Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The innovation strategy of firms: empirical evidence from the Chinese high‐tech industry

The innovation strategy of firms: empirical evidence from the Chinese high‐tech industry Purpose – A firm will seek an optimal balance between internal R&D and technology outsourcing when formulating its innovation strategy. This paper aims to provide a review of the determinants of firm's innovation strategy, and performs an empirical study on a sample from Chinese high‐tech industry, with the purpose of identifying two aspects of the issue: the choice patterns of Chinese firms over innovation strategy, and the innovation effect elasticity of different strategies. Design/methodology/approach – The development of a multiple regression model supported by data from industry level and a statistic analysis. Findings – Outsourcing is the major innovation strategy adopted by most Chinese high‐tech firms, especially technology import, which implies the imperfection of Chinese innovation service system. The empirical analysis also indicates the insufficiency of internal R&D expenditure and the weakness of absorptive capacity in Chinese high‐tech firms. Although, Chinese high‐tech firms prefer the outsourcing strategy in their innovation, the contribution of outsourcing is much smaller than that of internal R&D. When expenditures are increased by the same rate, the innovation output form internal R&D is twice the output of outsourcing. For improving Chinese firms' innovation efficiency, the reform of innovation service system is needed on the macro‐level, while on the micro‐level, it calls for firms to readjust their innovation strategy portfolio. Originality/value – This paper will make up for the deficiency in current researches on innovation, which often apply firm samples in developed countries, and lack evidences from firm samples in developing countries. In addition, it will provide the decision‐making basis for Chinese Government's current actions in constructing and improving China's innovation service system. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Technology Management in China Emerald Publishing

The innovation strategy of firms: empirical evidence from the Chinese high‐tech industry

Download PDF
9 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-innovation-strategy-of-firms-empirical-evidence-from-the-chinese-mh96j0xUH0
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1746-8779
DOI
10.1108/17468770710756095
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – A firm will seek an optimal balance between internal R&D and technology outsourcing when formulating its innovation strategy. This paper aims to provide a review of the determinants of firm's innovation strategy, and performs an empirical study on a sample from Chinese high‐tech industry, with the purpose of identifying two aspects of the issue: the choice patterns of Chinese firms over innovation strategy, and the innovation effect elasticity of different strategies. Design/methodology/approach – The development of a multiple regression model supported by data from industry level and a statistic analysis. Findings – Outsourcing is the major innovation strategy adopted by most Chinese high‐tech firms, especially technology import, which implies the imperfection of Chinese innovation service system. The empirical analysis also indicates the insufficiency of internal R&D expenditure and the weakness of absorptive capacity in Chinese high‐tech firms. Although, Chinese high‐tech firms prefer the outsourcing strategy in their innovation, the contribution of outsourcing is much smaller than that of internal R&D. When expenditures are increased by the same rate, the innovation output form internal R&D is twice the output of outsourcing. For improving Chinese firms' innovation efficiency, the reform of innovation service system is needed on the macro‐level, while on the micro‐level, it calls for firms to readjust their innovation strategy portfolio. Originality/value – This paper will make up for the deficiency in current researches on innovation, which often apply firm samples in developed countries, and lack evidences from firm samples in developing countries. In addition, it will provide the decision‐making basis for Chinese Government's current actions in constructing and improving China's innovation service system.

Journal

Journal of Technology Management in China – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 5, 2007

Keywords: Innovation; Outsourcing; Research and development

References

  • Technology strategy in small and medium‐sized firms
    Dodgson, M.
  • Incumbency and R&D incentives: licensing the gale of destruction
    Gans, J.; Stern, S.
  • Does being R&D intensive still discourage outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch manufacturing
    Michael, J.M.
  • Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth
    Mowery, D.; Rosenberg, N.
  • The Management of Innovation in High Technology Small Firms
    Oakey, R.; Rothwell, R.
  • Choosing among alternative technological strategies: an empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation
    Pilar, B.
  • The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis
    Pisano, G.
  • Technology acquisition strategies and processes: a reconsideration of the market versus buy decision
    Radnor, M.
  • R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing
    Reinhilde, V.
  • Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms
    Reinhilde, V.; Bruno, C.
  • Technology choice, technology substitution and innovation strategy choice
    Ye, H.; Qiu, H.