1995)
Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer AssessmentInnovations in Education and Training International, 32
N. Falchikov (2005)
Improving Assessment through Student Involvement
Sally Brown (1998)
Peer Assessment in Practice
N. Falchikov (2001)
Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education
This article looks at an attempt to enhance students’ critical thinking, professional and personal skills through an innovation in the use of peer assessment on an undergraduate law degree programme. This involved peer assessing asynchronously materials previously submitted. It was also to a limited extent mediated by the tutor as composites of previously submitted work were used to focus on skills development. The innovation’s aim was to enhance student performance. It drew on the existing literature on peer assessment as well as cognitive apprenticeship theory and was premised on the idea that students’ learning will be enhanced if they are better enculturated into the assessment process. It was felt that there was a body of students within the lower performing ranges who did not properly understand assessment criteria and consequently under‐performed. The effectiveness of the innovation was evaluated through student questionnaires (before and after students received their results), a focus group and a qualitative evaluation by the tutor, on the basis of marking the assessments. Whilst the assessment led to an improvement in student performance, reflection on the experience has identified ways in which the potential of this form of assessment can be further developed in the future.
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2009
Keywords: Asynchronous peer assessment; Cognitive apprenticeship theory; Critical thinking skills; Enhancing undergraduate performance; Personal skills; Professional skills
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.