Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Bharadwaj, S. Kaviraj
Perspectives on Capitalism
J. McAndrews, A. Sarkar, Z. Wang
The effect of the term auction facility on the London Interbank Offered Rate
R. Fan, S. Ng, J. Wong (2010)
Reliability of the Box–Jenkins model for forecasting construction demand covering times of economic austerityConstruction Management and Economics, 28
BBA
Historical perspective
T. McGough, S. Tsolacos (2009)
Interactions within the Office Market Cycle in Great BritainJournal of Real Estate Research, 18
A. Akintoye, M. Skitmore (1994)
Models of UK private sector quarterly construction demandConstruction Management and Economics, 12
W. Hughes, Deborah Ancell, S. Gruneberg, L. Hirst (2004)
Exposing the myth of the 1:5:200 ratio relating initial cost, maintenance and staffing costs of office buildings
R. Bennett (2005)
Marketing policies of companies in a cyclical sector: an empirical study of the construction industry in the United KingdomJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 20
Wall Street Journal
Historical LIBOR rate information
G. Meen (2000)
Housing cycles and efficiencyScottish Journal of Political Economy, 47
H. Sherman
The Business Cycle: Growth and Crisis Under Capitalism
Office of National Statistics
Construction Statistics Annual 2009
Daniel Baloi, A. Price (2003)
Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performanceInternational Journal of Project Management, 21
John Hekman (1985)
Rental Price Adjustment and Investment in the Office MarketReal Estate Economics, 13
J. Wong, S. Ng (2010)
Forecasting construction tender price index in Hong Kong using vector error correction modelConstruction Management and Economics, 28
Sergio Rebelo (2005)
Real Business Cycle Models: Past, Present and FutureCEPR Discussion Paper Series
Kenneth Rosen (1984)
Toward a Model of the Office Building SectorReal Estate Economics, 12
Oskar Morgenstern, J. Schumpeter (1940)
Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 35
H. Shannon (1934)
Bricks-A Trade Index, 1785-1849Economica, 1
S. Tsolacos, G. Keogh, T. McGough (1998)
Modelling Use, Investment, and Development in the British Office MarketEnvironment and Planning A, 30
Office of National Statistics
Output and employment in the construction industry – Q3 2009
R. Barras (2009)
Building Cycles: Growth and Instability
R. King, M. Watson (1996)
Money, Prices, Interest Rates and the Business CycleThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 78
R.M. Abrantes‐Metz, M. Kraten, A.D. Metz, G.S. Seow
Libor manipulation?
H. Sherman (1991)
The Business Cycle
P. Neumeyer, F. Perri (2004)
Business Cycles in Emerging Economies: The Role of Interest RatesCEPR Discussion Paper Series
A. Key, B. MacGregor, N. Nanthkumaran, F. Zarkesh
Understanding the Property Cycle: Economic Cycles and Property Cycles
A. Ng, M. Loosemore (2007)
Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructureInternational Journal of Project Management, 25
BBA
BBALIBOR explained
J. Ooi (2000)
Corporate reliance on bank loans: an empirical analysis of UK property companiesJournal of Property Investment & Finance, 18
Purpose – The aim of this research is to answer whether or not wholesale interest rates, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), can be used as an effective policy instrument to influence construction output. Developers and contractors borrow to finance construction and are charged retail interest rates, determined by the lending bank. The study investigated the relationship between LIBOR and construction industry output. Design/methodology/approach – The study identified two time series, LIBOR and annual construction output and a number of regressions were run using the first differences to observe whether a change in LIBOR alone had a significant influence on construction output lagged by one to four years. Findings – No significant relationship was found between changes in LIBOR and the annual change in construction output, regardless of the number of years lagged. Social implications – The policy implication of this research shows that control of demand for construction by government using wholesale interest rates is unlikely to succeed. Banks' lending to developers depends on other factors, such as retail interest rates, risk management and expectations. Originality/value – The value of this research is that it supports the view that government policy needs to focus on stimulating construction demand, using real projects rather than monetary policies, such as interest rate manipulation.
Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 1, 2013
Keywords: Construction business cycle; Construction output; Interest rates; LIBOR
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.