Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. Saga, R. Zmud (1993)
The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion
I. Ajzen (1991)
The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50
Anthony Hendrickson, Kristy Glorfeld, T. Cronan (1994)
On the Repeated Test-Retest Reliability of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument: A Comment*Decision Sciences, 25
V. Venkatesh, Fred Davis (2000)
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field StudiesManagement Science, 46
С. Кондрашов (2004)
Information Systems Research
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen (1977)
Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and ResearchContemporary Sociology, 6
Jay Galbraith (1977)
Organization Design
Patrick Chau (1996)
An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance ModelJ. Manag. Inf. Syst., 13
Thomas Hill, N. Smith, Millard Mann (1987)
Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72
Louis Thomas (1999)
Adoption order of new technologies in evolving marketsJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38
Edward Harvey (1968)
Technology and the Structure of OrganizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 33
P. Khandwalla (1974)
Mass Output Orientation of Operations Technology and Organizational Structure.Administrative Science Quarterly, 19
G. Sanctis (1983)
Expectancy Theory as an Explanation of Voluntary Use of a Decision-Support System:Psychological Reports, 52
V. Venkatesh, Michael Morris, P. Ackerman (2000)
A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 83 1
William Egelhoff (1982)
Strategy and Structure in Multinational Corporations: An Information- Processing ApproachAdministrative Science Quarterly, 27
R. Duncan (1973)
Mltiple Decision-making Structures in Adapting to Environmental Uncertainty: The Impact on Organizational EffectivenessHuman Relations, 26
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1988)
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACHPsychological Bulletin, 103
Margherita Pagani (2006)
Determinants of adoption of High Speed Data Services in the business market: Evidence for a combined technology acceptance model with task technology fit modelInf. Manag., 43
A. Eagly, S. Chaiken (1993)
The psychology of attitudes.Journal of Marketing Research, 34
R. Marsh, Hiroshi Mannari (1981)
Technology and Size as Determinants of the Organizational Structure of Japanese FactoriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 26
Luiz Mesquita, S. Lazzarini (2008)
Horizontal and Vertical Relationships in Developing Economies: Implications for SMEs' Access to Global MarketsAcademy of Management Journal, 51
Burns T.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288787.001.0001
Diamantopoulos A.
10.4135/9781849209359
B. Byrne (1998)
Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
A. Ilersic (1961)
Research methods in social relationsThe Eugenics Review, 52
M. Igbaria (1990)
End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation modelOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 18
K. Bollen, J. Long (1993)
Testing Structural Equation Models
Fred Davis, R. Bagozzi, P. Warshaw (1989)
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical ModelsManagement Science, 35
J. Child (1972)
Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic ChoiceSociology, 6
R. Cooper, R. Zmud (1990)
Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approachManagement Science, 36
Caran Colvin, Angeline Goh (2005)
Validation of the technology acceptance model for policeJournal of Criminal Justice, 33
Elena Karahanna, D. Straub, N. Chervany (1999)
Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption BeliefsMIS Q., 23
M. Browne, R. Cudeck (1992)
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitSociological Methods & Research, 21
Dennis Adams, R. Nelson, P. Todd (1992)
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A ReplicationMIS Q., 16
Bollen D.
10.1002/9781118619179
S. Floyd, Bill Wooldridge (1990)
Path Analysis of the Relationship between Competitive Strategy, Information Technology, and Financial PerformanceJ. Manag. Inf. Syst., 7
Susan Lippert (2007)
Investigating Postadoption Utilization: An Examination Into the Role of Interorganizational and Technology TrustIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54
Christopher Gresov, R. Drazin, A. Ven (1989)
Work-Unit Task Uncertainty, Design and MoraleOrganization Studies, 10
J. Schepers, Martin Wetzels (2007)
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effectsInf. Manag., 44
D. Harrison, Peter Mykytyn, Cynthia Riemenschneider (1997)
Executive Decisions About Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory and Empirical TestsInf. Syst. Res., 8
Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah (2007)
Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementationComput. Hum. Behav., 23
Kieran Mathieson (1991)
Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned BehaviorInf. Syst. Res., 2
W. Randolph, Gregory Dess (1984)
The Congruence Perspective of Organization Design: A Conceptual Model and Multivariate Research ApproachAcademy of Management Review, 9
Wei Zhang, O. Gutierrez (2007)
Information technology acceptance in the social services sector context: an exploration.Social work, 52 3
M. Igbaria (1993)
User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical testOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 21
Shirley Taylor, P. Todd (1995)
Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing ModelsInf. Syst. Res., 6
William Form, T. Burns, G. Stalker (1963)
The Management of Innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 8
Theresa Heintze, S. Bretschneider (2000)
Information Technology and Restructuring in Public Organizations: Does Adoption of Information Technology Affect Organizational Structures, Communications, and Decision Making?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10
G. Lynne, C. Casey, A. Hodges, M. Rahmani (1995)
Conservation technology adoption decisions and the theory of planned behaviorJournal of Economic Psychology, 16
Michael Morris, V. Venkatesh (2000)
AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCEPersonnel Psychology, 53
S. Barley (1990)
The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks.Administrative science quarterly, 35 1
K. Bollen (1989)
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
J. March, L. Sproull (1990)
Technology, management, and competitive advantage.
P. Kline (1993)
An easy guide to factor analysis
I. Ajzen, M. Fishbein (1980)
Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior
D. Tapscott (1995)
The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence
Mohamed Louadi (2009)
The Relationship Among Organization Structure, Information Technology and Information Processing in Small Canadian FirmsCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 15
The integration of information and communication technologies in a business context is currently an unquestionable strategic demand; however, companies do not always reveal identical information technology (IT) adoption levels. This paper addresses the manager’s attitude toward technology and the organizational structure as factors that may influence technological integration in a business context. The relationships among these variables are tested with a sample of Portuguese companies. Results support the hypothesis of manager’s attitude toward technology having an influence over the IT adoption level. However, the organizational structure adaptability seems not to have any influence on that same level. The results are discussed in light of current theory. This paper aims to highlight the important role of psychological and structural determinants in new technologies adoption processes in modern organizations.
Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2009
Keywords: Technology integration; Psychology; Organizational structure; Technology adoption
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.