Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Gram-hanssen (2010)
Residential heat comfort practices: understanding usersBuilding Research & Information, 38
F. Nicol, S. Roaf (2005)
Post-occupancy evaluation and field studies of thermal comfortBuilding Research & Information, 33
Kari Thunshelle, Åshild Hauge (2012)
Brukerundersøkelse om innemiljø på Marienlyst skole
(2012)
Inneklima i energieffektive bygninger – en litteraturstudie ( Indoor environmental conditions in energy efficient buildings – a literature study ) ” , report , SINTEF , Oslo
A. Strauss, J. Corbin (1998)
Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
(2012)
Inneklima i energieffektive bygninger – en litteraturstudie (Indoor environmental conditions in energy efficient buildings – a literature study)
B. Vale, R. Vale (2010)
Domestic energy use, lifestyles and POE: past lessons for current problemsBuilding Research & Information, 38
Charlotte Isaksson (2009)
Uthålligt lärande om värmen? : Domesticering av energiteknik i passivhus
(2004)
Energy Performance of NonDomestic Buildings: Closing the Credibility Gap, Building Performance Congress, Frankfurt, Germany
Å. Hauge, Judith Thomsen, T. Berker (2011)
User evaluations of energy efficient buildings: Literature review and further researchAdvances in Building Energy Research, 5
R. Dear, G. Brager (1998)
Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preferenceCenter for the Built Environment, 104
M. Klinski, Judith Thomsen, Åshild Hauge, Sidsel Jerkø, Tor Dokka (2012)
Systematisering av erfaringer med passivhus
(2012)
Systematisering av erfaringer med passivhus ( Systematic overview of experiences with passive houses ) ” , Report No . 90 , SINTEF , Oslo .
Zosia Brown, R. Cole (2009)
Influence of occupants' knowledge on comfort expectations and behaviourBuilding Research & Information, 37
(2009)
LECO – energibruk i fem kontorbygg i Norge (LECO – energy use in five Norwegian office buildings)
Elke Gossauer, A. Wagner (2007)
Post-occupancy Evaluation and Thermal Comfort: State of the Art and New ApproachesAdvances in Building Energy Research, 1
(2009)
Uthålligt lärande om värmen ? Domesticering av ener - giteknik i passivhus , ( Persistent learning about heating ? Domestication of energy technique in passive houses ) ”
V. Loftness, A. Aziz, Joon-Ho Choi, Kevin Kampschroer, Kevin Powell, Mike Atkinson, J. Heerwagen (2009)
The value of post-occupancy evaluation for building occupants and facility managersIntelligent Buildings International, 1
(2006)
Wohnen 1. Klasse im Passivhaus (First-class living in a passive house)”, report, Energieinstitut Vorarlberg, Dornbirn
(2007)
Brukerundersøkelse i Husby Amfi (User study at Husby Amfi)
Zachary Gill, M. Tierney, I. Pegg, N. Allan (2010)
Low-energy dwellings: the contribution of behaviours to actual performanceBuilding Research & Information, 38
Charlotta Isaksson, F. Karlsson (2006)
Indoor climate in low-energy houses : an interdisciplinary investigationBuilding and Environment, 41
M. Marshall (1996)
Sampling for qualitative research.Family practice, 13 6
J. Vischer (2008)
Towards a user-centred theory of the built environmentBuilding Research & Information, 36
J. Nicol, M. Humphreys (2002)
ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGSEnergy and Buildings, 34
A. Leaman, B. Bordass (2007)
Are users more tolerant of ‘green’ buildings?Building Research & Information, 35
T. Berker (2011)
Domesticating SpacesSpace and Culture, 14
A. Strauss (1992)
Basics Of Qualitative Research
(2007)
Brukerundersøkelse i Husby Amfi ( User study at Husby Amfi ) ” , Report No . SBF BY A 07022 , SINTEF . 17
(2011)
Energibruk i bygninger (Energy use in buildings)
(2010)
Analyse der Nutzerzufriedenheit bestehender Wiener Passiv-Wohnhausanlagen
Purpose The article's aim is to present user experiences with passive houses and zeroenergy buildings. The focus is on the interaction between the building and the users, specifically on how user interfaces, knowledge, and commitment influence the use of the building and the level of energy consumption awareness.Designmethodologyapproach The study follows an explorative grounded theory approach. This approach generates insights that will be consolidated in followup studies. Qualitative interviews with users of six buildings were conducted. Site inspections applying walkthrough method and other available information complement the data.Findings Users in general were satisfied with having a new energy efficient building. Several respondents were more concerned about the environment now than before. However, there were concerns about thermal comfort. Misuse or misunderstandings among users in some cases led to lower indoor comfort. New or dissatisfactory design solutions were also responsible for unsatisfactory indoor environmental quality.Practical implications Specific topics that should be paid more attention to in the design and research on new energy efficient buildings level of enduser control and adaptability of the building level of complexity of systems the need for adequate information.Originalityvalue The open approach enabled occupants to influence the parameters of the evaluations. Most evaluations of zeroenergy buildings are not yet publicly accessible.
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment Market – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 24, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.